This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 License.
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2011). National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level. Scientometrics, 86(2), 347–364.10.1007/s11192-010-0297-2AbramoG.D’AngeloC.A.2011National-scale research performance assessment at the individual level862347364Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Abramo, G., & D’Angelo, C.A. (2016). Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014). Scientometrics, 109(3), 1–13.AbramoG.D’AngeloC.A.2016Refrain from adopting the combination of citation and journal metrics to grade publications, as used in the Italian national research assessment exercise (VQR 2011–2014)109311310.1007/s11192-016-2153-5Search in Google Scholar
Abramo, G., D’Angelo, C.A., & Di Costa, F. (2011). National research assessment exercises: A comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings. Scientometrics, 89: 929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0459-x.10.1007/s11192-011-0459-xAbramoG.D’AngeloC.A.Di CostaF.2011National research assessment exercises: A comparison of peer review and bibliometrics rankings89929https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0459-xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar
Adam, D. (2002). Citation analysis: The counting house. Nature, 415(415), 726–729.10.1038/415726aAdamD.2002Citation analysis: The counting house415415726729Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Akademik Teşvik Ödeneği Yönetmeliği (By-law of Payment of Academic Incentive). (2015). Resmî Gazete. Retrieved from http://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/12/20151218-4.pdf.Akademik Teşvik Ödeneği Yönetmeliği (By-law of Payment of Academic Incentive)2015Retrieved fromhttp://www.resmigazete.gov.tr/eskiler/2015/12/20151218-4.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Albarrán, P., Crespo, J.A., Ortuño, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2011). The skewness of science in 219 subfields and a number of aggregates. Scientometrics, 88(2), 385–397.10.1007/s11192-011-0407-9AlbarránP.CrespoJ.A.OrtuñoI.Ruiz-CastilloJ.2011The skewness of science in 219 subfields and a number of aggregates882385397Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Auranen, O., & Nieminen, M. (2010). University research funding and publication performance— An international comparison. Research Policy, 39(6), 822–834.10.1016/j.respol.2010.03.003AuranenO.NieminenM.2010University research funding and publication performance— An international comparison396822834Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Butler, L. (2003). Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts. Research Policy, 32(1), 143–155.10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00007-0ButlerL.2003Explaining Australia’s increased share of ISI publications—the effects of a funding formula based on publication counts321143155Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Butler, L. (2004). What happens when funding is linked to publication counts? In H.F. Moed et al., (Ed.), Handbook of Quantitative Science and Technology Research: The Use of Publication and Patent Statistics in Studies of S&T Systems (pp. 389–405). Dordrecht: Kluwer.ButlerL.2004What happens when funding is linked to publication counts?MoedH.F.389405DordrechtKluwerSearch in Google Scholar
Butler, L. (2017). Response to van den Besselaar et al.: What happens when the Australian context is misunderstood. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 919–922.10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.017ButlerL.2017Response to van den Besselaar et al.: What happens when the Australian context is misunderstood113919922Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Casadevall, A., & Fang, F.C. (2012). Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania. mBio, 5(2). Retrieved on April 28, 2017, from http://mbio.asm.org/content/5/2/e00064-14.full.pdf.CasadevallA.FangF.C.2012Causes for the persistence of impact factor mania52Retrieved onApril 282017fromhttp://mbio.asm.org/content/5/2/e00064-14.full.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group. Data Collection Checklist. (2002). Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2pygx2N.Cochrane Effective Practice and Organisation of Care Review Group2002Retrieved fromhttp://bit.ly/2pygx2NSearch in Google Scholar
De Boer, H., Jongbloed, B.W.A., Benneworth, S., Cremonini, L. Kolster, R., Kottmann, A., … & Vossensteyn, J.J. (2015). Performance-based Funding and Performance Agreements in Fourteen Higher Education Systems. Enschede: University of Twente. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/274954335_Performance-based_funding_and_Performance_Agreements_in_fourteen_Higher_Education_Systems_Report_for_the_Ministry_of_Education_Culture_and_Science.De BoerH.JongbloedB.W.A.BenneworthS.CremoniniL.KolsterR.KottmannA.VossensteynJ.J.2015EnschedeUniversity of TwenteRetrieved fromhttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/274954335_Performance-based_funding_and_Performance_Agreements_in_fourteen_Higher_Education_Systems_Report_for_the_Ministry_of_Education_Culture_and_ScienceSearch in Google Scholar
European Commission (2010). Assessing Europe’s University-Based Research. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2oNukmM.European Commission2010Retrieved fromhttp://bit.ly/2oNukmMSearch in Google Scholar
Franzoni, C., Scellato, G., & Stephan, P. (2011). Changing incentives to publish. Science, 33(6043), 702–703.FranzoniC.ScellatoG.StephanP.2011Changing incentives to publish33604370270310.1126/science.119728621817035Search in Google Scholar
Garfield, E. (1972). Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation. Science, 178(4060), 471–479.507970110.1126/science.178.4060.471GarfieldE.1972Citation analysis as a tool in journal evaluation17840604714795079701Search in Google Scholar
Geuna, A., & Martin, B. (2003). University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison. Minerva, 41(4), 277–304.10.1023/B:MINE.0000005155.70870.bdGeunaA.MartinB.2003University research evaluation and funding: An international comparison414277304Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Good, B., Vermeulen, N., Tiefenthaler, B., & Arnold, E. (2015). Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system. Research Evaluation, 24(2), 91–105.10.1093/reseval/rvu035GoodB.VermeulenN.TiefenthalerB.ArnoldE.2015Counting quality? The Czech performance-based research funding system24291105Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Glänzel, W., & Moed, H.F. (2002). Journal impact measures in bibliometric research. Scientometrics, 53(2), 171–193.10.1023/A:1014848323806GlänzelW.MoedH.F.2002Journal impact measures in bibliometric research532171193Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Herbst, M. (2007). Financing public universities: The case of performance funding. Dordrecht: Springer.HerbstM.2007DordrechtSpringerSearch in Google Scholar
Heywood, J.S., Wei, X., & Ye, G. (2011). Piece rates for professors. Economics Letters, 113(3), 285–287.10.1016/j.econlet.2011.08.005HeywoodJ.S.WeiX.YeG.2011Piece rates for professors1133285287Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2012). Performance-based university research funding systems. Research Policy, 41(2), 251–261.10.1016/j.respol.2011.09.007HicksD.2012Performance-based university research funding systems412251261Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Hicks, D. (2017). What year? Difficulties in identifying the effect of policy on university output. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 933–936.10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.020HicksD.2017What year? Difficulties in identifying the effect of policy on university output113933936Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Interrupted time series analysis. (2013). Retrieved on April 28, 2017, from http://bit.ly/2qtEx48.Interrupted time series analysis2013April 282017fromhttp://bit.ly/2qtEx48Search in Google Scholar
Kamalski, J. et al. (2017). World of Research 2015: Revealing Patterns and Archetypes in Scientific Research. Elsevier Analytic Services. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2pMTWjE.KamalskiJ.2017World of Research 2015: Revealing Patterns and Archetypes in Scientific ResearchRetrieved fromhttp://bit.ly/2pMTWjESearch in Google Scholar
Larivière, V., Kiermer, V., MacCallum, C., … & Curry, S. (2016). A simple proposal for the publication of journal citation distributions. Retrieved from http://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/09/11/062109.full.pdf.LarivièreV.KiermerV.MacCallumC.CurryS.2016Retrieved fromhttp://biorxiv.org/content/biorxiv/early/2016/09/11/062109.full.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
McDowall, D., McCleary, R., Meidinger, E.E., & Hay, R.A. (1980). Interrupted Time Series Analysis. Newbury Park: Sage.McDowallD.McClearyR.MeidingerE.E.HayR.A.1980Newbury ParkSage10.4135/9781412984607Search in Google Scholar
Osuna, C., Cruz-Castro, L., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2011). Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance. Scientometrics, 86(3), 575–592.10.1007/s11192-010-0312-7OsunaC.Cruz-CastroL.Sanz-MenéndezL.2011Overturning some assumptions about the effects of evaluation systems on publication performance863575592Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Önder, C., Şevkli, M., Altinok, T., & Tavukçuoğlu, C. (2008). Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey’s recent social science publications. Scientometrics, 76(3), 543–560.10.1007/s11192-007-1878-6ÖnderC.ŞevkliM.AltinokT.TavukçuoğluC.2008Institutional change and scientific research: A preliminary bibliometric analysis of institutional influences on Turkey’s recent social science publications763543560Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Schneider, J.W. (2009). An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway. European Political Science, 8(3), 364–378.10.1057/eps.2009.19SchneiderJ.W.2009An outline of the bibliometric indicator used for performance-based funding of research institutions in Norway83364378Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Seglen, P.O. (1997, February 5). Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research. British Medical Journal, 314(7079), 498–502. Retrieved from http://www.dcscience.net/seglen97.pdf.SeglenP.O.1997February 5Why the impact factor of journals should not be used for evaluating research3147079498502Retrieved fromhttp://www.dcscience.net/seglen97.pdf10.1136/bmj.314.7079.49721260109056804Search in Google Scholar
Shao, J., & Shen, H. (2012). Research assessment: The overemphasized impact factor in China. Research Evaluation, 21(3), 199–203.10.1093/reseval/rvs011ShaoJ.ShenH.2012Research assessment: The overemphasized impact factor in China213199203Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
TÜBİTAK Türkiye Adresli Uluslararasi Bilimsel Yayinlari Teşvik (UBYT) Programi Uygulama Usul ve Esaslari. (2016). Retrieved from http://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2015/09/2016-Y%C4%B1l%C4%B1-UBYT-Program%C4%B1-Uygulama-Esaslar%C4%B1.pdf.TÜBİTAK Türkiye Adresli Uluslararasi Bilimsel Yayinlari Teşvik (UBYT)2016Retrieved fromhttp://cabim.ulakbim.gov.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2015/09/2016-Y%C4%B1l%C4%B1-UBYT-Program%C4%B1-Uygulama-Esaslar%C4%B1.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. (2017). Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citations-based research reward policies?Scientometrics, 112(3), 1853–1857.10.1007/s11192-017-2430-yTeixeira da SilvaJ.A.2017Does China need to rethink its metrics- and citations-based research reward policies?112318531857Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Tonta, Y. (2014). Use and misuse of bibliometric measures for assessment of academic performance, tenure and publication support. In the 77th Annual Meeting of the Association for Information Science and Technology, October 31 - November 5, 2014, Seattle, WA. http://bit.ly/2ghe6Ph.TontaY.2014Use and misuse of bibliometric measures for assessment of academic performance, tenure and publication supportOctober 31 - November 52014Seattle, WA.http://bit.ly/2ghe6PhSearch in Google Scholar
Tonta, Y. (2015). Support programs to increase the number of scientific publications using bibliometric measures: The Turkish case. In A.A. Salah et al. (Eds.). Proceedings of ISSI 2015 Istanbul: 15th International Society of Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 29 June to 4 July, 2015 (pp. 767–777). Istanbul: Boğaziçi University.TontaY.2015Support programs to increase the number of scientific publications using bibliometric measures: The Turkish caseSalahA.A.29 June to 4 July2015767777IstanbulBoğaziçi UniversitySearch in Google Scholar
Tonta, Y (2017a). Does monetary support increase the number of scientific papers? An interrupted time series analysis. Paper presented at ISSI 2017: 16th International Scientometrics and Informetrics Conference, 16–20 October 2017, Wuhan University, Wuhan, China. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2kXc9cJ.TontaY.2017aDoes monetary support increase the number of scientific papers? An interrupted time series analysis16–20 October2017Wuhan UniversityWuhan, ChinaRetrieved fromhttp://bit.ly/2kXc9cJSearch in Google Scholar
Tonta, Y. (2017b). TÜBİTAK Tüurkiye Adresli Uluslararasi Bilimsel Yayinlari Teşvik (UBYT) Programinin Değerlendirilmesi. Ankara: TÜBİTAK ULAKBİM. Retrieved from http://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-tubitak-ubyt-programinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdf.TontaY.2017bTÜBİTAK Tüurkiye Adresli Uluslararasi Bilimsel Yayinlari Teşvik (UBYT)AnkaraTÜBİTAK ULAKBİM.Retrieved fromhttp://yunus.hacettepe.edu.tr/~tonta/yayinlar/tonta-tubitak-ubyt-programinin-degerlendirilmesi.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
van den Besselaar, P., Heyman, U., & Sandström, U. (2017). Perverse effects of output-based research funding? Butler’s Australian case revisited. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 905–918. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016.10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016van den BesselaarP.HeymanU.SandströmU.2017Perverse effects of output-based research funding? Butler’s Australian case revisited113905918http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.05.016Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
van Raan, A.F. J. (2005). Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods. Scientometrics, 62(1), 133–143.10.1007/s11192-005-0008-6van RaanA.F. J.2005Fatal attraction: Conceptual and methodological problems in the ranking of universities by bibliometric methods621133143Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Wouters, P., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman, L., de Rijcke, S., Rushforth, A. & Franssen, T. (2015). The metric tide literature review: Supplementary report I to the independent review of the role of metrics in research assessment and management. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/IHliqle.WoutersP.ThelwallM.KoushaK.WaltmanL.de RijckeS.RushforthA.FranssenT.2015The metric tide literature reviewRetrieved fromhttp://bit.ly/IHliqleSearch in Google Scholar
Yuret, T. (2017). Do researchers pay attention to publication subsidies? Journal of Informetrics, 11(2), 423–434.10.1016/j.joi.2017.02.010YuretT.2017Do researchers pay attention to publication subsidies?112423434Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
Yurtsever, E., Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioğlu, Ö.A., & Tonta, M. (2001). Sosyal Bilimler Atif Dizini’nde (SSCI) Türkiye 1970–1999 (Turkey in Social Sciences Citation Index (SSCI): 1970–1999). Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.YurtseverE.GülgözS.YedekçioğluÖ.A.TontaM.2001Sosyal Bilimler Atif Dizini’nde (SSCI)1970–1999AnkaraTürkiye Bilimler AkademisiSearch in Google Scholar
Yurtsever, E., Gülgöz, S., Yedekçioğlu, Ö.A., & Tonta, M. (2002). Sağlik Bilimleri, Mühendislik ve Temel Bilimlerde Türkiye’nin Uluslararasi Atif Dizinindeki Yeri 1973–1999 (Turkey’s Place in Health Sciences, Engineering and Basic Sciences in International Citation Index). Ankara: Türkiye Bilimler Akademisi.YurtseverE.GülgözS.YedekçioğluÖ.A.TontaM.2002Sağlik Bilimleri, Mühendislik ve Temel Bilimlerde Türkiye’nin Uluslararasi Atif Dizinindeki Yeri 1973–1999AnkaraTürkiye Bilimler AkademisiSearch in Google Scholar
Zhang, L., Rousseau, R., & Sivertsen, G. (2017). Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen’s work on journal impact and research evaluation. PLoS ONE, 12(3), e0174205. Retrieved from http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174205.2835084910.1371/journal.pone.0174205ZhangL.RousseauR.SivertsenG.2017Science deserves to be judged by its contents, not by its wrapping: Revisiting Seglen’s work on journal impact and research evaluation123e0174205Retrieved fromhttp://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0174205536977928350849Search in Google Scholar