Otwarty dostęp

Home Birth in the Opinion of Obstetricians and Midwives: A Survey


Zacytuj

1. Zielinski R, Ackerson K, Kane Low L. Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:361-77.10.2147/IJWH.S55561Search in Google Scholar

2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(1):1-65.Search in Google Scholar

3. Wiegers TA, Keirse MJ, van der Zee J, Berghs GA. Outcome of planned home and planned hosptial births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the Netherlands. BMJ. 1996;313(7068):1309-13.10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1309Search in Google Scholar

4. Anderson RE, Murphy PA. Outcomes of 11,788 planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives. A retrospective descriptive study. J Nurse Midwifery. 1995;40(6):483-92.10.1016/0091-2182(95)00051-8Search in Google Scholar

5. Woodcock HC, Read AW, Moore DJ, Stanley FJ, Bower C. Planned homebirths in Western Australia 1981-1987: a descriptive study. Med J Aust. 1990;153(11-12):672-8.10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb126318.xSearch in Google Scholar

6. Janssen PA, Mitton C, Aghajanian J. Costs of planned home vs. Hospital birth in British Columbia attended by registered midwives and physicians. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133524.10.1371/journal.pone.0133524450588226186720Search in Google Scholar

7. Pang JW, Heffelfinger JD, Huang GJ, Benedetti TJ, Weiss NS. Outcomes of planned home births in Washington state: 1989-1996. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):253-9.10.1097/00006250-200208000-00009Search in Google Scholar

8. Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6-7):377-83.10.1503/cmaj.081869274213719720688Search in Google Scholar

9. Janssen PA, Holt V, Myers SJ. Licensed midwife-attended, out-of-hospital births in Washington state: are they safe? Birth. 1994;21(3):141-8.10.1111/j.1523-536X.1994.tb00513.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson D F, Peacock D, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ; 2002;166(3):315-23.Search in Google Scholar

11. Chamberlain G, Wraight A, Crowley P. Birth at home. Pract Midwife. 1999;2(7):35-9.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG. 2008;115(5):554-9.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01669.x18333936Search in Google Scholar

13. Ackermann-Liebrich U, Voegeli T, Günter-Witt K, Kunz I, Züllig M, Schindler C, et al. Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team. BMJ. 1996;313(7068):1313-8.10.1136/bmj.313.7068.131323527068942694Search in Google Scholar

14. Lindgren H, Rådestad IJ, Christensson K, Hildingsson IM. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):751-9.10.1080/0001634080219990318607818Search in Google Scholar

15. van Alten D, Eskes M, Treffers PE. Midwifery in the Netherlands. The Wormerveer study: selection, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality and infant morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(6):656-62.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03279.x2803988Search in Google Scholar

16. Gulbransen G, Hilton J, McKay L, Cox A. Home birth in New Zealand 1973-93: incidence and mortality. N Z Med J. 1997;110(1040):87-9.Search in Google Scholar

17. Sandall J: Place of birth in Europe, birth in Europe in the 21st century Entre Nous [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/entrenousSearch in Google Scholar

18. Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):243.e1-8.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.02820598284Search in Google Scholar

19. Oxford Pro Bono Publico. The legal regulation of home birth in the Domestic jurisdictions of the council of Europe. Research prepared for the League of human rights, the Czech Republic [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2002 Jul 9] Available from: http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/here.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

20. NICE. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. Clinical guideline [Internet]. London [cited 2017 Sept 9] Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.Search in Google Scholar

21. American college of Nurse-Midwives. Home Birth Transfer Guidelines [Internet].Silver Spring [cited 2017 Oct 29] Available from: http://www.midwife.org.Search in Google Scholar

22. ACOG. Planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e117-22.10.1097/AOG.000000000000202428333824Search in Google Scholar

23. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group, World Health Organization. Birth. 1997;24(2):121-3.Search in Google Scholar

24. Ministry of Health of Bulgaria. Seventy two percent of the population is opposed to resolving homebirth [Internet].2013 [cited 2017 Oct 15] Available from (in Bulgarian): http://www.mh.government.bg/bg/novini/aktualno/trichetvrti-ot-naselenieto-podkrepia-normativnite.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1313-9053
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
2 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Medicine, Clinical Medicine, other, Ophthalmology, Public Health, Pharmacy, Clinical Pharmacy