[1. Zielinski R, Ackerson K, Kane Low L. Planned home birth: benefits, risks, and opportunities. Int J Womens Health. 2015;7:361-77.10.2147/IJWH.S55561]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Martin JA, Hamilton BE, Osterman MJ, Curtin SC, Matthews TJ. Births: final data for 2013. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015;64(1):1-65.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Wiegers TA, Keirse MJ, van der Zee J, Berghs GA. Outcome of planned home and planned hosptial births in low risk pregnancies: prospective study in midwifery practices in the Netherlands. BMJ. 1996;313(7068):1309-13.10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1309]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Anderson RE, Murphy PA. Outcomes of 11,788 planned home births attended by certified nurse-midwives. A retrospective descriptive study. J Nurse Midwifery. 1995;40(6):483-92.10.1016/0091-2182(95)00051-8]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Woodcock HC, Read AW, Moore DJ, Stanley FJ, Bower C. Planned homebirths in Western Australia 1981-1987: a descriptive study. Med J Aust. 1990;153(11-12):672-8.10.5694/j.1326-5377.1990.tb126318.x]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Janssen PA, Mitton C, Aghajanian J. Costs of planned home vs. Hospital birth in British Columbia attended by registered midwives and physicians. PLoS One. 2015;10(7):e0133524.10.1371/journal.pone.0133524450588226186720]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Pang JW, Heffelfinger JD, Huang GJ, Benedetti TJ, Weiss NS. Outcomes of planned home births in Washington state: 1989-1996. Obstet Gynecol. 2002;100(2):253-9.10.1097/00006250-200208000-00009]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Janssen PA, Saxell L, Page LA, Klein MC, Liston RM, Lee SK. Outcomes of planned home birth with registered midwife versus planned hospital birth with midwife or physician. CMAJ. 2009;181(6-7):377-83.10.1503/cmaj.081869274213719720688]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Janssen PA, Holt V, Myers SJ. Licensed midwife-attended, out-of-hospital births in Washington state: are they safe? Birth. 1994;21(3):141-8.10.1111/j.1523-536X.1994.tb00513.x]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Janssen PA, Lee SK, Ryan EM, Etches DJ, Farquharson D F, Peacock D, et al. Outcomes of planned home births versus planned hospital births after regulation of midwifery in British Columbia. CMAJ; 2002;166(3):315-23.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Chamberlain G, Wraight A, Crowley P. Birth at home. Pract Midwife. 1999;2(7):35-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Mori R, Dougherty M, Whittle M. An estimation of intrapartum-related perinatal mortality rates for booked home births in England and Wales between 1994 and 2003. BJOG. 2008;115(5):554-9.10.1111/j.1471-0528.2008.01669.x18333936]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Ackermann-Liebrich U, Voegeli T, Günter-Witt K, Kunz I, Züllig M, Schindler C, et al. Home versus hospital deliveries: follow up study of matched pairs for procedures and outcome. Zurich Study Team. BMJ. 1996;313(7068):1313-8.10.1136/bmj.313.7068.131323527068942694]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Lindgren H, Rådestad IJ, Christensson K, Hildingsson IM. Outcome of planned home births compared to hospital births in Sweden between 1992 and 2004. A population-based register study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2008;87(7):751-9.10.1080/0001634080219990318607818]Search in Google Scholar
[15. van Alten D, Eskes M, Treffers PE. Midwifery in the Netherlands. The Wormerveer study: selection, mode of delivery, perinatal mortality and infant morbidity. Br J Obstet Gynaecol. 1989;96(6):656-62.10.1111/j.1471-0528.1989.tb03279.x2803988]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Gulbransen G, Hilton J, McKay L, Cox A. Home birth in New Zealand 1973-93: incidence and mortality. N Z Med J. 1997;110(1040):87-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Sandall J: Place of birth in Europe, birth in Europe in the 21st century Entre Nous [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 Nov 29]. Available from: http://www.euro.who.int/entrenous]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Wax JR, Lucas FL, Lamont M, Pinette MG, Cartin A, Blackstone J. Maternal and newborn outcomes in planned home birth vs planned hospital births: a metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010;203(3):243.e1-8.10.1016/j.ajog.2010.05.02820598284]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Oxford Pro Bono Publico. The legal regulation of home birth in the Domestic jurisdictions of the council of Europe. Research prepared for the League of human rights, the Czech Republic [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2002 Jul 9] Available from: http://ohrh.law.ox.ac.uk/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2015/03/here.pdf]Search in Google Scholar
[20. NICE. Intrapartum care for healthy women and babies. Clinical guideline [Internet]. London [cited 2017 Sept 9] Available from: https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg190.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. American college of Nurse-Midwives. Home Birth Transfer Guidelines [Internet].Silver Spring [cited 2017 Oct 29] Available from: http://www.midwife.org.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. ACOG. Planned home birth. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;129:e117-22.10.1097/AOG.000000000000202428333824]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Care in normal birth: a practical guide. Technical Working Group, World Health Organization. Birth. 1997;24(2):121-3.10.1111/j.1523-536X.1997.tb00352.x]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Ministry of Health of Bulgaria. Seventy two percent of the population is opposed to resolving homebirth [Internet].2013 [cited 2017 Oct 15] Available from (in Bulgarian): http://www.mh.government.bg/bg/novini/aktualno/trichetvrti-ot-naselenieto-podkrepia-normativnite.]Search in Google Scholar