Maternal Inheritance in Hybrids of Three Honey Bee Subspecies

Ałpatow, W.W. (1948). Parody miedonosnoj pczeły. Sredi Prirody, 4, Moskwa.Search in Google Scholar

De la Rúa, P., Jaffe, R., Dall’Ollio, R., Muñoz, I., Serrano, J. (2009). Biodiversity, conservation and current threats to European honeybees. Apidologie, 40, 263-284. DOI: 10.1051/apido/200902710.1051/apido/2009027Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Francoy, T.M., Wittmann, D., Drauschke, M., Müller, S., Steinhage, V., Bezerra-Laure, M.A.F., … Gonçalves, L.S. (2008). Identification of Africanized honey bees through wing morphometrics: two fast and efficient procedures. Apidologie, 39(5), 488-494. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200802810.1051/apido:2008028Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Francoy, T.M., Gonçalves, L.S., & De Jong, D. (2012). Rapid morphological changes in populations of hybrids between Africanized and European honey bees. Genetics and Molecular Research, 11(3), 3349-3356. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/201210.4238/2012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Gerula, D., Tofilski, A., Węgrzynowicz, P., & Skowronek, W. (2009). Computer-assisted discrimination of honeybee subspecies used for breeding in Poland. Journal of Apicultural Science, 53(2), 105-114.Search in Google Scholar

Gromisz, M., Bornus, L., Bobrzecki, J., Bojarczuk, C., Kalinowski, J., Król, A. … Zaremba, J. (1974). Ocena morfologiczna mieszańców międzyrasowych pszczoły miodnej. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, 18, 77-89.Search in Google Scholar

Gromisz, M. (1981). Morfologiczna ocena populacji rojów w pasiekach zarodowych. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, 25, 51-66.Search in Google Scholar

Guzmán-Novoa, E., & Page Jr, R. E. (1994). Genetic dominance and worker interactions affect honeybee colony defense. Behavioral Ecology, 5(1), 91-97.10.1093/beheco/5.1.91Search in Google Scholar

Guzmán-Novoa, E., Hunt, G. J., Uribe, J. L., Smith, C., Arechavaleta-Velasco, M. E. (2002). Confirmation of QTL effects and evidence of genetic dominance of honeybee defensive behavior: results of colony and individual behavioral assays. Behavior Genetics, 32(2), 95-102.10.1023/A:1015245605670Search in Google Scholar

Kandemir, İ., Özkan, A., & Fuchs, S. (2011) Reevaluation of honeybee (Apis mellifera) microtaxonomy: a geometric morphometric approach. Apidologie, 42(5), 618-627. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-011-0063-310.1007/s13592-011-0063-3Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Miguel, I., Baylac, M., Iriondo, M., Manzano, C., Garnery, L., Estonba, A. (2011). Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch. Apidologie, 42, 150-161. DOI: 10.1051/apido/201004810.1051/apido/2010048Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Moritz, R.F. (1985). Heritability of the postcapping stage in Apis mellifera and its relation to varroatosis resistance. Journal of Heredity, 76, 267–270.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110090Search in Google Scholar

Nawrocka A., Kandemir I., Fuchs S., Tofilski A. (2018). Computer software for identification of honey bee subspecies and evolutionary lineages. Apidologie, 49(2), 172-184. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-017-0538-y10.1007/s13592-017-0538-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

Oleksa, A., & Tofilski, A. (2015). Wing geometric morphometrics and microsatellite analysis provide similar discrimination of honey bee subspecies. Apidologie, 46(1), 49-60. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0300-710.1007/s13592-014-0300-7Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Page, R. E., & Robinson, G. E. (1991). The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies. In Advances in insect physiology (Vol. 23, pp. 117-169). Academic Press.10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60093-4Search in Google Scholar

Paleolog, J. (2009). Behavioural characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies containing mix of workers of divergent behavioural traits. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 27(3), 237-248.Search in Google Scholar

Paleolog, J., Borsuk, G., & Olszewski, K. (2003). Pollen hoarding effectiveness and strategies as affected by worker bee genotype II. Genetic diversity within a colony. Journal of Apicultural Science, 47(2), 13-17.Search in Google Scholar

Rinderer, TE., Daly, HV., Sylvester, HA., Collins, AM., Buco, S.M., Hellmich, R.L., Danka, R.G. (1990). Morphometric differences among Africanized and European honey bees and their F₁ hybrids (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83(3), 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/83.3.34610.1093/aesa/83.3.346Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Rohlf, F.J., & Slice, D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Biology, 39, 40-59.10.2307/2992207Search in Google Scholar

Schneider, S.S., Leamy, L.J., Lewis, L.A., & De Grandi-Hoffman, G. (2003). The influence of hybridization between African and European honeybees, Apis mellifera, on asymmetries in wing size and shape. Evolution, 57(10), 2350-2364.10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00247.x14628923Search in Google Scholar

StatSoft Inc (2017). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), wersion 13. www.statsoft.comSearch in Google Scholar

Tofilski, A. (2008). Using geometric morphometrics and standard morphometry to discriminate three honeybee subspecies. Apidologie, 39, 558-563. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200803710.1051/apido:2008037Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Unger, P., & Guzman-Novoa, E. (2010). Maternal effects on the hygienic behavior of Russian x Ontario hybrid honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Heredity, 101(1), 91-96. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp09210.1093/jhered/esp09219889722Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

Wolf, J. B., & Wade, M. J. (2009). What are maternal effects (and what are they not)?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1520), 1107-1115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.023810.1098/rstb.2008.0238266668019324615Open DOISearch in Google Scholar