[Ałpatow, W.W. (1948). Parody miedonosnoj pczeły. Sredi Prirody, 4, Moskwa.]Search in Google Scholar
[De la Rúa, P., Jaffe, R., Dall’Ollio, R., Muñoz, I., Serrano, J. (2009). Biodiversity, conservation and current threats to European honeybees. Apidologie, 40, 263-284. DOI: 10.1051/apido/200902710.1051/apido/2009027]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Francoy, T.M., Wittmann, D., Drauschke, M., Müller, S., Steinhage, V., Bezerra-Laure, M.A.F., … Gonçalves, L.S. (2008). Identification of Africanized honey bees through wing morphometrics: two fast and efficient procedures. Apidologie, 39(5), 488-494. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200802810.1051/apido:2008028]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Francoy, T.M., Gonçalves, L.S., & De Jong, D. (2012). Rapid morphological changes in populations of hybrids between Africanized and European honey bees. Genetics and Molecular Research, 11(3), 3349-3356. http://dx.doi.org/10.4238/201210.4238/2012]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Gerula, D., Tofilski, A., Węgrzynowicz, P., & Skowronek, W. (2009). Computer-assisted discrimination of honeybee subspecies used for breeding in Poland. Journal of Apicultural Science, 53(2), 105-114.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gromisz, M., Bornus, L., Bobrzecki, J., Bojarczuk, C., Kalinowski, J., Król, A. … Zaremba, J. (1974). Ocena morfologiczna mieszańców międzyrasowych pszczoły miodnej. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, 18, 77-89.]Search in Google Scholar
[Gromisz, M. (1981). Morfologiczna ocena populacji rojów w pasiekach zarodowych. Pszczelnicze Zeszyty Naukowe, 25, 51-66.]Search in Google Scholar
[Guzmán-Novoa, E., & Page Jr, R. E. (1994). Genetic dominance and worker interactions affect honeybee colony defense. Behavioral Ecology, 5(1), 91-97.10.1093/beheco/5.1.91]Search in Google Scholar
[Guzmán-Novoa, E., Hunt, G. J., Uribe, J. L., Smith, C., Arechavaleta-Velasco, M. E. (2002). Confirmation of QTL effects and evidence of genetic dominance of honeybee defensive behavior: results of colony and individual behavioral assays. Behavior Genetics, 32(2), 95-102.10.1023/A:1015245605670]Search in Google Scholar
[Kandemir, İ., Özkan, A., & Fuchs, S. (2011) Reevaluation of honeybee (Apis mellifera) microtaxonomy: a geometric morphometric approach. Apidologie, 42(5), 618-627. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-011-0063-310.1007/s13592-011-0063-3]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Miguel, I., Baylac, M., Iriondo, M., Manzano, C., Garnery, L., Estonba, A. (2011). Both geometric morphometric and microsatellite data consistently support the differentiation of the Apis mellifera M evolutionary branch. Apidologie, 42, 150-161. DOI: 10.1051/apido/201004810.1051/apido/2010048]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Moritz, R.F. (1985). Heritability of the postcapping stage in Apis mellifera and its relation to varroatosis resistance. Journal of Heredity, 76, 267–270.10.1093/oxfordjournals.jhered.a110090]Search in Google Scholar
[Nawrocka A., Kandemir I., Fuchs S., Tofilski A. (2018). Computer software for identification of honey bee subspecies and evolutionary lineages. Apidologie, 49(2), 172-184. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-017-0538-y10.1007/s13592-017-0538-y]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Oleksa, A., & Tofilski, A. (2015). Wing geometric morphometrics and microsatellite analysis provide similar discrimination of honey bee subspecies. Apidologie, 46(1), 49-60. DOI: 10.1007/s13592-014-0300-710.1007/s13592-014-0300-7]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Page, R. E., & Robinson, G. E. (1991). The genetics of division of labour in honey bee colonies. In Advances in insect physiology (Vol. 23, pp. 117-169). Academic Press.10.1016/S0065-2806(08)60093-4]Search in Google Scholar
[Paleolog, J. (2009). Behavioural characteristics of honey bee (Apis mellifera) colonies containing mix of workers of divergent behavioural traits. Animal Science Papers and Reports, 27(3), 237-248.]Search in Google Scholar
[Paleolog, J., Borsuk, G., & Olszewski, K. (2003). Pollen hoarding effectiveness and strategies as affected by worker bee genotype II. Genetic diversity within a colony. Journal of Apicultural Science, 47(2), 13-17.]Search in Google Scholar
[Rinderer, TE., Daly, HV., Sylvester, HA., Collins, AM., Buco, S.M., Hellmich, R.L., Danka, R.G. (1990). Morphometric differences among Africanized and European honey bees and their F1 hybrids (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 83(3), 346-351. https://doi.org/10.1093/aesa/83.3.34610.1093/aesa/83.3.346]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Rohlf, F.J., & Slice, D. (1990). Extensions of the Procrustes method for the optimal superimposition of landmarks. Systematic Biology, 39, 40-59.10.2307/2992207]Search in Google Scholar
[Schneider, S.S., Leamy, L.J., Lewis, L.A., & De Grandi-Hoffman, G. (2003). The influence of hybridization between African and European honeybees, Apis mellifera, on asymmetries in wing size and shape. Evolution, 57(10), 2350-2364.10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00247.x14628923]Search in Google Scholar
[StatSoft Inc (2017). STATISTICA (data analysis software system), wersion 13. www.statsoft.com]Search in Google Scholar
[Tofilski, A. (2008). Using geometric morphometrics and standard morphometry to discriminate three honeybee subspecies. Apidologie, 39, 558-563. DOI: 10.1051/apido:200803710.1051/apido:2008037]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Unger, P., & Guzman-Novoa, E. (2010). Maternal effects on the hygienic behavior of Russian x Ontario hybrid honeybees (Apis mellifera L.). Journal of Heredity, 101(1), 91-96. DOI: 10.1093/jhered/esp09210.1093/jhered/esp09219889722]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[Wolf, J. B., & Wade, M. J. (2009). What are maternal effects (and what are they not)?. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 364(1520), 1107-1115. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2008.023810.1098/rstb.2008.0238266668019324615]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar