Superior Responsibility in the Bemba Case – Analysis of the Court’s Findings on Necessary and Reasonable Measures

BROUWERS, M. P. W. (eds). The Law of superior Responsibility, Wolf Legal Publishers, 2012.Search in Google Scholar

FROUVILLE, Olivier. Droit International Penal, Modalites de participation a la commission de l’infraction. Paris: A. Pedone, 2012, pp. 404–405.Search in Google Scholar

JACKSON, Miles. Commanders’ Motivations in Bemba. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. 15. 7. 2018. [online] [27-01-2019]. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/commanders-motivations-in-bemba/Search in Google Scholar

JACKSON, Miles. Geographical Remoteness in Bemba. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. 30. 7. 2018. [online] [7-02-2019]. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/geographical-remoteness-in-bemba/Search in Google Scholar

O’REILLY, Arthur Thomas. Superior responsibility: a call to realign doctrine with principles. American University International Law Review. 2004, vol. 20, no. 1.Search in Google Scholar

SVAČEK Ondřej. CHADIMOVA, Michala. PROCHAZKOVA, Ivana. Superior responsibility in international criminal law. Praha: Leges, 2017.Search in Google Scholar

TRIFFTERER, Otto. Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: observers’ notes, article by article. München: Beck, 2008. p. 301.Search in Google Scholar

Remoteness in itself cannot serve as a defence to command responsibility. Amnesty International. Opinion. 10. 10. 2018. [online] [20-01-2019]. Available at: https://hrij.amnesty.nl/remoteness-command-responsibility-icc/Search in Google Scholar

Making Sense of Command Responsibility. Amnesty International. Opinion. 8. 10. 2018. [online] [22-01-2019]. Available at: https://hrij.amnesty.nl/making-sense-of-command-responsibility-bemba/Search in Google Scholar

BITTI, Gilbert. Article 21 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC. In STAHN, Carsten; SLUITE, Göran (ed). The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009.10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.91Search in Google Scholar

Akayesu, ICTR, ICTR-96-4-T, TCH, 2. 9. 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08 424. Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute, PTCH II, 3. 7. 2009.Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08 A, ACH, 8. 7. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-2138, TCH, 22. 2. 2012.10.4103/2278-330X.96490Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3121-Red, Defence, 22. 4. 2016.Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3343, TCH III, 21. 3. 2016.10.9790/0837-2108120105Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Anx1-Red, ACH, 8. 7. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Anx2, ACH, 8. 7. 2018Search in Google Scholar

Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Anx3, ACH, 8. 7. 2018.Search in Google Scholar

Hadžihasanović/Kubura, IT-01-47-A, ICTY, ACH, 22. 4. 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Kajelijeli, ICTR, ICTR-98-44A-T, TCH, 1. 12. 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Limaj et al., ICTY, IT-03-66-T, TCH, 30. 11. 2005.Search in Google Scholar

Mucić at al., ICTY, IT-96-21-A, ACH, 20. 2. 2001.Search in Google Scholar

Mucić et al., ICTY, IT-96-21-T, TCH, 16. 11. 1998.Search in Google Scholar

Semanza, ICTR, ICTR-97-20-T-15-5-2003, ICTR, TCH, 15. 3. 2003.Search in Google Scholar

Štrugar, ICTY, IT-01-42-T, TCH, 31. 1. 2005.10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00218.xSearch in Google Scholar