[BROUWERS, M. P. W. (eds). The Law of superior Responsibility, Wolf Legal Publishers, 2012.]Search in Google Scholar
[FROUVILLE, Olivier. Droit International Penal, Modalites de participation a la commission de l’infraction. Paris: A. Pedone, 2012, pp. 404–405.]Search in Google Scholar
[JACKSON, Miles. Commanders’ Motivations in Bemba. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. 15. 7. 2018. [online] [27-01-2019]. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/commanders-motivations-in-bemba/]Search in Google Scholar
[JACKSON, Miles. Geographical Remoteness in Bemba. EJIL: Talk! Blog of the European Journal of International Law. 30. 7. 2018. [online] [7-02-2019]. Available at: https://www.ejiltalk.org/geographical-remoteness-in-bemba/]Search in Google Scholar
[O’REILLY, Arthur Thomas. Superior responsibility: a call to realign doctrine with principles. American University International Law Review. 2004, vol. 20, no. 1.]Search in Google Scholar
[SVAČEK Ondřej. CHADIMOVA, Michala. PROCHAZKOVA, Ivana. Superior responsibility in international criminal law. Praha: Leges, 2017.]Search in Google Scholar
[TRIFFTERER, Otto. Commentary on the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court: observers’ notes, article by article. München: Beck, 2008. p. 301.]Search in Google Scholar
[Remoteness in itself cannot serve as a defence to command responsibility. Amnesty International. Opinion. 10. 10. 2018. [online] [20-01-2019]. Available at: https://hrij.amnesty.nl/remoteness-command-responsibility-icc/]Search in Google Scholar
[Making Sense of Command Responsibility. Amnesty International. Opinion. 8. 10. 2018. [online] [22-01-2019]. Available at: https://hrij.amnesty.nl/making-sense-of-command-responsibility-bemba/]Search in Google Scholar
[BITTI, Gilbert. Article 21 of the Statute of the International Criminal Court and the Treatment of Sources of Law in the Jurisprudence of the ICC. In STAHN, Carsten; SLUITE, Göran (ed). The Emerging Practice of the International Criminal Court. Leiden; Boston: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 2009.10.1163/ej.9789004166554.i-774.91]Search in Google Scholar
[Akayesu, ICTR, ICTR-96-4-T, TCH, 2. 9. 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08 424. Decision Pursuant to Article 61(7)(a) and (b) of the Rome Statute, PTCH II, 3. 7. 2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08 A, ACH, 8. 7. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-2138, TCH, 22. 2. 2012.10.4103/2278-330X.96490]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3121-Red, Defence, 22. 4. 2016.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3343, TCH III, 21. 3. 2016.10.9790/0837-2108120105]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Anx1-Red, ACH, 8. 7. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Anx2, ACH, 8. 7. 2018]Search in Google Scholar
[Bemba, ICC, ICC-01/05-01/08-3636-Anx3, ACH, 8. 7. 2018.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hadžihasanović/Kubura, IT-01-47-A, ICTY, ACH, 22. 4. 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kajelijeli, ICTR, ICTR-98-44A-T, TCH, 1. 12. 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Limaj et al., ICTY, IT-03-66-T, TCH, 30. 11. 2005.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mucić at al., ICTY, IT-96-21-A, ACH, 20. 2. 2001.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mucić et al., ICTY, IT-96-21-T, TCH, 16. 11. 1998.]Search in Google Scholar
[Semanza, ICTR, ICTR-97-20-T-15-5-2003, ICTR, TCH, 15. 3. 2003.]Search in Google Scholar
[Štrugar, ICTY, IT-01-42-T, TCH, 31. 1. 2005.10.1111/j.1747-4477.2005.tb00218.x]Search in Google Scholar