Bibliometric analysis of strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) research from Plant Sciences category based on Web of Science

Clarivate Analytics's Web of Science (WoS) is the world's leading scientific citation search and analytical information platform, and one of the world's largest and most comprehensive academic information resources covering >12,000 core academic journals. The publication counts from the WoS Core Collection were derived from the following databases: The SCIE – 1900-present, Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) – 1900-present, Conference Proceeding Citation Index-Science (CPCI-S) – 2015-present, Conference Proceedings Citation Index-Social Science and Humanities (CPCI-SSH) – 2015-present, Current Chemical Reactions (CCR-EXPANDED) – 1985-present, Index Chemicus (IC) – 1993-present.

This study surveyed papers in WoS Core Collection (1900-present) (retrieval data last updated: 2021-3-20). We used the keywords in the topic, with the query

Topic: (“Strawberry” OR “F. ananassa Duch”.)

Then refined by: Document Types (Article or Review) and WoS categories (Plant Sciences).

There are 2,930 papers from WoS Core Collection. Full record and cited references of the included papers were extracted at other reference software file formats and imported into VOSviewer (version 1.6.16, 2020, Leiden University, Leiden, The Netherlands) for further citation analysis. The impact factors (IF 2019 and IF 5 years) were taken from the Journal Citation Report (JCR 2019) published in 2020, which had the latest data available.

Visualisations (network and overlay) using the program VOSviewer are conducted on WoS data to determine co-occurrence and clusters of connected publications, country input and author collaboration (co-authorship) as well as clusters of interrelated research topics (text data). We used VOSviewer to show the international collaboration between the authors, organisations, countries and the research trends through all keywords (Van Eck and Waltman, 2010). In this paper, default parameters values of the VOSviewer are usually used in the analysis. Items are represented by a label and a circle. The size of circles reflects the weight of an item. Some items are not displayed to avoid overlapping. The colours in network visualisation (text maps) represent clusters of similar items as calculated by the program. The distance between the items indicates the strength of relationships (Van Eck and Waltman, 2020).

Based on Clarivate Analytics's WoS Index, the 2,930 papers were SCIE (2,930), CPCI-S (31), IC (7), SSCI (4), and Book Citation Index–Science (3).

The document types and languages were displayed in Table 1. Among the document types, there are articles (2,836, 96.792%) and reviews (94, 3.208%), including proceedings papers (30, 1.024%), early access (11, 0.375%) and book chapter (3, 0.102%). The first paper titled “Some new strawberry fungi” written by Stevens and Peterson (1916) was published in Phytopathology.

Almost all the papers were published in English (2,894, 98.771%), with the remaining in French (20, 0.683%), German (9, 0.307%), Spanish (3, 0.102%), Italian (2, 0.068%) and Portuguese (2, 0.068%). English was dominating language from the WoS, and scholars tend to publish their articles in English as they want them to be widely accepted. Most of the published documents were in the form of original research articles and English was the most common language followed (Khan et al., 2020).

To know the research trend in strawberry research from the Plant Sciences category based on WoS, a total number of 2,930 articles and reviews were published and trends were obtained from the online version of the WoS database from 1916 to 2021 and displayed in Figure 1. The highest number of papers published is 199 in the year 2020. The following are the percentage ratio of papers with 93.31%, 88.088%, 83.345%, 70.376% and 48.703% published after 1970, 1980, 1990, 2000 and 2010, respectively. The h-index was initially proposed as a measure of a researcher's scientific output based on counting the number of publications (N) by that researcher cited N or more times (Hirsch, 2005). For the total 2,930 papers, the h-index is 102, and the average citation per item is 22.89.

Figure 1

For strawberry research from the Plant Sciences category based on WoS, there are a total of 29 WoS subject categories in the science edition (total 254 categories) and 21 research areas. Table 2 shows the top 21 WoS categories and all the research areas in the subject of strawberry research from the Plant Sciences category. The top five WoS categories include Plant Sciences (2,930, 100%), Agronomy (609, 20.785%), Horticulture (372, 12.696%), Biochemistry Molecular Biology (133, 4.539%) and Biotechnology Applied Microbiology (115, 3.925%). The top five research areas include Plant Sciences (2,930, 100%), Agriculture (825, 28.157%), Biochemistry Molecular Biology (162, 5.529%), Biotechnology Applied Microbiology (115, 3.925%) and Genetics Heredity (105, 3.584%). The journals or papers may be classified into two or more categories in the WoS, which shows the multidisciplinary characteristics of the research field (Elango and Ho, 2017, 2018). In WoS, publications mapped to WoS categories are more detailed than research areas (Stopar et al., 2021).

Based on JCR 2019 data (published in 2020), there are 197 journals and book series for strawberry research from the Plant Sciences category based on WoS. The top 21 core journals were shown in Table 3 with total articles each >37 papers, Journal impact factor as IF 2019 and IF 5 years, and rank Quartile in category (QC).

The top 5, top 10, top 15 and top 20 Journals published about 25.564%, 38.259%, 47.44% and 54.027% of the total papers, respectively. Plant Disease was the most productive journal with 252 papers (8.601%), followed by Phytopathology (229, 7.816%), Plant Pathology (93, 3.174%), Frontiers in Plant Science (89, 3.308%), Canadian Journal of Plant Science (86, 2.935%), European Journal of Plant Pathology (86, 2.935%) and Journal of Experimental Botany (86, 2.935%), that these journals each published >86 papers. Based on Table 3 of the top 21 journals, there are 12 journals in Quartile 1, six journals in Quartile 2, one journal in Quartile 3, one journal in Quartile 4 in Category. White-Gibson et al. (2019) have demonstrated the importance of publishing in the English language and in a journal with a high impact factor. Citation analysis is not a measurement of scientific quality, but it is reflective of its importance.

According to the publication data in the citation of 197 journals, there were 91 journals that meet the thresholds of five publications. The network of citations in the field of strawberry research from the Plant Sciences category based on WoS is shown in six clusters with different colours in Figure 2, the size of circles reflects a total number of journal publication records. The six cluster colours from one to six are red, green, blue, yellow, violet, and shallow blue. Journals in the same cluster usually suggested that they published similar content papers and had close relations with each other.

Figure 2

In general, internationally collaborative articles had the highest visibility and scientific impact followed by inter-institutional collaborative articles, single-country articles and single-author articles, respectively (Wambu and Ho, 2016). According to the publication data, it was revealed that a total of 8,838 authors published 2,930 publications, there were 254 authors that meet the thresholds of 5 publications, but only 105 authors were connected to each other. The network of authorship in the field of Network visualisation maps of authors of strawberry research from the Plant Sciences category based on WoS is shown in Figure 3, the size of circles reflects a total number of records. Authors in the same cluster usually suggested that they studied in a similar field and had close cooperation with each other.

Figure 3

Table 4 shows the top 22 authors who published >17 papers and also lists the citations, average citations, organisation enhanced and countries. The top five authors are Peres, Natalia A. (Peres, Natalia; Peres, N.A.); Madden, LV; Munoz-Blanco, Juan (Munoz-Blanco, J); Schwab, Wilfried (Schwab, W) and Ellis, MA, each published >25 papers. Though we combined the same author with the different spells, the total number of authors was calculated separately. The top five authors with the higher citations per paper are Caballero, Jose L. (Caballero, JL); Freeman, Stanley (Freeman, S); Munoz-Blanco, Juan (Munoz-Blanco, J); Valpuesta, Victoriano (Valpuesta, V) and Schwab, Wilfried (Schwab, W), average citations per paper are >52.12 times. The top 22 authors are mainly from the USA and Spain. There are 11 authors from the USA, four authors from Spain, two authors from England, and then, Germany, Denmark, Israel, Canada and China have one author each.

A total of 96 countries or regions are contributing to the 2,930 papers in this study. Table 5 represents the lists of the top 21 countries or regions that the publications were above 40 papers ranked by the number of total publications (TPs), also lists the cluster, total link strength (TLS), citations and average citations. Among the 21 countries or regions, the USA, People's Republic of China, Spain, Canada and England are the five most papers countries. From the average citations, Netherlands, Israel, France, Germany and Spain show the higher citations per paper.

We developed the international country co-authorship network map using VOSviewer software (Figure 4). The threshold was set as five, 52 countries or regions were meeting the requirement and 51 countries or regions were connected to each other. The VOSviewer software divided these 51 countries or regions into eight clusters with different colours, the size of circles reflects a total number of records and the distance between the countries indicates the strength of relationships. There are different groups with different colours in different clusters that are formed by sets of countries. (Figure 4).

Figure 4

As we can see from Figure 4, the first cluster consisted of 10 countries and regions (red colour), France, Netherlands, New Zealand, Scotland, Greece, Cyprus, Sri Lanka, Malaysia, Colombia and Indonesia. The second cluster consisted of nine countries or regions (green colour), Turkey, Brazil, India, Russia, Czech Republic, Pakistan, Egypt, Hungary and Saudi Arabia. The third cluster consisted of eight countries (blue colour), Spain, Italy, Argentina, Iran, Belgium, Mexico, Switzerland and Tunisia. The fourth cluster consisted of eight countries and regions (yellow colour), People's Republic of China, Canada, Japan, Australia, Israel, Chile, Thailand and Fed Rep Germany. The fifth cluster consisted of six countries (violet), England, Poland, Portugal, Austria, Croatia and South Africa. The sixth cluster consisted of six countries (shallow blue), South Korea, Finland, Norway, Sweden, Serbia and Vietnam. The seventh cluster consisted of two countries (orange), Germany and Denmark. The eighth cluster consisted of two countries (brown), the USA and Lithuania. More cooperation could bring more advanced achievements in scientific research. Therefore, geographical location is an important factor that determines international cooperation. Nowadays, increasing international exchanges have promoted academic communications (Tang et al., 2018).

According to the publication data, it was revealed that a total of 1,845 organisations published 2,930 publications. Organisation co-authorship analysis reflects the degree of communication between institutions as well as the influential institutions in this field (Reyes-Gonzalez et al., 2016). Table 6 list the top 20 organisations and institutions whose publications were above 30 papers ranked by the number of TPs, also showed the TLS, citations, average citations and country. These organisations were mainly focused in the USA with 11 organisations; China with 2 organisations; Spain with 2 organisations; Canada with 2 organisations; Germany with 1 organisation; France with 1 organisation; and Israel with 1 organisation. University of Florida, USDA ARS, University of Malaga, University of California Davis, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada are the five most paper organisations. The organisations of Agr Res Org, INRA, University of Cordoba, Cornell University and the University of Malaga show the higher average citations per paper.

Of the all 1,845 organisations, there were 189 organisations that meet the minimum thresholds of five, but 175 organisations were connected to each other in Figure 5, and the VOSviewer software divided these 175 institutes into 19 clusters with different colours. Geographical localisation is an important factor for partnership and joint venture. Therefore, there is a heavy presence of intra-institutional relationships within the scientific network on publications.

Figure 5

Of the all 9,779 keywords, there were only 951 keywords that meet the threshold >5 co-occurrence, which were separated into 11 main clusters with viewpoints on strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch.) research from Plant Sciences category based on WoS (Figure 6). The top 20 co-occurrence keywords were strawberry, Fragaria × ananassa, identification, growth, plants, expression, resistance, fruit, Arabidopsis, gene-expression, Fragaria, anthracnose, temperature, biosynthesis, cultivars, leaves, tomato, accumulation, strawberry fruit, quality, etc.

Figure 6

Then, the same data were arranged as an overlay map (Figure 7). According to the manual for VOSviewer version 1.6.16 (Van Eck and Waltman, 2020), blue colours indicate earlier research topics, whereas, yellow and green colours indicate more recent topics of interest. If a topic is presented in blue, it does not mean that there is now no longer any research to this end. It usually means that, on average, this topic was intensely investigated earlier and that now more attention has shifted towards other topics. Yellow and green circles present those research fronts.

Figure 7

The top 20 keywords were list and ranked in each cluster (Figure 6).

The first cluster (red colour) is focused on strawberry resistance and disease infection, including keyword terms as strawberry, identification, resistance, anthracnose, temperature, infection, disease, gloeosporioides, DNA, soil, acutatum, pathogenicity, PCR, management, strains, epidemiology, sequence, differentiation, pathogens, rot, etc.

The second cluster (green) represents the plants growth and yield responses to stress, keyword terms ranked as growth, plants, leaves, accumulation, yield, stress, photosynthesis, responses, oxidative stress, tolerance, wheat, salinity, chlorophyll fluorescence, seedlings, nitrogen, plant growth, antioxidant, drought stress, drought, transport, etc.

The third cluster (blue) is focused on gene expression and biosynthesis during strawberry fruit ripening, including keyword terms as expression, Arabidopsis, gene-expression, biosynthesis, tomato, strawberry fruit, ethylene, gene, Arabidopsis-thaliana, abscisic-acid, fruit ripening, metabolism, anthocyanin, tomato fruit, protein, auxin, ripening, genes, cloning, proteins, etc.

The fourth cluster (yellow) represents strawberry genetic diversity, keyword terms ranked as Fragaria × ananassa, Fragaria, diversity, Rosaceae, apple, evolution, genetic diversity, Fragaria vesca, inheritance, genome, plant, linkage map, markers, wild strawberry, selection, photoperiod, diploid strawberry, cultivated strawberry, raspberry, microsatellite markers, etc.

The fifth cluster (violet) is focused on cultivars and fruit quality, including keyword terms as fruit, cultivars, quality, anthocyanins, antioxidant capacity, fruits, acid, phenolic-compounds, strawberries, F. ananassa, fruit quality, antioxidant activity, storage, capacity, aroma, flavonoids, antioxidants, berries, inhibition, vegetables, etc.

The sixth cluster (shallow blue) is focused on strawberry disease management and biological control, keyword terms ranked as grey mould, Botrytiscinerea, molecular characterisation, biological-control, Botrytis cinerea, fungi, populations, biocontrol, mechanisms, biological control, sensitivity, cinerea, fungicide resistance, flowers, strawberry fields, fungicides, fruit rot, grey mould, disease management, pyraclostrobin, etc.

The seventh cluster (orange) is focused on strawberry in-vitro and regeneration, keyword terms as in-vitro, transformation, regeneration, system, agrobacterium-mediated transformation, leaf, cells, RNA, cultures, genetic-transformation, invitro, Fragaria-vesca, tissue-culture, transgenic plants, promoter, transcription, woodland strawberry, agrobacterium, organogenesis, plant-regeneration, etc.

The eighth cluster (brown) is focused on powdery mildew disease resistance, keyword terms as powdery mildew, induction, disease resistance, salicylic-acid, Colletotrichum acutatum, tobacco, defence, induced resistance, systemic acquired-resistance, hypersensitive response, salicylic acid, chitinase, jasmonate, oxidative burst, pathogenesis-related proteins, A. thaliana, defence responses, secondary metabolites, brassinosteroids, defence response, etc.

The ninth cluster (pink) is focused on plant secondary metabolism, keyword terms as secondary metabolism, filamentous fungi, Japanese pear pathotype, ak-toxin, alternaria alternate, host-specific toxin, etc.

The tenth cluster is including two keywords of gibberellins and fruit size.

The 11th cluster is only one keyword of the achene.

Top papers are the sum of hot papers and highly cited papers, based on Clarivate Analytics’ Essential Science Indicators (ESI). A highly cited paper is a paper that belongs to the top 1% of papers in a research field published in a specified year. The 1% is determined by the highly cited threshold calculated for the research field in the specified year. Hot paper is a paper published in the past 2 years that received several citations in the most recent two-month period that places it in the top 0.1% of papers in the same field. Here, the ESI database has been updated as of January 21, 2021, data covers over a 10-year and 10-month period: January 1, 2010–October 31, 2020 (Clarivate, 2021b. Essential Science Indicators Help).

Based on the ESI database, these top papers are 23 highly cited papers, with no hot paper. These 23 top papers are mainly published in Journal of Experimental Botany (4), Plant Physiology (4), New Phytologist (2), Plant Journal (2), Trends In Plant Science (2), American Journal of Botany (1), Frontiers in Plant Science (1), Journal of Integrative Plant Biology (1), Molecular Plant Pathology (1), Nature Plants (1), Plant Biotechnology Journal (1), Plant Cell (1), Plant Cell and Environment (1), Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Culture (1); and year published in 2011 (1), 2012 (1), 2013 (2), 2014 (3), 2016 (2), 2017 (3), 2018 (2), 2019 (5), and 2020 (3), respectively. Among the 23 top papers, there are nine papers’ citations >100 times which are including Jia et al. (2011), Renner (2014), Schaart et al. (2013), Ruan et al. (2012), Christou et al. (2013), Steffens and Rasmussen (2016), Kang et al. (2013), Medina-Puche et al. (2014) and Leng et al. (2014), and the total citations were 328, 236, 214, 195, 165, 163, 162, 129 and 119, the average citations per year are 29.82, 29.50, 23.78, 19.50, 18.33, 27.17, 18.00, 16.13 and 14.88, respectively. For the 23 top papers, the h-index is 20, the sum of total citations is 2291, and the average citation per item is 99.61.

Although a great many articles had been published, a relatively small number of individuals account for a large proportion of the citations within the period. Here, the total citations for the most frequently cited articles are >303 times. The eight most cited papers were published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter (Porebski et al., 1997), Plant and Soil (Hartmann et al., 2009), Theoretical and Applied Genetics (Dirlewanger et al., 2002), Plant Cell (Aharoni et al., 2000), Plant Journal (Aharoni et al., 2001), Plant Physiology (Jia et al., 2011), Phytomedicine (Seeram et al., 2001), Phytopathology (Elghaouth et al., 1992), the total citations were 1058, 517, 446, 389, 356, 328, 326 and 303, and the average citations per year are 42.32, 39.77, 22.30, 17.68, 16.95, 29.82, 15.52 and 10.10, respectively. From Figure 8, it can be found that the citation per year of the papers increased till 2020, but the increase rate is different. The citations per year are still increased for the paper (blue line) published in Plant Molecular Biology Reporter and written by Porebski et al. (1997), and the average citations per year were the highest value as 42.32 in these eight papers. The number of citations to a paper is considered a good quantitative measure of a paper's impact. Among the eight most cited papers, the paper written by Jia et al. (2011) is also the highly cited paper based on ESI.

Figure 8