[
1. Barth, F. (1966). Models of social organization. London, England: Royal Anthropological Institute of Great Britain and Ireland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
2. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
3. Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. AEHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 1. Washington, DC: Jossey-Bass.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
4. Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511812507
]Search in Google Scholar
[
5. Callon, M. (1986). Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. In J. Law (Ed.), Power, action and belief: A new sociology of knowledge. London, England: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
6. Conole, G. (2015). Designing effective MOOCs. Educational Media International, 52(4), 239–252. http://doi:10.1080/09523987.2015.112598910.1080/09523987.2015.1125989
]Search in Google Scholar
[
7. Dijck, J. V., Waal, M. D., & Poell, T. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190889760.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
8. Dona, K. L., & Gregory, J. (2019). A ‘participant first’ approach to designing for collaborative group work in MOOCs. Paper presented at the ASCILITE 2015—Australasian Society for Computers in Learning and Tertiary Education Conference Proceedings.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
9. Engeness, I., & Nohr, M. (2019). Videos as teaching and learning resources for developing of pre- and in-service teachers’ professional digital competence in the ICTMOOC. Paper presented at the EMOOCs-WIP 2019: EMOOCs 2019 Work in Progress Papers of Research, Experience and Business Tracks, Proceedings of Work in Progress Papers of the Research, Experience and Business Tracks at EMOOCs 2019, co-located with the European MOOCs Stakeholders Submmit 2019 Conference, Naples, Italy.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
10. Gamage, D., Perera, I., & Fernando, S. (2018). Increasing interactivity and collaborativeness in MOOCs using facilitated groups: A pedagogical solution to meet 21st century goals. Paper presented at the IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference, EDUCON.10.1109/EDUCON.2018.8363324
]Search in Google Scholar
[
11. Garreta-Domingo, M., Sloep, P. B., Hérnandez-Leo, D., & Mor, Y. (2018). Design for collective intelligence: Pop-up communities in MOOCs. AI and Society, 33(1), 91–100. http://doi:10.1007/s00146-017-0745-010.1007/s00146-017-0745-0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
12. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York, NY: Basic Books.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
13. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, England: Polity Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
14. Gynther, K. (2016). Design framework for an adaptive MOOC enhanced by blended learning: Supplementary training and personalized learning for teacher professional development. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 14(1), 15–30.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
15. Haugsbakken, H. (2015). Using social media the inside out: A qualitative study about four stories on use and local models of organizing of social media in organizations [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
16. Hernández Rizzardini, R., & Amado-Salvatierra, H. R. (2018). Exploring new ways to increase engagement in full-path MOOC programs. In Vol. 10925 LNCS. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and lecture notes in bioinformatics) (pp. 16–25).10.1007/978-3-319-91152-6_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
17. Latour, B. (1987). Science in action: How to follow scientists and engineers through society. Milton Keynes, England: Open University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
18. Leonardi, P. M., & Barley, S. R. (2010). What’s under construction here? Social action, materiality, and power in constructivist studies of technology and organizing. The Academy of Management Annals, 4(1), 1–51.10.5465/19416521003654160
]Search in Google Scholar
[
19. Margaryan, A., Bianco, M., & Littlejohn, A. (2015). Instructional quality of massive open online courses (MOOCs). Computers & Education, 80(C), 77–83. http://doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.00510.1016/j.compedu.2014.08.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
20. Mohamad, N., Ahmad, N. B., & Jawawi, D. N. A. (2019). Online interaction model for MOOC design. International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, 8(2), 57–64.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
21. Mor, Y., Warburton, S., Nørgård, R. T., & Ullmo, P. A. (2016). MOOC design workshop: Educational innovation with empathy and intent. In Vol. 9891 LNCS. Lecture notes in computer science (including subseries Lecture notes in artificial intelligence and Lecture notes in bioinformatics) (pp. 453–459).10.1007/978-3-319-45153-4_42
]Search in Google Scholar
[
22. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science, 11(4), 404–428.10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600
]Search in Google Scholar
[
23. Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14, 399–441.10.1177/030631284014003004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
24. Salmon, G., Gregory, J., Dona, K. L., & Ross, B. (2015). Experiential online development for educators: The example of the Carpe Diem MOOC. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 542–556. http://doi:10.1111/bjet.12256.10.1111/bjet.12256
]Search in Google Scholar
[
25. Weick, K. E. (2001). Making sense of the organization. Oxford, England: Blackwell.et
]Search in Google Scholar
