Otwarty dostęp

Interpretations of Innovation in Rural Development. The Cases of Leader Projects in Lecce (Italy) and Granada (Spain) in 2007–2013 Period


Zacytuj

[1] Augustyn, A. & Nemes, G. (2014). Catching up with the West? Europeanisation of rural policies in Hungary and Poland. Studies in Agricultural Economies 116, 114–121. DOI: 10.7896/j.1419.10.7896/j.1419Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[2] Belliggiano, A. & De Rubertis, S. (2016). El farm tourism como oportunidad de desarrollo sostenible en las regiones del sur de Italia. Pampa 13, 11–30. DOI: 10.14409/pampa.v0i13.5900.10.14409/pampa.v0i13.5900Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] Böcher, M. (2008). Regional governance and rural development in Germany: the implementation of LEADER+. Sociologia Ruralis 48(4), 372–388. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00468.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[4] Bock, B. (2016). Rural marginalisation and the role of social innovation; a turn towards nexogenous development and rural reconnection. Sociologia Ruralis 56 (4), 552–573. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12119.10.1111/soru.12119Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Bonfiglio, A., Camaioni, B., Coderoni, S., Esposti, R., Pagliacci, F. & Sotte, F. (2017). Are rural regions prioritizing knowledge transfer and innovation? Evidence from Rural Development Policy expenditure across the EU space. Journal of Rural Studies 53, 78–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.00510.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.005Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[6] Bosworth, G., Annibal, I., Carroll, T., Price, L., Sellick, J. & Shepherd, J. (2016). Empowering local action through neo-endogenous development; the case of LEADER in England. Sociologia Ruralis 56(3), 427–449. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12089.10.1111/soru.12089Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[7] Bruchmeier, K. (2000). LEADER in Germany and the discourse of autonomous regional development. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 219–227. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00144.10.1111/1467-9523.00144Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Copus, A., Skuras, A. & Tsegenidi, K. (2008). Innovation and peripherality: and empirical comparative study of SMEs in six European Union member countries. Economic Geography 84(1), 51–82. DOI: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00391.x.10.1111/j.1944-8287.2008.tb00391.xSearch in Google Scholar

[9] Dargan, L. & Shucksmith, M., (2008). LEADER and innovation. Sociologia Ruralis 48(3), 274–291. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2008.00463.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Dax, T. & Oedl-Wieser, T. (2016). Rural innovation activities as a means for changing development perspectives – An assessment of more than two decades of promoting LEADER initiatives across the European Union. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118, 30–37. DOI: 10.7896/j.1535.10.7896/j.1535Search in Google Scholar

[11] Dax, T., Strahl, W., Kirwan, J. & Maye, D. (2016). The LEADER programme 2007–2013: Enabling or disabling social innovation and neo-endogenous development?. Insights from Austria and Ireland. European Urban and Regional Studies 23(1), 56–68. DOI: 10.1177/0969776413490425.10.1177/0969776413490425Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[12] De Rubertis, S. (2013). Spazio e sviluppo nelle politiche per il Mezzogiorno. Il caso della programmazione integrata in Puglia. Bologna: Pàtron.Search in Google Scholar

[13] Esparcia, J. (2014). Innovative and networks in rural areas. An analysis from European innovative projects. Journal of Rural Studies 34, 1–14. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2013.12.004Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[14] Esparcia, J. & Escribano, J. (2012). La dimensión territorial en la programación comunitaria y el nuevo marco de políticas públicas: desarrollo rural territorial, reforma de la PAC y nuevo LEADER. Anales de Geografía 32(2), 227–252. DOI: 10.5209/rev_AGUC.2012.v32.n2.39719.10.5209/rev_AGUC.2012.v32.n2.39719Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[15] Esparcia, J., Noguera, J. & Pitarch, M. (2000). LEADER en España: desarrollo rural, poder, legitimación, aprendizaje y nuevas estructuras. Documentos de Análisis Geográfico 37, 95–113.Search in Google Scholar

[16] Farrell, G. & Thirion, S. (2005). Social capital and rural development: from win-lose to winwin with the LEADER Initiative. In Schmied D., ed.,. Winning and losing. The changing geography of Europe’s rural areas (pp. 45–61), London: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[17] Fhlatharta, A. M. N., & Farrell, M. (2017). Unravelling the strands of ‘patriarchy’in rural innovation: A study of female innovators and their contribution to rural Connemara. Journal of Rural Studies, 54, 15–27. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.002.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2017.05.002Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Furmankiewicz, M., Thompson, N. & Zielinska, M. (2010). Area-based partnerships in rural Poland: the post-accession experience. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 52–62. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.05.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Gardner, G. (2011). Community action in rural Wales. In Milbourne, P., ed., Rural Wales in the twenty-first century: Society, economy and environment (pp. 89–106). Cardiff: University of Wales Press.Search in Google Scholar

[20] Labianca, M. (2014). Inter-municipal cooperation: from cooperation through rules to cooperation through networks – empirical evidence from Puglia. Regional Studies Regional Science 1(1), 184–206. DOI: 10.1080/21681376.2014.952769.10.1080/21681376.2014.952769Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] Labianca, M., De Rubertis, S., Belliggiano, A. & Salento, A. (2016). Innovation in rural development in Puglia, Italy: critical issues and potentialities starting from empirical evidence. Studies in Agricultural Economics 118, 38–46. DOI: 10.7896/j.1531.10.7896/j.1531Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Lowe, P., Murdoch, J. & Ward, N. (1995). Beyond endogenous and exogenous models: networks in rural development. In van der Ploeg, J. D. and van Dijk, G. eds., Beyond modernization: the impact of endogenous rural development (pp. 87–105). Assen: Van Gorcum.Search in Google Scholar

[23] MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F., Hillier, J. & Vicari, S. (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Martínez, F., Sacristán, H. & Yagüe, J. L. (2015). Are local action groups, under LEADER approach, a good way to support resilience in rural areas?. Ager 18, 39–63. DOI: 10.4422/ager.2015.06.10.4422/ager.2015.06Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Midmore, P. (1998). Rural policy reform and local development programmes: appropriate evaluation procedures. Journal of Agricultural Economics 49(3), 409–426. DOI: 10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01281.x.10.1111/j.1477-9552.1998.tb01281.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[26] Moulaert, F., Martinelli, F., Swyngedouw, E. & González, S. (2005). Towards alternative models of local innovation. Urban Studies 11, 1969–1990. DOI: 10.1080/00420980500279893.10.1080/00420980500279893Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Moulaert, F. (2008). Social innovation: institutionally embedded, territorially (re)produced. In MacCallum, D., Moulaert, F. Hillier, J. & Vicari Haddock, S., eds., Social innovation and territorial development (pp. 11–23). Farnham: Ashgate.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Nardone, G., Sisto, R. & Lopolito, A. (2010). Social capital in the Leader Initiative: a methodological approach. Journal of Rural Studies 26, 63–72. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2009.09.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Navarro, F., Cejudo, E. & Maroto, J. (2014). Reflexiones en torno a la participación en el desarrollo rural. ¿Reparto social o reforzamiento del poder? LEADER y PRODER en el sur de España. Eure 40(121), 203–224. DOI: 10.4067/S0250-71612014000300010.10.4067/S0250-71612014000300010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Navarro, F., Woods, M. & Cejudo, E. (2016). The LEADER Initiative has been a victim of its own success. The decline of the bottom-up approach in rural development programmes. The cases of Wales and Andalusia. Sociologia Ruralis 56(2), 270–288. DOI: 10.1111/soru.12079.10.1111/soru.12079Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Neumeier, S. (2012). Why do social innovations in rural development matter and should they be considered more seriously in rural development research? – Proposal for a stronger focus on social innovations in rural development research. Sociologia Ruralis 52(1), 48–69. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.x.10.1111/j.1467-9523.2011.00553.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] Osti, G. (2000). Leader and partnerships: the case of Italy. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 172–180. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00139.10.1111/1467-9523.00139Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[33] Ploeg, J. D. van der, Renting, H. & Brunori, G. (2000). Rural development: from practices and policies towards theory. Sociologia Ruralis 40(4), 391–408. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00156.10.1111/1467-9523.00156Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[34] Pollermann, K., Raue, P. & Schnaut, G. (2013). Rural development experiences in Germany: opportunities and obstacles in fostering Smart places through LEADER. Studies in Agricultural Economics 115, 111–117. DOI: 10.7896/j.1228.10.7896/j.1228Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Ray, C. (1998). New places and space for rural development in the European Union: an analysis of the UK LEADER II Programme [Working Paper 34]. Newcastle University.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Ray, C. (2006). Neo-endogenous rural development in the European Union. In Cloke, P., Marsden, T. & Mooney, P., eds., The Handbook of Rural Studies (pp. 278–291). London: Sage.10.4135/9781848608016.n19Search in Google Scholar

[37] Schucksmith, M. (2000). Endogenous development, social capital and social inclusion: perspectives from LEADER in the UK. Sociologia Ruralis 40(2), 208–218. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9523.00143.10.1111/1467-9523.00143Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[38] Shortall, S. (2008). Are rural development programmes socially inclusive? Social inclusion, civic engagement, participation, and social capital: exploring the differences. Journal of Rural Studies 24, 450–457. DOI: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001.10.1016/j.jrurstud.2008.01.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[39] ENRD (2010). Extended report on preserving the innovative character of LEADER. Brussel: ENRD.Search in Google Scholar

[40] European Union Rural Observatory (1997). Innovation and rural development, Observatory dossier nº 2. Brussels: AEIDL.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Howald, J. & Schwarz, M. (2010). Social Innovation: Concepts, research field and International trends, www.internationalmonitoring.com.Search in Google Scholar

[42] Ex-post evaluation of Leader+. Wien: Metis GmbH.Search in Google Scholar

[43] Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development/European Communities (2005). Oslo Manual. Guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Oslo: OECD.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
1803-8417
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Life Sciences, Ecology, other