Zacytuj

Figure 1

GC-MS chromatogram of ESE.1 = benzenesulfonyl chloride, 2 = benzopyran-4-one, 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-, 3 = benzenesulfonic acid, methyl ester, 4 = 2(5H)-furanone, 4-methoxy-5-phenyl-, 5 = 4,5-dimethylthiazole, 6 = p-chlorobenzenesulfonyl chloride.
GC-MS chromatogram of ESE.1 = benzenesulfonyl chloride, 2 = benzopyran-4-one, 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-, 3 = benzenesulfonic acid, methyl ester, 4 = 2(5H)-furanone, 4-methoxy-5-phenyl-, 5 = 4,5-dimethylthiazole, 6 = p-chlorobenzenesulfonyl chloride.

Figure 2

Stomach sections of effects of ESE against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer. Arrows indicate points of gastric ulceration. Plates A- E represents various treatments; groups A = distilled water 5.0 ml/kg, B = cimetidine 100 mg/kg, C = ESE 25 mg/kg, D = ESE 50 mg/kg, E = ESE 100 mg/kg (x 100 magnification).
Stomach sections of effects of ESE against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer. Arrows indicate points of gastric ulceration. Plates A- E represents various treatments; groups A = distilled water 5.0 ml/kg, B = cimetidine 100 mg/kg, C = ESE 25 mg/kg, D = ESE 50 mg/kg, E = ESE 100 mg/kg (x 100 magnification).

Figure 3

The relaxant effects of ESE on isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo ESE = Eremomastax speciosa extract, final bath concentration of ESE ranged between 57 – 456 μg/mL.
The relaxant effects of ESE on isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo ESE = Eremomastax speciosa extract, final bath concentration of ESE ranged between 57 – 456 μg/mL.

Figure 4

Concentration-dependent effects of histamine and acetylcholine on the intrinsic contraction in isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo HIS = histamine, ACH = acetylcholine, the final bath concentration of histamine was between 0.15 – 0.44 μg/mL while the final bath concentration of acetylcholine was between 0.015 – 0.044 μg/ml.
Concentration-dependent effects of histamine and acetylcholine on the intrinsic contraction in isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo HIS = histamine, ACH = acetylcholine, the final bath concentration of histamine was between 0.15 – 0.44 μg/mL while the final bath concentration of acetylcholine was between 0.015 – 0.044 μg/ml.

Figure 5

The inhibitory effects of ESE on acetylcholine-induced increased intrinsic contraction of isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo ACH = acetylcholine, ESE = Eremomastax speciosa extract, the final bath concentration of acetylcholine was 0.029 μg/mL while the final bath concentration of ESE ranged between 114 – 456 μg/mL.
The inhibitory effects of ESE on acetylcholine-induced increased intrinsic contraction of isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo ACH = acetylcholine, ESE = Eremomastax speciosa extract, the final bath concentration of acetylcholine was 0.029 μg/mL while the final bath concentration of ESE ranged between 114 – 456 μg/mL.

Figure 6

The inhibitory effects of ESE on histamine-induced increased intrinsic contraction of isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo HIS = histamine, ESE = Eremomastax speciosa extract, the final bath concentration of histamine was 0.29 μg/mL while the final bath concentration of ESE ranged between 114 – 456 μg/mL.
The inhibitory effects of ESE on histamine-induced increased intrinsic contraction of isolated rabbit jejunum ex vivo HIS = histamine, ESE = Eremomastax speciosa extract, the final bath concentration of histamine was 0.29 μg/mL while the final bath concentration of ESE ranged between 114 – 456 μg/mL.

Effects of ESE against indomethacin-induced gastric ulcer

GroupUlcer scoreUlcer severityUlcer index% inhibition
Distilled water, 5 ml/kg9.80 ± 1.4616.00 ± 0.8412.58 ± 0.07-
Cimetidine, 100 mg/kg5.80 ± 1.11*10.80 ± 2.8211.66 ± 0.32*7.31
ESE, 25 mg/kg4.00 ± 0.82*6.50 ± 1.55*11.05 ± 0.18*12.16
ESE, 50 mg/kg8.50 ± 1.2014.25 ± 1.8012.28 ± 0.292.38
ESE, 100 mg/kg8.00 ± 2.3115.67 ± 5.9312.37 ± 0.581.67

Chemical composition of ESE as identified by the GC-MS

S/NRT (min)%MW (g)MFChemical name
130.6040.63176C6H5ClO2SBenzenesulfonyl chloride
233.0021.25254C15H10O4Benzopyran-4-one, 5,7-dihydroxy-2-phenyl-
321.8015.63172C7H8O3SBenzenesulfonic acid, methyl ester
428.8012.50190C11H10O32(5H)-Furanone, 4-methoxy-5-phenyl-
534.504.38113C5H7NS4,5-Dimethylthiazole
632.005.63210C6H4Cl2O2Sp-Chlorobenzenesulfonyl chloride

Effects of ESE on ethanol-induced ulcer

GroupUlcer scoreUlcer severityUlcer index% inhibition
Distilled water, 5 ml/kg8.33 ± 1.6517.33 ± 3.9412.57 ± 0.55-
Misoprostol, 50 μg/kg0.50 ± 0.29*1.00 ± 0.71*5.15 ± 0.07*59.03
ESE, 25 mg/kg3.75 ± 2.259.00 ± 5.936.28 ± 0.63*50.04
ESE, 50 mg/kg7.67 ± 1.1717.67 ± 3.158.53 ± 0.40*32.14
ESE, 100 mg/kg5.00 ± 2.418.40 ± 3.617.34 ± 0.49*41.61

Effect of ESE on total gastric acidity

GroupTotal gastric acidity (mole/L)% reduction
Distilled water, 5 ml/kg0.08 ± 0.00-
Cimetidine, 100 mg/kg0.03 ± 0.01*62.5
ESE, 25 mg/kg0.06 ± 0.0025
ESE, 50 mg/kg0.04 ± 0.01*50
ESE, 100 mg/kg0.07 ± 0.0112.5
eISSN:
2564-615X
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Life Sciences, Genetics, Biotechnology, Bioinformatics, other