[
Abizadeh, Abizadeh and Gilabert, Pablo. 2008. Is there a genuine tension between cosmopolitan egalitarianism and special responsibilities? Philosophical Studies, 138(3): 349–65.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Alfano, Mark. 2016. Friendship and the structure of trust. In From Personality to Virtue, Alberto Masala and Jonathan Webber (eds.). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 186–206.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arneson, Richard J. 2016. Extreme cosmopolitanisms defended. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 19(5): 555–73.10.1080/13698230.2016.1183751
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baber, Harriet E. 2007. Adaptive preferences. Social Theory and Practice, 33(1): 105–26.10.5840/soctheorpract200733137
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnes, Elizabeth. 2007. Disability and adaptive preference. Philosophical Perspectives, 23(1): 1–22.10.1111/j.1520-8583.2009.00159.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Barnes, Elizabeth. 2016. The Minority Body: A Theory of Disability. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198732587.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Baron, Marcia. 1991. Impartiality and friendship. Ethics, 101(4): 836–57.10.1086/293346
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beach, Sarah. 2015. Adaptive Preferences Are Not Irrational. M.A. thesis, Department of Philosophy, University of Missouri, St. Louis.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bovens, Luc. 1992. Sour grapes and character planning. Journal of Philosophy, 89(2): 57–78.10.2307/2027152
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brogaard, Berit 2015. On Romantic Love, New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brogaard, Berit. 2020. Hatred: Understanding Our Most Dangerous Emotion. New York: Oxford University Press.10.1093/oso/9780190084448.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brogaard, Berit. 2021. Romantic Love and Friendship Love. In D. Jeske (ed.), Rout-ledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Friendship, Routledge. In Press.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199395729.013.3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bruckner, Donald. 2009. In defense of adaptive preferences. Philosophical Studies, 142(3): 307–24.10.1007/s11098-007-9188-7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, Judith. 2004. Precarious Life: The Powers of Mourning and Violence. Verso: London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Butler, Judith. 2009. Frames of War: When is Life Grievable? Verso: London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cocking, Dean and Kennett, Jeanette. 2000. Friendship and moral danger. The Journal of Philosophy, 97, 5: 278–96.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cottingham, John. 1986. Partiality, favouritism and morality. The Philosophical Quarterly, 36(144): 357–73.10.2307/2220190
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Darwall, Stephen. 2009. The Second-Person Standpoint: Morality, Respect, and Accountability. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1bzfp0f
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Doris, John. 2015. Talking to Our Selves: Reflection, Ignorance, and Agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199570393.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law’s Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Eekelaar, John. 1991. Are parents morally obliged to care for their children? Journal of Legal Studies, 11(3): 340–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Elster, Jon. 1983. Sour Grapes: Studies in the Subversion of Rationality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139171694
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fricker, Miranda. 2003. Epistemic injustice and a role for virtue in the politics of knowing. Metaphilosophy, 34(1–2): 154–73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fricker, Miranda. 2007. Epistemic Injustice: Power and the Ethics of Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198237907.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goodin, Robert E. 1985. Protecting the Vulnerable. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeske, Diane. 1998. Families, Friends, and Special Obligations. Canadian Journal of Philosophy, 28: 527–55.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeske, Diane. 2001. Friendship and Reasons of Intimacy. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 63(2): 329–46.10.1111/j.1933-1592.2001.tb00106.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jeske, Diane. 2008. Rationality and Moral Theory: How Intimacy Generates Reasons. Routledge.10.4324/9780203892886
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kagan, Shelly. 1989. The Limits of Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kant, Immanuel. 1797. Die metaphysik der sitten, translated as “The metaphysics of morals” (MM), in Immanuel Kant Practical Philosophy, Mary Gregor (trans. and ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press, 1996.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keller, Simon. 2006. Four theories of filial duty. The Philosophical Quarterly, 56(223): 254–74.10.1111/j.1467-9213.2006.00441.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Korsgaard, Christine. 1996. The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511554476
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Korsgaard, Christine. 2008. The Constitution of Agency: Essays on Practical Reason and Moral Psychology, Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199552733.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
LaFollette, Hugh. 1996. Personal Relationships: Love, Identity, and Morality. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mackenzie, Catriona. 2014. The importance of relational autonomy and capabilities for an ethics of vulnerability. In Vulnerability: New Essays in Ethics and Feminist Philosophy, Catriona Mackenzie, Wendy Rogers and Susan Dodds (eds.).New York: Oxford University Press, 33–59.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medina, José. 2011. The relevance of credibility excess in a proportional view of epistemic injustice: differential epistemic authority and the social imaginary. Social Epistemology, 25(1): 15–35.10.1080/02691728.2010.534568
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medina, José. 2012. Hermeneutical injustice and polyphonic contextualism: social silences and shared hermeneutical responsibilities. Social Epistemology, 26(2): 201–20.10.1080/02691728.2011.652214
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Medina, José. 2013. The Epistemology of Resistance: Gender and Racial Oppression, Epistemic Injustice, and Resistant Imaginations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199929023.001.0001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nussbaum, Martha. 2006. Frontiers of Justice: Disability, Nationality, Species Membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.2307/j.ctv1c7zftw
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pettit, Philip. 2006. Preference, deliberation, and satisfaction. In S. Olsaretti (ed.), Preferences and Wellbeing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 131–53.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pismenny, Arina. 2020. The amorality of romantic love. In Love, Justice, and Autonomy: Philosophical Perspectives, Rachel Fedock, Michael Kühler and Raja Rosenhagen (eds.). Routledge: 23–42.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sadler, Brook J. 2006. Love, friendship, morality. Philosophical Forum, 37(3): 243–63.10.1111/j.1467-9191.2006.00241.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scanlon, Thomas M. 2008. Moral Dimensions: Permissibility, Meaning, and Blame. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.10.4159/9780674043145
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scanlon, Thomas M. 2013. Giving desert its due. Philosophical Explorations, 16(2): 101–16.10.1080/13869795.2013.787437
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheffler, S. 1997. Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 26: 189–209.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scheffler, Samuel. 2001. Boundaries and Allegiances. Problems of Justice and Responsibility in Liberal Thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/0199257671.003.0011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Searle, John. 1976. A classification of illocutionary acts. Language in Society, 5(1): 1-23.10.1017/S0047404500006837
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sen, Amartya K. 1977. Rational fools. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 6(4): 317–44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Singer, Peter. 1972. Famine, affluence and morality. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 1(3), 229–43.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, Angela M. (2012). Attributability, answerability, and accountability: in defense of a unified account. Ethics, 122(3): 575–89.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Smith, Angela M. 2015. Responsibility as Answerability. Inquiry, 58(2): 99-126.10.1080/0020174X.2015.986851
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stark, Cynthia. 1997. Decision procedures, standards of rightness, and impartiality. Nous, 31(4): 478–95.10.1111/0029-4624.00057
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Strawson, Peter. 1962. Freedom and resentment. Proceedings of the British Academy, 48 (1962), reprinted in Free Will, ed. G. Watson, New York: Oxford University Press, 1982: 59–80.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Talbert, Matthew. 2017. Omission and attribution error. In The Ethics and Law of Omissions, Dana Kay Nelkin and Samuel C. Rickless (eds.). New York: Oxford University Press, 17–35.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tamir, Yuli. 1993. Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Taylor, Erin. 2013. A new conventionalist theory of promising. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 91: 667–82.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Velleman, J. David. 1999. Love as a moral emotion. Ethics, 109(2): 338–74.10.1086/233898
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wallace, Jay R. 2012. Duties of love. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 86: 175–98.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watson, Gary. 1975. Free agency. Journal of Philosophy, 72: 205–20.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Watson, Gary. 1996. Two faces of responsibility. Philosophical Topics, 24: 227–24.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wellman, Christopher Heath. 2000. Relational facts in liberal political theory: is there magic in the pronoun ‘My’? Ethics, 110(3): 537–62.10.1086/233323
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Williams, Bernard. 1981. Persons, character, and morality. In Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980, James Rachels (ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165860
]Search in Google Scholar
