Otwarty dostęp

Boosting Scientific Creativity Among Researchers: How Efficient are Creativity Trainings?

, , , , ,  oraz   
12 sie 2024

Zacytuj
Pobierz okładkę

Alves-Oliveira, P., Arriaga, P., Xavier, C., Hoffman, G., & Paiva, A. (2022). Creativity landscapes: Systematic review spanning 70 years of creativity interventions for children. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 56(1), 16–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.514 Search in Google Scholar

Anders, K., & Walsh, E. (2009). Encouraging creativity in PhD and postdoc researchers: a guide for supervisors and principal investigators. Imperial College London. Search in Google Scholar

Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 30(3), 183–187. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00767.x Search in Google Scholar

Bartoš, F., Maier, M., Shanks, D.R., Stanley, T.D., Sladekova, M., & Wagenmakers, E.J. (2023). Meta-analyses in psychology often overestimate evidence for and size of effects. Royal Society Open Science, 10(7), 230224. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.230224 Search in Google Scholar

Ben-Soussan, T.D., Berkovich-Ohana, A., Piervincenzi, C., Glicksohn, J., & Carducci, F. (2015). Embodied cognitive flexibility and neuroplasticity following Quadrato Motor Training. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.01021 Search in Google Scholar

Bi, H., Mi, S., Lu, S., & Hu, X. (2020). Meta-analysis of interventions and their effectiveness in students’ scientific creativity. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 38, 100750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100750 Search in Google Scholar

Bonetto, E., & Arciszewski, T. (2023). One “C” to Rule Them All: The Psychology of Creativity Needs to Refocus on Behaviors. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 57(3). https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.590 Search in Google Scholar

Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2022). The role of cultural values in national-level innovation: Evidence from 106 countries. Cross-Cultural Research, 56(4), 307–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/10693971221078087 Search in Google Scholar

Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Guiller, T., & Arciszewski, T. (2022). The Structure of Creative Revolutions. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 10(1–2), 41–49. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2023-0003 Search in Google Scholar

Bonetto, E., Pichot, N., Pavani, J.B., & Adam-Troïan, J. (2020). Creative individuals are social risk-takers: Relationships between creativity, social risk-taking and fear of negative evaluations. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 7(2), 309–320. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2020-0016 Search in Google Scholar

Bonnardel, N., & Pichot, N. (2020). Enhancing collaborative creativity with virtual dynamic personas. Applied ergonomics, 82, 102949. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apergo.2019.102949 Search in Google Scholar

Button, K.S., Ioannidis, J.P., Mokrysz, C., Nosek, B.A., Flint, J., Robinson, E.S., & Munafò, M.R. (2013). Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nature reviews neuroscience, 14(5), 365–376. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3475 Search in Google Scholar

Byrge, C., & Hansen, S. (2013). Course in new thinking in higher education: Enhancing creativity through the means of training, theory and workshop. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 51, 18–32. Search in Google Scholar

Calver, N. (2013). Sir Peter Medawar: science, creativity and the popularization of Karl Popper. Notes and Records of the Royal Society, 67(4), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsnr.2013.0022 Search in Google Scholar

Cohen J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (rev. ed.). Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Cohen J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Erlbaum. Search in Google Scholar

de Vries, H.B., & Lubart, T.I. (2019). Scientific creativity: divergent and convergent thinking and the impact of culture. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(2), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.184 Search in Google Scholar

Dovha, M.I., Antonenko, P.D., Shapovalov, Y.B., Lytovchenko, D.S., & Halchenko, M.S. (2023). Developing and evaluating the effectiveness of a pilot online course for creativity development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-023-09852-8 Search in Google Scholar

Dutton, D., & Krausz, M. (2014). The concept of creativity in science and art (Vol. 6). Springer. Search in Google Scholar

Cropley, A.J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: Are creativity tests worth using?. Roeper review, 23(2), 72–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/02783190009554069 Search in Google Scholar

Ellwood, S., Pallier, G., Snyder, A., & Gallate, J. (2009). The incubation effect: hatching a solution?. Creativity Research Journal, 21(1), 6–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802633368 Search in Google Scholar

Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G* Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior research methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146 Search in Google Scholar

Feldhusen, J.F., & Goh, B.E. (1995). Assessing and accessing creativity: An integrative review of theory, research, and development. Creativity Research Journal, 8(3), 231–247. Search in Google Scholar

Foster, E.D., & Deardorff, A. (2017). Open science framework (OSF). JMLA. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 105(2), 203–206. https://doi.org/10.5195/jmla.2017.88 Search in Google Scholar

Funder, D.C., & Ozer, D.J. (2019). Evaluating effect size in psychological research: Sense and nonsense. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 2(2), 156–168. https://doi.org/10.1177/2515245919847202 Search in Google Scholar

Gobet, F., & Sala, G. (2023). Cognitive training: A field in search of a phenomenon. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(1), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221091830 Search in Google Scholar

Grosul, M., & Feist, G. (2014). The Creative Person in Science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(1), 30–43. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0034828 Search in Google Scholar

Guilford, J.P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5(9), 444–454. Search in Google Scholar

Haase, J., Hanel, P.H.P., & Gronau, N. (2023). Creativity enhancement methods for adults: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1037/aca0000557 Search in Google Scholar

Haslam, S.A., Adarves-Yorno, I., Postmes, T., & Jans, L. (2013). The collective origins of valued originality: A social identity approach to creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 17(4), 384–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868313498001 Search in Google Scholar

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C.M., & Martin, B.R. (Eds.). (2004). Creative knowledge environments: The influences on creativity in research and innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing. Search in Google Scholar

Hemlin, S., Allwood, C.M., & Martin, B.R. (2008). Creative knowledge environments. Creativity Research Journal, 20(2), 196–210. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410802060018 Search in Google Scholar

Hemlin, S., & Olsson, L. (2011). Creativity-Stimulating Leadership: A Critical Incident Study of Leaders’ Influence on Creativity in Research Groups. Creativity and Innovation Management, 20(1), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2010.00585.x Search in Google Scholar

Higuchi, T., Miyata, K., & Yuizono, T. (2012, November). Creativity improvement by idea-marathon training, measured by torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT) and its applications to laboratories. 2012 Seventh International Conference on Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems. IEEE. Melbourne, VIC, Australia. Search in Google Scholar

Hu, W., Wu, B., Jia, X., Yi, X., Duan, C., Meyer, W., & Kaufman, J.C. (2013). Increasing students’ scientific creativity: The “learn to think” intervention program. The journal of creative behavior, 47(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.20 Search in Google Scholar

Im, H., Hokanson, B., & Johnson, K.K. (2015). Teaching creative thinking skills: A longitudinal study. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal, 33(2), 129–142. https://doi.org/10.1177/0887302X15569010 Search in Google Scholar

Jenaro-Río, C., Castaño-Calle, R., & García-Perez Omaña, A. (2019). La experiencia de un taller para el fomento de la creatividad en niños de Primaria [A workshop experience for the promotion of creativity in primary school children]. Arte, individuo y sociedad, 31(4), 735–752. https://doi.org/10.5209/aris.60841 Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Kaufman, J.C. (Eds.). (2017). The creative self: Effect of beliefs, self-efficacy, mindset, and identity. Academic Press. Search in Google Scholar

Karwowski, M., & Soszynski, M. (2008). How to develop creative imagination?: Assumptions, aims and effectiveness of Role Play Training in Creativity (RPTC). Thinking Skills and Creativity, 3(2), 163–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2008.07.001 Search in Google Scholar

Kaufman, S.B., Quilty, L.C., Grazioplene, R.G., Hirsh, J.B., Gray, J.R., Peterson, J.B., & DeYoung, C.G. (2016). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of personality, 84(2), 248–258. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12156 Search in Google Scholar

Kim, J. (2015). Physical activity benefits creativity: squeezing a ball for enhancing creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2015.1087258 Search in Google Scholar

Koestler, A. (1964). The act of creation. Macmillan. Search in Google Scholar

Kuhn, T.S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. University of Chicago Press. Search in Google Scholar

Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 863. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863 Search in Google Scholar

Lee, A., Legood, A., Hughes, D., Tian, A.W., Newman, A., & Knight, C. (2020). Leadership, creativity and innovation: a meta-analytic review. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 29(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2019.1661837 Search in Google Scholar

Lucchiari, C., Sala, P.M., & Vanutelli, M.E. (2019). The effects of a cognitive pathway to promote class creative thinking. An experimental study on Italian primary school students. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 31, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2018.12.002 Search in Google Scholar

Ma, H.H. (2006). A synthetic analysis of the effectiveness of single components and packages in creativity training programs. Creativity Research Journal, 18(4), 435–446. Search in Google Scholar

Marcos, R.I.S., Fernández, V.L., González, M.T.D., & Phillips-Silver, J. (2020). Promoting children’s creative thinking through reading and writing in a cooperative learning classroom. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 36, 100663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100663 Search in Google Scholar

Marope, M., Griffin, P., & Gallagher, C. (2017). Future competences and the future of curriculum: A global reference for curricula transformation. International Bureau of Education (UNESCO). Search in Google Scholar

Maydeu-Olivares, A., & Millsap, R.E. (2009). The SAGE handbook of quantitative methods in psychology. Sage. Search in Google Scholar

McKiernan, E.C., Bourne, P.E., Brown, C.T., Buck, S., Kenall, A., Lin, J., … & Yarkoni, T. (2016). How open science helps researchers succeed. elife, 5, e16800. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.16800.001 Search in Google Scholar

Medawar, P.B. (1990). The threat and the glory: reflections on science and scientists. Harper Collins. Search in Google Scholar

Medawar, P.B. (2021). The art of the soluble. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

OECD. (2023). OECD Science, Technology and Innovation Outlook 2023. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/sti/oecd-science-technology-and-innovation-outlook-25186167.htm Search in Google Scholar

Oppezzo, M., & Schwartz, D.L. (2014). Give your ideas some legs: the positive effect of walking on creative thinking. Journal of experimental psychology: learning, memory, and cognition, 40(4), 1142–1152. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036577 Search in Google Scholar

Parnes, S.J., & Brunelle, E.A. (1967). The literature of creativity (part I). The Journal of Creative Behavior, 1(1), 52–109. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1967.tb00010.x Search in Google Scholar

Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., Pavani, J.B., Arciszewski, T., Bonnardel, N., & Weisberg, R.W. (2022). The construct validity of creativity: empirical arguments in favor of novelty as the basis for creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 34(1), 2–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2021.1997176 Search in Google Scholar

Phillips, A.M., Watkins, J., & Hammer, D. (2017). Problematizing as a scientific endeavor. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 13(2). https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.13.020107 Search in Google Scholar

Qian, M., Plucker, J.A., & Yang, X. (2019). Is creativity domain specific or domain general? Evidence from multilevel explanatory item response theory models. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 33, 100571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100571 Search in Google Scholar

Qiang, R., Han, Q., Guo, Y., Bai, J., & Karwowski, M. (2020). Critical Thinking Disposition and Scientific Creativity: The Mediating Role of Creative Self-Efficacy. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 54(1), 90–99. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.347 Search in Google Scholar

Raj, H., & Saxena, D.R. (2016). Scientific creativity: A review of researches. European Academic Research, 4(2), 1122–1138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2019.100571 Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, S.M., Gu, X., Crijns, M., & Biekens, P. (2020). Fostering students’ creative thinking skills by means of a one-year creativity training program. PloS one, 15(3), e0229773. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229773 Search in Google Scholar

Ritter, S.M., & Mostert, N. (2017). Enhancement of creative thinking skills using a cognitive-based creativity training. Journal of Cognitive enhancement, 1, 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41465-016-0002-3 Search in Google Scholar

Rose, L.H., & Lin, H.T. (1984). A meta-analysis of long-term creativity training programs. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 18(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1984.tb00985.x Search in Google Scholar

Ruiz-del-Pino, B., Fernández-Martín, F.D., & Arco-Tirado, J.L. (2022). Creativity training programs in primary education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 46, 101172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2022.101172 Search in Google Scholar

Runco, M.A., & Jaeger, G.J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity research journal, 24(1), 92–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2012.650092 Search in Google Scholar

Said-Metwaly, S., Van den Noortgate, W., & Kyndt, E. (2017). Methodological issues in measuring creativity: A systematic literature review. Creativity. Theories–Research–Applications, 4(2), 276–301. https://doi.org/10.1515/ctra-2017-0014 Search in Google Scholar

Scope, E.E. (1998). Meta-analysis of research on creativity: The effects of instructional variables. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Fordham University, New York. Search in Google Scholar

Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004a). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review. Creativity research journal, 16(4), 361–388. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400410409534549 Search in Google Scholar

Scott, G., Leritz, L.E., & Mumford, M.D. (2004b). Types of creativity training: Approaches and their effectiveness. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 38(3), 149–179. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.2004.tb01238.x Search in Google Scholar

Shavinina, L.V. (2013). The Routledge international handbook of innovation education. Routledge. Search in Google Scholar

Sherwood, D. (2022). Creativity for Scientists and Engineers. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/978-0-7503-4967-3 Search in Google Scholar

Siew, N.M., & Ambo, N. (2018). Development and Evaluation of an Integrated Project-Based and STEM Teaching and Learning Module on Enhancing Scientific Creativity among Fifth Graders. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 17(6), 1017–1033. Search in Google Scholar

Silvia, P.J., Christensen, A.P., & Cotter, K.N. (2016). Commentary: The development of creativity—Ability, motivation, and potential. In B. Barbot (Ed.), Perspectives on creativity development. New directions for child and adolescent development, 151 (pp. 111–119). Wiley Periodicals, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1002/cad.20147 Search in Google Scholar

Simonton, D.K. (2004). Creativity in science: Chance, logic, genius, and zeitgeist. Cambridge University Press. Search in Google Scholar

Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2019). Using computer-based cognitive mapping to improve students’ divergent thinking for creativity development. British journal of educational technology, 50(5), 2217–2233. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjet.12825 Search in Google Scholar

Sun, M., Wang, M., & Wegerif, R. (2020). Effects of divergent thinking training on students’ scientific creativity: The impact of individual creative potential and domain knowledge. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 37, 100682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100682 Search in Google Scholar

Toumi, K., Girandola, F., & Bonnardel, N. (2021). Technologies for supporting creativity in design: A view of physical and virtual environments with regard to cognitive and social processes. Creativity: Theories– Research–Applications, 8(1), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.2478/ctra-2021-0012 Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E.P. (1972a). Can we teach children to think creatively? Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 114–143. Search in Google Scholar

Torrance, E.P. (1972b). Predictive validity of the torrance tests of creative thinking. The Journal of creative behavior, 6(4), 236–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1972.tb00936.x Search in Google Scholar

Tsai, K.C. (2013). A review of the effectiveness of creative training on adult learners. Journal of Social Science Studies, 1(1), 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5296/jsss.v1i1.4329 Search in Google Scholar

United Nations (2023). Peace, dignity and equality on a healthy planet. Global issues. https://www.un.org/en/global-issues Search in Google Scholar

Valgeirsdottir, D., & Onarheim, B. (2017). Studying creativity training programs: A methodological analysis. Creativity and Innovation Management, 26(4), 430–439. https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12245 Search in Google Scholar

Warnick, B.J., Kier, A.S., LaFrance, E.M., & Cuttler, C. (2021). Head in the clouds? Cannabis users’ creativity in new venture ideation depends on their entrepreneurial passion and experience. Journal of Business Venturing, 36(2), 106088. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2020.106088 Search in Google Scholar

Watts, L.L., Steele, L.M., & Song, H. (2017). Re-examining the relationship between need for cognition and creativity: Predicting creative problem solving across multiple domains. Creativity Research Journal, 29(1), 21–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2017.1263505 Search in Google Scholar

Weisberg, R., Pichot, N., Bonetto, E., Pavani, J.B., Arciszewski, T., & Bonnardel, N. (2021). From explicit to implicit theories of creativity and back: The relevance of naive criteria in defining creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 55(3), 839–856. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.492 Search in Google Scholar

Woelfle, M., Olliaro, P., & Todd, M.H. (2011). Open science is a research accelerator. Nature chemistry, 3(10), 745–748. https://doi.org/10.1038/nchem.1149 Search in Google Scholar

Yasin, R.M., & Yunus, N.S.R. (2014). A meta-analysis study on the effectiveness of creativity approaches in technology and engineering education. Asian Social Science, 10(3), 242–252. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/ass.v10n3p242 Search in Google Scholar

Język:
Angielski