1. bookTom 14 (2021): Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
access type Otwarty dostęp

Accountability, Public Values, and Participatory Budgeting in Poland

Data publikacji: 17 Mar 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 14 (2021) - Zeszyt 2 (December 2021)
Zakres stron: 72 - 100
Otrzymano: 18 May 2021
Przyjęty: 30 Dec 2021
Informacje o czasopiśmie
License
Format
Czasopismo
eISSN
2029-0454
Pierwsze wydanie
05 Feb 2009
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Języki
Angielski
Abstract

Among the different instruments of collaborative governance, participatory budgeting (PB) is of particular interest in Poland. PB includes the residents who co-decide about local public expenditure. PB proponents suggest that it has the potential to democratize budgeting but others point to the ease with which organized groups sometimes capture the process to serve their interests. The analysis shows that due to the weak axiological grounds that result from the infringements of all nodal public values, e.g. human dignity, sustainability, citizen involvement, openness, secrecy, compromise, integrity, and robustness, PB in Poland has little potential to enhance accountability for the protection of the common good.

Keywords

1. Allegretti, Giovanni. “Paying Attention to the Participants’ Perceptions in Order to Trigger a Virtuous Circle”: 47–75. In: Hope for Democracy – 25 Years of Participatory Budgeting. São Brás de Alportel: Nelson Dias, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

2. Allen, Richard, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter. “Introduction: The Meaning, Content and Objectives of Public Financial Management”: 1–12. In: Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter, eds. The International Handbook of Public Financial Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

3. Arnstein, Sherry R. “A Ladder of Citizen Participation.” Journal of the American Planning Association 35 (1969): 216–224.10.1080/01944366908977225 Search in Google Scholar

4. Atlas, Mark. “Enforcement Principles and Environmental Agencies: Principal-Agent Relationships in a Delegated Environmental Program.” Law & Society Review 41 (2007): 939–980.10.1111/j.1540-5893.2007.00330.x Search in Google Scholar

5. Barrett, Will. “Responsibility, Accountability and Corporate Activity.” Online Opinion, Australia’s E-journal of Social and Political Debate (2004) // http://www.onlineopinion.com.au/print.asp?article=2480#. Search in Google Scholar

6. Behn, Robert D. Rethinking Democratic Accountability. Washington: Brookings Institution Press, 2001. Search in Google Scholar

7. Benish, Avishai, and Asa Maron. “Infusing Public Law into Privatized Welfare: Lawyers, Economists, and the Competing Logics of Administrative Reform.” Law & Society Review 50 (2016): 953–984.10.1111/lasr.12238 Search in Google Scholar

8. Bivins, Thomas. “Responsibility and Accountability”: 19–38. In: Kathy Fitzpatrick and Carolyn Bronstein, eds. Ethics in Public Relations: Responsible Advocacy. London: Sage, 2006. Search in Google Scholar

9. Bovens, Mark, Thomas Schillemans, and Paul T. Hart. “Does Public Accountability Work? An Assessment Tool.” Public Administration 86 (2008): 225–242.10.1111/j.1467-9299.2008.00716.x Search in Google Scholar

10. Bovens, Mark. “Analysing and Assessing Public Accountability: A Conceptual Model.” European Law Journal 13 (2007): 447–468.10.1111/j.1468-0386.2007.00378.x Search in Google Scholar

11. Braman, Eileen. “Exploring Citizen Assessments of Unilateral Executive Authority.” Law & Society Review 50 (2016): 189–223.10.1111/lasr.12180 Search in Google Scholar

12. Canfield, Matthew C. “Disputing the Global Land Grab: Claiming Rights and Making Markets Through Collaborative Governance.” Law & Society Review 52 (2018): 994–1025.10.1111/lasr.12367 Search in Google Scholar

13. Damgaard, Bodil, and Jenny M. Lewis. “Accountability and Citizen Participation”: 258–272. In: Mark Bovens, Robert E. Goodin, and Thomas Schillemans, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Public Accountability. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

14. Davies, Andrew Lucas B., and Alissa P. Worden. “Local Governance and Redistributive Policy: Explaining Local Funding for Public Defense.” Law & Society Review 51 (2017): 313–345.10.1111/lasr.12266 Search in Google Scholar

15. De Tocqueville, Alexis. Democracy in America. London: Saunders and Otley, 1835. Search in Google Scholar

16. Dias, Nelson, and Simone Júlio. “The next thirty years of Participatory Budgeting in the world start today”: 15–34 In: Nelson Dias, ed. Hope for Democracy. 30 Years of Participatory Budgeting Worldwide. São Brás de Alportel: In Loco Association, 2018. Search in Google Scholar

17. Emerson, Kirk, Tina Nabatchi, and Stephen Balogh. “An Integrative Framework for Collaborative Governance.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 22 (2012): 1–29.10.1093/jopart/mur011 Search in Google Scholar

18. Ferry, Laurence, Peter Eckersley, and Zamzulaila Zakaria. “Accountability and Transparency in English Local Government: Moving from ‘Matching Parts’ to ‘Awkward Couple’?” Financial Accountability & Management Volume 31 (2015): 345–361.10.1111/faam.12060 Search in Google Scholar

19. Goodpaster, Kenneth. “Human Dignity and the Common Good: The Institutional Insight.” Business and Society Review 122 (2017): 27–50.10.1111/basr.12107 Search in Google Scholar

20. Gouguet, Ronald G., et al. “Effective Coordination and Cooperation Between Ecological Risk Assessments and Natural Resource Damage Assessments: A New Synthesis.” Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management 5 (2009): 523–534.10.1897/IEAM_2009-012.1 Search in Google Scholar

21. Grzybek, Grzegorz. Etyka rozwoju a wychowanie. Rzeszów: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Rzeszowskiego, 2010. Search in Google Scholar

22. Guy, Mary E. Ethical Decisions Making in Everyday Work Situations. Westport: Conn, 1990. Search in Google Scholar

23. Huberts, Leo. The Integrity of Governance. What It Is, What We Know, What Is Done, and Where to Go. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

24. Jensen, Michael C., and William H. Meckling. “Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure.” Journal of Financial Economics 4 (1976): 305–360.10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X Search in Google Scholar

25. Jent, H. Clay. “Demos Kratos. Democracy, Old and New.” The Social Studies 58 (1967): 242–245.10.1080/00220973.1942.11018856 Search in Google Scholar

26. Jørgensen, Torben B., and Barry Bozeman. “Public Values an Inventory.” Administration & Society 39 (2007): 354–381.10.1177/0095399707300703 Search in Google Scholar

27. Joss, Simon. “Accountable governance, accountable sustainability? a case study of accountability in the governance for sustainability.” Environmental Policy and Governance 20 (2010): 408–421.10.1002/eet.559 Search in Google Scholar

28. Kaifeng, Yang, and Sanjay K. Pandey. “Further Dissecting the Black Box of Citizen Participation: When Does Citizen Involvement Lead to Good Outcomes?” Public Administration Review 71 (2021): 880–892.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02417.x Search in Google Scholar

29. Kamir, Orit. “Honor and Dignity in the Film Unforgiven: Implications for Sociolegal Theory.” Law & Society Review 40 (2006): 193–234.10.1111/j.1540-5893.2006.00263.x Search in Google Scholar

30. Kamrowska-Zaluska, Dorota. “Participatory Budgeting in Poland – Missing Link in Urban Regeneration Process.” Procedia Engineering 161 (2016): 1996–2000.10.1016/j.proeng.2016.08.792 Search in Google Scholar

31. Kersting, Norbert. “Participatory Turn? Comparing Citizens’ and Politicians’ Perspectives on Online and Offline Local Political Participation.” Lex Localis – Journal of Local Self Government 14 (2016): 251–263.10.4335/14.2.249-263(2016) Search in Google Scholar

32. Kluvers, Ron. “Accountability for Performance in Local Government.” Australian Journal of Public Administration 62 (2003): 57–69.10.1111/1467-8500.00314 Search in Google Scholar

33. Kraszewski, Dariusz, and Karol Mojkowski. Budżet obywatelski w Polsce. Warsaw: Fundacja im. Stefana Batorego, 2014. Search in Google Scholar

34. Lienert, Jan. “The Legal Framework for Public Finances and Budget Systems”: 1–12. In: Richard Allen, Richard Hemming, and Barry H. Potter, eds. The International Handbook of Public Financial Management. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016. Search in Google Scholar

35. Lotko, Ewa. “Participatory budgeting in Russia – Procedural Aspects.” Bialystok Legal Studies 24 (3) (2019): 177–185.10.15290/bsp.2019.24.03.14 Search in Google Scholar

36. Ma, Jun, and Yilin Hou. “Budgeting for Accountability: A Comparative Study of Budget Reforms in the United States during the Progressive Era and in Contemporary China.” Public Administration Review 69S (2009): 53–59.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02089.x Search in Google Scholar

37. Mulgan, Richard. “‘Accountability’: An Even Expanding Concept.” Public Administration 78 (2000): 555–573.10.1111/1467-9299.00218 Search in Google Scholar

38. Mulgan, Richard. Holding Power to Account: Accountability in Modern Democracies. London: Palgrave, 2013. Search in Google Scholar

39. O’Donnell, Guillermo A. “Horizontal Accountability in New Democracies.” Journal of Democracy 9 (1998): 112–126.10.1353/jod.1998.0051 Search in Google Scholar

40. OECD. Budgeting and Public Expenditures in OECD Countries 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

41. OECD. OECD Budget Transparency Toolkit. Practical Steps for Supporting Openness, Integrity and Accountability in Public Financial Management. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2017. Search in Google Scholar

42. Olson, Susan M., and Albert W. Dzur. “Revisiting Informal Justice: Restorative Justice and Democratic Professionalism.” Law & Society Review 38 (2004): 139–176.10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03801005.x Search in Google Scholar

43. Pape, Madeleine, and Chaeyoon Lim. “‘Beyond the Usual Suspects’? Reimagining Democracy with Participatory Budgeting in Chicago.” Sociological Forum 34 (2019): 861–882.10.1111/socf.12550 Search in Google Scholar

44. Peeters, Marguerite A. The globalization of the Western cultural revolution. Bruxelles: Institute for Intercultural Dialogue Dynamics, 2007. Search in Google Scholar

45. Pesci, Caterina, Ericka Costa, and Michele Andreaus. “Using accountability to shape the common good.” Critical Perspectives on Accounting 67-68 (2020): 1–24.10.1016/j.cpa.2019.03.001 Search in Google Scholar

46. Protasiewicz, Anna, and Trzaska Karolina. “The Role of Institutions in the Technology Transfer Process with Particular Focus on Technology Parks in Poland.” Eastern European Journal of Transnational Relations 4 (2) (2020): 49–68.10.15290/eejtr.2020.04.02.03 Search in Google Scholar

47. Przeworski, Adam, Susan C. Stokes, and Bernard Manin, B. Democracy, Accountability, and Representation. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1999.10.1017/CBO9781139175104 Search in Google Scholar

48. Robinson, John B., and Jon Tinker. “Reconciling Ecological, Economic and Social Imperatives: A New Conceptual Framework”: 71–94. In: Ted Schrecker, ed. Surviving Globalism: The Social and Economic Challenges. Macmillan: London, 1997. Search in Google Scholar

49. Rossmann, Doralyn, and Elizabeth A. Shanahan. “Defining and Achieving Normative Democratic Values in Participatory Budgeting Processes.” Public Administration Review 72 (2012): 56–66.10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02480.x Search in Google Scholar

50. Sintomer, Yves, Anja Röcke, and Carsten Herzberg. Participatory Budgeting in Europe. Democracy and Public Governance. London: Routledge, 2016.10.4324/9781315599472 Search in Google Scholar

51. Sintomer, Yves, Carsten Herzberg, and Anja Röcke. “Participatory Budgeting in Europe: Potentials and Challenges.” International Journal of Urban and Regional Research 32 (2008): 164–178.10.1111/j.1468-2427.2008.00777.x Search in Google Scholar

52. Smulovitz, Catalina, and Enrique Smulovitz. “Societal Accountability in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 11 (2000): 147–158.10.1353/jod.2000.0087 Search in Google Scholar

53. Sześciło, Dawid. “Participatory Budgeting in Poland: Quasi-Referendum Instead of Deliberation.” Croatian and Comparative Public Administration 15 (2015): 373–388. Search in Google Scholar

54. Ter Bogt, Henk. “NPM’s Ideals About the Accountability and Control of Outsourced Activities: Tough, But Realizable, Or A Utopian Dream?” European Policy Analysis 4 (2018): 118–145.10.1002/epa2.1032 Search in Google Scholar

55. Thompson, Denis F. “Democratic Secrecy.” Political Science Quarterly 114 (1999): 181–193.10.2307/2657736 Search in Google Scholar

56. Van Wichelen, Sonja. “Moving Children through Private International Law: Institutions and the Enactment of Ethics.” Law & Society Review 53 (2019): 671–705.10.1111/lasr.12412 Search in Google Scholar

57. Wampler, Brian. “Expanding Accountability Through Participatory Institutions: Mayors, Citizens, and Budgeting in Three Brazilian Municipalities.” Latin American Politics and Society 46 (2004): 73–99.10.1353/lap.2004.0027 Search in Google Scholar

58. Wampler, Brian. “Participative Institutions in Brazil: Mayors and the Expansion of Accountability in Comparative Perspective”: 77–98. In: Patricio Silva and Herwig Cleuren, eds. Widening Democracy. Citizens and Participatory Schemes in Brazil and Chile. Leiden-Boston: Brill, 2009. Search in Google Scholar

59. Wampler, Brian. “When Does Participatory Democracy Deepen the Quality of Democracy.” Comparative Politics 41 (2008): 61–81.10.5129/001041508X12911362383679 Search in Google Scholar

60. Zawadzka-Pąk, Urszula K. “Shaping Financial Accountability Via Participatory Budgeting - Theoretical Framework for Axiological and Legal Analysis”: 629–638. In: Gabor Hulkó and Roman Vybíral. European Financial Law in Times of Crisis of the European Union. Budapest: Dialóg Campus, 2019. Search in Google Scholar

61. Zawadzka-Pąk, Urszula K., and Eva Tomášková. “Legal and Axiological Aspects of Participatory Budgeting Procedure in Poland and the Czech Republic.” Białostockie Studia Prawnicze 24 (2019): 165–175.10.15290/bsp.2019.24.03.13 Search in Google Scholar

62. Zdanowicz, Mieczysława. “Citizenship in the context of territorial changes adopted in the Versailles Treaty.” Miscellanea Historico-Iuridica 18 (1) (2019): 169–179.10.15290/mhi.2019.18.01.10 Search in Google Scholar

63. Zhang, Yahong, and Yuguo Liao. “Participatory Budgeting in Local Government: Evidence From New Jersey Municipalities.” Public Performance & Management Review 35 (2011): 281–302.10.2753/PMR1530-9576350203 Search in Google Scholar

1. Constitution of Republic of Poland. Journal of Laws, 1997, no. 483. Search in Google Scholar

2. Judgment of the Polish Constitutional Tribunal of November, SK 36/07. Journal of the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Court, 2009, no. 19A/151. Search in Google Scholar

3. Law amending Certain Laws to Increase the Participation of Citizens in the Process of Selecting, Functioning and Controlling Certain Public Bodies. Journal of Laws, no. 18/130. Search in Google Scholar

4. Law on Public Finance. Journal of Laws, 2021, no. 305. Search in Google Scholar

5. Law on of Municipal Self-Government. Journal of Laws, 2020, no. 713. Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo