1. bookTom 12 (2022): Zeszyt 1 (May 2022)
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
18 Jun 2013
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku
Otwarty dostęp

Open Data: A Stepchild in e-Estonia’s Data Management Strategy?

Data publikacji: 23 Jun 2022
Tom & Zeszyt: Tom 12 (2022) - Zeszyt 1 (May 2022)
Zakres stron: 123 - 144
Informacje o czasopiśmie
Pierwsze wydanie
18 Jun 2013
Częstotliwość wydawania
2 razy w roku

The availability of open data has increased dramatically, partly in reaction to several types of government agencies publishing their raw data. Access to and use of open data is not only essential for the development of public policy and delivery of various services, but it is also of eminent value for private (and often economic) purposes. To meet these demands, the availability of open data has increased dramatically both domestically and EU-wide. Nevertheless, it is still access to and use of personal data which is usually in the spotlight of public—and also legal—debates. Contributing to fill this gap, this paper analyses the significance of open data and the resulting challenges imposed by the widespread lack of specific open data policies. The paper also provides an overview of the existing systems used in Estonian governance to ensure access to open information, but also highlights the shortcomings, before it finally makes proposals on how to improve open data disclosure practices in Estonia.


Bertot, J. C.; Jaeger, P. T. & Grimes, J. M. (2010), ‘Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001 Search in Google Scholar

Bonina, C. & Eateon, B. (2020), ‘Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479 Search in Google Scholar

Conradie, P. & Choenni, S. (2014), ‘On the barriers for local government releasing open data,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31(1), pp. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003 Search in Google Scholar

Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on “hate speech”, 30.10.1997. Search in Google Scholar

Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the reuse of public sector information, OJ L 172, 26.6.2019, pp. 56–83. Search in Google Scholar

Estonian Public Information Act, Riigi Teataja I, 30.11.2021, 17. Search in Google Scholar

European Convention on Human Rights, 4.11.1950. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Finck, M. & Pallas, F. (2020), ‘They who must not be identified—distinguishing personal from non-personal data under the GDPR,’ International Data Privacy Law, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz026 Search in Google Scholar

Forero, D. A.; Curioso, W. H. & Patrinos, G. P. (2021), ‘The importance of adherence to international standards for depositing open data in public repositories,’ BMC Res Notes, vol. 14, no. 1, art. 405. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05817-z856134834727971 Search in Google Scholar

German Basic Law (Grundgesetz), Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland in der im Bundesgesetzblatt Teil III, Gliederungsnummer 100-1, veröffentlichten bereinigten Fassung, das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 u. 2 Satz 2 des Gesetzes vom 29. September 2020 (BGBl. I S. 2048) geändert worden ist. Search in Google Scholar

Halachmi, A. & Greiling, D. (2013), ‘Transparency, e-Government, and accountability,’ Public Performance & Management Review, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 562–584. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360404 Search in Google Scholar

Hamuľák, O.; Kocharyan, H. & Kerikmäe, T. (2020), ‘The contemporary issues of post-mortem personal data protection in the EU after GDPR entering into force,’ Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, vol. 11, pp. 225−238. Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T. (2020a), ‘Schutz oder Beschränkung der Privatautonomie durch den digitalen Staat: Eine Untersuchung am estnischen Beispiel,’ in T. Zarandia, E. Kurzynsky-Singer & L. Shatberashvili (eds.) Private Autonomy as a Fundamental Principle of Civil Law, Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, pp. 116−119. Search in Google Scholar

Hoffmann, T. (2020b), ‘The impact of digital autonomous tools on private autonomy,’ Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online, vol. 18, pp. 18−31. Search in Google Scholar

Jaeger, P. T. & Bertot, J. C. (2010), ‘Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003 Search in Google Scholar

Janssen, K. (2011), ‘The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.01.004 Search in Google Scholar

Janssen, M.; Charalabidis, Y. & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012), ‘Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government,’ Information Systems Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740 Search in Google Scholar

Kassen, M. (2019), ‘Open data and e-government—related or competing ecosystems: a paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia,’ Information Technology for Development, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 552–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1412289 Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T.; Hoffmann, T. & Chochia, A. (2018), ‘Legal technology for law firms: Determining roadmaps for innovation,’ Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 24, no. 81, pp. 91−112. https://doi.org/10.2478/cirr-2018-0005 Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T.; Mölder, H. & Chochia, A. (2019), ‘Estonia and the European Union,’ in F. Laursen (ed.) Encyclopedia of European Union Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1−18. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1105 Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2020a), ‘Machines are taking over—are we ready? Law and artificial intelligence,’ Singapore Academy of Law Journal, vol. 33, pp. 24–49. Search in Google Scholar

Kerikmäe, T. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2020b), ‘The rule of law and the protection of fundamental human rights in an era of automation,’ in J.-S. Gordon (ed.) Smart Technologies and Fundamental Rights, Philosophy and Human Rights, Leiden: Brill, pp. 221−239. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437876_011 Search in Google Scholar

Kulk, S. & Loenen, B. (2012), ‘Brave new open data world?’ International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, no. 7, pp. 196–206. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2039305 Search in Google Scholar

Lindstedt, C. & Naurin, D. (2010), ‘Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110377602 Search in Google Scholar

Martini, M. & Wenzel, M. (2017), ‘“Once only” versus “only once”: Das Prinzip einmaliger Erfassung zwischen Zweckbindungsgrundsatz und Bürgerfreundlichkeit,’ DVBl 2017, pp. 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1515/dvbl-2017-1206 Search in Google Scholar

McDermott, P. (2010), ‘Building open government,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002 Search in Google Scholar

Napoli, P. M. & Karaganis, J. (2010), ‘On making public policy with publicly available data: The case of US communications policymaking,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.005 Search in Google Scholar

Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2014), ‘e-Governance in law and by law: The legal framework of e-governance,’ in T. Kerikmäe (ed.) Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 33−51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08117-5_3 Search in Google Scholar

Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Papageorgiou, I. (2018), ‘The European Union Digital Single Market—Challenges and impact for the EU Neighbourhood states,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2018-0013 Search in Google Scholar

OECD (2019), ‘Open, Useful and Re-usable data (OURdata) Index.’ Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/ourdata-index-policy-paper-2020.pdf [9 May 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Paide, K.; Pappel, I.; Vainsalu, H. & Draheim, D. (2018), ‘On the systematic exploitation of the Estonian data exchange layer X-Road for strengthening public–private partnerships,’ in ICEGOV ’18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209441 Search in Google Scholar

Pau, A. (2021), ‘Transpordiamet hakkab saama Telialt inimeste liikumisandmeid,’ Delfi, 21 September. Retrieved from https://forte.delfi.ee/artikkel/94639549/transpordiamet-hakkab-saama-telialt-inimeste-liikumisandmeid [accessed Apr 2022] Search in Google Scholar

Priisalu, J. & Ottis, R. (2017), ‘Personal control of privacy and data: Estonian experience,’ Health and Technology, no. 7, pp. 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-017-0195-1574178029308346 Search in Google Scholar

Principles for Managing Services and Governing Information, Riigi Teataja I, 31.05.2017, 7 Search in Google Scholar

Public Information Act Amendment Act, Riigi Teataja I, 30.11.2021, 3. Search in Google Scholar

Republic of Estonia Information System Authority (2021a), ‘Data exchange layer X-tee.’ Retrieved from https://www.ria.ee/en/state-information-system/x-tee.html [accessed 17 Dec 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Republic of Estonia Information System Authority (2021b), ‘The 20th anniversary of X-tee.’ Retrieved from https://www.ria.ee/en/calendar/20th-anniversary-x-tee.html [accessed 17 Dec 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Riigiportaal eesti.ee (n.d.), ‘Terms of use of State Portal eesti.ee.’ Retrieved from https://www.eesti.ee/en/using-the-state-portal/terms-of-use-of-state-portal-eestiee [accessed 17 Dec 2021] Search in Google Scholar

Ruijer, E.; Grimmelikhuijsen, S.; Hogan, M.; Enzerink, S.; Ojo, A. & Mejer, A. (2017), ‘Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.003 Search in Google Scholar

Salumaa-Lepik, K.; Kerikmäe, T. & Nisu, N. (2021), ‘Data protection in Estonia,’ in E. Kiesow Cortez (ed.) Data Protection around The World. Privacy Laws in Action, The Information Technology and Law Series, 33, Cham: Springer, pp. 23−57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-407-5 Search in Google Scholar

Saputro, R.; Pappel, I.; Vainsalu, H.; Lips, S. & Draheim, D. (2020), ‘Prerequisites for the adoption of the X-Road interoperability and data exchange framework: A comparative study,’ in 2020 Seventh International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment, pp. 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096704 Search in Google Scholar

Saxena, K. B. C. (2005), ‘Towards excellence in e-governance,’ International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510616733 Search in Google Scholar

The Constitution of the Republic of Estonia, Riigi Teataja I, 15.05.2015, 2. Search in Google Scholar

Tupay, P. K. (2020), ‘Estonia, the digital nation: reflections on a digital citizen’s rights in the European Union,’ European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 294–300. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2020/2/16 Search in Google Scholar

Wijnhoven, F.; Ehrenhard, M. & Kuhn, J. (2015), ‘Open government objectives and participation motivations,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002 Search in Google Scholar

Zuiderwijk, A. & Janssen, M. (2013), ‘Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003 Search in Google Scholar

Zuiderwijk, A.; Janssen, M.; Meijer, R.; Choenni, S.; Charalabidis, Y. & Jeffery, K. (2012), ‘Issues and guiding principles for opening governmental judicial research data,’ in International Conference on Electronic Government, vol. 91, pp. 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_8 Search in Google Scholar

Polecane artykuły z Trend MD

Zaplanuj zdalną konferencję ze Sciendo