[
Bertot, J. C.; Jaeger, P. T. & Grimes, J. M. (2010), ‘Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for societies,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 3, pp. 264–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.03.001
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bonina, C. & Eateon, B. (2020), ‘Cultivating open government data platform ecosystems through governance: Lessons from Buenos Aires, Mexico City and Montevideo,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 25, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2020.101479
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conradie, P. & Choenni, S. (2014), ‘On the barriers for local government releasing open data,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31(1), pp. 10–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.01.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Council of Europe Committee of Ministers Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on “hate speech”, 30.10.1997.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Directive (EU) 2019/1024 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on open data and the reuse of public sector information, OJ L 172, 26.6.2019, pp. 56–83.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Estonian Public Information Act, Riigi Teataja I, 30.11.2021, 17.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
European Convention on Human Rights, 4.11.1950. Retrieved from https://www.echr.coe.int/documents/convention_eng.pdf [accessed Apr 2022]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Finck, M. & Pallas, F. (2020), ‘They who must not be identified—distinguishing personal from non-personal data under the GDPR,’ International Data Privacy Law, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 11–36. https://doi.org/10.1093/idpl/ipz026
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Forero, D. A.; Curioso, W. H. & Patrinos, G. P. (2021), ‘The importance of adherence to international standards for depositing open data in public repositories,’ BMC Res Notes, vol. 14, no. 1, art. 405. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-021-05817-z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
German Basic Law (Grundgesetz), Grundgesetz für die Bundesrepublik Deutschland in der im Bundesgesetzblatt Teil III, Gliederungsnummer 100-1, veröffentlichten bereinigten Fassung, das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 u. 2 Satz 2 des Gesetzes vom 29. September 2020 (BGBl. I S. 2048) geändert worden ist.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Halachmi, A. & Greiling, D. (2013), ‘Transparency, e-Government, and accountability,’ Public Performance & Management Review, vol. 36, no. 4, pp. 562–584. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576360404
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hamuľák, O.; Kocharyan, H. & Kerikmäe, T. (2020), ‘The contemporary issues of post-mortem personal data protection in the EU after GDPR entering into force,’ Czech Yearbook of Public and Private International Law, vol. 11, pp. 225−238.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmann, T. (2020a), ‘Schutz oder Beschränkung der Privatautonomie durch den digitalen Staat: Eine Untersuchung am estnischen Beispiel,’ in T. Zarandia, E. Kurzynsky-Singer & L. Shatberashvili (eds.) Private Autonomy as a Fundamental Principle of Civil Law, Tbilisi: Ivane Javakhishvili Tbilisi State University, pp. 116−119.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hoffmann, T. (2020b), ‘The impact of digital autonomous tools on private autonomy,’ Baltic Yearbook of International Law Online, vol. 18, pp. 18−31.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Jaeger, P. T. & Bertot, J. C. (2010), ‘Transparency and technological change: Ensuring equal and sustained public access to government information,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 371–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.05.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Janssen, K. (2011), ‘The influence of the PSI directive on open government data: An overview of recent developments,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 446–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2011.01.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Janssen, M.; Charalabidis, Y. & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012), ‘Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government,’ Information Systems Management, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 258–268. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2012.716740
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kassen, M. (2019), ‘Open data and e-government—related or competing ecosystems: a paradox of open government and promise of civic engagement in Estonia,’ Information Technology for Development, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 552–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1412289
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kerikmäe, T.; Hoffmann, T. & Chochia, A. (2018), ‘Legal technology for law firms: Determining roadmaps for innovation,’ Croatian International Relations Review, vol. 24, no. 81, pp. 91−112. https://doi.org/10.2478/cirr-2018-0005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kerikmäe, T.; Mölder, H. & Chochia, A. (2019), ‘Estonia and the European Union,’ in F. Laursen (ed.) Encyclopedia of European Union Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1−18. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228637.013.1105
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kerikmäe, T. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2020a), ‘Machines are taking over—are we ready? Law and artificial intelligence,’ Singapore Academy of Law Journal, vol. 33, pp. 24–49.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kerikmäe, T. & Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2020b), ‘The rule of law and the protection of fundamental human rights in an era of automation,’ in J.-S. Gordon (ed.) Smart Technologies and Fundamental Rights, Philosophy and Human Rights, Leiden: Brill, pp. 221−239. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004437876_011
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kulk, S. & Loenen, B. (2012), ‘Brave new open data world?’ International Journal of Spatial Data Infrastructures Research, no. 7, pp. 196–206. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2039305
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lindstedt, C. & Naurin, D. (2010), ‘Transparency is not enough: Making transparency effective in reducing corruption,’ International Political Science Review, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 301–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192512110377602
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martini, M. & Wenzel, M. (2017), ‘“Once only” versus “only once”: Das Prinzip einmaliger Erfassung zwischen Zweckbindungsgrundsatz und Bürgerfreundlichkeit,’ DVBl 2017, pp. 749–758. https://doi.org/10.1515/dvbl-2017-1206
]Search in Google Scholar
[
McDermott, P. (2010), ‘Building open government,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 401–413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Napoli, P. M. & Karaganis, J. (2010), ‘On making public policy with publicly available data: The case of US communications policymaking,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 384–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2010.06.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2014), ‘e-Governance in law and by law: The legal framework of e-governance,’ in T. Kerikmäe (ed.) Regulating eTechnologies in the European Union, Heidelberg: Springer Verlag, pp. 33−51. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08117-5_3
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Papageorgiou, I. (2018), ‘The European Union Digital Single Market—Challenges and impact for the EU Neighbourhood states,’ TalTech Journal of European Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1515/bjes-2018-0013
]Search in Google Scholar
[
OECD (2019), ‘Open, Useful and Re-usable data (OURdata) Index.’ Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/gov/digital-government/ourdata-index-policy-paper-2020.pdf [9 May 2022]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Paide, K.; Pappel, I.; Vainsalu, H. & Draheim, D. (2018), ‘On the systematic exploitation of the Estonian data exchange layer X-Road for strengthening public–private partnerships,’ in ICEGOV ’18: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Theory and Practice of Electronic Governance, pp. 34–41. https://doi.org/10.1145/3209415.3209441
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pau, A. (2021), ‘Transpordiamet hakkab saama Telialt inimeste liikumisandmeid,’ Delfi, 21 September. Retrieved from https://forte.delfi.ee/artikkel/94639549/transpordiamet-hakkab-saama-telialt-inimeste-liikumisandmeid [accessed Apr 2022]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Priisalu, J. & Ottis, R. (2017), ‘Personal control of privacy and data: Estonian experience,’ Health and Technology, no. 7, pp. 441–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12553-017-0195-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Principles for Managing Services and Governing Information, Riigi Teataja I, 31.05.2017, 7
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Public Information Act Amendment Act, Riigi Teataja I, 30.11.2021, 3.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Estonia Information System Authority (2021a), ‘Data exchange layer X-tee.’ Retrieved from https://www.ria.ee/en/state-information-system/x-tee.html [accessed 17 Dec 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Republic of Estonia Information System Authority (2021b), ‘The 20th anniversary of X-tee.’ Retrieved from https://www.ria.ee/en/calendar/20th-anniversary-x-tee.html [accessed 17 Dec 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Riigiportaal eesti.ee (n.d.), ‘Terms of use of State Portal eesti.ee.’ Retrieved from https://www.eesti.ee/en/using-the-state-portal/terms-of-use-of-state-portal-eestiee [accessed 17 Dec 2021]
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ruijer, E.; Grimmelikhuijsen, S.; Hogan, M.; Enzerink, S.; Ojo, A. & Mejer, A. (2017), ‘Connecting societal issues, users and data. Scenario-based design of open data platforms,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 34, no. 3, pp. 470–480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2017.06.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Salumaa-Lepik, K.; Kerikmäe, T. & Nisu, N. (2021), ‘Data protection in Estonia,’ in E. Kiesow Cortez (ed.) Data Protection around The World. Privacy Laws in Action, The Information Technology and Law Series, 33, Cham: Springer, pp. 23−57. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-407-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saputro, R.; Pappel, I.; Vainsalu, H.; Lips, S. & Draheim, D. (2020), ‘Prerequisites for the adoption of the X-Road interoperability and data exchange framework: A comparative study,’ in 2020 Seventh International Conference on eDemocracy & eGovernment, pp. 216–222. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG48599.2020.9096704
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Saxena, K. B. C. (2005), ‘Towards excellence in e-governance,’ International Journal of Public Sector Management, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 498–513. https://doi.org/10.1108/09513550510616733
]Search in Google Scholar
[
The Constitution of the Republic of Estonia, Riigi Teataja I, 15.05.2015, 2.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tupay, P. K. (2020), ‘Estonia, the digital nation: reflections on a digital citizen’s rights in the European Union,’ European Data Protection Law Review, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 294–300. https://doi.org/10.21552/edpl/2020/2/16
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wijnhoven, F.; Ehrenhard, M. & Kuhn, J. (2015), ‘Open government objectives and participation motivations,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 32, no. 1, pp. 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2014.10.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuiderwijk, A. & Janssen, M. (2013), ‘Open data policies, their implementation and impact: A framework for comparison,’ Government Information Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2013.04.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zuiderwijk, A.; Janssen, M.; Meijer, R.; Choenni, S.; Charalabidis, Y. & Jeffery, K. (2012), ‘Issues and guiding principles for opening governmental judicial research data,’ in International Conference on Electronic Government, vol. 91, pp. 90–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33489-4_8
]Search in Google Scholar