Otwarty dostęp

Opinions of Music Education Department Students on Web 2.0 Tools: The Case of Bursa Uludag University


Zacytuj

Adigüzel, A. (2010). The status of instructional technology in the primary schools and classroom teachers’ level of using these technologies. Dicle Üniversitesi Ziya Gökalp Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 15, 1-17.Search in Google Scholar

Akbana, Y. E., & Dikilitaş, K. (2022). EFL teachers’ sources of remote teaching anxiety: Insights and implications for EFL teacher education. Acta Educationis Generalis, 12(1), 157-180. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2022-0009Search in Google Scholar

Altıok, S., Yükseltürk, E., & Üçgel, M. (2017). Web 2.0 eğitimine yönelik gerçekleştirilen bilimsel bir etkinliğin değerlendirilmesi: katılımcı görüşleri. Journal of Instructional Technologies & Teacher Education, 6(1), 1-8.Search in Google Scholar

Aytan, T., & Başal, A. (2015). Investigation of the perceptions of pre-service Turkish teachers towards web 2.0 tools. Turkish Studies, 10(7), 149-166.Search in Google Scholar

Başkale, H. (2016). Nitel araştırmalarda geçerlik, güvenirlik ve örneklem büyüklüğünün belirlenmesi. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Hemşirelik Fakültesi Elektronik Dergisi, 9(1), 23-28.Search in Google Scholar

Bayne, S., & Ross, J. (2007). The ‘Digital Native’ and ‘Digital Immigrant’: A Dangerous Opposition [Conference presentation]. Annual Conference of the Society for Research into Higher Education (SRHE), Brighton, United Kingdom.Search in Google Scholar

Başal, A., & Eryılmaz, A. (2021). Engagement and affection of pre-service teachers in online learning in the context of COVID 19: engagement-based instruction with web 2.0 technologies vs direct transmission instruction. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(1), 131-133. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2020.1841555Search in Google Scholar

Bugawa, A. M., & Mirzal, A. (2018). The impact of Web 2.0 technologies on the learning experience of students in higher education: A review. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 13(3), 1-17.Search in Google Scholar

Can, B. (2021). Fen bilimleri dersinde web 2.0 destekli kavramsal karikatür kullanımının akademik başarı ve tutuma etkisi [Master’s Thesis]. Necmettin Erbakan University.Search in Google Scholar

Choy, S. C., & San Oo, P. (2012). Reflective thinking and teaching practices: A precursor for incorporating critical thinking into the classroom?. International Journal of Instruction, 5(1), 167-182.Search in Google Scholar

Coutinho, C., & Mota, P. (2011). Web 2.0 technologies in music education in Portugal: Using podcasts for learning. Computers in the Schools, 28(1), 56-74. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380569.2011.552043Search in Google Scholar

Cumhur, F., & Çam, S. S. (2021). Digital transformation in assessment and evaluation course: The effects of web 2.0 tools. Journal of Pedagogical Research, 5(3), 15-39. https://doi.org/10.33902/JPR.2021370559Search in Google Scholar

Crawford, R. (2013). Evolving technologies require educational policy change: Music education for the 21st century. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(5), 717-734.Search in Google Scholar

Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2020). Karma yöntem araştırmaları tasarımı ve yürütülmesi. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.Search in Google Scholar

Çalışkan, S., Güney, Z., Sakhieva, R., Vasbieva, D., & Zaitseva, N. (2019). Teachers’ views on the availability of web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 14(22), 70-81. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v14i22.11752Search in Google Scholar

Dikbaş Torun, E. (2020). Educational use of social media in higher education: Gender and social networking sites as the predictors of consuming, creating, and sharing content. Acta Educationis Generalis, 10(2), 112-132. https://doi.org/10.2478/atd-2020-0013Search in Google Scholar

Downes, S. (2005). E-learning 2.0. ELearn, 10, 1.Search in Google Scholar

Echeng, R., & Usoro, A. (2016). Enhancing the use of web 2.0 technologies in higher education: students’ and lectures’ views. Journal of International Technology and Information Management, 25(1), 89-106.Search in Google Scholar

Erdoğan, F. (2020). The relationship between prospective middle school mathematics teachers’ critical thinking skills and reflective thinking skills. Participatory Educational Research, 7(1), 220-241. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.20.13.7.1Search in Google Scholar

Faboya, O. T., & Adamu, B. J. (2017). Integrating web 2.0 tools into teaching and learning process through mobile device technology in Nigerian schools: current status and future directions. International Journal of Education and Research, 5(5), 113-124.Search in Google Scholar

Gündüzalp, C. (2021). Web 2.0 araçları ile zenginleştirilmiş çevrimiçi öğrenmenin öğrencilerin üst bilişsel ve yaratıcı düşünme becerilerine etkisi. Uluslararası Türkçe Edebiyat Kültür Eğitim Dergisi, 10(3), 1158-1177.Search in Google Scholar

Gürleroğlu, L., & Yıldırım, M. (2022). Investigation of secondary school students’ views on web 2.0 supported educational web site. Milli Eğitim Dergisi, 51(233), 191-217.Search in Google Scholar

Hew, K. F., & Brush, T. (2007). Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(3), 223-252. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5Search in Google Scholar

Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2013). Use of Web 2.0 technologies in K-12 and higher education: The search for evidence-based practice. Educational Research Review, 9, 47-64.Search in Google Scholar

Jarrah, M. A., & Alzubi, A. A. F. (2021). Arab postgraduates’ readiness towards and effectiveness of utilizing web 2.0 in language learning. International Journal of Instruction, 14(1), 673-690. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14141aSearch in Google Scholar

Karadağ, B. F., & Garip, S. (2021). Use of learning apps as a web 2.0 application in Turkish teaching. Journal of Child, Literature and Language Education (JCLLE), 4(1), 21-40. https://doi.org/10.47935/ceded.897374Search in Google Scholar

Kekeç Morkoç, D., & Erdönmez, C. (2015). The effect of web 2.0 technology in the training processes: the sample of vocational school of Çanakkale social sciences. Journal of Higher Education and Science, 5(3), 335-346. https://doi.org/10.5961/jhes.2015.135Search in Google Scholar

Kirschner, P. A., & De Bruyckere, P. (2017). The myths of the digital native and the multitasker. Teaching and Teacher Education, 67, 135-142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.06.001Search in Google Scholar

Kocasaraç, H. (2003). Bilgisayarların öğretim alanında kullanımına ilişkin öğretmen yeterlilikleri. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 2(3), 77-86.Search in Google Scholar

Kozikoğlu, I. (2019). Investigating critical thinking in prospective teachers: Metacognitive skills, problem solving skills and academic self-efficacy. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 10(2), 111-130.Search in Google Scholar

Kulaklı, A., & Mahony, S. (2014). Knowledge creation and sharing with web 2.0 tools for teaching and learning roles in so-called university 2.0. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 150, 648-657.Search in Google Scholar

Luckin, R., Clark, W., Graber, R., Logan, K., Mee, A., & Oliver, M. (2009). Do Web 2.0 tools really open the door to learning? Practices, perceptions and profiles of 11–16‐year‐old students. Learning, Media and Technology, 34(2), 87-104. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439880902921949Search in Google Scholar

O’Reilly, T. (2005). What Is Web 2.0 Design Patterns and Business Models for the Next Generation of Software? O’Railly.Search in Google Scholar

Parkita, E. (2021). Digital tools of universal music education. Central European Journal of Educational Research, 3(1), 60-66. https://doi.org/10.37441/CEJER/2021/3/1/9352Search in Google Scholar

Polat, S. (2020). Multidimensional analysis of the teaching process of the critical thinking skills. Research in Social Sciences and Technology, 5(2), 134-157. https://doi.org/10.46303/ressat.05.02.8Search in Google Scholar

Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5).Search in Google Scholar

Revenko, V. (2021). Education and music culture in the context of web 2.0. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 16(10), 96-107.Search in Google Scholar

Rockinson-Szapkiw, A. J., & Walker, W. L. (2009). Web 2.0 technologies: Facilitating interaction in an online human services counseling skills course. Journal of Technology in Human Services, 27(3), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.1080/15228830903093031Search in Google Scholar

Rosen, D., & Nelson, C. (2008). Web 2.0: A new generation of learners and education. Computers in the Schools, 25(3-4), 211-225. https://doi.org/10.1080/07380560802370997Search in Google Scholar

Sastre, J., Cerdà, J., García, W., Hernández, C. A., Lloret, N., Murillo, A., Picó, D., Serrano, J. E., Scarani, S., & Dannenberg, R. B. (2013). New technologies for music education. In 2013 Second international conference on E-learning and E-technologies in education (ICEEE) (pp. 149–154). Lodz, Poland. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICeLeTE.2013.6644364Search in Google Scholar

Selwyn, N. (2009). The digital native - Myth and reality. Aslib Proceedings, 61(4), 364-379. https://doi.org/10.1108/00012530910973776Search in Google Scholar

Süğümlü, Ü., & Aslan, S. (2022). The use of web 2.0 tools in mother-tongue instruction: teachers’ experiences. International Journal of Education & Literacy Studies, 10(1), 124-137.Search in Google Scholar

Şahin Topalcengiz, E., & Yıldırım, B. (2020). Teachers’ opinions about distance web 2.0 tools training and teachers’ in-class web 2.0 practices. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 17(4), 561-577.Search in Google Scholar

Taghva, F., Rezaei, N., Ghaderi, J., & Taghva, R. (2014). Studying the relationship between critical thinking skills and students’ educational achievement (Eghlid Universities as case study). International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 25, 18-25. https://doi.org/10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILSHS.25.18Search in Google Scholar

Tulaboev, A., & Oxley, A. (2012). A case study on using web 2.0 social networking tools in higher education. 2012 International Conference on Computer & Information Science (ICCIS), 1, 84-88. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCISci.2012.6297217Search in Google Scholar

Tünkler, V. (2021). Web 2.0 Araçlarıyla grafik materyalleri deneyimlemek: Sosyal bilgiler öğretmen adaylarının görüşleri. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 53, 234-260.Search in Google Scholar

Uça Güneş, E. P. (2016). Toplumsal değişim, teknoloji ve eğitim ilişkisinde sosyal ağların yeri. Açıköğretim Uygulamaları ve Araştırmaları Dergisi (AUAd), 2(2), 191-206. Uzunkavak, M. Ç., & Gül, G. (2022). The contribution of the activities prepared withSearch in Google Scholar

Web 2.0 technologies to the level of learning. GIST–Education and Learning Research Journal, 24, 95-117.Search in Google Scholar

Wu, M. (2022). A music teaching resource management model based on fuzzy clustering algorithm. Mobile Information Systems, 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/3469869Search in Google Scholar

Xu, J. (2011). The application of critical thinking in teaching English reading. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 1(2), 136-141.Search in Google Scholar

Yıldırım Taştı, Ö., & Yıldırım, A. (2022). Critical thinking skills and dispositions of Turkish pre-service teachers: A systematic review of research. Journal of Theoretical Educational Science, 15(3), 561-604. https://doi.org/10.30831/akukeg.1062721Search in Google Scholar

Yuen, S. C. Y., Yaoyuneyong, G., & Yuen, P. K. (2011). Perceptions, interest, and use: teachers and web 2.0 tools in education. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 7(2), 109-123.Search in Google Scholar

eISSN:
2585-7444
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
3 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Social Sciences, Education, Theory and History of Education, Curriculum and Pedagogy, other, Social Pedagogy, Social Work