This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Thurow RC. Atlas of orthodontic principles. 2nd ed. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1977: 361-379.Search in Google Scholar
Kieser JA. Human adult odontometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 12-14.Search in Google Scholar
Moorrees CFA. The Aleut dentition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957.Search in Google Scholar
Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sex difference in tooth size. J Dent Res 1964; 43:306.Search in Google Scholar
Beresford JS. Tooth size and class distinction. The Dental Practitioner and Dental Record 1969; 20: 113-120.Search in Google Scholar
Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas D, Clarkson Q. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 479-486.Search in Google Scholar
Doris JM, Bernard BW, Kuftinec MM. A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 326-336.Search in Google Scholar
Howe RP, McNamara JA, O’Connor KA. An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 363-373Search in Google Scholar
Barrett MJ, Brown T, Macdonald MR. Dental observations on Australian aborigines: mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth. Aust Dent J 1963; 8: 150-155.Search in Google Scholar
Lavelle CLB. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 29-37.Search in Google Scholar
Axelsson G, Kirveskari P. Crown size of permanent teeth in Icelanders. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41: 181-186.Search in Google Scholar
Merz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 53-58.Search in Google Scholar
Brash JC. The aetiology of irregularity and malocclusion of teeth. 2nd ed. London: The Dental Board of the United Kingdom, 1956: 299-301.Search in Google Scholar
Ballard M. Asymmetry in tooth size: A factor in the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1944; 14: 67-70.Search in Google Scholar
Gilpatric WH. Arch predetermination - is it practical? J Am Dent Assoc 1923; 10: 553-572.Search in Google Scholar
Korbitz G Jun. Biologie im dienste der kieferorthopodie - Zschr F Stom 1940; 38: 50. Quoted in: Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scandinav 1954; 12: 265-292.Search in Google Scholar
Rees DJ. A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 693-707.Search in Google Scholar
Steadman SR. The relation of upper anterior teeth to lower anterior teeth as presented on plaster models of a group of acceptable occlusions. Angle Orthod 1952; 22:91-97.Search in Google Scholar
Neff CW. Tailored occlusion with the anterior coefficient. Am J Orthod 1949; 35: 309-333.Search in Google Scholar
Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scandinav 1954; 12: 265-292.Search in Google Scholar
Lundstrom A. Variation of tooth size in the aetiology of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1955; 41: 872-876.Search in Google Scholar
Ballard NL. A fifth column within normal dental occlusions. Am J Orthod 1956; 42: 116-124.Search in Google Scholar
Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 113-130.Search in Google Scholar
Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962; 48: 504-529.Search in Google Scholar
Crosy DR, Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95: 457-461.Search in Google Scholar
Neff CW. The size relationship between the maxillary and mandibular anterior segments of the dental arch. Angle Orthod 1957; 27: 138-147.Search in Google Scholar
Stifter J. A study of Pont’s, Howe’s, Rees’, Neffs and Bolton’s analyses on Class I adult dentitions. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 215-225.Search in Google Scholar
Tonn P. Uber die mesio-distalen Zahnbreitenrelationen der Zahne des Oberkiefers zu den entsprechenden des Unterkiefers bei normalen and anormalen Okklusion. Diss Berlin, 1937. Quoted in: Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scandinav 1954; 12: 265-292.Search in Google Scholar
Bowles RM. Evaluation of tooth size relationship in various intradental and interdental arch segments. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Tennessee, 1968. Quoted in: Claridge D. Evaluating tooth size in premolar-extraction cases. Am J Orthod 1973; 64: 457-468.Search in Google Scholar
Dahlberg AA. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1940: 122-132.Search in Google Scholar
Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62: 296-309.Search in Google Scholar