The Graphical Analysis of Tooth Width Discrepancy

1 Thurow RC. Atlas of orthodontic principles. 2nd ed. St Louis: The CV Mosby Company, 1977: 361-379. Search in Google Scholar

2 Kieser JA. Human adult odontometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1990: 12-14. Search in Google Scholar

3 Moorrees CFA. The Aleut dentition. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1957. Search in Google Scholar

4 Garn SM, Lewis AB, Kerewsky RS. Sex difference in tooth size. J Dent Res 1964; 43:306. Search in Google Scholar

5 Beresford JS. Tooth size and class distinction. The Dental Practitioner and Dental Record 1969; 20: 113-120. Search in Google Scholar

6 Arya BS, Savara BS, Thomas D, Clarkson Q. Relation of sex and occlusion to mesiodistal tooth size. Am J Orthod 1974; 66: 479-486. Search in Google Scholar

7 Doris JM, Bernard BW, Kuftinec MM. A biometric study of tooth size and dental crowding. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 326-336. Search in Google Scholar

8 Howe RP, McNamara JA, O’Connor KA. An examination of dental crowding and its relationship to tooth size and arch dimension. Am J Orthod 1983; 83: 363-373 Search in Google Scholar

9 Barrett MJ, Brown T, Macdonald MR. Dental observations on Australian aborigines: mesiodistal crown diameters of permanent teeth. Aust Dent J 1963; 8: 150-155. Search in Google Scholar

10 Lavelle CLB. Maxillary and mandibular tooth size in different racial groups and in different occlusal categories. Am J Orthod 1972; 61: 29-37. Search in Google Scholar

11 Axelsson G, Kirveskari P. Crown size of permanent teeth in Icelanders. Acta Odontol Scand 1983; 41: 181-186. Search in Google Scholar

12 Merz ML, Isaacson RJ, Germane N, Rubenstein LK. Tooth diameters and arch perimeters in a black and a white population. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1991; 100: 53-58. Search in Google Scholar

13 Brash JC. The aetiology of irregularity and malocclusion of teeth. 2nd ed. London: The Dental Board of the United Kingdom, 1956: 299-301. Search in Google Scholar

14 Ballard M. Asymmetry in tooth size: A factor in the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of malocclusions. Angle Orthod 1944; 14: 67-70. Search in Google Scholar

15 Gilpatric WH. Arch predetermination - is it practical? J Am Dent Assoc 1923; 10: 553-572. Search in Google Scholar

16 Korbitz G Jun. Biologie im dienste der kieferorthopodie - Zschr F Stom 1940; 38: 50. Quoted in: Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scandinav 1954; 12: 265-292. Search in Google Scholar

17 Rees DJ. A method for assessing the proportional relation of apical bases and contact diameters of the teeth. Am J Orthod 1953; 39: 693-707. Search in Google Scholar

18 Steadman SR. The relation of upper anterior teeth to lower anterior teeth as presented on plaster models of a group of acceptable occlusions. Angle Orthod 1952; 22:91-97. Search in Google Scholar

19 Neff CW. Tailored occlusion with the anterior coefficient. Am J Orthod 1949; 35: 309-333. Search in Google Scholar

20 Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scandinav 1954; 12: 265-292. Search in Google Scholar

21 Lundstrom A. Variation of tooth size in the aetiology of malocclusion. Am J Orthod 1955; 41: 872-876. Search in Google Scholar

22 Ballard NL. A fifth column within normal dental occlusions. Am J Orthod 1956; 42: 116-124. Search in Google Scholar

23 Bolton WA. Disharmony in tooth size and its relation to the analysis and treatment of malocclusion. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 113-130. Search in Google Scholar

24 Bolton WA. The clinical application of a tooth-size analysis. Am J Orthod 1962; 48: 504-529. Search in Google Scholar

25 Crosy DR, Alexander CG. The occurrence of tooth size discrepancies among different malocclusion groups. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop 1989; 95: 457-461. Search in Google Scholar

26 Neff CW. The size relationship between the maxillary and mandibular anterior segments of the dental arch. Angle Orthod 1957; 27: 138-147. Search in Google Scholar

27 Stifter J. A study of Pont’s, Howe’s, Rees’, Neffs and Bolton’s analyses on Class I adult dentitions. Angle Orthod 1958; 28: 215-225. Search in Google Scholar

28 Tonn P. Uber die mesio-distalen Zahnbreitenrelationen der Zahne des Oberkiefers zu den entsprechenden des Unterkiefers bei normalen and anormalen Okklusion. Diss Berlin, 1937. Quoted in: Lundstrom A. Intermaxillary tooth width ratio and tooth alignment and occlusion. Acta Odontol Scandinav 1954; 12: 265-292. Search in Google Scholar

29 Bowles RM. Evaluation of tooth size relationship in various intradental and interdental arch segments. Unpublished M.S. thesis, University of Tennessee, 1968. Quoted in: Claridge D. Evaluating tooth size in premolar-extraction cases. Am J Orthod 1973; 64: 457-468. Search in Google Scholar

30 Dahlberg AA. Statistical methods for medical and biological students. London: Allen and Unwin Ltd, 1940: 122-132. Search in Google Scholar

31 Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion. Am J Orthod 1972; 62: 296-309. Search in Google Scholar