This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ et al. Test of a method to determine social acceptable occlusal conditions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8: 424-33.Search in Google Scholar
Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ. Comparison of SASOC, a measure of dental aesthetics, with three orthodontic indices and orthodontist judgement. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1983; 11: 236-41.Search in Google Scholar
Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 314-8.Search in Google Scholar
Kenealy P, Shaw W. The effects of social class on uptake of orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1989; 16: 107-11.Search in Google Scholar
Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment: A Review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8: 36-45.Search in Google Scholar
Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: the dental aesthetic index. Iowa City: NC Cons and J. Jenny, 1986.Search in Google Scholar
Cons NC, Jenny, Kohout FJ, et al. Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America. Int Dent J 1983; 33: 200-6.Search in Google Scholar
Tullock JFC, Shaw WC, UnderhillG, et al. A comparison of attitudes towards orthodontic treatment in British and American communities. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 253-259.Search in Google Scholar
Cons NC, Jenny J, Kahout FJ et al. Utility of the DAI in industrialized and developing countries. J Public Health Dent 1989; 49: 163-6.Search in Google Scholar
Shaw WC, Lewis HG, Robinson NRE. Perceptions of malocclusion. Br Dent J 1975; 138: 211-216.Search in Google Scholar
Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 399-415.Search in Google Scholar
Helm S, Petersen PE, Kreiborg S et al. Effect of separate malocclusion traits on concern for dental appearance. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986; 14: 217-20.Search in Google Scholar
Linn EL. Social meanings of dental appearance. J Health Human Behav 1966; 7: 289-95.Search in Google Scholar
Banack AR, Cleall JF, Yip AS. Epidemiology of malocclusion in 12-year-old Winnipeg school children. J Canad Dent Assoc 1972; 12: 437-55.Search in Google Scholar
Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion: A 15-year follow-up study in 30-year-old Danes. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 110-18.Search in Google Scholar
Jenny J, Proshek JM. Visibility and prestige of occupations and the importance of dental appearance. J Canad Dent Assn 1986; 12: 987-9.Search in Google Scholar
Jenny J, Cons NC. Guidelines to uising the DAI. A supplement to the DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: NC Cons, J Jenny, 1988.Search in Google Scholar
Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Orthodontically treated young adults: Awareness of their own dental Arrangement. Europ J Orthod. 1991; 13: 7-14.Search in Google Scholar
Freer TJ, Olive R. A survey of malocclusion and treatment needs. Aust Orthod J 1976; 4: 128-36.Search in Google Scholar
Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, et al.. The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Europ J Orthod 1992; 14: 125-39.Search in Google Scholar