Orthodontic Treatment Need and the Dental Aesthetic Index

1 Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ et al. Test of a method to determine social acceptable occlusal conditions. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8: 424-33. Search in Google Scholar

2 Jenny J, Cons NC, Kohout FJ. Comparison of SASOC, a measure of dental aesthetics, with three orthodontic indices and orthodontist judgement. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1983; 11: 236-41. Search in Google Scholar

3 Evans R, Shaw W. Preliminary evaluation of an illustrated scale for rating dental attractiveness. Eur J Orthod 1987; 9: 314-8. Search in Google Scholar

4 Kenealy P, Shaw W. The effects of social class on uptake of orthodontic treatment. Br J Orthod 1989; 16: 107-11. Search in Google Scholar

5 Shaw WC, Addy M, Ray C. Dental and social effects of malocclusion and effectiveness of orthodontic treatment: A Review. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1980; 8: 36-45. Search in Google Scholar

6 Cons NC, Jenny J, Kohout FJ. DAI: the dental aesthetic index. Iowa City: NC Cons and J. Jenny, 1986. Search in Google Scholar

7 Cons NC, Jenny, Kohout FJ, et al. Perceptions of occlusal conditions in Australia, the German Democratic Republic and the United States of America. Int Dent J 1983; 33: 200-6. Search in Google Scholar

8 Tullock JFC, Shaw WC, UnderhillG, et al. A comparison of attitudes towards orthodontic treatment in British and American communities. Am J Orthod 1984; 85: 253-259. Search in Google Scholar

9 Cons NC, Jenny J, Kahout FJ et al. Utility of the DAI in industrialized and developing countries. J Public Health Dent 1989; 49: 163-6. Search in Google Scholar

10 Shaw WC, Lewis HG, Robinson NRE. Perceptions of malocclusion. Br Dent J 1975; 138: 211-216. Search in Google Scholar

11 Shaw WC. The influence of children’s dentofacial appearance on social attractiveness as judged by peers and lay adults. Am J Orthod 1981; 79: 399-415. Search in Google Scholar

12 Helm S, Petersen PE, Kreiborg S et al. Effect of separate malocclusion traits on concern for dental appearance. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1986; 14: 217-20. Search in Google Scholar

13 Linn EL. Social meanings of dental appearance. J Health Human Behav 1966; 7: 289-95. Search in Google Scholar

14 Banack AR, Cleall JF, Yip AS. Epidemiology of malocclusion in 12-year-old Winnipeg school children. J Canad Dent Assoc 1972; 12: 437-55. Search in Google Scholar

15 Helm S, Kreiborg S, Solow B. Psychosocial implications of malocclusion: A 15-year follow-up study in 30-year-old Danes. Am J Orthod 1985; 87: 110-18. Search in Google Scholar

16 Jenny J, Proshek JM. Visibility and prestige of occupations and the importance of dental appearance. J Canad Dent Assn 1986; 12: 987-9. Search in Google Scholar

17 Jenny J, Cons NC. Guidelines to uising the DAI. A supplement to the DAI: The Dental Aesthetic Index. Iowa City: NC Cons, J Jenny, 1988. Search in Google Scholar

18 Espeland LV, Stenvik A. Orthodontically treated young adults: Awareness of their own dental Arrangement. Europ J Orthod. 1991; 13: 7-14. Search in Google Scholar

19 Freer TJ, Olive R. A survey of malocclusion and treatment needs. Aust Orthod J 1976; 4: 128-36. Search in Google Scholar

20 Richmond S, Shaw WC, O’Brien KD, et al.. The development of the PAR index (Peer Assessment Rating): reliability and validity. Europ J Orthod 1992; 14: 125-39. Search in Google Scholar