Examining the relationship between adult education participant engagement and learning effectiveness using statistical analysis

[1] Long, Y., & Aleven, V. (2017). Enhancing learning outcomes through self-regulated learning support with an open learner model. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 27(1), 55-88. Search in Google Scholar

[2] Fleagle, T. R., Borcherding, N. C., Harris, J., & Hoffmann, D. S. (2018). Application of flipped classroom pedagogy to the human gross anatomy laboratory: student preferences and learning outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education. Search in Google Scholar

[3] Payne, P., Lele, O., Johnson, B., & Holve, E. (2017). Enabling open science for health research: collaborative informatics environment for learning on health outcomes (cielo). Journal of Medical Internet Research, 19(7), e276. Search in Google Scholar

[4] Xing, X., & Saghaian, S. (2022). Learning outcomes of a hybrid online virtual classroom and in-person traditional classroom during the covid-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 14. Search in Google Scholar

[5] Nicolas, P., Katie, T., Julie, M., Vincent, B., Franoise, J., & Ghelfenstein-Ferreira, Théo, et al. (2023). Using gamification to improve engagement and learning outcomes in medical microbiology: the case study of ‘bacteriagame’. FEMS Microbiology Letters. Search in Google Scholar

[6] Haslam, Catherine, Wagner, Joseph, Wegener, & Signy, et al. (2017). Elaborative encoding through self-generation enhances outcomes with errorless learning: findings from the skypekids memory study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation. Search in Google Scholar

[7] Frberg, A., & Lundvall, S. (2022). Sustainable development perspectives in physical education teacher education course syllabi: an analysis of learning outcomes. Sustainability, 14. Search in Google Scholar

[8] Choi-Lundberg, Derek, L., Williams, Anne-Marie, M., & Zimitat, C. (2017). A psychometric evaluation of the anatomy learning experiences questionnaire and correlations with learning outcomes. Anatomical Sciences Education. Search in Google Scholar

[9] Grinberg, I., & Singer, J. (2021). Etac abet and evaluateur-cure: findings from combining two assessment approaches as indicators of student learning outcomes. Journal of engineering technology(2), 38. Search in Google Scholar

[10] Bogner, F. X. (2021). Cannot see the forest for the trees? comparing learning outcomes of a field trip vs. a classroom approach. Forests, 12. Search in Google Scholar

[11] Wiegert, J. G., Leslie, F., Jonan, D., Kathrin, D., & Sushil, P. (2021). 485 opportunities produced and learning outcomes achieved through a design thinking approach to problem based learning in an animal science capstone. Journal of Animal Science(Supplement_3), Supplement_3. Search in Google Scholar

[12] Harder, M. K., Dike, F. O., Firoozmand, F., Des, Bouvrie, N., & Masika, R. J. (2021). Are those really transformative learning outcomes? validating the relevance of a reliable process. Journal of cleaner production(Feb.20), 285. Search in Google Scholar

[13] Koldestam, M., Brostrom, A., Petersson, C., & Knutsson, S. (2021). Model for improvements in learning outcomes (milo): development of a conceptual model grounded in caritative caring aimed to facilitate undergraduate nursing students’ learning during clinical practice (part 1). Nurse education in practice(55-), 55. Search in Google Scholar

[14] Rodriguez-Triana, M. J., Prieto, L. P., Holzer, A., & Gillet, D. (2020). Instruction, student engagement, and learning outcomes: a case study using anonymous social media in a face-to-face classroom. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, PP(99), 1-1. Search in Google Scholar

[15] Heo, D., Anwar, S., & Menekse, M. (2018). The relationship between engineering students’ achievement goals, reflection behaviors, and learning outcomes. The international journal of engineering education, 34(5), 1634-1643. Search in Google Scholar

[16] Lindsey, W., Warfa, A. M., & Tractenberg, R. E. (2017). Process oriented guided inquiry learning (pogil) marginally effects student achievement measures but substantially increases the odds of passing a course. Plos One, 12(10), e0186203. Search in Google Scholar

[17] Shen, Y., Wang, Z., Hao, A., Yu, P., Zhai, X., & Wang, H. (2021). Investigating the effect of vr + haptics approach on students’ flow experience and outcomes: an empirical study on vr laparoscopy. Complexity. Search in Google Scholar

[18] Turner, M. J., & Webster, R. (2017). An eualuation of flipped courses in electrical engineering technology using course learning outcomes and student course assessments. Journal of engineering technology, 34(2), 34-43. Search in Google Scholar

[19] Yueh, H. P., Liang, C., & Liu, Y. L. (2018). Influences of learning competency and e-learning implementation on learning outcomes of engineering students. International Journal of Engineering Education, 34(4), 1376-1383. Search in Google Scholar