Effect of Pore Architecture of 3D Printed Open Porosity Cellular Structures on Their Resistance to Mechanical Loading: Part II – Numerical Analysis

1. Korkmaz ME, Gupta MK, Robak G, Moj K, Krolczyk GM, Kuntoğlu M. Development of lattice structure with selective laser melting process: A state of the art on properties, future trends and challenges. J Manuf Process. 2022 Sep 1;81:1040–63. Search in Google Scholar

2. Tian L, Lu L, Chen W, Xia Y, Wang CCL, Wang W. Organic Open-cell Porous Structure Modeling. In: Symposium on Computational Fabrication [Internet]. New York, NY, USA: ACM; 2020. p. 1–12. Available from: https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3424630.3425414 Search in Google Scholar

3. Mora S, Pugno NM, Misseroni D. 3D printed architected lattice structures by material jetting. Mater Today [Internet]. 2022;59: 107–32. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2022.05.008 Search in Google Scholar

4. Thirunavukkarasu N, Gao J, Peng S, Laroui A, Wu L, Weng Z. Mechanically robust 3D printed elastomeric lattices inspired by strong and tough hierarchical structures. Addit Manuf [Internet]. 2023;66(November 2022):103451. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2023.103451 Search in Google Scholar

5. Kurzydłowski KJ, Ralph B. The quantitative description of the microstructure of materials. CRC Press; 1995. 418 p. Search in Google Scholar

6. Bernacka M, Aladag M, Dubicki A, Zgłobicka I. Effect of Pore Architecture of 3d Printed Open Porosity Cellular Structures on their Resistance to Mechanical Loading: Part I – Experimental Studies. Acta Mech Autom. 2024;18(3):419–26. Search in Google Scholar

7. Montazerian H, Davoodi E, Asadi-Eydivand M, Kadkhodapour J, Solati-Hashjin M. Porous scaffold internal architecture design based on minimal surfaces: A compromise between permeability and elastic properties. Mater Des [Internet]. 2017 Jul;126(April):98–114. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2017.04.009 Search in Google Scholar

8. Li S, Yuan S, Zhu J, Zhang W, Tang Y, Wang C, et al. Optimal and adaptive lattice design considering process-induced material anisotropy and geometric inaccuracy for additive manufacturing. Struct Multidiscip Optim. 2022 Jan 1;65(1):1–16. Search in Google Scholar

9. Barbaros I, Yang Y, Safaei B, Yang Z, Qin Z, Asmael M. State-of-the-art review of fabrication, application, and mechanical properties of functionally graded porous nanocomposite materials. Nanotechnol Rev [Internet]. 2022 Jan 1 [cited 2022 Oct 22];11(1):321–71. Available from: https://www.degruyter.com/document/doi/10.1515/ntrev-2022-0017/html Search in Google Scholar

10. Liu R, Ma L, Liu H, Xu B, Feng C, He R. Effects of pore size on the mechanical and biological properties of stereolithographic 3D printed HAp bioceramic scaffold. Ceram Int. 2021 Oct 15;47(20):28924–31. Search in Google Scholar

11. Jiao C, Xie D, He Z, Liang H, Shen L, Yang Y, et al. Additive manufacturing of Bio-inspired ceramic bone Scaffolds: Structural Design, mechanical properties and biocompatibility. Mater Des. 2022 May 1;217. Search in Google Scholar

12. Cerardi A, Caneri M, Meneghello R, Concheri G, Ricotta M. Mechanical characterization of polyamide cellular structures fabricated using selective laser sintering technologies. Mater Des. 2013 Apr 1;46:910–5. Search in Google Scholar

13. Cipriani CE, Ha T, Martinez Defilló OB, Myneni M, Wang Y, Benjamin CC, et al. Structure–Processing–Property Relationships of 3D Printed Porous Polymeric Materials. ACS Mater Au [Internet]. 2021 Sep 8 [cited 2022 Oct 22];1(1):69–80. Available from: https://pubs.acs.org/doi/full/10.1021/acsmaterialsau.1c00017 Search in Google Scholar

14. Zeleniakienė D, Kleveckas T, Liukaitis J, G. M. The Influence of Porosity on Stress and Strain State of Porous Polymer Materials. Mater Sci. 2003;9(4):358–62. Search in Google Scholar

15. Chen X, Ji Q, Wei J, Tan H, Yu J, Zhang P, et al. Light-weight shell-lattice metamaterials for mechanical shock absorption. Int J Mech Sci [Internet]. 2020;169(August 2019):105288. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.105288 Search in Google Scholar

16. White DA, Kudo J, Swartz K, Tortorelli DA, Watts S. A reduced order model approach for finite element analysis of cellular structures. Finite Elem Anal Des [Internet]. 2023 Feb [cited 2022 Oct 26];214:103855. Available from: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0168874X22001287 Search in Google Scholar

17. Ni Y, Liao H, Zhao Q, Wu W, Shi Y, Wu S. Investigations of the failure behaviors of open-cell copper foam based on in-situ X-ray tomography compression experiments and image reconstructed finite element modeling. Eng Fract Mech. 2022 Mar 15;263:108323. Search in Google Scholar

18. Ruiz de Galarreta S, Jeffers JRT, Ghouse S. A validated finite element analysis procedure for porous structures. Mater Des. 2020 Apr 1;189. Search in Google Scholar

19. Abueidda DW, Elhebeary M, Shiang CS (Andrew), Pang S, Abu Al-Rub RK, Jasiuk IM. Mechanical properties of 3D printed polymeric Gyroid cellular structures: Experimental and finite element study. Mater Des. 2019 Mar 5;165:107597. Search in Google Scholar

20. Smith M, Guan Z, Cantwell WJ. Finite element modelling of the compressive response of lattice structures manufactured using the selective laser melting technique. Int J Mech Sci. 2013 Feb 1;67: 28–41. Search in Google Scholar

21. Zhong L, Li X. Simulation analysis of lightweight cylindrical lattice materials with different unit cells. J Coast Res. 2015 Mar; (73 (10073)):155–9. Search in Google Scholar

22. Sadeghzade M, Gharehbaghi H, Farrokhabadi A. Experimental and analytical studies of mechanical properties of additively manufactured lattice structure based on octagonal bipyramid cubic unit cell. Addit Manuf. 2021 Dec 1;48:102403. Search in Google Scholar

23. Chen W, Zheng X, Liu S. Finite-Element-Mesh Based Method for Modeling and Optimization of Lattice Structures for Additive Manufacturing. Mater 2018:23;11(11):2073. Search in Google Scholar

24. Song J, Wang Y, Zhou W, Fan R, Yu B, Lu Y, et al. Topology optimization-guided lattice composites and their mechanical characterizations. Compos Part B Eng. 2019 Mar 1;160:402–11. Search in Google Scholar

25. Leon-Patiño CA, Drew RAL. Role of metal interlayers in the infiltration of metal-ceramic composites. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2005 Aug;9(4–5):211–8. Search in Google Scholar

26. Lim YE, Park JH, Park K. Automatic Design of 3D Conformal Lightweight Structures Based on a Tetrahedral Mesh. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Technol 2018 54 [Internet]. 2018 Aug 23 [cited 2022 Oct 26];5(4):499–506. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40684-018-0053-2 Search in Google Scholar

27. Salonitis K, Chantzis D, Kappatos V. A hybrid finite element analysis and evolutionary computation method for the design of lightweight lattice components with optimized strut diameter. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 2016 909 [Internet]. 2016 Oct 21 [cited 2022 Oct 26]; 90(9):2689–701. Available from: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00170-016-9528-x Search in Google Scholar

28. Yang L, Yan C, Cao W, Liu Z, Song B, Wen S, et al. Compression–compression fatigue behaviour of gyroid-type triply periodic minimal surface porous structures fabricated by selective laser melting. Acta Mater. 2019 Dec 1;181:49–66. Search in Google Scholar

29. Shin J, Kim S, Jeong D, Lee HG, Lee D, Lim JY, et al. Finite Element Analysis of Schwarz P Surface Pore Geometries for Tissue-Engineered Scaffolds. Math Probl Eng [Internet]. 2012;2012:1–13. Available from: http://www.hindawi.com/journals/mpe/2012/694194/ Search in Google Scholar

30. Gonzalez FJQ, Nuno N. Finite element modeling of manufacturing irregularities of porous materials. Biomater Biomech Bioeng [Internet]. 2016 Mar 25;3(1):1–14. Available from: http://koreascience.or.kr/journal/view.jsp?kj=E1TPEG&py=2016&vnc=v3n1&sp=1 Search in Google Scholar

31. Deliormanlı AM, Deliormanlı AH. Finite element method simulation for the prediction of mechanical properties of three-dimensional periodic bioactive glass scaffolds. J Aust Ceram Soc [Internet]. 2017 Oct 13;53(2):299–307. Available from: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s41779-017-0037-7 Search in Google Scholar

32. Khrapov D, Koptyug A, Manabaev K, Léonard F, Mishurova T, Bruno G, et al. The impact of post manufacturing treatment of functionally graded Ti6Al4V scaffolds on their surface morphology and mechanical strength. J Mater Res Technol. 2020;9(2):1866–81. Search in Google Scholar

33. Gardan J. Additive manufacturing technologies : State of the art and trends [Internet]. Additive Manufacturing Handbook. CRC Press; 2017 [cited 2022 Oct 26]. Available from: https://www.taylorfrancis.com/chapters/edit/10.1201/9781315119106-10/additive-manufacturing-technologies-julien-gardan Search in Google Scholar

34. Ngo TD, Kashani A, Imbalzano G, Nguyen KTQ, Hui D. Additive manufacturing (3D printing): A review of materials, methods, applications and challenges. Compos Part B Eng. 2018 Jun 15;143:172–96. Search in Google Scholar

35. PA 12 - PA2200: Nylon for Industrial 3D Printing | EOS GmbH [Internet]. [cited 2022 Oct 10]. Available from: https://www.eos.info/en/additive-manufacturing/3d-printing-plastic/sls-polymer-materials/polyamide-pa-12-alumide Search in Google Scholar

36. MSC Software. Marc/Mentat 2020 Advanced Nonlinear FEA Software. Search in Google Scholar

37. Bernacka ME. Bio-inspired design and experimental verification properties of porous elements obtained by 3D printing. [Bialystok]: Bialystok University of Technology; 2021. Search in Google Scholar

38. Teng F, Sun Y, Guo S, Gao B, Yu G. Topological and Mechanical Properties of Different Lattice Structures Based on Additive Manufacturing. Micromachines. 2022;13(7). Search in Google Scholar