[
Armsworth, P.R., Chan, K.M., Daily, G.C., Ehrlich, P.R., Kremen, C., Ricketts, T.H., Sanjayan, M.A. (2007). Ecosystem-service science and the way forward for conservation. Conservation Biology, 21(6),1383-4.10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00821.x18173455
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Balmford, A., Rodrigues, A.S.L., Walpole, M., ten Brink, P., Kettunen, M., Braat, L., de Groot, R. (2008). The Economics of Biodiversity and Ecosystems: Scoping the Science. Cambridge, UK: European Commission (ENV/070307/2007/486089/ETU/B2).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Beaumont, N.J., Mongruel, R., Hooper, T. (2017). Practical application of the Ecosystem Service Approach (ESA): lessons learned and recommendations for the future. International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management, 13, 68–78.10.1080/21513732.2018.1425222
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bingham, G., Bishop, R., Brody, M., Bromley, D., Clark, E.T., Cooper, W., Costanza, R., Hale, T., Hayden, G., Kellert, S., Norgaard, R., Norton, B., Payne, J., Russell, C., Suter. G. (1995). Issues in ecosystem valuation: improving information for decision making. Ecological Economics, 14, 73–90.10.1016/0921-8009(95)00021-Z
]Search in Google Scholar
[
CEC, (2006). Commission Staff Working Document. Document Accompanying the Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions - Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Impact Assessment of the Thematic Strategy for Soil Protection. Brussels: SEC. Retrieved January 18, 2022, from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=celex:52006SC0620
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costanza, R., d’Arge, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Grasso, M., Hannon, B., Limburg, K., Naeem, S., O’Neill, R.V., Paruelo, J., Raskin, R.G., Sutton. P., van den Belt, M. (1997). The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature, 387, 253-260.10.1038/387253a0
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Costanza, R., Daly, H.E. (1992). Natural capital and sustainable development. Conservation Biology, 6, 37–46.10.1046/j.1523-1739.1992.610037.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
de Groot, R. S. (1992). Functions of Nature: Evaluation of Nature in Environmental Planning, Management, and Decision Making. Wolters-Noordhoff, Groningen. Polar Record,, 29(169), 162
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Desrousseaux, M., Kotiaho, J.S., Kohler, F. (2017). Are Soils Taken into Consideration by the IPBES Assessment on Land Degradation and Restoration? In: Ginzky H., Heuser I., Qin T., Ruppel O., Wegerdt P. (eds) International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy 2016. International Yearbook of Soil Law and Policy, 2016. Springer, Cham, 165-177.10.1007/978-3-319-42508-5_13
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Diaz, S., Demisse, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., Larigauderie, A., Adhikari, J.R., Arico, S., Baldi, A., Bartuska, A., Baste, I.A., Bilgin, A., Brondizio, E., Chan, K.M., Figueroa, V.E., Duraiappah, A., Fischer, M., Zlatanova, D. (2015). The IPBES Conceptual Framework – connecting nature and people. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 14, 1-16.10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dominati, E., Patterson, M., Mackay, A. (2010). A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils. Ecological Economics, 69(9), 1858-1868.10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.05.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Fisher, B., Turner, K., Zysltra, M., Brouwer, R., de Groot, R., Farber, S., Ferraro, P., Green, R., Hadley, D., Harlow, J., Jefferiss, P., Kirkby, C., Morling, P., Mowatt, S., Naidoo, R., Paavola, J., Strassburg, B., Yu, D., Balmford, A. (2008). Ecosystem services and economic theory: integration for policy-relevant research. Ecological Applications, 18(8), 2050–2067.10.1890/07-1537.119263897
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Grodzinska-Jurczak, M., Cent, J. (2011). Expansion of Nature Conservation Areas: Problems with Natura 2000 Implementation in Poland? Environmental Management, 47, 11–27.10.1007/s00267-010-9583-2301619521107836
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Haase, D., Schwarz, N., Strohbach, M., Kroll, F., Seppelt, R. (2012). Synergies, trade-offs, and losses of ecosystem services in urban regions: an integrated multiscale framework applied to the Leipzig-Halle region, Germany. Ecology and Society, 17(3), 22.10.5751/ES-04853-170322
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ingram, J.C., Wilkie, D., Clements, T., McNab, R.B., Nelson, F., Baur, E.H., Sachedina, H.T., Peterson, D.D., Foley, C.A.H. (2014). Evidence of Payments for Ecosystem Services as a mechanism for supporting biodiversity conservation and rural livelihoods. Ecosystem Services, 7, 10–21.10.1016/j.ecoser.2013.12.003
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kluvánková-Oravská, T., Chobotová, V., Banaszak, I., Slavikova, L., Trifunovova, S. (2009). From government to governance for biodiversity: the perspective of central and Eastern European transition countries. Environmental Policy and Governance, 19, 186–196.10.1002/eet.508
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latawiec AE, Koryś A, Koryś KA, Kuboń M, Sadowska U, Gliniak M, Sikora J, Drosik A, Niemiec M, Klimek-Kopyra A, Sporysz M, Usowicz B, Medeiros B. (2021). Economic Analysis of Bio-char Use in Soybean Production in Poland. Agronomy, 11, 2108.10.3390/agronomy11112108
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Latawiec, A.E., Strassburg, B.B.N, Junqueira, A.B., Araujo, E., de Moraes, L.F.D., Pinto, H.A.N., Castro, A., Rangel, M., Malaguti, G.A., Rodrigues A.F., Barioni, L.G., Novotny, E.H., Cornelissen, G., Mendes, M., Batista, N., Guerra, J.G., Zonta, E., Jakovac, C., Hale, S.E. (2019). Biochar amendment improves degraded pasturelands in Brazil: environmental and cost-benefit analysis. Scientific Reports, 9, 11993.10.1038/s41598-019-47647-x670030931427607
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Maes, J., Burkhard, B., Geneletti, D. (2018). Ecosystem services are inclusive and deliver multiple values. A comment on the concept of nature’s contributions to people. One Ecosystem, 3, e24720.10.3897/oneeco.3.e24720
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mączka, K. 2019. Ecosystem services in environmental discourse – Application of ecosystem services concept in Poland (in Polish: Usługi ekosystemowe w dyskursie środowiskowym. Studium wdrożenia koncepcji usług ekosystemowych w Polsce). Doctoral dissertation, University of Adam Mickiewicz in Poznań, Faculty of Social Sciences, Poland.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mączka, K., Chmielewski, P., Jeran, A., Matczak, P., van Riper, C.J. (2019). The ecosystem services concept as a tool for public participation in management of Poland’s Natura 2000 network. Ecosystem Services, 35, 173-183.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.12.005
]Search in Google Scholar
[
MEA, 2005. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press. ISBN 1-59726-040-1.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mizgajski, A., Stępniewska, M. (2012). Ecosystem Services Assessment for Poland - Challenges and Possible Solutions (in Polish: Ocena świadczeń ekosystemów dla Polski wyzwania i możliwe rozwiązania). Economics and Environment, 2(42), 54-73.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pascual, U., Balvanera, P., Díaz, S., Pataki, G., Roth, E., Stenseke, M., Watson, R.T., Dessane, E.B., Islar, M., Kelemen, E., Maris, V., Quaas, M., Subramanian, S., Wittmer, H., Adlan, A., Ahn, S., Al-Hafedh, Y., Amankwah, E., Asah, S., Berry, P., Bilgin, A., Breslow, S., Bullock, C., Caceres, D., Daly-Hassen, H., Figueroa, E., Golden, C., Gómez-Baggethun, E., Gonzalez-Jimenez, D., Houdet, J., Keune, H., Kumar, R., Ma, K., May, P., Mead, A., O’Farrell, P., Pandit, R., Pengue, W., Pichis-Madruga, R., Popa, F., Preston, S., Pacheco-Balanza, D., Saarikoski, H., Strassburg, B., van den Belt, M., Verma, M., Wickson, F., Yagi, N. (2017). Valuing nature’s contributions to people: The IPBES approach. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26-27, 7–16.10.1016/j.cosust.2016.12.006
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodrigues, A.F., Latawiec, A.E., Reid, B.J., Solorzano, A., Schuler, A.E., Lacerda, C., Fidalgo, E.C.C., Scarano, F.R., Tubenchlak, F., Pena, I., Vicente-Vicente, J.L., Korys, K.A., Cooper, M., Fernandes, N.F., Prado, R.B., Maioli, V., Dib, V., Teixeira W.G. (2021). Systematic review of soil ecosystem services in tropical regions. Royal Society Open Science, 8, 201584.10.1098/rsos.201584807495833959328
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Seppelt, R., Dormann, C.F., Eppink, F.V., Lautenbach, S., Schmidt, S. (2011). A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48, 630–636.10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Spangenberg, J.H., Settele, J. 2010. Precisely incorrect? Monetising the value of ecosystem services. Ecological Complexity, 7, 327-337.10.1016/j.ecocom.2010.04.007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stępniewska, M., Lupa, P., Mizgajski, A. (2018). Drivers of the ecosystem services approach in Poland and perception by practitioners. Ecosystem Services, 33(A), 59-67.10.1016/j.ecoser.2018.08.010
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sukhdev, P., Wittmer, H., Miller, D., ‘The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity (TEEB): Challenges and Responses’, Helm, D., Hepburn, C. (eds) (2014). Nature in the Balance: The Economics of Biodiversity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199676880.003.0007
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vegh, T., Jungwiwattanaporn, M., Pendleton, L., Murray, B. (2014). Mangrove ecosystem services valuation: state of the literature. Durham, NC: Duke University. (NI WP 14-06).
]Search in Google Scholar
