Otwarty dostęp

Connectors as a Key to Efficient Storm Water Management System: An In-Situ Assessment of Residential Estates in Poland


Zacytuj

INTRODUCTION

Urbanization has worsened urban flooding to a great extent. Together with this was accomplished a rapid change in landscape from natural to man-made [1]. The development of impermeable surfaces blocks water from natural penetration and leads to the intensification of surface runoff. That increase of impermeable surfaces causes hydrological characteristic changes in urban catchments [1, 2]. To reduce the human impact on components of the hydrological cycle in urban areas, paradigm shifts have emerged in recent decades from drainage-based urban design towards nature-based solutions [3]. The term nature-based solutions (NbS) has been present since the late 2000s, however, the concept itself is not new, based on the traditional design, the alternative one to “conventional engineering” [4, 5]. While NbS have been influenced and can still learn from traditions, the conceptual framework of NbS is linked to 21st century societal challenges. One of the challenges is climate change and the second is the human impact on biological diversity [6]. According to the United Nations definition, NbS for water are inspired and supported by nature and use, or mimic, natural processes to contribute to the improved management of water [7]. Such solutions introduce into cities, landscapes, and marine landscapes increasingly diverse natural and natural features and processes thanks to locally adapted, resource-efficient, and systemic interventions [8]. The definition, however, is not very detailed, but it’s commonly agreed that NbS must provide benefits for society, the economy, and nature at the same time. The opposite of the “traditional” water infrastructure, nature-based storm water control is characterized as a multi-functional system [9]. Those are the solutions that not only ensure safety against floods but also as an ecosystem service, to bring cultural and aesthetic values and have a positive impact on the health and well-being of the inhabitants [10, 11, 12, 13, 14].

In order to achieve sustainability goals to counteract these problems in Poland, there are prepared climate adaptation plans (MPA) that are strategic documents created on a local level. The goal of MPAs is to increase the adaptive capacity of the city in the face of possible threats of climate change [15]. Besides that, many cities take care of a rising awareness among citizens. Among other activities, they publish guides and catalogues that focus on easy-to-install retention and infiltration solutions.

However, there is a persistent gap between knowledge and practice. In the adaptation plan for Metropolis GZM (Poland) blue infrastructure solutions despite the declared systemic approach in reality propose individual elements [16]. Different cities started to publish informative catalogues and brochures that show just particular elements with their descriptions, advantages, and maintenance [17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22]. Their purpose is not only to raise awareness about flush floods among residents but also among local authorities, architects, or town planners. One of the examples could be the catalogue prepared for the city of Bydgoszcz. It presents elements of blue-green infrastructure divided into categories of land development [22]. However, the information is mostly theoretical there is missing instruction about how to organize a system. Another publication prepared for the city of Gdańsk has information that presented solutions for rain gardens that could be combined together, but missing information on how to achieve it [21]. In reality, such publications have mainly educational purposes and are not useful for professionals. Blue and green infrastructure has developed mainly in an informal manner [23, 24] thus it is missing formal terminology that could develop methods, ideas, concepts, and techniques [23]. Formal publications about sustainable rainwater management appear as textbooks showing elements of their advantages and technical tools [25, 26, 27]. However, sustainability is a wide term used by the authors who represent a more universal approach toward sustainability that is missing common framing and differs in details. So, confusion can occur, with different authors using different terms to mean the same thing, or ascribing different meanings to a given term [24].

The research aims to identify possible rainwater collection systems around the studied housing estates. While the previous studies mainly focus on describing particular elements and catalogues, the innovation of the paper is to identify rainwater management systems (RMS) in a scale of residential housing. Respecting the nature of the blue infrastructure, which is a set of interconnected elements, needs to be managed within the catchment [28]. Analyses of the number and type of elements and their composition in the system helped to determine whether land development projects could be called water-sensitive. It also allowed to name typically missing elements and the efficiency of applied solutions and answer the question of which elements are critical for efficient functioning of RMS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The investigation was based on desk research and in situ inventory. The research subjects were surface blue and green elements of land development, which were assessed considering their impact and role in rainwater management in residential estates.

To narrow down the area of choice of housing estates that were studied, I subjectively picked three localizations. The city of Warsaw, Wrocław, and Gdańsk. Those are three out of forty-four cities in Poland for which Urban Adaptation Plans were created. The plans, developed in cooperation with the Ministry of the Environment, aim to adapt to the forecasted climate changes. I used a systemic strategy for screening and finding relevant housing estates that are widely considered in media as “green”, “sustainable” or “water sensitive”. The selection criteria were location (Warsaw, Wrocław, Gdańsk), time of construction (between 2000 and 2020), and type of building (multifamily housing estate). The first step was to search for the projects from PLGBC (Eng. Polish Green Building Association) “Green Building” awards from 2010 to 2021. Two met the inclusion criteria of a total of ninety-five awarded projects. The second step was to search for examples in Google using the keywords “green housing estate”, “sustainable housing estate”, and “water management housing estate” in each localization. The resulting projects were screened for relevance and analysed in terms of the contents of their advertisements. This approach added eight housing estates to the research. In total, it gave eleven housing estates, including four estates in Gdańsk, two estates in Gdynia, one complex of estates in Wrocław, and four in Warsaw. The examples, due to the manner of selection, cannot be considered as representative ones.

The research concerned eleven housing estates in Poland that were built in the 21st century. Part of the estate is still under construction, but the research concerned only selected, existing fragments of buildings and land development. The examined fragments can be divided in terms of size into three groups (Table 1) large with an area of 60,000–84,000 m2, medium with an area of 34,000–48,000 m2, and small with an area of 19,000–28,000 m2. Wolne Miasto, Nowe Żerniki, 19 dzielnica, and Żoliborz Artystyczny are examples of large housing estates. The housing estate Nowe Żerniki in Wrocław consists of seven multifamily residential estates yet the structure of the complex was designed as a master plan. There are designed public spaces, green areas as well as a retention basin. So, in the tables as well they are visible as one. The medium estates are Zielony Południk, Nadmorski Dwór, Idea, and Beauforta estate. The group of small estates is Sokółka Zielenisz, Mickiewicza, and Jaśminowy Mokotów. Almost all housing estates, except Zielony Południk, have underground car parks. Underground car parks have an impact on green areas evaluation and may have an impact on shaping RMS.

Division by area. Author’s study

Group type Housing estate Research area [m2] The presence of an underground car park

large Wolne Miasto 68 612 yes
Nowe Żerniki 73 642 yes
19 dzielnica 60 975 yes
Żoliborz Artystyczny 84 000 yes

medium Zielony Południk 39 007 no
Nadmorski Dwór 33 958 yes
Idea 36 614 yes
Beauforta 47 752 yes

small Sokółki Zielenisz 18 948 yes
Mickiewicza 27 925 yes
Jaśminowy Mokotów 24 952 yes

The RMS was defined as a set of elements connected with the water flow where the rainwater is directed and captured for a specific purpose like an infiltration, or permanent or temporary retention. What is visualized in Fig. 1. The specific aspects of the research directly follow the presented definition on the local scale, and they were the origin of the rainwater (i), the general division of areas into use (ii), topography (iii), elements directing rainwater (iv), and identification of NbS elements (v). All of the chosen eleven housing estates were studied using those criteria.

Figure 1.

The rainwater management system diagram on which the methodology is based. Author’s study

Each of the estates was analyzed to verify the composition of an individual system. Following specific aspects of the research, recognition started with the rainwater sources (i): precipitation, surface runoff, and roof runoff. At this stage, to evaluate if the water from the surface runoff is well used in the system, crucial are road and pavement materials and the sewage sump’s location. The second analyzed element was the overall evaluation of land cover (ii): the percentage of roads and pavements area, building area, and green area that were additionally divided into different types. Naturally, water flows from higher parts of the landscape to lower ones by gravity so the third investigated element is terrain profile (iii). For this purpose, geoportal.gov.pl was used which acts as the central node of the Spatial Information Infrastructure, mediating access to spatial data and related services. The characteristics were investigated on a numerical land cover model, and the height differences were taken from the terrain profile created for each example. The system is efficient when the water flow is planned and controlled, so the next investigated elements are those directing the rainwater. Water can be guided by underground pipes, open channels, or breaks in the curbs to the point where it could be used as a resource. The fifth element of the system is nature-based solutions (v). They are divided into three main groups divided in terms of the process of infiltration, temporary retention, and long-term retention.

RESULTS
Rainwater sources

My analysis revealed that the origin of rainwater is omitted in many examples. The rainwater roof runoff as a source was included in two estates: Zielony Południk, Beauforta. The surface runoff as a rainwater source was present in all of the housings, yet three were carefully planned to be a part of the RMS: Zielony Południk, Idea, and Beauforta. In other examples, the lack of curbs suggested rather esthetical reasons than management of the rainwater from surface runoff. In Fig. 2a can be seen that curbs determine water flow direction and the opening allows rainwater to fill the rain garden. In Fig. 2b can be seen that the water from the pavement runoff fills the surrounding grass. Besides that, an infiltration element and open channels were designed on the side. Unfortunately, due to the lack of decline of the terrain, the open channel was twisted at the right angle, and the vast pavement runoff will end up in the sump and will not fill the infiltration area with aggregate.

Figure 2.

(a) Zielony Południk, Gdańsk. Example of the carefully planned catchment of rainwater from the surface runoff; (b) Wolne Miasto, Gdańsk. Example of a design with untapped surface runoff potential. Author’s photos

Land cover, greenery type, and roads and pavement materials

This analysis took into account the building area, greenery area, and roads and pavements area. The outcomes shown in Fig. 3. Investigation of the areas in terms of the type allowed me to notice that in the vast majority of housing estates the green area is above 40% of the total area: (49%) Wolne Miasto, (53%) Zielony Południk, (55%) Nadmorski Dwór, (56%) Idea, (46%) Beauforta, (45%) Sokółki Zielenisz, (70%) Mickiewicza, (46%) Jaśminowy Mokotów, (49%) Żoliborz Artystyczny. The wider picture divided the green areas into three categories: private gardens, low greenery, and greenery above 1m in height. The outcomes are shown in Fig. 4. Because the area of private gardens was fenced and covered from the view of pedestrians, it was verified in a quantitative manner during inventory and was excluded from the qualitative research. Mickiewicza’s housing estate is the only one that does not have private gardens. In other estates on a closer look high percentage of green area did not translate into a decent quality of green spaces in terms of water retention (Table 2). According to the research, four estates had a high amount of low greenery: Wolne Miasto (61%), Nadmorski Dwór (50%), Nowe Żerniki (59%), and Mickiewicza (70%). Besides, the buildings at Idea estate had green roofs, and there were green walls at Nowe Żerniki and Nadmorski Dwór estates. In terms of afforestation, most housing estates there have planted young trees whose crowns' diameter did not exceed 2 m (Zielony Południk, Beauforta, Sokółki Zielenisz, Nowe Żerniki, Jaśminowy Mokotów). At four housing estates (Idea, Mickiewicza, 19 dzielnica, Żoliborz Artystyczny), single old trees remain, and at two estates (Wolne Miasto, Nadmorski Dwór), larger areas with old trees were observed.

Figure 3.

Percentage of the land cover of investigated estates. Author’s study

Figure 4.

Green area division. Author’s study

The quality of green areas. Author’s study

Housing estate Percentage of green area in total Level of low grass Level of greenery above 1m in height Level of Quality of green area

Wolne Miasto 49% high medium low medium
Zielony Południk 53% low high medium high
Nadmorski Dwór 55% high medium medium medium
Idea 56% low high low high
Beauforta 46% low high low high
Sokółki Zielenisz 45% low high medium high
Nowe Żerniki 21% high medium medium medium
Mickiewicza 70% high medium - medium
Jaśminowy Mokotów 46% low low high low
19 dzielnica 30% low high high medium
Żoliborz Artystyczny 49% medium low high low

As a road and pavement material, all housing estates used impervious paving such as asphalt or concrete bricks without phase as a major surface finish. At six housing estates for parking spaces or part of the road additionally were used partly pervious paving such as concrete bricks with phases larger than five centimetres or geo ground grid: Wolne Miasto, Idea, Sokółki Zielenisz, Nowe Żerniki, Jaśminowy Mokotów, 19 dzielnica. Eight housing estates additionally had previous paving such as large and small fraction aggregate or sand: Wolne Miasto, Zielony Południk, Nadmorski Dwór, Idea, Beauforta, Nowe Żerniki, 19 dzielnica, Żoliborz Artystyczny. They were used as a part of temporary retention elements e.g., rain gardens, infiltration thorough, or inner pedestrian paths.

Terrain profile and elements directing the water

The natural differences in height help to shape an efficient RMS. The outcomes are shown in Table 3.

Terrain profile and its impact on RMS design. Terrain profiles are generated from geoportal.gov.pl. Author’s study

Housing estate Terrain profile Description Characteristic
Wolne Miasto The section done across the plot (from the north to the south). a: 15.19 m The topography of the area has great potential in shaping efficient RMS based on gravity water flow.
Zielony Południk The section done along the lot (from the north-west to the south-east) a: 15 m The topography of the area took a prime part in the shape of RMS at the estate. The areas placed lower are used as surface retention elements such as major rain gardens.
Nadmorski Dwór The section done along the plot (from the north-west to the south-east) a: 1.93 m

The differences in height appeared due to green roofs (green areas on the top of garages).

The slope was used for creating fountain and water cascades.

Idea The section done along the plot (from the west to the east) a: 0.65 m The depression visible on the terrain profile was not visible on the side. The area was mostly flat and water flow was determined by slight infliction of the pavement.
Beauforta The section done along the plot (from the north-west to the south-east) a: 1 m The first depression was the emergency reservoir, and the second depression (drop 1m) was not visible on the side. The characteristics were drops in the place of the car park and rises in the place of buildings and inner courtyards.
Sokółki Zielenisz The section done along the plot (from the south-west to the north-east) a: 1.85 m The topography has good potential for shaping RMS, which was noticed and used for open channels.
Nowe Żerniki The section done along the bottom part (from the west to the east) a: 4.88 m

Since Nowe Żerniki estate consists of many various residential estates in different parts the topography has unique characteristics.

The area was mostly flat, and more significant height differences appeared due to green roofs, which in fact are green areas on the top of garages.

The section done along the middle part (from the west to the east) a: 0.98 m
The section done along the upper part (from the west to the east) a: 2.98 m
Mickiewicza The section done along the plot (from the west to the east) d: 1.7 m That difference in height shown on the profile can be observed on the side as a slight depression with greenery.
Jaśminowy Mokotów The section done along the plot (from the south-west to the north-east) d: 2.31 m The visible height difference was in the area of private gardens. During inventory there was no observed significant height differences.
19 dzielnica The section done along the plot (from the north-west to the south-east) d: 4.39 m The characteristics were high slopes in the inner courtyards that are accessible just for residents.
Żoliborz Artystyczny The section done along the plot (from the east to the west) a: 7.7m Except for one bigger drop (that is rather a hole, in its shape difficult to use as an RMS element) the area was moderately hilly and had a good potential for shaping RMS.

a: height difference

Elements directing the water

This analysis concerned elements directing the rainwater from the parts where infiltration is impossible to the places where it could happen. Elements such as pipes, open channels, or breaks in curbs are designed to control the rainwater coming from surface runoff from impermeable surfaces or to prevent some elements that capture the rainwater for temporary or long-term retention from overfilling (Fig. 5). At three housing estates were used pipes (Fig. 5b): Zielony Południk, Beauforta, Nowe Żerniki. At Zielony Południk and Beauforta estates, due to the height differences, pipes hidden in the slopes helped to transport the roof runoff to the rain gardens. At Nowe Żerniki pipes directed the water from large impervious paving to the green area where water could infiltrate.

Figure 5.

Elements directing the rainwater from the area above the car park to the permeable areas at housing estate Beauforta in Gdynia. (a) open channels; (b) pipes. Photos Author’s

Open channels were the elements observed at five housing estates: Wolne Miasto, Zielony Południk, Nadmorski Dwór, Beauforta, Sokółki Zielenisz. Although, at Zielony Południk and Beauforta open channels were part of RMS (Fig 5a). At Zielony Południk channels were used for two main purposes. Firstly, due to big differences in heights, they directed the rainwater from the higher parts of the development plan to the lower parts. Secondly, in order to prevent overfilling some rain gardens, they transported the rainwater to other rain gardens that functioned as support basins. At Beauforta estate pipes transported the water that overflowed from rain gardens that were above the car park to the parts where water could be captured and slowly infiltrated. At the rest of the estates, they directed the rainwater to the sewage (Fig 6a, 6b). Wolne Miasto and Sokółki Zielenisz were the estates where external gutters drain rainwater from the roofs, which could potentially expand the RMS, except that total roof runoff ended up in the sewage. At Nowy Dwór estate the open channels were used for esthetical purposes as a part of an extensive fountain.

Figure 6.

Examples of open channels directing the rainwater to the sumps (a) Wolne Miasto, Gdynia; (b) Sokółki Zielenisz, Gdynia. Photos Author’s

Breaks in curbs or no curbs that allow surface runoff to infiltrate into nearby green fields were observed at six housing estates: Wolne Miasto, Zielony Południk, Idea, Beauforta, Nowe Żerniki, Jaśminowy Mokotów. At Zielony Południk and Beauforta breaks in curbs allowed to control the amount of water and directed it to increase the efficiency of the RMS.

The nature-based solutions

Observed nature-based solutions for RMS could be categorized into three main groups taking into account the rainwater surface retention period: infiltration, temporary retention, and long-term retention. NbS from the first group are the most popular solutions observed at nine housing estates: Wolne Miasto, Zielony Południk, Idea, Beauforta, Sokółki Zielenisz, Nowe Żerniki, Mickiewicza, Jaśminowy Mokotów, and Żoliborz Artystyczny. Those were the elements that helped fast infiltration in some cases it is a pervious surface like aggregate or sand (Fig 7a) in other cases it was accompanied by vegetation (Fig. 7b). In the second group are elements that because of their depth and shape were able to keep the rainwater temporally, such elements were observed at four estates: Wolne Miasto, Zielony Południk Idea, Beauforta. Those were different shapes and sizes of wet rain gardens (Fig. 7c) or slight depressions in the ground (Fig. 7d). In the third category are the elements that worked like an emergency reservoir (Beauforta, Wolne Miasto) (Fig. 7e) or the ones that had an esthetical function and were accompanied by vegetation (Wolne Miasto, Nowe Żerniki) (Fig. 7f).

Figure 7.

NbS for infiltration (a) Idea estate, (b) Nowe Żerniki estate; NbS for temporary retention (c) Zielony Południk estate, (d) Zielony Południk estate; NbS for long-term retention (e) Beauforta estate, (f) Wolne Miasto estate. Photos Author’s

Summary

The summary of the investigation is presented in Table 4. The objective of the research was to find housing estates with land development that can stand for rainwater management systems. The study showed three housing estates that fulfil this condition and had fully planned RMS: Zielony Południk, Idea, Beauforta. All of them had multiple rainwater sources, various types of paving materials, and numerous NbS. Two of them (Zielony Południk and Bauforta) had height differences that allowed the use of connectors such as open channels and underground pipes. The juxtaposition and combination of the individual elements positively impact the water flow. That’s why those were the most efficient systems. The terrain of Idea estate was flat, so the only solution used was the lack of curbs. Even though the combination of pervious and impervious surfaces and rain gardens made it a successful example of RMS.

The other ten housing estates could not be called efficient in water management. However, there were some examples that should be mentioned as interesting ones.

Summary table of elements of the rainwater management system. Author’s study

x – not properly/intentionally implemented solution

One of them is Nowe Żerniki, where the majority of elements were present. Despite breaks in the curbs the surface water was not intentionally captured. There were elements where runoff from large paved surfaces was directed by pipes to the green area where could infiltrate. However, there were too few due to the estate area. The topography in this area was quite an advantage, unfortunately, its potential had not been realized. In conclusion, there were some good elements, thus not compiled as a system for the whole estate.

Another one with big potential is Wolne Miasto estate. Rainwater management was missing some logic to stand for the system. There was a great number of NbS, the significant height differences, yet no connections and an overall plan had an impact on its failure. Existing open channels directed runoff straight to the sewage.

Looking at the results of the other eight housing estates in Table 4 it is possible to name typically missing elements (Fig. 8). Firstly, roof runoff was omitted. Secondly, connectors like pipes, open channels, and breaks in the curbs were lacking. Thirdly, no elements other than permeable surfaces capable of infiltration were identified, so the number and type of NbS were missing.

Figure 8.

Typically, missing elements. Author’s study

As a result, the RMS diagram for most cases (Fig. 9) does not differ from a standard situation where no rainwater management is based on surface retention and the nature-based solution is designed. This means the majority of surface runoff is captured by the sewage system. Some rain, when falls on permeable surfaces can be infiltrated.

Figure 9.

Diagram of RMS including typically missing elements. Author’s study

CONCLUSION

The most valuable green elements for RMS are trees and green roofs. Trees are a key element shaping the microclimate of the estate because they lower the local temperature. They bring hydrological benefits by slowing down and limiting the flow of rainwater [29]. For example, they can reduce storm water runoff by intercepting 15% to 27% of annual rainfall [30]. Even better results in retaining the rainwater have extensive green roofs that are promising elements of reducing rainfall runoff [31]. They obtain different results according to the layers and vegetation types [32, 33]. According to the research in Opole, about 44% of the rainwater from torrential rains is retained in the layers of the green roof, and in the case of rains not exceeding 5 mm/day [34]. While the other research results showed up to 80% of retained rainfall volume [35]. In quantitative evaluation, roof runoff area has hydrological potential [36]. This makes it clear that overlooking the roof area in planning a retention system is a mistake and has a great impact on efficiency if not disqualifying a project from being water-sensitive.

A high percentage of green areas does not constitute efficient RMS but should be considered while evaluating overall efficiency. In the housing estate Mickiewicza where 70% of green area, the quality of those spaces was low because of a large area of trimmed lawn. There were four housing estates with high-quality green areas, but one of them (Sokółki Zielenisz) had missing elements of RMS. Nevertheless, even a slight inclusion of vegetation helps to create an urban environment with better sustainability parameters [37] Vegetation is one of the most effective mitigation strategies for reducing the global change impact. Even lawn areas immediately reduce the impact effect of rainwater through direct interception that delays the outflow [30]. Any actions that increase permeable areas are valuable, e.g., a 35% reduction in the impermeable surface due to tree planting can reduce runoff in a parking lot by almost 18% [30].

Previous and partly pervious surfaces are widely considered elements of storm water management [27, 38]. On open-graded aggregate, much of the pollution material can seep down into the pavement and soil, where the community of microorganisms living there begins a rapid breakdown process [39]. Whereas sealed surfaces cause the transport and accumulation of pollutants originating from traffic areas, building materials, and other impervious surfaces [38, 39, 40]. Hence, it is necessary to provide an effective solution to drain and capture rainwater runoff from the impermeable surface [41]. As was noticed at Zielony Południk and Beauforta estates impermeable surfaces could be a part of the RMS as a passage for rainwater into elements of nature-based solutions such as rain gardens. These are promising elements in controlling the water. Maximum capacity is a frequently used parameter for evaluating efficiency, however, it might be misleading. The important thing is if the water will end up there, so investigating the way of the rainwater. The crucial element in terms of the definition of the system is the connectors between the elements. Individual rainwater management elements not connected together do not always have an impact on increasing the area’s retention ability [42].

The research investigation focuses on the RMS in systemic review, not discussing its impact on land development in terms of the quality of spaces that make them attractive for visiting and, in turn, support health and wellbeing. A combination of those two should be an interesting topic for further discussion while the studies of the quality of green spaces [43, 44] and blue spaces [45, 46] have already started. Another point is that the definition and diagram focus on water as a resource to be useful for greenery. Rainwater can be used not only for gardening but as well for car washing, and laundry [47], which might be a promising extension for maintaining residential areas. The RMS diagram was presented as a conceptual framework for rainwater systems in housing estates where the forward research agenda would need to consider the user needs and expectations.

eISSN:
2720-6947
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
4 razy w roku
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Architecture and Design, Architecture, Architects, Buildings