Stereochemistry plays an important role in drug design because the enantiomers of a drug frequently vary in their biological action and pharmacokinetic profiles. Racemates of a drug with either an inactive or an unsafe enantiomer can lead to detrimental effects. The manufacturing industry may still produce racemates, but such decisions must pass through rigorous analyses of the pharmacological and pharmacokinetic characteristics of the particular enantiomer related to the racemates. The pharmacokinetics of antidepressants or antidepressive agents is stereoselective and predominantly favors one enantiomer. The use of pure enantiomers offers (i) better specificity than the racemates in terms of certain pharmacological actions, (ii) enhanced clinical indications, and (iii) optimized pharmacokinetics. Therefore, controlling the stereoselectivity in the pharmacokinetics of antidepressive drugs is of critical importance in dealing with depression and psychiatric conditions. The objective of this review is to highlight the importance of the stereochemistry of antidepressants in the context of the design and development of new chirally pure pharmaceuticals, the potential complications caused by using racemates, and the benefits of using pure enantiomers.
Depression is one of the most common psychological illnesses, affecting >340 million people globally. This condition results in a 10% decrease of productive years, which cost the USA alone an additional US$210.5 billion in 2010, an increase of around 22% since 2005. Depressive disorders cause disability and are the single largest contributing group to nonfatal health loss worldwide [1, 2]. At any stage in life, people may experience sporadic feelings of anxiety or depression. Feeling depressed is a natural human response to challenging situations, such as the death of a loved one, financial difficulties, or personal issues. When such emotions transform into overwhelming sadness, or when a person feels hopeless, useless, or desperate, and if this lasts for a week or longer, the emotions might lead to a mood disorder and clinical depression. The symptoms of clinical depression impede everyday life and cause serious discomfort to the patients, their family, and friends. Although people with serious depressive symptoms can recover with appropriate treatment, many do not ever seek treatment because of the related societal stigma.
For reasons that are unclear, women and girls are nearly twice as likely to suffer from depression as men and boys. At any point in their life, close to 26% of women and girls suffer depression, by contrast with the figure among men and boys (up to 12%). Stress is among the greatest causes of depression, as shifts in certain aspects of life, society, professions, and ways of transport, in addition to drastic lifestyle changes, bring pressure on people to adapt at equal speed. In a representative population-based analysis using a medical expenditure panel survey, the proportion of those undergoing antidepressive treatment and those taking antidepressive agents through 2 decades (between 1996 and 2015) was calculated, and the prevalence of adults diagnosed with a major depressive disorder was found to have increased from 6.1% in 1996 to 10.4% in 2015 .
Depression is usually triggered by anomalies in the activities or production of certain neurotransmitters, particularly norepinephrine and dopamine. Norepinephrine controls alertness, attention, and motivation. Pharmacological treatments of depression vary widely among individuals.
Most antipsychotic and antidepressive medications are sold as a racemic mixture of their enantiomers, and some are available as individual enantiomers (Table 1). The response to these medications varies among individuals. Switching antidepressants is recommended when some patients have intolerable side effects, when the efficacy of the medication is low, or when there are adverse interactions between an antidepressant and other prescribed medications . The enantiomers or geometric isomers of a drug molecule differ substantially from one another in terms of their pharmacological properties. The latest advances in enantiomeric resolution have increased understanding of the chemical structure of drug targets. Increased perception of the many possible benefits of using single enantiomers instead of racemic drug mixtures has resulted in an increased focus to comprehend the role that chirality plays in drug design [4,5,6]. This has led to improved analysis of single enantiomers during drug development and chiral switching, that is, replacing a racemate with a substance that is already registered or sold as a pure enantiomer. While stereochemistry is an essential aspect to consider in all drug development, this review emphasizes the importance of the chirality of antidepressive agents.
Classification of chiral antidepressant drugs
More active form
Celexa, Cipramil, Zetalo, Lexapro
Racemate and (S)-citalopram
Prozac, Sarafem, Rapiflux
Racemate and (S)-fluoxetine
Zoloft, Actiser, Bioserene, Episod, Mentolift
Racemate and (+)-cis-(1S,4S)-sertraline
Paxil, Brisdelle, Paxil CR, Pexeva
Effexor, Effexor XR
Cymbalta, Drizalma Sprinkle, Irenka
Ixel, Savella, Dalcipran, Toledomin
Mixture of d-milnacipran (1S,2R) and l-milnacipran (1R,2S)
Mixture of (S,R)-reboxetine, (R,R)-, (R,S)-reboxetine (S,S)-reboxetine
Bonserin, Tolvon, Athimil, Depnon, Deprexolet, Lantanon, Lerivon, Demisone, and others
Science Direct, PubMed, Google Scholar, and Scopus databases were used to gather data for this review. The major descriptors used were selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI), antidepressants, stereoselectivity chirality of antidepressants, and pharmacokinetics.
During the past 2 decades, several important reviews of antidepressants have appeared; a summary of these reviews is provided below:
Sethi and Bhushan  presented a review article on enantioselective liquid chromatography (LC) analysis and determination of SSRIs. The review highlights a range of separation techniques and related aspects of antidepressant drugs.
Wei et al.  presented a review entitled “A historical review of antidepressant effects of ketamine and its enantiomers” in Pharmacology, Biochemistry, and Behavior, in which the authors discussed a history of (R,S)-ketamine and the effects of ketamine enantiomers in humans and rodents. The mechanisms of ketamine's antidepressive effects are discussed.
“A brief history of antidepressant drug development: from tricyclics to beyond ketamine,” published in 2018, provides a retrospective account of monoaminergic antidepressant drug development .
“Chirality of modern antidepressants: an overview,” by Budău et al.  is a review on the importance of chirality of a few modern antidepressive agents. However, there is no apparent discussion of their classification.
“Stereospecific LC and LC-mass spectrometry (MS) bioassays of antidepressants and psychotics,” by Nageswara Rao and Guru Prasad , in 2015, reviewed LC methods for the analysis of chiral antidepressive agents. The review provides a discussion of the advancement of chromatographic methods, including both direct and indirect approaches reported from 2000 to 2013.
“Stereochemistry and drug efficacy and development: relevance of chirality to antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs,” by Baker and Prior  in 2002 reviewed the role of each enantiomer in the efficacy of a drug. However, the discussion is limited to only a few antidepressive agents.
“Enantiomeric antidepressant drugs should be considered on individual merit,” by Baumann and Eap  in 2001, reviewed the enantiomeric pharmacology of 5 chiral anti-depressant drugs. They highlighted the stereoselective characteristics of enantiomeric drugs.
“Great expectations in stereochemistry: focus on antidepressants” by DeVane and Boulton , in 2002, highlighted the role of chirality in the stereoselective disposition and actions of antidepressants, although the focus was on a limited number of antidepressive agents.
Our present review comprises a discussion of various antidepressive agents listed in the sections as follows:
Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants (NASSAs)
Classification of antidepressive agents
There are various categories of antidepressant drugs. Each category has a different action mechanism and profile of side effects. These have been described by Wasan et al. .
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors
SSRIs are the most widely approved second-generation anti-depressant drugs used to relieve the symptoms of mild-to-serious depression. Compared with other forms of antidepressant drugs, these are reasonably safe with rare adverse effects. SSRIs counter depression by affecting neurotransmitters. Certain other disorders, including anxiety, obsessive–compulsive disorder, panic disorder, and phobic neurosis, are also controlled by SSRIs. Drug–drug interactions and therapeutic drug monitoring of non-SSRI antidepressants have been reviewed by Protti et al. . These authors have discussed the metabolism and interactions of these drugs, and brief notes on analytical methods useful for therapeutic monitoring have also been discussed.
Citalopram is a commonly utilized antidepressive agent of the SSRI family [16, 17]. The structure of citalopram or (RS)-1-[3-(dimethylamino)propyl]-1-(4-fluorophenyl)-3H-2-benzofuran-5-carbonitrile is presented in Figure 1. Citalopram has 1 asymmetric center and was originally marketed as a racemate (equimolar ratio of (R)- and (S)-citalopram). As found in numerous studies in vitro and in vivo, (S)-citalopram is pharmacologically more active, with (S)-desmethylcitalopram [(S)-d-citalopram] being active to a smaller extent . Investigations have also indicated (R)-citalopram to be therapeutically dormant and to reduce the activity of (S)-citalopram . After administering (RS)-citalopram, the plasma level of (S)-citalopram is roughly a third of the overall drug, although it is uncertain whether the relatively frequent removal of (S)-citalopram is attributed to the stereoselective activity of cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes in the liver [20,21,22].
An enantioselective study of citalopram and its metabolites in femoral blood from about 50 autopsies using a chiral high-performance LC (HPLC) technique indicated that the S:R ratio for citalopram was 0.67 ± 0.25 (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) and that for desmethylcitalopram was 0.68 ± 0.20 (mean ± SD). Further, it was shown that the S:R ratios increase with increasing concentrations of citalopram . “Chiral switch” is an expression used to describe the substitution of an already-accepted-and-sold racemic drug mixture with a pure enantiomer [24, 25]. Citalopram was originally marketed as a racemate, but the difference between the physiological actions of the individual enantiomers resulted in a chiral switch to escitalopram, the pharmacologically active S-(+)-enantiomer of racemic citalopram [26, 27]. Presently, citalopram is among the antidepressive agents that are available on the market as both racemates and a single enantiomer.
The metabolism of citalopram by demethylation produces an effective metabolite, desmethylcitalopram, which is around 6 times less effective than (S)-citalopram; moreover, the metabolite (R)-desmethylcitalopram is about 4-fold more effective than (R)-citalopram. Further, the N-demethylation of desmethylcitalopram to didesmethylcitalopram (DDCIT) has a high inhibitory efficacy and achieves a greater reduction in plasma levels than the parent drug and its major metabolites (Figure 1) [26, 28]. Application of (S)-citalopram has many benefits compared with (RS)-citalopram, such as enhanced efficacy, lower dosage, and reduction of negative effects of (R)-citalopram; this is an ideal model for the advantages of chiral switch . Depending on the amount of (S)-citalopram administered (whether as (S)-citalopram or as (RS)-citalopram), a specified dosage of (S)-citalopram was anticipated to be 2 times the dosage of (RS)-citalopram [29, 30]. Nevertheless, the outcomes of clinical trials indicated preferable results while using (S)-citalopram .
An influence of the interaction of (R)-citalopram on (S)-citalopram, with greater affinity toward the principal binding site and its detachment from the serotonin transporter through an allosteric mechanism, can describe the potential antagonism of (R)-citalopram to the effect of (S)-citalopram. The behavior of serotonin in coupling to 2 sites (the main and allosteric sites) on the transporter may be accountable for the greater binding and, thus, the higher hindrance of the neurotransmitter by (S)-citalopram, because (S)-citalopram can be regarded as an allosteric serotonin reuptake inhibitor .
In addition, (R)-citalopram is a substrate for CYP2D6, and, therefore, hereditary polymorphism and variance in drug quantities are avoided by the administration of (S)-citalopram . Findings of randomly assigned, double-blind, placebo-controlled, regulated clinical trials demonstrate that (S)-citalopram has a higher efficacy than (RS)-citalopram at dose levels that were anticipated to be comparable to (RS)-citalopram at doses that resulted in less drug termination . Clinical studies indicate that (S)-citalopram, may have a faster onset than (RS)-citalopram and that the single enantiomer tends to be safer and more effective than the racemates [35, 36]. However, there has been no definitive proof that individuals with severe depression who adapt well to the racemate benefit by shifting to (S)-citalopram.
Fluoxetine belongs to the important class of antidepressive agents, the SSRIs. Fluoxetine or N-methyl-3-phenyl-3-[4-(trifluoromethyl)phenoxy]propan-1-amine was the first SSRI therapy introduced and has been used to treat major depressive disorder, panic disorder, obsessive–compulsive disorder, premenstrual dysphoric disorder, and nervous bulimia [37, 38]. Fluoxetine contains a chiral center (Figure 2). Unlike citalopram, fluoxetine could not be developed as a single-enantiomeric form and is still sold as a racemate. Both (R)- and (S)-fluoxetine display similar activity in blocking serotonin reuptake; however, the 2 enantiomers are metabolized differently [39, 40]. Administration of (R)-fluoxetine leads to less-variable plasma concentrations of fluoxetine and its active metabolites than (RS)-fluoxetine. The (R)-enantiomer and its metabolites inhibit CYP2D6 to a lesser extent than the (S)-enantiomer and its metabolites . The racemate of fluoxetine has been observed to be a safe and efficient anti-depressive agent for >15 years, and (R)-fluoxetine is not used due to safety issues.
The metabolism of fluoxetine via N-demethylation by the CYP enzyme system in the liver is stereoselective, leading toward an active chiral metabolite, norfluoxetine. Norfluoxetine has a pharmacological profile comparable to that of fluoxetine, but achieves different plasma concentrations and leads to the pharmacological effect seen with fluoxetine therapy . Unlike the 2 enantiomers of fluoxetine, the metabolites of (S)-fluoxetine [(S)-norfluoxetine] and (R)-fluoxetine [(R)-norfluoxetine] show different efficacies as compared with SSRIs: (S)-norfluoxetine is more effective than (R)-norfluoxetine. Plasma levels of (S)-norfluoxetine in adult patients were higher than levels of (R)-norfluoxetine in patients treated with (RS)-fluoxetine . (R)-Fluoxetine and (S)-fluoxetine present distinct metabolic processes, because (R)-fluoxetine clearance is around 4-fold higher than that of (S)-fluoxetine clearance . The half-lives for the elimination of (S)-fluoxetine and (S)-norfluoxetine are influenced by the variation in CYP2D6 activity to a higher degree than that of the (R)-enantiomers [42, 43]. The stereo-selective metabolism of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine in vitro indicate that N-demethylation is also involved in metabolic processes; in addition, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and—to a smaller extent—CYP2C19 are also involved in N-demethylation, with a preference for R-norfluoxetine. Conversely, CYP2D6 exhibits greater interaction toward (S)-norfluoxetine than (R)-norfluoxetine [42, 44]. Therefore, clinical trials have been conducted to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of (R)-fluoxetine. However, administration of higher doses of (R)-fluoxetine in Phase II clinical trials resulted in a small, but significant, effect on cardiac repolarization, and so the investigations were terminated [37, 45]. (S)-Fluoxetine has also been investigated for migraine prophylaxis in clinical trials, but has not obtained U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulatory approval to date . Perinatal SSRI exposure produces brain-wide differences in the functional activity of the unborn child during adolescence and adulthood .
In 1991, sertraline was approved by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of severe depression and, in 2003, approved for the management of social anxiety disorder . Sertraline has been reported to be successful in the treatment of generalized anxiety disorder for nearly 20 years [48, 49]. Sertraline or (1S,4S)-4-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-N-methyl-1,2,3,4-tetrahydronaphthalen-1-amine has been utilized for the diagnosis and treatment of major depression, panic, obsessive–compulsive, and social anxiety disorders .
The structure of sertraline comprises 2 stereocenters and thus has 4 stereoisomers, but it is sold as a single enantiomer because only the stereoisomer with the 1S,4S configuration is clinically effective . Across its preparation, substantial amounts of (−)-cis-(1R,4R)-N-methyl-4-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-naphthalenemine hydrochloride, trans-(1S,4R), and (1R,4S)-N-methyl-4-(3,4-dichlorophenyl)-1,2,3,4-tetrahydro-1-naphthalenemine hydrochloride are produced, which are considered as impurities (Figure 3). The stereoisomer used for the treatment has a configuration (+)-cis-(1S,4S).
Studies conducted to determine the enantiomers of sertraline in Wistar rat plasma 6 h after oral administration of rac-sertraline indicated the presence of trans isomers (1S,4R) and (1R,4S) in the plasma. This confirmed that only the cis-(1S,4S) and cis-(1R,4R) enantiomers were present in Wistar rats when rac-sertraline was administered. However, in the rat plasma, no sertraline metabolites were found . A pharmacokinetic study of sertraline found the kinetics to be stereoselective in terms of the area under the curve (AUC0–∞) (P = 0.68), clearance (P = 0.68), and maximum serum concentration of a drug (Cmax) (P = 0.43). Wistar male rats displayed greater plasma levels of cis-(1S,4S)-sertraline. Further, higher AUC0–∞ was observed for cis-(1S,4S)-sertraline than for the cis-(1R,4R)-sertraline enantiomer. The disposition of sertraline is enantioselective in male Wistar rats, with a (+):(−) plasma concentration ratio (AUC) near 1.04. The Cmax was also greater for (+)-cis-(1S,4S)-sertraline than for (−)-cis-(1R,4R)-sertraline .
Paroxetine is another SSRI used in the treatment of all kinds of depressive disorders. The paroxetine enantiomer used in therapeutics is (−)-trans-(3S,4R)-3-(1,3-benzodioxol-5-hydroxymethyl)-4-(4-fluorophenyl)piperidine (Figure 4); it is composed of 2 asymmetric centers and can form 4 stereoisomers, of which 2 have trans and 2 have cis conformations. Paroxetine is sold as an individual enantiomer, that is, the (−)-trans-(3S,4R) stereoisomer, which is therapeutically more active than the other stereoisomers . However, in drug preparations, its inactive enantiomer, (+)-trans-paroxetine, may also be present .
Serotonin–norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors
SNRIs are a class of antidepressive agents used for the diagnosis and treatment of depression and other cognitive disorders, such as anxiety, obsessive–compulsive disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and chronic pelvic pain. SNRIs affect 2 neurotransmitters, namely, serotonin and norepinephrine, in the brain. Due to their compound effect, both their efficiency and tolerability tend to be better than those of the SSRIs.
Venlafaxine was first manufactured in the early 1980s and is known to suppress the reuptake of serotonin and noradrenaline with low efficacy . Venlafaxine has been demonstrated to function in animal models of anxiety in vivo and has less interaction with postsynaptic muscarinic or histaminergic receptors . Venlafaxine is expected to have a higher tolerability profile than tricyclic antidepressive agents and is among the most widely used drugs in the SNRI category [44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53]. Venlafaxine is used as an antidepressive agent and is administered as a racemic mixture consisting of the enantiomers (S)- and (R)-venlafaxine in equal quantities . Enantiomers of venlafaxine or 1-[2-(dimethylamino)-1-(4-methoxyphenyl)ethyl]cyclohexan-1-ol (Figure 5) display different therapeutic behaviors, and they affect neurotransmitters differently. The (R)-form of venlafaxine is a potent inhibitor of the reuptake of serotonin noradrenaline, whereas the (S)-form is more selective in suppressing the reuptake of serotonin only [56, 57]. However, both enantiomeric forms exhibit practical therapeutic activity in treating depression, although they interact with the 2 neurotransmitters in different ways .
(S)-Venlafaxine displays greater potency toward CYP2D6 as an inhibitor than (R)-venlafaxine in vitro; it is selectively metabolized at clinical doses by CYP2D6 in humans, whereas the opposite occurs at high doses [59, 60]. Venlafaxine is primarily metabolized in the liver to O-desmethylvenlafaxine, N-desmethylvenlafaxine, N,O-didesmethylvenlafaxine, and potent metabolites, which are also chiral compounds. The major metabolic route in humans is the O-demethylation of racemic venlafaxine to O-desmethylvenlafaxine, while N-demethylation of the alkylamino side chain in N-desmethylvenlafaxine and the removal of both O-methyl and N-methyl groups in N,O-didesmethylvenlafaxine are the minor routes. Among these, the O-desmethyl derivative maintains similar pharmacological interaction as the parent drug, whereas the N-desmethyl derivative is also effective, although it is a weaker inhibitor of serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake than venlafaxine . The (R)- and (S)-enantiomeric forms of the metabolites preserve their parent drug's respective effectiveness to inhibit serotonin and norepinephrine reuptake .
Duloxetine or (+)-S-N-methyl-3-naphthalene-1-yloxy-3-thiophen-2-ylpropan-1-amine (Figure 6) is an important SNRI used to treat major depression, general anxiety, fibromyalgia, and chronic pain [62, 63]. It may also be used to treat certain medical problems such as urinary incontinence, in addition to the treatment of psychiatric disorders . It has a chiral center and is applied as a single enantiomer in medication, namely, as (S)-duloxetine. Both the enantiomeric forms of duloxetine effectively inhibit norepinephrine and serotonin reuptake, although the (S)-form is 2-fold more active than the (R)-form and is sold as a single-enantiomeric form for clinical therapy [65, 66]. Studies on the binding of duloxetine enantiomers to human serum albumin indicate that the binding constant for the (R)-enantiomer is greater than that for rac-duloxetine. Moreover, the effect of pH on the binding constants showed that at pH 7.4, both (R)-enantiomer and rac-duloxetine showed similar binding, but at higher pH (8.5), (R)-duloxetine showed better binding ability than racduloxetine .
The direct enantioseparation of duloxetine and its R-enantiomer has been achieved by HPLC using hydroxypropyl-β-cyclodextrin as a chiral selector and vancomycin as a chiral stationary phase (Chirobiotic V), with a limit of detection of 0.06 μg per mL .
Milnacipran is an SNRI accepted for the treatment of fibroma by the U.S. FDA and for the treatment of depression by agencies elsewhere . Milnacipran or (2-(aminomethyl)-N,N-diethyl-1-phenylcyclopropane-1-carboxamide) possesses 2 chiral centers in its structure (Figure 7) and is available as an equimolar mixture of the cis isomers with the following conformation: d-milnacipran (1S,2R) and l-milnacipran (1R,2S). Pharmacokinetic studies in humans [70, 71] have demonstrated a median peak plasma time (tmax) of 2 h. Milnacipran is steadily absorbed from the gastrointestinal system. The absolute oral bioavailability of milnacipran is large (85%), and diet does not affect absorption. The plasma half-life is around 8 h, and approximately 50%–60% of milnacipran is excreted unaltered in the urine. When administered orally, nearly the entire dose (about 93%) is eliminated steadily in the urine.
Elimination of the milnacipran carbamoyl O-glucuronide metabolite in urine (about 19% of the dose) is primarily as a metabolite of l-milnacipran carbamoyl O-glucuronide (about 17% of the dose); approximately 8% of the dose excreted in urine is a metabolite of N-desethylmilnacipran. No significant quantities of extra metabolites are secreted in the urine. Comparable plasma levels of milnacipran and l-milnacipran carbamoyl O-glucuronide metabolite have been detected after medication, and the highest possible plasma level of l-milnacipran carbamoyl O-glucuronide metabolite at 4 h after dosing was 234 ng per mL. Low levels of N-desmethylmilnacipran and d-milnacipran carbamoyl O-glucuronide metabolites (<25 ng per mL of milnacipran) have been reported in the plasma .
Norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors
NRIs inhibit norepinephrine (noradrenaline) and epinephrine reabsorption by neurons in the brain. Inhibiting the reabsorption influences the neuronal activity that certain neurotransmitters provide, enhancing cognition and concentration. NRIs have many applications, such as for the treatment of sleep disturbances, major depression, and ADHD. The adverse effects of NRIs include headache, digestive discomfort, and increased heart rate. Overdose of these drugs can lead to severe physiological complications, including anxiety and brain trauma .
Reboxetine or (2RS)-2-[(RS)-(2-ethoxyphenoxy)-phenylmethyl]morpholine is the most effective NRI medication used to manage anxiety. Reboxetine has 2 chiral centers (Figure 8) and can therefore appear as a racemate; nevertheless, during enantioselective synthesis, mostly (R,R)-, and (S,S)-reboxetine are formed . Therefore, it is available as a racemate in clinical preparations. However, the 2 enantiomers show substantially different pharmacological properties [73, 74]. For instance, the Cmax and AUC0–tz of (R,R)-reboxetine are greater than those of (S,S)-reboxetine . Conversely, several reports indicate that (S,S)-reboxetine is a more active NRI than (R,R)-reboxetine  and is accountable for the vasomotor and adverse effects of reboxetine on the heart .
Receptor-binding models in vitro and in vivo indicate that (S,S)-reboxetine is the most active NRI , even though its plasma levels are almost half after either injectable or oral administration . The activity is not a consequence of stereoselective metabolism, because CYP3A4 acts on both the enantiomers to about the same extent in vitro [80, 81]. The enantiomers exhibit identical half-lives, irrespective of the route of administration [74, 81]. The difference in plasma levels between the enantiomeric forms is likely due to better renal clearance of (S,S)-reboxetine [74, 82]. The predicted distribution of reboxetine enantiomers following an injectable dose is approximately 2.4-times higher. The difference indicates that enantioselective disposition of reboxetine can result from an association or redistribution with enantioselective tissue. Reboxetine is available as a racemic drug with an explicitly active enantiomer, whereby its enantioselective nature has impaired the accurate description of the dosage–effect interaction .
Norepinephrine–dopamine reuptake inhibitors
Bupropion ((±)-2-(tert-butyl amino)-1-(3-chlorophenyl)propane-1-one) is an important member of the NDRI class and has 1 chiral center (Figure 9). It is used clinically as a racemic mixture [81, 82] and as its pure enantiomers . The (R)-enantiomer is more effective than the (S)-enantiomer . Bioactivation of bupropion is catalyzed predominantly by stereoselective CYP2B6 and CYP2B6-catalyzed bupropion hydroxylation .
Investigations in vitro have established that bupropion may be a noncompetitive, functional inhibitor of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors . The stereoselective pharmacokinetics of bupropion and its metabolites, namely, (R)-bupropion:(S)-bupropion and (1R,2R)-:(1S,2S)-threohydrobupropion, and their ratios are probably indicative of greater presystemic metabolism of (S)- versus (R)-bupropion by carbonyl reductases. Remarkably, the apparent renal clearance of (2S,3S)-hydroxybupropion is nearly 10 times greater than that of (2R,3R)-hydroxybupropion . Bupropion is metabolized into 3 active metabolites, namely, hydroxybupropion, erythrohydrobupropion, and threohydrobupropion (Figure 9), which further metabolize into ineffective metabolites and are eventually eliminated via the urinary tract . Hydroxybupropion is the main metabolite of bupropion detected in human plasma  and is obtained by the hydroxylation of its tert-butyl group and amino alcohol isomers and the consequent morpholino ring formation . The Cmax and AUC0–1 for (S)-bupropion were found to be 3 and about 2 times higher respectively, than those of (R)-bupropion ; whereas, the Cmax and AUC0–∞ for (R,R)-hydroxybupropion were 11 and 7 times higher respectively, than for (S,S)-hydroxybupropion. Further, the AUC ratio of metabolite to parent plasma was found to be 12–15 times higher . By contrast, a study of bupropion in patients with kidney disease found that its pharmacokinetics is stereoselective. In the context of kidney disease, the time for rac-bupropion, (R)-bupropion, and (S)-bupropion to display tmax was 4 h . While the tmax for hydroxybupropion and (R,R)-hydroxybupropion was found to be around 16 h, (S,S)-bupropion showed a tmax of 8.8 h and demonstrated a faster absorption . The AUC of (R)- and (S)-bupropion were 30% and 70% of the AUC of racbupropion, respectively; thus, indicating that (S)-bupropion is the main enantiomer distributed in normal patients [84, 87]. The AUC of (R,R)-hydroxybupropion and (S,S)-hydroxybupropion were 95% and 5% of the AUC of hydroxybupropion, respectively; thus presenting (R,R)-hydroxybupropion as the prime metabolite .
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors
Monoamine oxidase inhibitors are a family of drugs that suppress one or both monoamine oxidase enzymes namely: monoamine oxidase A and monoamine oxidase B. One of the important examples of this class is selegiline ((2R)-N-methyl-1-phenyl-N-prop-2-ynylpropan-2-amine) (Figure 10). Selegiline is metabolized in the kidney by 3 different pathways, namely, N-dealkylation, β-carbon hydroxylation, and ring-hydroxylation, producing 9 metabolites, (R)-desmethylselegiline, (R)-methamphetamine (MA), (R)-amphetamine, (1S,2R)-norephedrine, (1R,2R)-norpseudoephedrine, (1S,2R)-ephedrine, (1R,2R)-pseudoephedrine, (R)-p-hydroxyamphetamine, and (R)-p-hydroxymethamphetamine, which are encountered in urine along with unmetabolized drug. The major metabolite is (R)-methamphetamine. However, during metabolism, no racemization takes place and β-carbon hydroxylation demonstrates stereoselectivity .
After oral administration of selegiline tablets, (R)-desmethylselegiline, methamphetamine, and amphetamine were found as the (−)-isomers in the urine and plasma. Nearly 40% of orally ingested selegiline was excreted in urine within the first 2 d after dosing as 3 metabolites, namely, (R)-desmethylselegiline, methamphetamine, and amphetamine. Additionally, no parent selegiline was found in urine or plasma samples . Conversely, (R)-methamphetamine and amphetamine were only found as the (+)-enantiomers in the urine of (R)-methamphetamine abusers. For abusers of selegiline, (−)-(R)-desmethylselegiline, a selegiline metabolite, is not an appropriate predictor because (−)-(R)-desmethylselegiline is quickly removed from the urine, and only 1% of the dose is secreted. The mean residence times of (−)-(R)-desmethylselegiline in plasma and urine are 5–20 times lower than those of (−)-methamphetamine or (−)-amphetamine .
An important example of this tetracyclic antidepressant class is mianserin (5-methyl-2,5-diazatetracyclo[13.4.0.02,7.08,13] nonadeca-1(19),8,10,12,15,17-hexaene), which contains 1 chiral center (Figure 11) and functions by blocking presynaptic α2-adrenergic autoreceptors. Mianserin is produced as a racemate, and (S)-mianserin is more potent than (R)-mianserin as an inhibitor of the reuptake of noradrenaline . In several animal behavioral experiments, it corresponds with antidepressive action. The mechanism of action of mianserin is stereoselective and essentially favors (S)-mianserin [94, 95]. Nevertheless, both enantiomers have identical activities for the antagonism toward α2-adrenergic heteroreceptors on 5-hydroxytryptaminergic (5-HT) nerve terminals . Mianserin enantiomers still vary remarkably from one another in their capability to transport the bound radioligands to distinct 5-HT receptor subtypes [96, 97]. In a variation, pharmacological evaluations found that the sedative (seemingly expected from the antihistaminic potency of mianserin) effects are identical for the single enantiomers of the drug. Some investigations have indicated noteworthy metabolic distinctions between the 2 enantiomers of mianserin. Mianserin is widely metabolized and its excretion in human urine is unaffected (only about 5%). The major paths for the metabolism of mianserin in humans are aromatic hydroxylation, N-oxidation, and N-demethylation . (S)-Mianserin is considered an effective antidepressant; however, its 2 enantiomers display identical sedative effects . Desmethylmianserin and 8-hydroxymianserin maintain antidepressant activities, but are less sedative than mianserin, whereas mianserin-N-oxide tends to be a comparatively inactive metabolite . Thus, the 2 enantiomers display substantially different enantioselective variations in metabolism [101, 102]. Studies conducted with mianserin or the active metabolite, desmethylmianserin, have found coadministration of benzodiazepines is not an important factor in deciding the dosage of mianserin . In an analysis using human liver microsomes and 8 recombinant CYP isozymes, CYP2D6 has been shown to mediate the 8-hydroxylation of the 2 enantiomers of mianserin, although CYP1A2 catalyzes the N-demethylation of both enantiomers in equal amounts, whereas N-oxidation favored for S-mianserin . CYP3A is implicated in each of the stereoselective mianserin processes to some degree. The mean values for the ratio of the maximum rate of the CYP-catalyzed reaction to the substrate concentration that yields the half-maximal velocity (Michaelis constant) (Vmax:Km) of 8-hydroxylation and N-oxidation were higher for (S)-mianserin than for (R)-mianserin, while the reverse was observed for N-demethylation; this reverse enantioselectivity for N-demethylation and N-oxidation mirrored previous results in rats and mice and human hepatic microsomes [100, 101, 104]. Significant interindividual differences in the percentages of the 2 enantiomers of mianserin and N-desmethylmianserin have been already identified in various plasma samples . In an analysis of weak and comprehensive debrisoquin and mephenytoin metabolizers, the disappearance of both mianserin and N-desmethylmianserin depended on CYP2D6 activity, and CYP2D6-dependent removal of mianserin demonstrates significant enantioselectivity for both (S)-mianserin and N-desmethylmianserin .
Noradrenergic and specific serotonergic antidepressants
NASSAs, such as mirtazapine, have a double mode of action, which increase the 5-HT and noradrenaline concentrations in the sarcoplasmic reticulum to within a normal range. NASSAs act by blockade of both α2-auto- and α2-heteroreceptors controlling noradrenaline and 5-HT release.
Mirtazapine (Figure 12) is a recently developed noradrenergic and powerful serotonergic antidepressive agent commonly administered as a racemate despite the multiple therapeutic actions of the enantiomers. Both stereoisomers have pharmacological effects that seem to predict antidepressant activity. Its (S)-form is the more powerful antagonist of receptors of the type α2-autoreceptor and 5-HT type-2, while the (R)-enantiomer primarily acts on α2-heteroreceptors and 5-HT type-3 receptors . Mirtazapine enantiomers are metabolized predominantly by hydroxylation, demethylation, and N-oxidation reactions of various CYP enzymes .
Most antidepressive agents contain one or more asymmetric centers in their structure. The enantiomers of antidepressive agents differ substantially in their pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. Enantiomers show different affinities toward protein binding, clearance, and stereoselective metabolism. Compositions containing less-active enantiomers hinder pharmacological studies regarding drug disposition and diagnostic effects related to dosage levels. The use of pure enantiomers provides potential advantages, including: (i) decreasing the overall quantity of the allocated drug required to produce a therapeutic effect; (ii) an increased therapeutic effect via enhanced receptor selectivity and efficiency; (iii) diminished detrimental effects; (iv) reduced interindividual inconsistency, and (v) diminished drug–drug binding associations and interactions. Because of the advantages of using pure enantiomers, efforts are made to introduce pure enantiomers of drugs. There are various antidepressants available as pure enantiomers, including (S)-citalopram, (R)-fluoxetine, (3R,4R)-paroxetine, and (S)-duloxetine. Nonstereoselective pharmacokinetic studies are frequently insufficient to explain the fate of chiral drugs prescribed as racemates. Stereoselectivity is inherently essential in the development of a chiral drug at every phase, and its neglect can inevitably lead to misinterpretation of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profiles. However, it has become evident that the definition of a chiral medication of effective and inactive stereoisomers is an overgeneralization. The distomer could have a sequence of impacts ranging from eutomer antagonism to explicit tolerance or may even have a substantial impact, which can provide a benefit over the use of racemates. Each medication must be treated individually in its usage as a standard stereoisomer formulation. Many unexamined forms of stereoselectivity could be of clinical importance throughout the metabolism of the drug.
In the production of psychoactive substances, chirality seems to be an essential component because enantiomers frequently display significant variations in their pharmacological effects. This review describes the therapeutic psychopharmacological consequences of stereoisomers of antidepressants as a target. In several instances; a deeper interpretation of stereochemistry would enhance the clinical results. For example, the racemic combination of citalopram is beneficial for depression, anxiety, and obsessive–compulsive tendencies. Nonetheless, escitalopram, or (S)-citalopram, is at least 2 times as active as racemic citalopram as a serotonin reuptake inhibitor, meaning that it could be administered at a lower dosage, thus providing an enhanced therapeutic index and a better safety profile with decreased drug interactions. Data from clinical trials support those benefits. Prolonged assessment of the stereochemistry of antidepressant drugs will improve the interpretation of dose–response relationships and may explain the effects of the stereoselective pharmacological properties of drugs in various disorders, gene mutations, pregnancy, sex, and age. Thorough interpretation of the future of chiral antidepressants and the factors influencing their enantioselective behavior and actions should offer a reasonable basis for their extended usage in a wide range of patients.
The growing development of enantiomerically pure medications aims to provide physicians with better, safer, more widely tolerated, and more effective medicines for patients. Practitioners are responsible for familiarizing themselves with the essential principles of the chiral pharmaceutical products mentioned in this article, particularly because each enantiomer of a specific chiral substance can have a specific pharmacological profile, and a pure enantiomer drug composition can have unique characteristics compared with those of the given drug's racemic formulations. When both enantiomers and a racemate dosage are accessible, clinical evidence and practical skills can be used to assess the suitability of any drug formulation. Advances in scientific methods to distinguish racemate drugs from their pure enantiomers will facilitate the process.
Efforts to establish formulations for the pure eutomer are motivated by the stereoselective pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic scale of the same. Such formulations may be more effective, have less or less-severe negative impacts, and have fewer drug interactions than the racemic mixture. Previously, single enantiomers were costly to produce; however, with recent developments in stereospecific synthesis and evaluation, single enantiomer compositions have become more reasonably priced, and enantiomerically pure medications are becoming much more prevalent. Recent advances in the field of antidepressive drug production have resulted in many new medications that include potentially major deviations from their racemic equivalents.
Sethi S, Bhushan R. Enantioselective LC analysis and determination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Biomed Chromatogr. 2020; 34:e4730. doi: 10.1002/bmc.4730SethiSBhushanREnantioselective LC analysis and determination of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors202034e473010.1002/bmc.473031652353Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
Luo Y, Kataoka Y, Ostinelli EG, Cipriani A, Furukawa TA. National prescription patterns of antidepressants in the treatment of adults with major depression in the US between 1996 and 2015: a population representative survey based analysis. Front Psychiatry. 2020; 11:35. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00035LuoYKataokaYOstinelliEGCiprianiAFurukawaTANational prescription patterns of antidepressants in the treatment of adults with major depression in the US between 1996 and 2015: a population representative survey based analysis2020113510.3389/fpsyt.2020.00035703362532116850Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
Boyce P, Hopwood M, Morris G, Hamilton A, Bassett D, Baune BT, et al. Switching antidepressants in the treatment of major depression: when, how and what to switch to? J Affect Disord. 2020; 261:160–3.BoycePHopwoodMMorrisGHamiltonABassettDBauneBTSwitching antidepressants in the treatment of major depression: when, how and what to switch to?2020261160310.1016/j.jad.2019.09.08231630037Search in Google Scholar
Vashistha VK, Kumar A. Stereochemical facets of clinical β-blockers: an overview. Chirality. 2020; 32:722–35.VashisthaVKKumarAStereochemical facets of clinical β-blockers: an overview2020327223510.1002/chir.2320032105373Search in Google Scholar
Maryanoff BE, McComsey DF, Craig JC. Chiroptical properties and absolute configuration of pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants. Chirality. 1998; 10:169–72.MaryanoffBEMcComseyDFCraigJCChiroptical properties and absolute configuration of pyrroloisoquinoline antidepressants1998101697210.1002/chir.26Search in Google Scholar
Coutts RT, Baker GB. Implications of chirality and geometric isomerism in some psychoactive drugs and their metabolites. Chirality. 1989; 1:99–120.CouttsRTBakerGBImplications of chirality and geometric isomerism in some psychoactive drugs and their metabolites198919912010.1002/chir.5300102042701850Search in Google Scholar
Wei Y, Chang L, Hashimoto K. A historical review of antidepressant effects of ketamine and its enantiomers. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 2020; 190:172870. doi: 10.1016/j.pbb.2020.172870WeiYChangLHashimotoKA historical review of antidepressant effects of ketamine and its enantiomers202019017287010.1016/j.pbb.2020.17287032035078Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
Pereira VS, Hiroaki-Sato VA. A brief history of antidepressant drug development: from tricyclics to beyond ketamine. Acta Neuropsychiatr. 2018; 30:307–22.PereiraVSHiroaki-SatoVAA brief history of antidepressant drug development: from tricyclics to beyond ketamine2018303072210.1017/neu.2017.3929388517Search in Google Scholar
Budău M, Hancu G, Rusu A, Cârcu-Dobrin M, Muntean DL. Chirality of modern antidepressants: an overview. Adv Pharm Bull. 2017; 7:495–500.BudăuMHancuGRusuACârcu-DobrinMMunteanDLChirality of modern antidepressants: an overview2017749550010.15171/apb.2017.061578820429399539Search in Google Scholar
Nageswara Rao R, Guru Prasad K. Stereospecific LC and LC-MS bioassays of antidepressants and psychotics. Biomed Chromatogr. 2015; 29:21–40.Nageswara RaoRGuru PrasadKStereospecific LC and LC-MS bioassays of antidepressants and psychotics201529214010.1002/bmc.335625355601Search in Google Scholar
Baker GB, Prior TI. Stereochemistry and drug efficacy and development: relevance of chirality to antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs. Ann Med. 2002; 34:537–43.BakerGBPriorTIStereochemistry and drug efficacy and development: relevance of chirality to antidepressant and antipsychotic drugs2002345374310.1080/078538902321117742Search in Google Scholar
Baumann P, Eap CB. Enantiomeric antidepressant drugs should be considered on individual merit. Hum Psychopharmacol. 2001; 16(Suppl 2):S85–92.BaumannPEapCBEnantiomeric antidepressant drugs should be considered on individual merit200116Suppl 2S859210.1002/hup.336Search in Google Scholar
DeVane CL, Boulton DW. Great expectations in stereochemistry: focus on antidepressants. CNS Spectr. 2002(Suppl 1); 7:28–33.DeVaneCLBoultonDWGreat expectations in stereochemistry: focus on antidepressants2002Suppl 17283310.1017/S1092852900028571Search in Google Scholar
Wasan AD, Smith HS, Argoff CE. Antidepressants. Ch. 61. In: Smith HS, editors. Current therapy in pain. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier; 2009, p. 448–58.WasanADSmithHSArgoffCEAntidepressants. Ch. 61In:SmithHSeditors.Philadelphia, PAElsevier20094485810.1016/B978-1-4160-4836-7.00061-4Search in Google Scholar
Protti M, Mandrioli R, Marasca C, Cavalli A, Serretti A, Mercolini L. New-generation, non-SSRI antidepressants: Part 2: NaSSAs, NRIs, SNDRIs, MASSAs, NDRIs, and others. Med Res Rev. 2020; 40:1794–832.ProttiMMandrioliRMarascaCCavalliASerrettiAMercoliniLNew-generation, non-SSRI antidepressants: Part 2: NaSSAs, NRIs, SNDRIs, MASSAs, NDRIs, and others202040179483210.1002/med.21671Search in Google Scholar
Milne RJ, Goa KL. Citalopram. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in depressive illness. Drugs. 1991; 41:450–77.MilneRJGoaKLCitalopram. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in depressive illness1991414507710.2165/00003495-199141030-00008Search in Google Scholar
Pollock BG. Citalopram: a comprehensive review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2001; 2:681–98.PollockBGCitalopram: a comprehensive review200126819810.1517/14656522.214.171.1241Search in Google Scholar
Hyttel J, Bøgesø KP, Perregaard J, Sánchez C. The pharmacological effect of citalopram resides in the (S)-(+)-enantiomer. J Neural Transm Gen Sect. 1992; 88:157–60.HyttelJBøgesøKPPerregaardJSánchezCThe pharmacological effect of citalopram resides in the (S)-(+)-enantiomer1992881576010.1007/BF01244820Search in Google Scholar
Mørk A, Kreilgaard M, Sánchez C. The R-enantiomer of citalopram counteracts escitalopram-induced increase in extracellular 5-HT in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats. Neuropharmacology. 2003; 45:167–73.MørkAKreilgaardMSánchezCThe R-enantiomer of citalopram counteracts escitalopram-induced increase in extracellular 5-HT in the frontal cortex of freely moving rats2003451677310.1016/S0028-3908(03)00138-2Search in Google Scholar
Baumann P, Zullino DF, Eap CB. Enantiomers’ potential in psychopharmacology—a critical analysis with special emphasis on the antidepressant escitalopram. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2002; 12:433–44.BaumannPZullinoDFEapCBEnantiomers’ potential in psychopharmacology—a critical analysis with special emphasis on the antidepressant escitalopram2002124334410.1016/S0924-977X(02)00051-2Search in Google Scholar
Kugelberg FC, Carlsson B, Ahlner J, Bengtsson F. Stereoselective single-dose kinetics of citalopram and its metabolites in rats. Chirality. 2003; 15:622–9.KugelbergFCCarlssonBAhlnerJBengtssonFStereoselective single-dose kinetics of citalopram and its metabolites in rats200315622910.1002/chir.10266Search in Google Scholar
Kingbäck M, Carlsson B, Ahlner J, Bengtsson F, Kugelberg FC. Cytochrome P450-dependent disposition of the enantiomers of citalopram and its metabolites: in vivo studies in Sprague-Dawley and Dark Agouti rats. Chirality. 2011; 23:172–7.KingbäckMCarlssonBAhlnerJBengtssonFKugelbergFCCytochrome P450-dependent disposition of the enantiomers of citalopram and its metabolites: in vivo studies in Sprague-Dawley and Dark Agouti rats201123172710.1002/chir.20901Search in Google Scholar
Holmgren P, Carlsson B, Zackrisson AL, Lindblom B, Dahl ML, Scordo MG, et al. Enantioselective analysis of citalopram and its metabolites in postmortem blood and genotyping for CYD2D6 and CYP2C19. J Anal Toxicol. 2004; 28:94–104.HolmgrenPCarlssonBZackrissonALLindblomBDahlMLScordoMGEnantioselective analysis of citalopram and its metabolites in postmortem blood and genotyping for CYD2D6 and CYP2C192004289410410.1093/jat/28.2.94Search in Google Scholar
Gellad WF, Choi P, Mizah M, Good CB, Kesselheim AS. Assessing the chiral switch: approval and use of single-enantiomer drugs, 2001 to 2011. Am J Manag Care. 2014; 20:e90–7.GelladWFChoiPMizahMGoodCBKesselheimASAssessing the chiral switch: approval and use of single-enantiomer drugs, 2001 to 2011201420e907Search in Google Scholar
Budău M, Hancu G, Muntean DL, Papp LA, Cârje AG, Garaj V. Enantioseparation of citalopram enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis: method development through experimental design and computational modeling. Chirality. 2020; 32:1119–28.BudăuMHancuGMunteanDLPappLACârjeAGGarajVEnantioseparation of citalopram enantiomers by capillary electrophoresis: method development through experimental design and computational modeling20203211192810.1002/chir.23255Search in Google Scholar
Pastoor D, Gobburu J. Clinical pharmacology review of escitalopram for the treatment of depression. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol. 2014; 10:121–8.PastoorDGobburuJClinical pharmacology review of escitalopram for the treatment of depression201410121810.1517/17425255.2014.863873Search in Google Scholar
Michman E, Agranat I. Classroom enters the courtroom: stereochemistry of SN1 and SN2 reactions in enantiomer patent litigations of the antidepressant escitalopram. Chirality. 2016; 28:39–43.MichmanEAgranatIClassroom enters the courtroom: stereochemistry of SN1 and SN2 reactions in enantiomer patent litigations of the antidepressant escitalopram201628394310.1002/chir.22501Search in Google Scholar
Bezchlibnyk-Butler K, Aleksic I, Kennedy SH. Citalopram—a review of pharmacological and clinical effects. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2000; 25:241–54.Bezchlibnyk-ButlerKAleksicIKennedySHCitalopram—a review of pharmacological and clinical effects20002524154Search in Google Scholar
Owens MJ, Knight DL, Nemeroff CB. Second generation SSRIs: human monoamine transporter binding profile of escitalopram and R-fluoxetine. Biol Psychiatry. 2001; 50:345–50.OwensMJKnightDLNemeroffCBSecond generation SSRIs: human monoamine transporter binding profile of escitalopram and R-fluoxetine2001503455010.1016/S0006-3223(01)01145-3Search in Google Scholar
Budău M, Hancu G, Rusu A, Muntean DL. Analytical methodologies for the enantiodetermination of citalopram and its metabolites. Chirality. 2020; 32:32–41.BudăuMHancuGRusuAMunteanDLAnalytical methodologies for the enantiodetermination of citalopram and its metabolites202032324110.1002/chir.2313931702071Search in Google Scholar
Auquier P, Robitail S, Llorca PM, Rive B. Comparison of escitalopram and citalopram efficacy: a meta-analysis. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2003; 7:259–68.AuquierPRobitailSLlorcaPMRiveBComparison of escitalopram and citalopram efficacy: a meta-analysis200372596810.1080/1365150031000340824930412Search in Google Scholar
Sánchez C. The pharmacology of citalopram enantiomers: the antagonism by R-citalopram on the effect of S-citalopram. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2006; 99:91–5.SánchezCThe pharmacology of citalopram enantiomers: the antagonism by R-citalopram on the effect of S-citalopram20069991510.1111/j.1742-7843.2006.pto_295.x16918708Search in Google Scholar
Montgomery SA, Loft H, Sánchez C, Reines EH, Papp M. Escitalopram (S-enantiomer of citalopram): clinical efficacy and onset of action predicted from a rat model. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2001; 88:282–6.MontgomerySALoftHSánchezCReinesEHPappMEscitalopram (S-enantiomer of citalopram): clinical efficacy and onset of action predicted from a rat model200188282610.1111/j.1600-0773.2001.880511.xSearch in Google Scholar
Gorman JM, Korotzer A, Su G. Efficacy comparison of escitalopram and citalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: pooled analysis of placebo controlled trials. CNS Spectr. 2002; 7(4 Suppl 1):40–4.GormanJMKorotzerASuGEfficacy comparison of escitalopram and citalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: pooled analysis of placebo controlled trials200274 Suppl 140410.1017/S1092852900028595Search in Google Scholar
Li H, Li T, Li G, Luo J. Citalopram and escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of 3 clinical trials. Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2014; 26:281–7.LiHLiTLiGLuoJCitalopram and escitalopram in the treatment of major depressive disorder: a pooled analysis of 3 clinical trials2014262817Search in Google Scholar
Sidhu J, Priskorn M, Poulsen M, Segonzac A, Grollier G, Larsen F. Steady-state pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of citalopram and its metabolites in humans. Chirality. 1997; 9:686–92.SidhuJPriskornMPoulsenMSegonzacAGrollierGLarsenFSteady-state pharmacokinetics of the enantiomers of citalopram and its metabolites in humans199796869210.1002/(SICI)1520-636X(1997)9:7<686::AID-CHIR9>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar
Perez-Caballero L, Torres-Sanchez S, Bravo L, Mico JA, Berrocoso E. Fluoxetine: a case history of its discovery and preclinical development. Expert Opin Drug Discov. 2014; 9:567–78.Perez-CaballeroLTorres-SanchezSBravoLMicoJABerrocosoEFluoxetine: a case history of its discovery and preclinical development201495677810.1517/17460441.2014.907790Search in Google Scholar
Aspeslet LJ, Baker GB, Coutts RT, Torok-Both GA. The effects of desipramine and iprindole on levels of enantiomers of fluoxetine in rat brain and urine. Chirality. 1994; 6:86–90.AspesletLJBakerGBCouttsRTTorok-BothGAThe effects of desipramine and iprindole on levels of enantiomers of fluoxetine in rat brain and urine19946869010.1002/chir.530060208Search in Google Scholar
Schmidt MJ, Fuller RW, Wong DT. Fluoxetine, a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor: a review of preclinical studies. Br J Psychiatry. 1998; 153(Suppl 3):40–6.SchmidtMJFullerRWWongDTFluoxetine, a highly selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor: a review of preclinical studies1998153Suppl 340610.1192/S0007125000297274Search in Google Scholar
Lemberger L, Rowe H, Carmichael R, Crabtree R, Horng JS, Bymaster F, Wong D. Fluoxetine, a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1978; 23:421–9.LembergerLRoweHCarmichaelRCrabtreeRHorngJSBymasterFWongDFluoxetine, a selective serotonin uptake inhibitor197823421910.1002/cpt1978234421Search in Google Scholar
Stevens JC, Wrighton SA. Interaction of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine with human liver cytochrome P450. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1993; 266:964–71.StevensJCWrightonSAInteraction of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine with human liver cytochrome P450199326696471Search in Google Scholar
Mandrioli R, Cantelli Forti G, Raggi MA. Fluoxetine metabolism and pharmacological interactions: the role of cytochrome P450. Curr Drug Metab. 2006; 7:127–33.MandrioliRCantelli FortiGRaggiMAFluoxetine metabolism and pharmacological interactions: the role of cytochrome P450200671273310.2174/138920006775541561Search in Google Scholar
Fuller RW, Snoddy HD, Krushinski JH, Robertson DW. Comparison of norfluoxetine enantiomers as serotonin uptake inhibitors in vivo. Neuropharmacology. 1992; 31:997–1000.FullerRWSnoddyHDKrushinskiJHRobertsonDWComparison of norfluoxetine enantiomers as serotonin uptake inhibitors in vivo199231997100010.1016/0028-3908(92)90100-4Search in Google Scholar
Eap CB, Bondolfi G, Zullino D, Savary-Cosendai L, Powell-Golay K, Kosel M, Baumann P. Concentrations of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine after multiple doses of fluoxetine in cytochrome P4502D6 poor and extensive metabolizers. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2001; 21:330–4.EapCBBondolfiGZullinoDSavary-CosendaiLPowell-GolayKKoselMBaumannPConcentrations of the enantiomers of fluoxetine and norfluoxetine after multiple doses of fluoxetine in cytochrome P4502D6 poor and extensive metabolizers200121330410.1097/00004714-200106000-00013Search in Google Scholar
Sekhon BS. Exploiting the power of stereochemistry in drugs: an overview of racemic and enantiopure drugs. J Mod Med Chem. 2013; 1:10–36.SekhonBSExploiting the power of stereochemistry in drugs: an overview of racemic and enantiopure drugs20131103610.12970/2308-8044.2013.01.01.2Search in Google Scholar
Van der Knaap N, Wiedermann D, Schubert D, Hoehn M, Homberg JR. Perinatal SSRI exposure affects brain functional activity associated with whisker stimulation in adolescent and adult rats. Sci Rep. 2021; 11:1680. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-81327-zVan der KnaapNWiedermannDSchubertDHoehnMHombergJRPerinatal SSRI exposure affects brain functional activity associated with whisker stimulation in adolescent and adult rats202111168010.1038/s41598-021-81327-zOtwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
Romeo R, Knapp M, Hellier J, Dewey M, Ballard C, Baldwin R, et al. Cost-effectiveness analyses for mirtazapine and sertraline in dementia: randomised controlled trial. Br J Psychiatry. 2013; 202:121–8.RomeoRKnappMHellierJDeweyMBallardCBaldwinRCost-effectiveness analyses for mirtazapine and sertraline in dementia: randomised controlled trial2013202121810.1192/bjp.bp.112.115212Search in Google Scholar
Katzelnick DJ, Kobak KA, Greist JH, Jefferson JW, Mantle JM, Serlin, RC. Sertraline for social phobia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study. Am J Psychiatry. 1995; 152:1368–71.KatzelnickDJKobakKAGreistJHJeffersonJWMantleJMSerlinRCSertraline for social phobia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover study199515213687110.1176/ajp.152.9.1368Search in Google Scholar
Sokolenko M, Kutcher S. Sertraline for social anxiety disorder. Expert Rev Neurother. 2003; 3:787–95.SokolenkoMKutcherSSertraline for social anxiety disorder200337879510.1586/14737126.96.36.1997Search in Google Scholar
Cipriani A, La Ferla T, Furukawa TA, Signoretti A, Nakagawa A, Churchill R, et al. Sertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010; (4):CD006117. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006117.pub4CiprianiALa FerlaTFurukawaTASignorettiANakagawaAChurchillRSertraline versus other antidepressive agents for depression20104CD006117.10.1002/14651858.CD006117.pub4Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
Rosettia A, Ferretti R, Zanitti L, Casulli A, Villani C, Cirilli C. Single-run reversed-phase HPLC method for determining sertraline content, enantiomeric purity, and related substances in drug substance and finished product. J Pharm Anal. 2020; 10:610–6.RosettiaAFerrettiRZanittiLCasulliAVillaniCCirilliCSingle-run reversed-phase HPLC method for determining sertraline content, enantiomeric purity, and related substances in drug substance and finished product202010610610.1016/j.jpha.2020.11.002Search in Google Scholar
Rao RN, Kumar KN, Shinde DD. Determination of rat plasma levels of sertraline enantiomers using direct injection with achiral–chiral column switching by LC–ESI/MS/MS. J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2010; 52:398–405.RaoRNKumarKNShindeDDDetermination of rat plasma levels of sertraline enantiomers using direct injection with achiral–chiral column switching by LC–ESI/MS/MS20105239840510.1016/j.jpba.2009.09.020Search in Google Scholar
Segura M, Roura L, de la Torre R, Joglar J. Synthesis of the major metabolites of paroxetine. Bioorg Chem. 2003; 31:248–58.SeguraMRouraLde la TorreRJoglarJSynthesis of the major metabolites of paroxetine2003312485810.1016/S0045-2068(03)00040-3Search in Google Scholar
Muth EA, Haskins JT, Moyer JA, Husbands GE, Nielsen ST, Sigg EB. Antidepressant biochemical profile of the novel bicyclic compound Wy-45,030, an ethyl cyclohexanol derivative. Biochem Pharmacol. 1986; 35:4493–7.MuthEAHaskinsJTMoyerJAHusbandsGENielsenSTSiggEBAntidepressant biochemical profile of the novel bicyclic compound Wy-45,030, an ethyl cyclohexanol derivative1986354493710.1016/0006-2952(86)90769-0Search in Google Scholar
Smith D, Dempster C, Glanville J, Freemantle N, Anderson I. Efficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: a meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2002; 180:396–404.SmithDDempsterCGlanvilleJFreemantleNAndersonIEfficacy and tolerability of venlafaxine compared with selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors and other antidepressants: a meta-analysis200218039640410.1192/bjp.180.5.396Search in Google Scholar
Holliday SM, Benfield P. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in depression. Drugs. 1995; 49:280–94.HollidaySMBenfieldPA review of its pharmacology and therapeutic potential in depression1995492809410.2165/00003495-199549020-00010Search in Google Scholar
Kandhwal K, Dey S, Nazarudheen S, Reyar S, Mishra S, Thudi NR, et al. Establishing bioequivalence of racemic venlafaxine formulations using stereoselective assay method: is it necessary? Chirality. 2011; 23:948–54.KandhwalKDeySNazarudheenSReyarSMishraSThudiNREstablishing bioequivalence of racemic venlafaxine formulations using stereoselective assay method: is it necessary?2011239485410.1002/chir.21021Search in Google Scholar
Golden RN, Nicholas L. Antidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine. Depress Anxiety. 2000; 12(Suppl 1):45–9.GoldenRNNicholasLAntidepressant efficacy of venlafaxine200012Suppl 145910.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:1+<45::AID-DA5>3.0.CO;2-5Search in Google Scholar
Spina E, Santoro V, D’Arrigo C. Clinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with second generation antidepressants: an update. Clin Ther. 2008; 30:1206–27.SpinaESantoroVD’ArrigoCClinically relevant pharmacokinetic drug interactions with second generation antidepressants: an update20083012062710.1016/S0149-2918(08)80047-1Search in Google Scholar
Wang CP, Howell SR, Scatina J, Sisenwine SF. The disposition of venlafaxine enantiomers in dogs, rats, and humans receiving venlafaxine. Chirality. 1992; 4:84–90.WangCPHowellSRScatinaJSisenwineSFThe disposition of venlafaxine enantiomers in dogs, rats, and humans receiving venlafaxine19924849010.1002/chir.530040204Search in Google Scholar
Ereshefsky L, Dugan D. Review of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, and drug interaction potential of antidepressants: focus on venlafaxine. Depress Anxiety. 2000; 12(Suppl 1):30–44.EreshefskyLDuganDReview of the pharmacokinetics, pharmacogenetics, and drug interaction potential of antidepressants: focus on venlafaxine200012Suppl 1304410.1002/1520-6394(2000)12:1+<30::AID-DA4>3.0.CO;2-GSearch in Google Scholar
Lunn MPT, Hughes RAC, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014; (1):CD007115. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007115.pub3LunnMPTHughesRACWiffenPJDuloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia20141CD007115.10.1002/14651858.CD007115.pub3Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
Liu H, Hoff BH, Anthonsen T. Chemo-enzymatic synthesis of the antidepressant duloxetine and its enantiomer. Chirality. 2000; 12:26–9.LiuHHoffBHAnthonsenTChemo-enzymatic synthesis of the antidepressant duloxetine and its enantiomer20001226910.1002/(SICI)1520-636X(2000)12:1<26::AID-CHIR5>3.0.CO;2-ZSearch in Google Scholar
Li J, Yang L, Pu C, Tang Y, Yun H, Han P. The role of duloxetine in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int Urol Nephrol. 2013; 45: 679–86.LiJYangLPuCTangYYunHHanPThe role of duloxetine in stress urinary incontinence: a systematic review and meta-analysis2013456798610.1007/s11255-013-0410-6Search in Google Scholar
Larik FA, Saeed A, Channar PA, Mehfooz H. Stereoselective synthetic approaches towards (S)-duloxetine: 2000 to date. Tetrahedron: Asymmetry. 2016; 27:1101–12.LarikFASaeedAChannarPAMehfoozHStereoselective synthetic approaches towards (S)-duloxetine: 2000 to date20162711011210.1016/j.tetasy.2016.09.007Search in Google Scholar
Lupu D, Hancu G. Achiral and chiral analysis of duloxetine by chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, a review on the separation methodologies. Biomed Chromatogr. 2021; 35:e4883. doi: 10.1002/bmc.4883LupuDHancuGAchiral and chiral analysis of duloxetine by chromatographic and electrophoretic methods, a review on the separation methodologies202135e488310.1002/bmc.4883Otwórz DOISearch in Google Scholar
Forest Laboratories. Savella (milnacipran HCl) full prescribing information. U.S. Food and Drug Administration Reference ID: 3226972. New Jersey: Cypress Bioscience-Forest Laboratories; 2012; 1–25. Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/022256s013lbl.pdfForest LaboratoriesNew JerseyCypress Bioscience-Forest Laboratories2012125Available from: https://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2012/022256s013lbl.pdfSearch in Google Scholar
Yang J, Lu X, Bi Y, Qin F, Li F. Chiral separation of duloxetine and its R-enantiomer by LC. Chromatographia. 2007; 66:389–93.YangJLuXBiYQinFLiFChiral separation of duloxetine and its R-enantiomer by LC2007663899310.1365/s10337-007-0337-0Search in Google Scholar
Puech A, Montgomery SA, Prost JF, Solles A, Briley M. Milnacipran, a new serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor: an overview of its antidepressant activity and clinical tolerability. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1997; 12:99–108.PuechAMontgomerySAProstJFSollesABrileyMMilnacipran, a new serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor: an overview of its antidepressant activity and clinical tolerability1997129910810.1097/00004850-199703000-00005Search in Google Scholar
Puozzo C, Leonard BE. Pharmacokinetics of milnacipran in comparison with other antidepressants. Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 1996; 11(Suppl 4):S15–27.PuozzoCLeonardBEPharmacokinetics of milnacipran in comparison with other antidepressants199611Suppl 4S152710.1097/00004850-199609004-00003Search in Google Scholar
Melloni P, Della Torre A, Lazzari E, Mazzini G, Meroni M. Configurational studies on 2-[α-2-ethoxyphenoxybenzyl] morpholine. Tetrahedron. 1985; 41:1393–9.MelloniPDella TorreALazzariEMazziniGMeroniMConfigurational studies on 2-[α-2-ethoxyphenoxybenzyl] morpholine1985411393910.1016/S0040-4020(01)96541-XSearch in Google Scholar
Strolin Benedetti M, Frigerio E, Tocchetti P, Brianceschi G, Castelli MG, Pellizzoni C, Dostert P. Stereoselective and species-dependent kinetics of reboxetine in mouse and rat. Chirality. 1995; 7:285–9.Strolin BenedettiMFrigerioETocchettiPBrianceschiGCastelliMGPellizzoniCDostertPStereoselective and species-dependent kinetics of reboxetine in mouse and rat19957285910.1002/chir.530070416Search in Google Scholar
Fleishaker JC, Mucci M, Pellizzoni C, Poggesi I. Absolute bioavailability of reboxetine enantiomers and effect of gender on pharmacokinetics. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1999; 20:53–7.FleishakerJCMucciMPellizzoniCPoggesiIAbsolute bioavailability of reboxetine enantiomers and effect of gender on pharmacokinetics19992053710.1002/(SICI)1099-081X(199901)20:1<53::AID-BDD157>3.0.CO;2-PSearch in Google Scholar
Rey E, Dostert P, d’Athis Ph, Jannuzzo MG, Poggesi I, Olive G. Dose proportionality of reboxetine enantiomers in healthy male volunteers. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1999; 20:177–81.ReyEDostertPd’AthisPhJannuzzoMGPoggesiIOliveGDose proportionality of reboxetine enantiomers in healthy male volunteers1999201778110.1002/(SICI)1099-081X(199905)20:4<177::AID-BDD172>3.0.CO;2-ISearch in Google Scholar
Dostert P, Benedetti MS, Poggesi I. Review of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor. Eur Neuropsychopharm. 1997; 7(Suppl 1):S23–35.DostertPBenedettiMSPoggesiIReview of the pharmacokinetics and metabolism of reboxetine, a selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor19977Suppl 1S233510.1016/S0924-977X(97)00417-3Search in Google Scholar
Denolle T, Pellizzoni C, Jannuzzo MG, Poggesi I. Hemodynamic effects of reboxetine in healthy male volunteers. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1999; 66:282–7.DenolleTPellizzoniCJannuzzoMGPoggesiIHemodynamic effects of reboxetine in healthy male volunteers199966282710.1016/S0009-9236(99)70036-6Search in Google Scholar
Frigerio E, Benecchi A, Brianceschi G, Pellizzoni C, Poggesi I, Strolin Benedetti M, Dostert P. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine enantiomers in the dog. Chirality. 1997; 9:303–6.FrigerioEBenecchiABrianceschiGPellizzoniCPoggesiIStrolin BenedettiMDostertPPharmacokinetics of reboxetine enantiomers in the dog19979303610.1002/(SICI)1520-636X(1997)9:3<303::AID-CHIR17>3.0.CO;2-RSearch in Google Scholar
Cocchiara G, Battaglia R, Pevarello P, Strolin Benedetti M. Comparison of the disposition and of the metabolic pattern of reboxetine, a new antidepressant, in the rat, dog, monkey and man. Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet. 1991; 16:231–9.CocchiaraGBattagliaRPevarelloPStrolin BenedettiMComparison of the disposition and of the metabolic pattern of reboxetine, a new antidepressant, in the rat, dog, monkey and man199116231910.1007/BF03189965Search in Google Scholar
Wienkers LC, Allievi C, Hauer MJ, Wynalda MA. Cytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of the individual enantiomers of the antidepressant agent reboxetine in human liver microsomes. Drug Metab Dispos. 1999; 27:1334–40.WienkersLCAllieviCHauerMJWynaldaMACytochrome P450-mediated metabolism of the individual enantiomers of the antidepressant agent reboxetine in human liver microsomes199927133440Search in Google Scholar
Edwards DM, Pellizzoni C, Breuel HP, Berardi A, Castelli MG, Frigerio E, et al. Pharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers. Single oral doses, linearity and plasma protein binding. Biopharm Drug Dispos. 1995; 16:443–60.EdwardsDMPellizzoniCBreuelHPBerardiACastelliMGFrigerioEPharmacokinetics of reboxetine in healthy volunteers. Single oral doses, linearity and plasma protein binding1995164436010.1002/bdd.2510160603Search in Google Scholar
Haustein KO. Bupropion: pharmacological and clinical profile in smoking cessation. Int J Clin Pharm Ther. 2003; 41:56–66.HausteinKOBupropion: pharmacological and clinical profile in smoking cessation200341566610.5414/CPP41056Search in Google Scholar
Fang QK, Han Z, Grover P, Kessler D, Senanayake CH, Wald SA. Rapid access to enantiopure bupropion and its major metabolite by stereospecific nucleophilic substitution on an α-ketotriflate. Tetrahedron. 2000; 11:3659–63.FangQKHanZGroverPKesslerDSenanayakeCHWaldSARapid access to enantiopure bupropion and its major metabolite by stereospecific nucleophilic substitution on an α-ketotriflate20001136596310.1016/S0957-4166(00)00349-9Search in Google Scholar
Kharasch ED, Mitchell D, Coles R. Stereoselective bupropion hydroxylation as an in vivo phenotypic probe for cytochrome P4502B6 (CYP2B6) activity. J Clin Pharmacol. 2008; 48:464–74.KharaschEDMitchellDColesRStereoselective bupropion hydroxylation as an in vivo phenotypic probe for cytochrome P4502B6 (CYP2B6) activity2008484647410.1177/0091270008314254Search in Google Scholar
Musso DL, Mehta NB, Soroko FE, Ferris RM, Hollingsworth EB, Kenney BT. Synthesis and evaluation of the antidepressant activity of the enantiomers of bupropion. Chirality. 1993; 5:495–500.MussoDLMehtaNBSorokoFEFerrisRMHollingsworthEBKenneyBTSynthesis and evaluation of the antidepressant activity of the enantiomers of bupropion1993549550010.1002/chir.530050704Search in Google Scholar
Wang P-F, Neiner A, Kharasch ED. Stereoselective bupropion hydroxylation by cytochrome P450 CYP2B6 and cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase genetic variants. Drug Metab Dispos. 2020; 48:438–45.WangP-FNeinerAKharaschEDStereoselective bupropion hydroxylation by cytochrome P450 CYP2B6 and cytochrome P450 oxidoreductase genetic variants2020484384510.1124/dmd.119.090407Search in Google Scholar
Johnston JA, Ascher J, Leadbetter R, Schmith VD, Patel DK, Durcan M, Bentley B. Pharmacokinetic optimisation of sustained-release bupropion for smoking cessation. Drugs. 2002; 62(Suppl 2):11–24.JohnstonJAAscherJLeadbetterRSchmithVDPatelDKDurcanMBentleyBPharmacokinetic optimisation of sustained-release bupropion for smoking cessation200262Suppl 2112410.2165/00003495-200262002-00002Search in Google Scholar
Masters AR, Gufford BT, Lu JB, Metzger IF, Jones DR, Desta Z (2016) Chiral plasma pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of bupropion and metabolites in healthy volunteers. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 2016; 358:230–8.MastersARGuffordBTLuJBMetzgerIFJonesDRDestaZ2016Chiral plasma pharmacokinetics and urinary excretion of bupropion and metabolites in healthy volunteers2016358230810.1124/jpet.116.232876Search in Google Scholar
Laizure SC, DeVane CL, Stewart JT, Dommisse CS, Lai AA. Pharmacokinetics of bupropion and its major basic metabolites in normal subjects after a single dose. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985; 38:586–9.LaizureSCDeVaneCLStewartJTDommisseCSLaiAAPharmacokinetics of bupropion and its major basic metabolites in normal subjects after a single dose198538586910.1038/clpt.1985.228Search in Google Scholar
Suckow RF, Zhang MF, Cooper TB. Enantiomeric determination of the phenylmorpholinol metabolite of bupropion in human plasma using coupled achiral–chiral liquid chromatography. Biomed Chromatogr. 1997; 11:174–9.SuckowRFZhangMFCooperTBEnantiomeric determination of the phenylmorpholinol metabolite of bupropion in human plasma using coupled achiral–chiral liquid chromatography199711174910.1002/(SICI)1099-0801(199705)11:3<174::AID-BMC681>3.0.CO;2-ESearch in Google Scholar
Joy MS, Frye RF, Stubbert K, Brouwer KR, Falk RJ, Kharasch ED. Use of enantiomeric bupropion and hydroxybupropion to assess CYP2B6 activity in glomerular kidney diseases. J Clin Pharmacol. 2010; 50:714–20.JoyMSFryeRFStubbertKBrouwerKRFalkRJKharaschEDUse of enantiomeric bupropion and hydroxybupropion to assess CYP2B6 activity in glomerular kidney diseases2010507142010.1177/0091270009353031Search in Google Scholar
Hasegawa M, Matsubara K, Fukushima S, Maseda C, Uezono T, Kimura K. Stereoselective analyses of selegiline metabolites: possible urinary markers for selegiline therapy. Forensic Sci Int. 1999; 101:95–106.HasegawaMMatsubaraKFukushimaSMasedaCUezonoTKimuraKStereoselective analyses of selegiline metabolites: possible urinary markers for selegiline therapy19991019510610.1016/S0379-0738(99)00015-8Search in Google Scholar
Taylor KM, Snyder SH. Amphetamine: differentiation by d and I isomers of behavior involving brain norepinephrine or dopamine. Science. 1970;168(3938):1487–9.TaylorKMSnyderSHAmphetamine: differentiation by d and I isomers of behavior involving brain norepinephrine or dopamine197016839381487910.1126/science.168.3938.1487Search in Google Scholar
Schoemaker H, Berendsen HH, Stevens HJ, Nickolson VJ. Differences in presynaptic α-blockade, noradrenaline uptake inhibition, and potential antidepressant activity between (+)- and (–)-mianserin. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1981; 74:137–42.SchoemakerHBerendsenHHStevensHJNickolsonVJDifferences in presynaptic α-blockade, noradrenaline uptake inhibition, and potential antidepressant activity between (+)- and (–)-mianserin1981741374210.1007/BF00432680Search in Google Scholar
Raiteri M, Maura G, Versace P. Functional evidence for two stereochemically different alpha-2 adrenoceptors regulating central norephinephrine and serotonin release. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1983; 224:679–84.RaiteriMMauraGVersacePFunctional evidence for two stereochemically different alpha-2 adrenoceptors regulating central norephinephrine and serotonin release198322467984Search in Google Scholar
Wood MD, Thomas DR, Watkins CJ, Newberry NR. Stereoselective interaction of mianserin with 5-HT3 receptors. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1993; 45:711–4.WoodMDThomasDRWatkinsCJNewberryNRStereoselective interaction of mianserin with 5-HT3 receptors199345711410.1111/j.2042-7158.1993.tb07094.xSearch in Google Scholar
Kooyman AR, Zwart R, Vanderheijden PM, Van Hooft JA, Vijverberg HP. Interaction between enantiomers of mianserin and ORG3770 at 5-HT3 receptors in cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells. Neuropharmacology. 1994; 33:501–7.KooymanARZwartRVanderheijdenPMVan HooftJAVijverbergHPInteraction between enantiomers of mianserin and ORG3770 at 5-HT3 receptors in cultured mouse neuroblastoma cells199433501710.1016/0028-3908(94)90081-7Search in Google Scholar
Brogden RN, Heel RC, Speight TM, Avery GS. Mianserin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness. Drugs. 1978; 16:273–301.BrogdenRNHeelRCSpeightTMAveryGSMianserin: a review of its pharmacological properties and therapeutic efficacy in depressive illness19781627330110.2165/00003495-197816040-00001Search in Google Scholar
Pinder RM, van Delft AML. The potential therapeutic role of the enantiomers and metabolites of mianserin. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1983; 15(Suppl 2):269S–76S.PinderRMvan DelftAMLThe potential therapeutic role of the enantiomers and metabolites of mianserin198315Suppl 2269S76S10.1111/j.1365-2125.1983.tb05875.xSearch in Google Scholar
Pinder RM, van Delft AML. Pharmacological aspects of mianserin. Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. 1983; 302:59–71.PinderRMvan DelftAMLPharmacological aspects of mianserin1983302597110.1111/j.1600-0447.1983.tb00359.xSearch in Google Scholar
Heinig R, Blaschke G. In vivo and in vitro stereoselective metabolism of mianserin in mice. Arzneimittelforschung. [Drug Res.] 1993; 43:5–10. [in English, German abstract]HeinigRBlaschkeGIn vivo and in vitro stereoselective metabolism of mianserin in mice. Arzneimittelforschung199343510[in English, German abstract]Search in Google Scholar
Heinig R, Delbressine LP, Kaspersen FM, Blaschke G. Enantiomeric aspects of the metabolism of mianserin in rats. Arzneimittelforschung. [Drug Res.] 1993; 43:709–15. [in English, German abstract]HeinigRDelbressineLPKaspersenFMBlaschkeGEnantiomeric aspects of the metabolism of mianserin in rats. Arzneimittelforschung19934370915[in English, German abstract]Search in Google Scholar
Otani K, Sasa H, Kaneko S, Kondo T, Fukushima Y. Steady-state plasma concentrations of mianserin and its major active metabolite, desmethylmianserin. Ther Drug Monit. 1993; 15:113–7.OtaniKSasaHKanekoSKondoTFukushimaYSteady-state plasma concentrations of mianserin and its major active metabolite, desmethylmianserin199315113710.1097/00007691-199304000-00008Search in Google Scholar
Lambert C, Park BK, Kitteringham NR. Activation of mianserin and its metabolites by human liver microsomes. Biochem Pharmacol. 1989; 38:2853–8.LambertCParkBKKitteringhamNRActivation of mianserin and its metabolites by human liver microsomes1989382853810.1016/0006-2952(89)90441-3Search in Google Scholar
Eap CB, Powell K, Campus-Souche D, Monney C, Baettig D, Taeschner W, Baumann P. Determination of the enantiomers of mianserin, desmethylmianserin, and 8-hydroxymianserin in the plasma and urine of mianserin-treated patients. Chirality. 1994; 6:555–63.EapCBPowellKCampus-SoucheDMonneyCBaettigDTaeschnerWBaumannPDetermination of the enantiomers of mianserin, desmethylmianserin, and 8-hydroxymianserin in the plasma and urine of mianserin-treated patients199465556310.1002/chir.5300607087986669Search in Google Scholar
Dahl ML, Tybring G, Elwin CE, Alm C, Andreasson K, Gyllenpalm M, Bertilsson L. Stereoselective disposition of mianserin is related to debrisoquin hydroxylation polymorphism. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1994; 56:176–83.DahlMLTybringGElwinCEAlmCAndreassonKGyllenpalmMBertilssonLStereoselective disposition of mianserin is related to debrisoquin hydroxylation polymorphism1994561768310.1038/clpt.1994.1218062494Search in Google Scholar
Saveanu RV, Botros MSA, Thase ME. Mirtazapine. Ch 34.21. In: Sadock BJ, Sadock VA, Ruiz, P. (eds.) Kaplan and Sadock's comprehensive textbook of psychiatry. Vol. II, 10th ed. Philadelphia: Wolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2017, p. 7940–50.SaveanuRVBotrosMSAThaseMEMirtazapine. Ch 34.21In:SadockBJSadockVARuizP.(eds.)II10th ed.PhiladelphiaWolters Kluwer Lippincott Williams & Wilkins2017794050Search in Google Scholar
de Boer T, Ruigt GSF. The selective α2-adrenoceptor antagonist mirtazapine (Org 3770) enhances noradrenergic and 5-HT1A mediated serotonergic neurotransmission. CNS Drugs. 1995; 4:29–38.de BoerTRuigtGSFThe selective α2-adrenoceptor antagonist mirtazapine (Org 3770) enhances noradrenergic and 5-HT1A mediated serotonergic neurotransmission19954293810.2165/00023210-199500041-00006Search in Google Scholar
Grasmäder K, Verwohlt PL, Kühn K-U, Dragicevic A, von Widdern O, Zobel A, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of mirtazapine. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2004; 60:473–80.GrasmäderKVerwohltPLKühnK-UDragicevicAvon WiddernOZobelAPopulation pharmacokinetic analysis of mirtazapine2004604738010.1007/s00228-004-0737-015289959Search in Google Scholar