[1. Deal T, Kountakis S. Significance of nasal polyps in chronic rhinosinusitis: symptoms and surgical outcomes. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114: 1932-5.10.1097/01.mlg.0000147922.12228.1f]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Wynn R, Har-El G. Recurrence rates after endoscopic sinus surgery for massive sinus polyposis. Laryngoscope. 2004; 114:811-3.10.1097/00005537-200405000-00004]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Chan KO, Huang ZH, Wang DY. Acoustic rhinometric assessment of nasal obstruction after treatment with fluticasone propionate in patients with perennial rhinitis. Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003; 30: 379-83.10.1016/S0385-8146(03)00085-314656563]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[4. Sipila J, Suonpaa J. A prospective study using rhinomanometry and patient clinical satisfaction to determine if objective measurements of nasal airway resistance can improve the quality of septoplasty. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 1997; 254, 387-90.10.1007/BF01642556]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Ishizuka T, Ichimura K. Measurements of the nasal volume and the cross sectional areas in adult by acoustic rhinometry. Jpn J Rhinology. 1997; 36:141-4.10.7248/jjrhi1982.36.2_141]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Wen J, Inthavong K, Tu J, Wang S. Numerical simulations for detailed airflow dynamics in a human nasal cavity. Respirat Physiol Neurobiol. 2008; 161: 125-35.10.1016/j.resp.2008.01.01218378196]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Segal RA, Kepler GM, Kimbell JS. Effects of differences in nasal anatomy on airflow distribution: a comparison of four individuals at rest. Ann Biomed Eng. 2008; 36: 1870-82.10.1007/s10439-008-9556-218777212]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[8. Mylavarapu G, Murugappan S, Mihaescu M, Kalra M, Khosla S, Gutmark E. Validation of computational fluid dynamics methodology used for human upper airway flow simulations. J Biomech. 2009; 42:1553-9.10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.03519501360]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Cheng YS. Yeh HC, Guilmette RA, Simpson SQ, Cheng KH, Swift DL. Nasal deposition of ultrafine particles in human volunteers and its relationship to airway geometry. Aerosol Sci Technol. 1996; 25: 274-91.10.1080/02786829608965396]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Weinhold I, Mlynski G. Numerical simulation of airflow in the human nose. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2004; 261:452-5.10.1007/s00405-003-0675-y14652769]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Garcia GJM, Bailie N, Martins DA, Kimbell JS. Atrophic rhinitis: a CFD study of airconditioning in the nasal cavity. J Appl Physiol. 2007; 103:1082-92.10.1152/japplphysiol.01118.200617569762]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Xiong GX, Zhan JM, Jiang HY, Li JF, Rong LW, Xu G. Computational fluid dynamics simulation of airflow in the normal nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Am J Rhinol. 2008; 22:477-82.10.2500/ajr.2008.22.321118954506]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[13. Cole P. Nasal airflow resistance: a survey of 2500 assessments. Am J Rhinol. 1997; 11:415-20.10.2500/1050658977809149019438053]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Hilberg O, Jackson AC, Swift DL, Pedersen OF. Acoustic rhinometry: evaluation of the nasal cavity by acoustic rhinometry. J Appl Physiol. 1989; 66: 295-303.10.1152/jappl.1989.66.1.2952917933]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[15. Austin CE, Foreman JC. Acoustic rhinometry compared with posterior rhinomanometry in the measurement of histamine- and bradykinin-induced changes in nasal airway patency. Br J Clin Pharmac. 1994; 37: 33-7.10.1111/j.1365-2125.1994.tb04235.x13647068148216]Search in Google Scholar