[
Abedi, J. (2006). Language issues in item-development. In S. M. Downing & T. M. Haladyna (Eds.), Handbook of test development (pp. 377–398). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Applebee, A. N. (1984). Writing and Reasoning. Review of Educational Research, 54(4), 557-596. doi:10.3102/00346543054004577
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Arnold, K. M., Umanath, S., Thio, K., Reilly, W. B., McDaniel, M. A., & Marsh, E. J. (2017). Understanding the cognitive process involved in writing to learn. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 23(2), 115-127. doi:10.1037/xap0000119
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Hurley, M. M., & Wilkinson, B. (2004). The effects of school-based writing-to-learn interventions on academic achievement: a meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 29-58. doi:10.3102/00346543074001029
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bell, E. S., & Bell, E. N. (1985). Writing and mathematical problem solving: arguments in favor of synthesis. School Science and Mathematics, 85(3), 210-221. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.1985.tb09614.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Bereiter, C. (1980). Development in writing. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 73-93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1987). The psychology of written composition. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Boero, P. (1999). Argumentation and mathematical proof: a complex, productive, unavoidable relationship in mathematics and mathematics education. Intrenational Newsletter on the Teaching and Learning of Mathematical Proof, 7(8).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Casa, T. M., Firmender, J. M., Cahill, J., Cardetti, F., Choppin, J. M., Cohen, J. A., . . . Zawodniak, R. (2016). Types of and purposes for elementary mathematical writing: task force recommendations.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Common Core State Standards Initiative (CCSSI) (2017). Common core standards for mathematics. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/Math/Practice/#CCSS.Math.Practice.MP1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cross, D., I. (2009). Creating optimal mathematics learning anvironments: combining argumentation and writing to enhance achievement. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(5), 905-930. doi:10.1007/s10763-008-9144-9
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Daroczy, G., Wolska, M., Meurers, W. D., & Nuerk, H. C. (2015). Word problems: a review of linguistic and numerical factors contributing to their difficulty. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 348. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00348
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Emig, J. (1977). Writing as a mode of learning. College Composition and Communication, 28, 122-128. doi:10.2307/356095
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Galbraith, D. (1999). Writing as a knowledge-constituing process. In D. Galbraith & M. Torrance (Eds.), Knowing what to write (pp. 137-157). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Glogger, I., Holzäpfel, L., Schwonke, R., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2009). Activation of learning stategies in writing learning journals. The specifity of prompts matters. Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie (German Journal of Educational Psychology), 23(2), 95-104. doi:10.1024/1010-0652.23.2.95
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Glogger, I., Schwonke, R., Holzäpfel, L., Nückles, M., & Renkl, A. (2012). Learning strategies assessed by jpurnal writing: prediction of learning outcomes by quantity, quality, and combinations of learning strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(2), 452-468. doi:10.1037/a0026683
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Hayes, J. R., & Flower, L. S. (1980). Identifying the organization of writing processes. In L. Gregg & E. R. Steinberg (Eds.), Cognitive processes in writing (pp. 3-30). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Healy, L., & Hoyles, C. (1998). Justifying and proving in school mathematics (technical report). London: Institute of Education, University of London.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Hilbert, T. S., Renkl, A., Kessler, S., & Reiss, K. (2008). Learning to prove in geometry: Learning from heuristic examples and how it can be supported. Learning and Instruction, 18(1), 54–65. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.10.008
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA) (2013). TIMSS 2015 assessment frameworks. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Keys, C. W. (1994). The development of scientific reasoning skills in conjunction with collaborative writing assignments: an interpretive study of six ninth-grade students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31(9), 1003-1022. doi:10.1002/tea.3660310912
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Keys, C. W. (1999). Revitalizing instruction in scientific genres: connecting knowledge production with writing to learn in science. Science Education, 83(2), 115-130. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1098-237X(199903)83:2<115::AID-SCE2>3.0.CO;2-Q
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kintsch, W., & Greeno, J. G. (1985). Understanding and solving word arithmetic problems. Psychological Review, 92(1), 109-129.10.1037/0033-295X.92.1.109
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kultusministerkonferenz (KMK) (2015). Bildungsstandards im Fach Mathematik für die Allgemeine Hochschulreife. Köln: Wolters Kluwer.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Koedinger, K. R. (1999). Conjecturing and argumentation in high-school geometry students. In R. Lehrer & D. Chatan (Eds.), Designing learning environmentsfor developing understanding of geometry and space (pp. 319-347). Mahwah: Erlbaum.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Hesse, F. W. (2006). Collaboration scripts - a conceptual analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 18(2), 159-185. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9007-2
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708-721. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.09.021
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Vogel, F., Fischer, F., & Reiss, K. (2014). Effects of collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples on the acquisition of mathematical argumentation skills of teacher students with different levels of prior achievement. Learning and Instruction, 32, 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2014.01.003
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kosko, K. W. (2016). Making use of what’s given: childrens detailing in mathematical argumentative writing. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 41, 68-86. doi:10.1016/j.jmathb.2015.11.002
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Kosko, K. W., & Zimmermann, B. S. (2017). Emergence of argument in children’s mathematical writing. Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 0(0), 1-25. doi:10.1177/1468798417712065
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Leiss, D., Schukajlow, S., Blum, W., Messner, R., & Pekrun, R. (2010). The role of the situation model in Mathematical Modelling - task analyses, student competencies, and teacher interventions. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik, 31(1), 119-141. doi:10.1007/s13138-010-0006-y
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Leitão, S. (2000). The potential of argument in knowledge building. Human Development, 43, 332-360. doi:10.1159/000022695
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
McCutchen, D. (1996). A capacity theory of writing: working memory in composition. Educational Psychology Review, 8(3), 299-325. doi:10.1007/BF01464076
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Mendez, B., & Taube, S. R. (1997). Mathematics and writing: linking problem solving and composing strategies. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 28(3), 108-118. doi:10.1080/10790195.1997.10850041
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Miller, D. M., Scott, C. E., & McTigue, E. M. (2016). Writing in the secondary-level disciplines: a systematic review of context, cognition, and content. Educational Psychology Review, 1-38. doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9393-z
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Nesher, P., & Teubal, E. (1975). Verbal cues as an interfering factor in verbal problem solving. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 6, 41-51. doi:10.1007/BF590023
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Nückles, M., Hübner, S., Dümer, S., & Renkl, A. (2010). Expertise reversal effects in writing-to-learn. Instructional Science, 38, 237-258. doi:10.1007/s11251-009-9106-9
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2016). PISA 2015 assessment and analytical framework: science, reading, mathematic and financial literacy. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ottinger, S., Kollar, I., & Ufer, S. (2016). Content and form - all the same or different qualities of mathematical arguments? In C. Csíkos, A. Rausch, & J. Szitáni (Eds.), Proceedings of the 40th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, Vol. 4 (pp. 219-226), Szeged: PME.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pohl, T., & Steinhoff, T. (2010). Textformen als Lernformen. In T. Pohl & T. Steinhoff (Eds.), Textformen als Lernformen (pp. 5-26). Duisburg: Gilles & Francke.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Pólya, G. (1945). How to solve it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400828678
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Powell, S. R., Hebert, M. A., Cohen, J. A., Casa, T. M., & Firmender, J. M. (2017). A synthesis of mathematics writing: assesments, interventions, and surveys. Journal of Writing research, 8(3), 493-526. doi:10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.04
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Prediger, S. (2018). Comparing and combining research approaches to empirically inform the design of subject-matter interventions: the case of fostering language learners’ strategies for word problems. RISTAL, 1, 4-18. doi:10.23770/rt1808
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Prediger, S., Wilhelm, N., Büchter, A., Gürsoy, E., & Benholz, C. (2018). Language Proficiency and Mathematics Achievement. Journal für Mathematik-Didaktik. doi:10.1007/s13138-018-0126-3
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Pugalee, D. K. (2001). Writing, mathematics, and metacognition: looking for connections through students’ work in mathematical problem solving. School Science and Mathematics, 101(5), 236-245. doi:10.1111/j.1949-8594.2001.tb18026.x
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Reiss, K., Heinze, A., Renkl, A., & Groß, C. (2008). Reasoning and proof in geometry: Effects of a learning environment based on heuristic worked-out examples. ZDM, 40(3), 455–467. doi:10.1007/s11858-008-0105-0
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Reiss, K., & Renkl, A. (2002). Learning to prove: The idea of heuristic examples. Zeitschrift für Mathematikdidaktik, 34(1), 29–35. doi:10.1007/BF02655690
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Reiss, K., & Ufer, S. (2009). Was macht mathematisches Arbeiten aus?: Empirische Ergebnisse zum Argumentieren, Begründen und Beweisen. Jahresbericht der DMV, 111(4), 155–177.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Renkl, A. (2002). Worked-out examples: instructional explanations support learning by self-explanations. Learning and Instruction, 12, 529–556. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00030-5
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Renkl, A., Hilbert, T., & Schworm, S. (2009). Example-Based Learning in Heuristic Domains: A Cognitive Load Theory Account. Educational Psychology Review, 21(1), 67–78. doi:10.1007/s10648-008-9093-4
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Schwaighofer, M., Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Strohmaier, A., Terwedow, I., . . . Fischer, F. (2017). How to combine collaboration scripts and heuristic worked examples to foster mathematical argumentation - when working memory matters. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 8(3). doi:10.1007/s11412-017-9260-z
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Schworm, S., & Renkl, A. (2007). Learning argumentation skills through the use of prompts for self-explaining examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 285–296. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.285
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Sweller, J. (2010). Element interactivity and intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load. Educational Psychology Review, 22(2), 123-138. doi:10.1007/s10648-010-9128-5
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Thurston, W. P. (1994). On proof and progress in mathematics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), 161-177. doi:10.1090/S0273-0979-1994-00502-6
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Tynjälä, P., Mason, L., & Lonka, K. (2001). Writing as a learning tool: an introduction. In P. Tynjälä, L. Mason, & K. Lonka (Eds.), Writing as a learning tool. Integrating theory and practice (pp. 7-22). Dorbrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/978-94-010-0740-5
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vogel, F., Kollar, I., Ufer, S., Reichersdorfer, E., Reiss, K., & Fischer, F. (2016). Developing argumentation skills in mathematics through computer-supported collaborative learning: the role of transactivity. Instructional Science, 44(5), 477-500. doi:10.1007/s11251-016-9380-2
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[
Vogel, F., Wecker, C., Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2017). Socio-cognitive scaffolding with computer-supported collaboration scripts: a meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 29(3), 477-511. doi:10.1007/s10648-016-9361-7
]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
