Otwarty dostęp

Short-term Impacts of Tillage and Fertilizer Treatments on Soil and Root Borne Nematodes and Maize Yield in a Fine Textured Cambisol


Zacytuj

Figure 1.

Percentage composition of total soil and root borne nematodes from soils and roots collected in tillage and fertilizer split plot experiment at Chinhoyi University of Technology farm, Zimbabwe, combined for all time points and treatments in the 2014/15 and 2015/16 seasons.
Percentage composition of total soil and root borne nematodes from soils and roots collected in tillage and fertilizer split plot experiment at Chinhoyi University of Technology farm, Zimbabwe, combined for all time points and treatments in the 2014/15 and 2015/16 seasons.

Figure 2.

Biplot representing the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on nematodes assemblages (Heli (Helicotylenchus), Nonp (non-plant-parasitic nematodes), Scute (Scutellonema), Roty (Rotylenchulus), Xiph (Xiphinema), Tyle (Tylenchus), Trich (Trychodorus), Melo (Meloidogyne), and Praty (Pratylenchus)) and maize grain yield (GYD) collected from 36 plots that were subjected to three tillage systems (basin NT (BASIN), rip line NT (RIP), and conventional tillage (CONV)) and four fertilizer regimes (no-fertilizer (NF), micro dosing (LF), medium fertilizer (MF), and high fertilizer (HF)) at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 cropping season. Treatments are depicted using arrows while nematodes are depicted with dots.
Biplot representing the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on nematodes assemblages (Heli (Helicotylenchus), Nonp (non-plant-parasitic nematodes), Scute (Scutellonema), Roty (Rotylenchulus), Xiph (Xiphinema), Tyle (Tylenchus), Trich (Trychodorus), Melo (Meloidogyne), and Praty (Pratylenchus)) and maize grain yield (GYD) collected from 36 plots that were subjected to three tillage systems (basin NT (BASIN), rip line NT (RIP), and conventional tillage (CONV)) and four fertilizer regimes (no-fertilizer (NF), micro dosing (LF), medium fertilizer (MF), and high fertilizer (HF)) at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 cropping season. Treatments are depicted using arrows while nematodes are depicted with dots.

Figure 3

. Biplot representing the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on nematodes assemblages (Heli (Helicotylenchus), Nonp (non-plant-parasitic nematodes), Scute (Scutellonema), Roty (Rotylenchulus), Tylen (Tylenchus), and Praty (Pratylenchus)) and maize grain yield (GYD) collected from 36 plots that were subjected to three tillage systems (basin NT (BASIN), rip line NT (RIP), and conventional tillage (CONV)) and four fertilizer regimes (no-fertilizer (NF), micro dosing (LF), medium fertilizer (MF), and high fertilizer (HF)) at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, averaged across all sampling points in 2015/16 cropping season. Treatments are depicted using arrows while nematodes are depicted with dots.
. Biplot representing the principal component analysis (PCA) performed on nematodes assemblages (Heli (Helicotylenchus), Nonp (non-plant-parasitic nematodes), Scute (Scutellonema), Roty (Rotylenchulus), Tylen (Tylenchus), and Praty (Pratylenchus)) and maize grain yield (GYD) collected from 36 plots that were subjected to three tillage systems (basin NT (BASIN), rip line NT (RIP), and conventional tillage (CONV)) and four fertilizer regimes (no-fertilizer (NF), micro dosing (LF), medium fertilizer (MF), and high fertilizer (HF)) at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, averaged across all sampling points in 2015/16 cropping season. Treatments are depicted using arrows while nematodes are depicted with dots.

Mean maize grain yield in kg ha−1 as affected by tillage and fertilizer treatments at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 and 2015/16 cropping seasons.

Tillage treatments Fertilizer treatments
Cropping season Basins Rip Conv SED NF LF MF HF SED
2014/15 6,846b 6,449b 3,697a 1,041.84 5,022 6,200 5,459 5,975 709.90
2015/16 9,672c 7,463b 4,580a 635.33 5,945 7,755 7,842 7,412 1,048.66

Mean plant-parasitic diversity across different tillage and fertilizer treatments at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 and 2015/16 cropping seasons.

Basin Rip Conv SED NF LF MF HF SED
2014/15 season
Evenness index 0.62 0.65 0.60 0.03 0.62 0.63 0.64 0.61 0.03
Richness index 5.08b 4.64a 4.97ab 0.13 4.74 5.04 4.82 5.00 0.15
Shannon index 1.12 1.07 1.06 0.05 1.04 1.12 1.10 1.08 0.06
2015/16 season
Evenness index 0.66 0.66 0.71 0.02 0.67 0.66 0.68 0.68 0.03
Richness index 5.33 5.21 5.17 0.19 5.17 5.11 5.28 5.39 0.22
Shannon index 1.23 1.21 1.29 0 1.2 1.2 1.3 1.3 0

Tillage and fertilizer effects on population density of different nematode feeding site groups recovered from 100 cm3 of soil and 10 g of maize roots at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 and 2015/16 cropping seasons.

Tillage treatments Fertilizer treatments
Basin Rip Conv SED NF LF MF HF SED
2014/15 season
Soil
Sedentary endoparasites 1 0 0 0.31 1 0 0 0 0.36
Migratory endoparasites 22 35 40 13.59 37 41 28 23 15.69
Semi-endoparasites 167b 108b 59a 25.42 108 121 103 114 29.35
Ectoparasites 0 0 0 0.18 0 0 0 0 0.21
Root
Migratory endoparasites 255 302 494 122.90 334 428 411 229 141.90
Semi-endoparasites 1 0 1 1.04 12 0 0 0 1.20
2015/16 season
Soil
Algal feeders 1 0 0 0.47 1 0 1 1 0.55
Sedentary endoparasites 3 4 4 3.71 4 6 3 1 4.28
Migratory endoparasites 19 23 25 6.47 23 17 31 19 7.471
Semi-endoparasites 105b 92b 43a 24.58 63 91 93 73 28.38
Root
Migratory endoparasites 889 354 917 284.40 643 779 638 820 328

Correlation (Pearson r) between maize grain yield and plant-parasitic nematode population in the soil and on roots (log (x + 2.5)−transformed) before planting and 120 d after crop emergence at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 and 2015/16 cropping seasons.

Sampling time point Pratylenchus Scutellonema Helicotylenchus Total nematode
2014/15 cropping season
Pre-planting −0.19 0.23 0.51** 0.37*
120 DAE 0.04 0.19 0.03 0.27
2015/16 cropping season
Pre-planting −0.14 0.24 0.19 0.26
120 DAE −0.03 0.06 −0.11 −0.03

Tillage and fertilizer effects on population density of nematodes recovered from 100 cm3 of soil and 10 g of maize root tissue at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 and 2015/16 cropping seasons.

Tillage treatments Fertilizer treatments
Basin Rip Conv SED NF LF MF HF SED
2014/15 season
Soil
Helicotylenchus sp. 55b 30b 22a 12.20 27 42 27 45 14.09
Pratylenchus sp. 22 35 40 13.59 37 41 28 23 15.69
Rotylenchulus sp. 1 0 0 0.32 1 0 0 0 0.37
Scutellonema sp. 112b 78b 37a 17.90 81 78 75 68 20.67
Non- parasitic 44 39 38 4.583 41 35 40 46 5.292
Total nematodes 233b 182a 137a 24.97 186 197 171 182 28.84
Root
Pratylenchus sp. 255 302 494 122.90 334 428 411 229 141.90
2015/20 season
Soil
Helicotylenchus sp. 27 37 19 15.73 21 31 36 22 18.17
Pratylenchus sp. 19 23 25 6.47 23 17 31 19 7.47
Rotylenchulus sp. 3 4 4 3.71 4 6 3 1 4.28
Scutellonema sp. 74b 52b 21a 14.58 37 54 54 49 16.83
Tylenchus 1 0 0 0.47 1 0 1 1 0.55
Non- parasitic 23b 10a 21b 4.91 14 12 23 22 5.67
Total nematodes 148b 126ab 88a 29.04 1001 120 147 115 33.53
Root
Pratylenchus sp. 889 354 917 284.40 643 779 638 820 328.40

Monthly total rainfall (mm) at Chinhoyi of Technology farm in Zimbabwe in 2014/15 and 2015/16 cropping seasons.

Month 2014/15 (Rainfall in mm) 2015/16 (Rainfall in mm)
September 0 0
October 3.1 20.9
November 22 90.9
December 302.8 184.9
January 339.2 53.8
February 104.9 61.8
March 34.3 173.4
April 38 94
May 0 0
June 0 0
July 0 0
August 0 0
Total 844.3 679.7

Summary of treatments used in the study at Chinhoyi University farm, Zimbabwe, in 2014/15 and 2015/16 cropping seasons.

Factor Level of factor Explanation
Tillage Basin planting Each basin (15 × 15 × 15 cm) was done using hoes. The basins were about 10 cm below the rest of the land after planting
Rip line seeding Marked using a tractor-mounted ripper to a depth of about 15 cm
Conventional tillage Disc plowed as primary tillage followed by secondary tillage using a disc harrow
Fertilizer regime Control (no fertilizer) No fertilizer
Micro dosing (low fertilizer) 100 g of manure per plant position + 80 kg ha−1 compound D fertilizer (8 N: 14 P2O5: 7 K2O) + 80 kg ha−1 ammonium nitrate (34.5% N) (total rate: 35.2 kg ha−1 N: 12.2 kg ha−1 P2O5: 6.6 kg ha−1K2O)
Medium fertilizer rate 100 kg ha−1 compound D fertilizer (8 N: 14 P2O5: 7 K2O) + 100 kg ha−1 ammonium nitrate (34.5% N) (total rate: 41.5 kg ha-1 N: 14 kg ha−1P2O5: 7 kg ha−1K2O)
High fertilizer rate 200 kg ha−1 compound D fertilizer (8 N: 14 P2O5: 7 K2O) + 200 kg ha−1 ammonium nitrate (34.5% N) (total rate: 83 kg ha−1 N: 28 kg ha−1 P2O5: 14 kg ha−1 K2O)
eISSN:
2640-396X
Język:
Angielski
Częstotliwość wydawania:
Volume Open
Dziedziny czasopisma:
Life Sciences, other