[1. Grubisa HS, Heo G, Raboud D, Glover KE, Major PW. An evaluation and comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths achieved with self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:213-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.016]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Noble J, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. In vivo bonding of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel using an adhesion promotor. Angle Orthod 2008;78:357-60.10.2319/020207-53.1]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Miller RA. Bonding fluorosed teeth: new materials for old problems. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:424-7.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Ateyah N, Akpata E. Factors affecting shear bond strength of composite resin to fluorosed human enamel. Oper Dent 2000;25:216-22.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Awliya WY, Akpata ES. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:290-4.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70271-4]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Ermi RB, Gokay N. Effect of fluorosis on dentine shear bond strength of a self-etching bonding system. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1090-4.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01171.x]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Weerasinghe DS, Nikaido T, Wettasinghe KA, Abayakoon JB, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength and morphological analysis of a self-etching primer adhesive system to fluorosed enamel. J Dent 2005;33:419-26.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.004]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Ng’ang’a PM, Ogaard B, Cruz R, Chindia ML, Aasrum E. Tensile strength of orthodontic brackets bonded directly to fluorotic and
nonfluorotic teeth: an in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:244-50.10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81059-5]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Adanir N, Türkkahraman H, Yalçin Güngör A. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:276-80.10.1093/ejo/cjn093]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Borsatto MC, Catirse AB, Palma Dibb RG, Nascimento TN, Rocha RA, Corona SA. Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system. Braz Dent J 2002;13:175-8.10.1590/S0103-64402002000300006]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Canay S, Kocadereli I, Ak”ca E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:15-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70243-5]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:366-73.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80018-2]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Tandecka K, Szatkiewicz T, Sporniak-Tutak K, Grocholewicz K. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of adhesive remnants and enamel loss resulting from debonding orthodontic molar tubes. Head Face Med 2014;10:37.10.1186/1746-160X-10-37416602125208969]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Ryf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, Lussi A, van Meerbeek B, Zimmerli B. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:25-32.10.1093/ejo/cjq12821228118]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Lee YK, Lim YK. Three-dimensional quantification of adhesive remnants on teeth after debonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:556-62.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.02718929274]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Brosh T, Strouthou S, Sarne O. Effects of buccal versus lingual surfaces, enamel conditioning procedures and storage duration on brackets debonding characteristics. J Dent 2005;33:99-105.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.00515683890]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Miksi M, Slaj M, Mestrovi S. Stereomicroscope analysis of enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding. Coll Antropol 2003;27:83-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:717-24.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.03215592221]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Louie TM, Jones RS, Sarma AV, Fried D. Selective removal of composite sealants with near-ultraviolet laser pulses of nanosecond duration. J Biomed Opt 2005;10:14001.10.1117/1.185467615847582]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Sudit G. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product. Dissertation. Minnesota: University of Minnesota, 2014.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:315-28.10.1111/j.1600-0528.1978.tb01173.x282114]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Shida K, Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strengths and etching efficacy of a two-step self-etching adhesive system to fluorosed and non-fluorosed enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:182-6.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00609.x19320728]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Suma S, Anita G, Chandra Shekar BR, Kallury A. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:230-5.10.4103/0970-9290.10043222945715]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Al Shamsi A, Cunningham JL, Lamey PJ, Lynch E. Shear bond strength and residual adhesive after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 2006;76:694-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Sorel O, El Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:260-6.10.1067/mod.2002.12583412226606]Search in Google Scholar