Bond strength and micro-computed tomographic evaluation of pre-coated brackets

1. Grubisa HS, Heo G, Raboud D, Glover KE, Major PW. An evaluation and comparison of orthodontic bracket bond strengths achieved with self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:213-9.10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.01.016Search in Google Scholar

2. Proffit WR, Fields Jr HW, Sarver DM. Contemporary orthodontics. 5^th Ed. St. Louis: Mosby, 2013.Search in Google Scholar

3. Noble J, Karaiskos NE, Wiltshire WA. In vivo bonding of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel using an adhesion promotor. Angle Orthod 2008;78:357-60.10.2319/020207-53.1Search in Google Scholar

4. Miller RA. Bonding fluorosed teeth: new materials for old problems. J Clin Orthod 1995;29:424-7.Search in Google Scholar

5. Ateyah N, Akpata E. Factors affecting shear bond strength of composite resin to fluorosed human enamel. Oper Dent 2000;25:216-22.Search in Google Scholar

6. Awliya WY, Akpata ES. Effect of fluorosis on shear bond strength of glass ionomer-based restorative materials to dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:290-4.10.1016/S0022-3913(99)70271-4Search in Google Scholar

7. Ermi RB, Gokay N. Effect of fluorosis on dentine shear bond strength of a self-etching bonding system. J Oral Rehabil 2003;30:1090-4.10.1046/j.1365-2842.2003.01171.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Weerasinghe DS, Nikaido T, Wettasinghe KA, Abayakoon JB, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strength and morphological analysis of a self-etching primer adhesive system to fluorosed enamel. J Dent 2005;33:419-26.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.11.004Search in Google Scholar

9. Ng’ang’a PM, Ogaard B, Cruz R, Chindia ML, Aasrum E. Tensile strength of orthodontic brackets bonded directly to fluorotic and nonfluorotic teeth: an in vitro comparative study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1992;102:244-50.10.1016/S0889-5406(05)81059-5Search in Google Scholar

10. Adanir N, Türkkahraman H, Yalçin Güngör A. Effects of adhesion promoters on the shear bond strengths of orthodontic brackets to fluorosed enamel. Eur J Orthod 2009;31:276-80.10.1093/ejo/cjn093Search in Google Scholar

11. Borsatto MC, Catirse AB, Palma Dibb RG, Nascimento TN, Rocha RA, Corona SA. Shear bond strength of enamel surface treated with air-abrasive system. Braz Dent J 2002;13:175-8.10.1590/S0103-64402002000300006Search in Google Scholar

12. Canay S, Kocadereli I, Ak”ca E. The effect of enamel air abrasion on the retention of bonded metallic orthodontic brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2000;117:15-9.10.1016/S0889-5406(00)70243-5Search in Google Scholar

13. Reisner KR, Levitt HL, Mante F. Enamel preparation for orthodontic bonding: a comparison between the use of a sandblaster and current techniques. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1997;111:366-73.10.1016/S0889-5406(97)80018-2Search in Google Scholar

14. Artun J, Bergland S. Clinical trials with crystal growth conditioning as an alternative to acid-etch enamel pretreatment. Am J Orthod 1984;85:333-40.10.1016/0002-9416(84)90190-8Search in Google Scholar

15. Janiszewska-Olszowska J, Tandecka K, Szatkiewicz T, Sporniak-Tutak K, Grocholewicz K. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of adhesive remnants and enamel loss resulting from debonding orthodontic molar tubes. Head Face Med 2014;10:37.10.1186/1746-160X-10-37416602125208969Search in Google Scholar

16. Ryf S, Flury S, Palaniappan S, Lussi A, van Meerbeek B, Zimmerli B. Enamel loss and adhesive remnants following bracket removal and various clean-up procedures in vitro. Eur J Orthod 2012;34:25-32.10.1093/ejo/cjq12821228118Search in Google Scholar

17. Lee YK, Lim YK. Three-dimensional quantification of adhesive remnants on teeth after debonding. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2008;134:556-62.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.10.02718929274Search in Google Scholar

18. Brosh T, Strouthou S, Sarne O. Effects of buccal versus lingual surfaces, enamel conditioning procedures and storage duration on brackets debonding characteristics. J Dent 2005;33:99-105.10.1016/j.jdent.2004.08.00515683890Search in Google Scholar

19. Miksi M, Slaj M, Mestrovi S. Stereomicroscope analysis of enamel surface after orthodontic bracket debonding. Coll Antropol 2003;27:83-9.Search in Google Scholar

20. Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2004;126:717-24.10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.10.03215592221Search in Google Scholar

21. Louie TM, Jones RS, Sarma AV, Fried D. Selective removal of composite sealants with near-ultraviolet laser pulses of nanosecond duration. J Biomed Opt 2005;10:14001.10.1117/1.185467615847582Search in Google Scholar

22. Sudit G. Debonding and adhesive remnant cleanup: an in vitro comparison of bond quality, adhesive remnant cleanup, and orthodontic acceptance of a flash-free product. Dissertation. Minnesota: University of Minnesota, 2014.Search in Google Scholar

23. Thylstrup A, Fejerskov O. Clinical appearance of dental fluorosis in permanent teeth in relation to histologic changes. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1978;6:315-28.10.1111/j.1600-0528.1978.tb01173.x282114Search in Google Scholar

24. Shida K, Kitasako Y, Burrow MF, Tagami J. Micro-shear bond strengths and etching efficacy of a two-step self-etching adhesive system to fluorosed and non-fluorosed enamel. Eur J Oral Sci 2009;117:182-6.10.1111/j.1600-0722.2009.00609.x19320728Search in Google Scholar

25. Suma S, Anita G, Chandra Shekar BR, Kallury A. The effect of air abrasion on the retention of metallic brackets bonded to fluorosed enamel surface. Indian J Dent Res 2012;23:230-5.10.4103/0970-9290.10043222945715Search in Google Scholar

26. Al Shamsi A, Cunningham JL, Lamey PJ, Lynch E. Shear bond strength and residual adhesive after orthodontic bracket debonding. Angle Orthod 2006;76:694-9.Search in Google Scholar

27. Sorel O, El Alam R, Chagneau F, Cathelineau G. Comparison of bond strength between simple foil mesh and laser-structured base retention brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2002;122:260-6.10.1067/mod.2002.12583412226606Search in Google Scholar