[1. Ngan PW, Burch JG, Wei SH. Grafted and ungrafted labial gingival recession in pediatric orthodontic patients: effects of retraction and inflammation. Quintessence Int 1991;22:103-11.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Yu Q, Pan XG, Ji GP, Shen G. The association between lower incisal inclination and morphology of the supporting alveolar bone – a cone-beam CT study. Int J Oral Sci 2009;1:217-23.10.4248/IJOS09047]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Yamada C, Kitai N, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Takada K. Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2007;77:766-72.10.2319/072906-309]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Nahás-Scocate AC, de Siqueira Brandão A, Patel MP, Lipiec-Ximenez ME, Chilvarquer I, do Valle-Corotti KM. Bone tissue amount related to upper incisors inclination. Angle Orthod 2014;84:279-85.10.2319/031213-211.1]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1953;39:729-55.10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961;31:141-56.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Tweed CH. The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod 1969;55:651-7.10.1016/0002-9416(69)90041-4]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognatic surgery. J Oral Surgery 1978;36:269-77.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Sun L, Zhang L, Shen G, Wang B, Fang B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:313-23.10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.03225726398]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:S109-19.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.01320381751]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, Verdugo F, Pirronti T, D’Addona A. The thickness of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol 2012;83:187-97.10.1902/jop.2011.11017221692627]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Fuhrmann RA, Wehrbein H, Langen HJ, Diedrich PR. Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol 1995;24:50-4.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116:238-57.10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.00223849378]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Allais D, Melsen B. Does labial movement of lower incisors influence the level of the gingival margin? A case-control study of adult orthodontic patients. Europ J Orthod 2003;25:343-52.10.1093/ejo/25.4.34312938839]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Årtun J, Krogstad O, Little RM. Stability of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination: a study in adults with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 1990;60:99-106.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Ruf S, Hansen K, Pancherz H. Does orthodontic proclination of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gingival recession? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:100-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Yared KF, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:6.e1-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.01516849063]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Renkema AM, Navratilova Z, Mazurova K, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors. Europ J Orthod 2015;37:508-13.10.1093/ejo/cju07325481921]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Zekry A, Wang R, Chau AC, Lang NP. Facial alveolar bone wall width – a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:194-206.10.1111/clr.1209623294441]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Gütermann C, Peltomäki T, Markic G, Hänggi M, Schätzle M, Signorelli L, Patcas R. The inclination of mandibular incisors revisited. Angle Orthod 2014;84:109-19.10.2319/040413-262.1868305823985035]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Gracco A, Lombardo L, Mancuso, G, Gravina V, Siciliani G. Upper incisor position and bony support in untreated patients as seen on CBCT. Angle Orthod 2009;79:692-702.10.2319/081908-437.119537878]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Evangelista K, Vasconcelos Kde F, Bumann A, Hirsch E, Nitka M, Garcia-Silva MA. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:133.e1-7.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.02120691344]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S. Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012;82:67-74.10.2319/040811-250.1888102621696298]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Persson RE, Hollender LG, Persson GR. Assessment of alveolar bone levels from intraoral radiographs in subjects between ages 15 and 94 years seeking dental care. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:647-54.10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02501.x]Search in Google Scholar
[25. European Commission. Radiation Protection. No 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (Evidence-based guidelines). 2012. Viewed January 2016, <http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf>.]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Ahmed M, Shaikh A, Fida M. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21:41-9.10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.041-049.oar502931527653263]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 1996;66:95-109.]Search in Google Scholar