Alveolar bone height and thickness assessed by CBCT

1. Ngan PW, Burch JG, Wei SH. Grafted and ungrafted labial gingival recession in pediatric orthodontic patients: effects of retraction and inflammation. Quintessence Int 1991;22:103-11.Search in Google Scholar

2. Yu Q, Pan XG, Ji GP, Shen G. The association between lower incisal inclination and morphology of the supporting alveolar bone – a cone-beam CT study. Int J Oral Sci 2009;1:217-23.10.4248/IJOS09047Search in Google Scholar

3. Yamada C, Kitai N, Kakimoto N, Murakami S, Furukawa S, Takada K. Spatial relationships between the mandibular central incisor and associated alveolar bone in adults with mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 2007;77:766-72.10.2319/072906-309Search in Google Scholar

4. Nahás-Scocate AC, de Siqueira Brandão A, Patel MP, Lipiec-Ximenez ME, Chilvarquer I, do Valle-Corotti KM. Bone tissue amount related to upper incisors inclination. Angle Orthod 2014;84:279-85.10.2319/031213-211.1Search in Google Scholar

5. Steiner CC. Cephalometrics for you and me. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1953;39:729-55.10.1016/0002-9416(53)90082-7Search in Google Scholar

6. Ricketts RM. Cephalometric synthesis. Angle Orthod 1961;31:141-56.Search in Google Scholar

7. Tweed CH. The diagnostic facial triangle in the control of treatment objectives. Am J Orthod 1969;55:651-7.10.1016/0002-9416(69)90041-4Search in Google Scholar

8. Burstone CJ, James RB, Legan H, Murphy GA, Norton LA. Cephalometrics for orthognatic surgery. J Oral Surgery 1978;36:269-77.Search in Google Scholar

9. Sun L, Zhang L, Shen G, Wang B, Fang B. Accuracy of cone-beam computed tomography in detecting alveolar bone dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2015;147:313-23.10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.10.03225726398Search in Google Scholar

10. Leung CC, Palomo L, Griffith R, Hans MG. Accuracy and reliability of cone-beam computed tomography for measuring alveolar bone height and detecting bony dehiscences and fenestrations. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;137:S109-19.10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.07.01320381751Search in Google Scholar

11. Ghassemian M, Nowzari H, Lajolo C, Verdugo F, Pirronti T, D’Addona A. The thickness of facial alveolar bone overlying healthy maxillary anterior teeth. J Periodontol 2012;83:187-97.10.1902/jop.2011.11017221692627Search in Google Scholar

12. Fuhrmann RA, Wehrbein H, Langen HJ, Diedrich PR. Assessment of the dentate alveolar process with high resolution computed tomography. Dentomaxillofac. Radiol 1995;24:50-4.Search in Google Scholar

13. American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Clinical recommendations regarding use of cone beam computed tomography in orthodontics. Position statement by the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol 2013;116:238-57.10.1016/j.oooo.2013.06.00223849378Search in Google Scholar

14. Allais D, Melsen B. Does labial movement of lower incisors influence the level of the gingival margin? A case-control study of adult orthodontic patients. Europ J Orthod 2003;25:343-52.10.1093/ejo/25.4.34312938839Search in Google Scholar

15. Årtun J, Krogstad O, Little RM. Stability of mandibular incisors following excessive proclination: a study in adults with surgically treated mandibular prognathism. Angle Orthod 1990;60:99-106.Search in Google Scholar

16. Ruf S, Hansen K, Pancherz H. Does orthodontic proclination of lower incisors in children and adolescents cause gingival recession? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1998;114:100-6.Search in Google Scholar

17. Yared KF, Zenobio EG, Pacheco W. Periodontal status of mandibular central incisors after orthodontic proclination in adults. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2006;130:6.e1-8.10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.01.01516849063Search in Google Scholar

18. Renkema AM, Navratilova Z, Mazurova K, Katsaros C, Fudalej PS. Gingival labial recessions and the post-treatment proclination of mandibular incisors. Europ J Orthod 2015;37:508-13.10.1093/ejo/cju07325481921Search in Google Scholar

19. Zekry A, Wang R, Chau AC, Lang NP. Facial alveolar bone wall width – a cone-beam computed tomography study in Asians. Clin Oral Implants Res 2014;25:194-206.10.1111/clr.1209623294441Search in Google Scholar

20. Gütermann C, Peltomäki T, Markic G, Hänggi M, Schätzle M, Signorelli L, Patcas R. The inclination of mandibular incisors revisited. Angle Orthod 2014;84:109-19.10.2319/040413-262.1868305823985035Search in Google Scholar

21. Gracco A, Lombardo L, Mancuso, G, Gravina V, Siciliani G. Upper incisor position and bony support in untreated patients as seen on CBCT. Angle Orthod 2009;79:692-702.10.2319/081908-437.119537878Search in Google Scholar

22. Evangelista K, Vasconcelos Kde F, Bumann A, Hirsch E, Nitka M, Garcia-Silva MA. Dehiscence and fenestration in patients with Class I and Class II Division 1 malocclusion assessed with conebeam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2010;138:133.e1-7.10.1016/j.ajodo.2010.02.02120691344Search in Google Scholar

23. Yagci A, Veli I, Uysal T, Ucar FI, Ozer T, Enhos S. Dehiscence and fenestration in skeletal Class I, II and III malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod 2012;82:67-74.10.2319/040811-250.1888102621696298Search in Google Scholar

24. Persson RE, Hollender LG, Persson GR. Assessment of alveolar bone levels from intraoral radiographs in subjects between ages 15 and 94 years seeking dental care. J Clin Periodontol 1998;25:647-54.10.1111/j.1600-051X.1998.tb02501.xSearch in Google Scholar

25. European Commission. Radiation Protection. No 172. Cone beam CT for dental and maxillofacial radiology (Evidence-based guidelines). 2012. Viewed January 2016, <http://www.sedentexct.eu/files/radiation_protection_172.pdf>.Search in Google Scholar

26. Ahmed M, Shaikh A, Fida M. Diagnostic performance of various cephalometric parameters for the assessment of vertical growth pattern. Dental Press J Orthod 2016;21:41-9.10.1590/2177-6709.21.4.041-049.oar502931527653263Search in Google Scholar

27. Handelman CS. The anterior alveolus: its importance in limiting orthodontic treatment and its influence on the occurrence of iatrogenic sequelae. Angle Orthod 1996;66:95-109.Search in Google Scholar