Evaluation of the relationship between quantitative ultrasound findings and morbidly adherent placenta

1Lin Q, Li B, Chen S, Lin C, Lin Z, Zhang F et al. Application of scanning magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prenatal placental implantation and related care. Scanning 2022: 4883989.Lin Q Li B Chen S Lin C Lin Z Zhang F et al Application of scanning magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prenatal placental implantation and related care Scanning 2022 488398910.1155/2022/4883989917731435692697Search in Google Scholar

2Ali H, Chandraharan E: Etiopathogenesis and risk factors for placental accreta spectrum disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 72: 4–12.Ali H Chandraharan E Etiopathogenesis and risk factors for placental accreta spectrum disorders Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021 72 4 1210.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.07.00632753310Search in Google Scholar

3American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Obstetric care consensus no. 7: placenta accreta spectrum. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: e259–e275.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Obstetric care consensus no. 7: placenta accreta spectrum Obstet Gynecol 2018 132 e259 e27510.1097/AOG.000000000000298330461695Search in Google Scholar

4Habek D, Karadjole VS, Knežević F, Marton I, Ivanišević M.: Morbidly adherent placenta in the first trimester with consecutive hysterectomy. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2022; 226: 339–342.Habek D Karadjole VS Knežević F Marton I Ivanišević M. Morbidly adherent placenta in the first trimester with consecutive hysterectomy Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2022 226 339 34210.1055/a-1812-557435785814Search in Google Scholar

5Xia H, Ke S-C, Qian R-R, Lin J-G, Li Y, Zhang X: Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Medicine 2020; 99: e17908.Xia H Ke S-C Qian R-R Lin J-G Li Y Zhang X Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy Medicine 2020 99 e1790810.1097/MD.0000000000017908695986731914010Search in Google Scholar

6Hong S, Le Y, Lio KU, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhang N: Performance comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in their diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Insights Imaging 2022; 13: 50.Hong S Le Y Lio KU Zhang T Zhang Y Zhang N Performance comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in their diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis Insights Imaging 2022 13 5010.1186/s13244-022-01192-w894097135316430Search in Google Scholar

7Jauniaux E, Bhide A: Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 27–36.Jauniaux E Bhide A Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017 217 27 3610.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.05028268196Search in Google Scholar

8Romeo V, Sarno L, Volpe A, Ginocchio MI, Esposito R, Mainenti PP et al. US and MR imaging findings to detect placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa: a comparative systematic study. Abdom Radiol 2019; 44: 3398–3407.Romeo V Sarno L Volpe A Ginocchio MI Esposito R Mainenti PP et al US and MR imaging findings to detect placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa: a comparative systematic study Abdom Radiol 2019 44 3398 340710.1007/s00261-019-02185-y31435761Search in Google Scholar

9Calì G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, Forlani F: Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 406–412.Calì G Giambanco L Puccio G Forlani F Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 41 406 41210.1002/uog.1238523288834Search in Google Scholar

10Ahmed HAK, Ahmed AA-E, Ahmed KA, Sakr AI: Accuracy of MRI vs ultrasound in the diagnosis of placental adhesive disorder. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 2020; 18: 317–324.Ahmed HAK Ahmed AA-E Ahmed KA Sakr AI Accuracy of MRI vs ultrasound in the diagnosis of placental adhesive disorder Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 2020 18 317 32410.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_67_20Search in Google Scholar

11DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837–845.DeLong ER DeLong DM Clarke-Pearson DL Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach Biometrics 1988 44 837 84510.2307/2531595Search in Google Scholar

12Budorick NE, Figueroa R, Vizcarra M, Shin J: Another look at ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30: 2422–2427.Budorick NE Figueroa R Vizcarra M Shin J Another look at ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of placenta accreta J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017 30 2422 242710.1080/14767058.2016.125274427806657Search in Google Scholar

13Gao Y, Gao X, Cai J, Han F, Xu G, Zhang X et al. Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum by a scoring system based on maternal characteristics combined with ultrasonographic features. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 60: 1011–1017.Gao Y Gao X Cai J Han F Xu G Zhang X et al Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum by a scoring system based on maternal characteristics combined with ultrasonographic features Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2021 60 1011 101710.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.01134794730Search in Google Scholar

14Yang J, Lim YK, Kim HS, Chang KH, Lee JP, Ryu HS: Sonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 178–182.Yang J Lim YK Kim HS Chang KH Lee JP Ryu HS Sonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006 28 178 18210.1002/uog.279716858740Search in Google Scholar

15Hamada S, Hasegawa J, Nakamura M, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K, Sekizawa A et al. Ultrasonographic findings of placenta lacunae and a lack of a clear zone in cases with placenta previa and normal placenta. Prenat. Diagn. 2011; 31: 1062–1065.Hamada S Hasegawa J Nakamura M Matsuoka R Ichizuka K Sekizawa A et al Ultrasonographic findings of placenta lacunae and a lack of a clear zone in cases with placenta previa and normal placenta. Prenat Diagn 2011 31 1062 106510.1002/pd.283321800335Search in Google Scholar

16Finberg HJ, Williams JW: Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 333–343.Finberg HJ Williams JW Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section J Ultrasound Med 1992 11 333 34310.7863/jum.1992.11.7.3331522623Search in Google Scholar

17Pagani G, Cali G, Acharya G, Trisch I-T, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Familiari A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97: 25–37.Pagani G Cali G Acharya G Trisch I-T Palacios-Jaraquemada J Familiari A et al Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018 97 25 3710.1111/aogs.1323828963728Search in Google Scholar

18Comstock CH, Bronsteen RA: The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. BJOG 2014; 121: 171–181; discussion 181–182.Comstock CH Bronsteen RA The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta BJOG 2014 121 171 181 discussion 181–18210.1111/1471-0528.1255724373591Search in Google Scholar

19Maruthappa M, Lee Y, Wong SF, Shanthi S, Pyingkodi M: A review on placenta inefficiencies and complications analysis with ultrasound images. Materials Today: Proceed 2020.Maruthappa M Lee Y Wong SF Shanthi S Pyingkodi M A review on placenta inefficiencies and complications analysis with ultrasound images Materials Today: Proceed 202010.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.919Search in Google Scholar

20Tovbin J, Melcer Y, Shor S, Pekar-Zlotin M, Mendlovic S, Svirsky R et al. Prediction of morbidly adherent placenta using a scoring system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 504–510.Tovbin J Melcer Y Shor S Pekar-Zlotin M Mendlovic S Svirsky R et al Prediction of morbidly adherent placenta using a scoring system Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016 48 504 51010.1002/uog.1581326574157Search in Google Scholar

21D’Antonio FD, Iacovella C, Bhide A: Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 509–517.D’Antonio FD Iacovella C Bhide A Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta‐analysis Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013 42 509 51710.1002/uog.1319423943408Search in Google Scholar

22Shih J, Palacios Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Sy YN, Shyu MK, Lin CH, Lin SY et al. Role of three‐dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray‐scale and color Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 193–203.Shih J Palacios Palacios Jaraquemada JM Sy YN Shyu MK Lin CH Lin SY et al Role of three‐dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray‐scale and color Doppler techniques Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009 33 193 20310.1002/uog.628419173239Search in Google Scholar

23Gulati A, Anand R, Aggarwal K, Agarwal S, Tomer S: Ultrasound as a sole modality for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum: potentialities and pitfalls. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2021; 31: 527–538.Gulati A Anand R Aggarwal K Agarwal S Tomer S Ultrasound as a sole modality for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum: potentialities and pitfalls Indian J Radiol Imaging 2021 31 527 53810.1055/s-0041-1735864859057334790294Search in Google Scholar

24Comstock CH, Love Jr JJ, Bronsteen RA, Lee W, Vettraino IM, Huang RR et al. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1135–1140.Comstock CH Love Jr JJ Bronsteen RA Lee W Vettraino IM Huang RR et al Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004 190 1135 114010.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.02415118654Search in Google Scholar

25Hussein M, Ramadan Abd MF, Abu-Elhassan AM, Abbas AM, Youssef AEA: Evaluation of different ultrasonographic modalities in the diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta: a cross-sectional study. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 9: 405–416.Hussein M Ramadan Abd MF Abu-Elhassan AM Abbas AM Youssef AEA Evaluation of different ultrasonographic modalities in the diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta: a cross-sectional study Open J Obstet Gynecol 2019 9 405 41610.4236/ojog.2019.94041Search in Google Scholar