This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Lin Q, Li B, Chen S, Lin C, Lin Z, Zhang F et al. Application of scanning magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prenatal placental implantation and related care. Scanning 2022: 4883989.LinQLiBChenSLinCLinZZhangFet alApplication of scanning magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of prenatal placental implantation and related care2022488398910.1155/2022/4883989917731435692697Search in Google Scholar
Ali H, Chandraharan E: Etiopathogenesis and risk factors for placental accreta spectrum disorders. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2021; 72: 4–12.AliHChandraharanEEtiopathogenesis and risk factors for placental accreta spectrum disorders20217241210.1016/j.bpobgyn.2020.07.00632753310Search in Google Scholar
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine: Obstetric care consensus no. 7: placenta accreta spectrum. Obstet Gynecol 2018; 132: e259–e275.American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, Society for Maternal-Fetal MedicineObstetric care consensus no. 7: placenta accreta spectrum2018132e259e27510.1097/AOG.000000000000298330461695Search in Google Scholar
Habek D, Karadjole VS, Knežević F, Marton I, Ivanišević M.: Morbidly adherent placenta in the first trimester with consecutive hysterectomy. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 2022; 226: 339–342.HabekDKaradjoleVSKneževićFMartonIIvaniševićM.Morbidly adherent placenta in the first trimester with consecutive hysterectomy202222633934210.1055/a-1812-557435785814Search in Google Scholar
Xia H, Ke S-C, Qian R-R, Lin J-G, Li Y, Zhang X: Comparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy. Medicine 2020; 99: e17908.XiaHKeS-CQianR-RLinJ-GLiYZhangXComparison between abdominal ultrasound and nuclear magnetic resonance imaging detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimester of pregnancy202099e1790810.1097/MD.0000000000017908695986731914010Search in Google Scholar
Hong S, Le Y, Lio KU, Zhang T, Zhang Y, Zhang N: Performance comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in their diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Insights Imaging 2022; 13: 50.HongSLeYLioKUZhangTZhangYZhangNPerformance comparison of ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging in their diagnostic accuracy of placenta accreta spectrum disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis2022135010.1186/s13244-022-01192-w894097135316430Search in Google Scholar
Jauniaux E, Bhide A: Prenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2017; 217: 27–36.JauniauxEBhideAPrenatal ultrasound diagnosis and outcome of placenta previa accreta after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis2017217273610.1016/j.ajog.2017.02.05028268196Search in Google Scholar
Romeo V, Sarno L, Volpe A, Ginocchio MI, Esposito R, Mainenti PP et al. US and MR imaging findings to detect placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa: a comparative systematic study. Abdom Radiol 2019; 44: 3398–3407.RomeoVSarnoLVolpeAGinocchioMIEspositoRMainentiPPet alUS and MR imaging findings to detect placental adhesion spectrum (PAS) in patients with placenta previa: a comparative systematic study2019443398340710.1007/s00261-019-02185-y31435761Search in Google Scholar
Calì G, Giambanco L, Puccio G, Forlani F: Morbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 41: 406–412.CalìGGiambancoLPuccioGForlaniFMorbidly adherent placenta: evaluation of ultrasound diagnostic criteria and differentiation of placenta accreta from percreta20134140641210.1002/uog.1238523288834Search in Google Scholar
Ahmed HAK, Ahmed AA-E, Ahmed KA, Sakr AI: Accuracy of MRI vs ultrasound in the diagnosis of placental adhesive disorder. Al-Azhar Assiut Med J 2020; 18: 317–324.AhmedHAKAhmedAA-EAhmedKASakrAIAccuracy of MRI vs ultrasound in the diagnosis of placental adhesive disorder20201831732410.4103/AZMJ.AZMJ_67_20Search in Google Scholar
DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL: Comparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics 1988; 44: 837–845.DeLongERDeLongDMClarke-PearsonDLComparing the areas under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach19884483784510.2307/2531595Search in Google Scholar
Budorick NE, Figueroa R, Vizcarra M, Shin J: Another look at ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of placenta accreta. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med 2017; 30: 2422–2427.BudorickNEFigueroaRVizcarraMShinJAnother look at ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of placenta accreta2017302422242710.1080/14767058.2016.125274427806657Search in Google Scholar
Gao Y, Gao X, Cai J, Han F, Xu G, Zhang X et al. Prediction of placenta accreta spectrum by a scoring system based on maternal characteristics combined with ultrasonographic features. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 2021; 60: 1011–1017.GaoYGaoXCaiJHanFXuGZhangXet alPrediction of placenta accreta spectrum by a scoring system based on maternal characteristics combined with ultrasonographic features2021601011101710.1016/j.tjog.2021.09.01134794730Search in Google Scholar
Yang J, Lim YK, Kim HS, Chang KH, Lee JP, Ryu HS: Sonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2006; 28: 178–182.YangJLimYKKimHSChangKHLeeJPRyuHSSonographic findings of placental lacunae and the prediction of adherent placenta in women with placenta previa totalis and prior Cesarean section20062817818210.1002/uog.279716858740Search in Google Scholar
Hamada S, Hasegawa J, Nakamura M, Matsuoka R, Ichizuka K, Sekizawa A et al. Ultrasonographic findings of placenta lacunae and a lack of a clear zone in cases with placenta previa and normal placenta. Prenat. Diagn. 2011; 31: 1062–1065.HamadaSHasegawaJNakamuraMMatsuokaRIchizukaKSekizawaAet alUltrasonographic findings of placenta lacunae and a lack of a clear zone in cases with placenta previa and normal placenta. Prenat2011311062106510.1002/pd.283321800335Search in Google Scholar
Finberg HJ, Williams JW: Placenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section. J Ultrasound Med 1992; 11: 333–343.FinbergHJWilliamsJWPlacenta accreta: prospective sonographic diagnosis in patients with placenta previa and prior cesarean section19921133334310.7863/jum.1992.11.7.3331522623Search in Google Scholar
Pagani G, Cali G, Acharya G, Trisch I-T, Palacios-Jaraquemada J, Familiari A et al. Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2018; 97: 25–37.PaganiGCaliGAcharyaGTrischI-TPalacios-JaraquemadaJFamiliariAet alDiagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in detecting the severity of abnormally invasive placentation: a systematic review and meta-analysis201897253710.1111/aogs.1323828963728Search in Google Scholar
Comstock CH, Bronsteen RA: The antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta. BJOG 2014; 121: 171–181; discussion 181–182.ComstockCHBronsteenRAThe antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta2014121171181discussion 181–18210.1111/1471-0528.1255724373591Search in Google Scholar
Maruthappa M, Lee Y, Wong SF, Shanthi S, Pyingkodi M: A review on placenta inefficiencies and complications analysis with ultrasound images. Materials Today: Proceed 2020.MaruthappaMLeeYWongSFShanthiSPyingkodiMA review on placenta inefficiencies and complications analysis with ultrasound images202010.1016/j.matpr.2020.10.919Search in Google Scholar
Tovbin J, Melcer Y, Shor S, Pekar-Zlotin M, Mendlovic S, Svirsky R et al. Prediction of morbidly adherent placenta using a scoring system. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2016; 48: 504–510.TovbinJMelcerYShorSPekar-ZlotinMMendlovicSSvirskyRet alPrediction of morbidly adherent placenta using a scoring system20164850451010.1002/uog.1581326574157Search in Google Scholar
D’Antonio FD, Iacovella C, Bhide A: Prenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta‐analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2013; 42: 509–517.D’AntonioFDIacovellaCBhideAPrenatal identification of invasive placentation using ultrasound: systematic review and meta‐analysis20134250951710.1002/uog.1319423943408Search in Google Scholar
Shih J, Palacios Palacios Jaraquemada JM, Sy YN, Shyu MK, Lin CH, Lin SY et al. Role of three‐dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray‐scale and color Doppler techniques. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 33: 193–203.ShihJPalaciosPalacios Jaraquemada JMSyYNShyuMKLinCHLinSYet alRole of three‐dimensional power Doppler in the antenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta: comparison with gray‐scale and color Doppler techniques20093319320310.1002/uog.628419173239Search in Google Scholar
Gulati A, Anand R, Aggarwal K, Agarwal S, Tomer S: Ultrasound as a sole modality for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum: potentialities and pitfalls. Indian J Radiol Imaging 2021; 31: 527–538.GulatiAAnandRAggarwalKAgarwalSTomerSUltrasound as a sole modality for prenatal diagnosis of placenta accreta spectrum: potentialities and pitfalls20213152753810.1055/s-0041-1735864859057334790294Search in Google Scholar
Comstock CH, Love Jr JJ, Bronsteen RA, Lee W, Vettraino IM, Huang RR et al. Sonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004; 190: 1135–1140.ComstockCHLoveJr JJBronsteenRALeeWVettrainoIMHuangRRet alSonographic detection of placenta accreta in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy20041901135114010.1016/j.ajog.2003.11.02415118654Search in Google Scholar
Hussein M, Ramadan Abd MF, Abu-Elhassan AM, Abbas AM, Youssef AEA: Evaluation of different ultrasonographic modalities in the diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta: a cross-sectional study. Open J Obstet Gynecol 2019; 9: 405–416.HusseinMRamadan AbdMFAbu-ElhassanAMAbbasAMYoussefAEAEvaluation of different ultrasonographic modalities in the diagnosis of morbidly adherent placenta: a cross-sectional study2019940541610.4236/ojog.2019.94041Search in Google Scholar