Comparison of Biometric Values and Intraocular Lens Power Calculations Obtained by Ultrasound and Optical Biometry

1. R Sheard. Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery. Eye 2014; 28(2): 118-125.10.1038/eye.2013.248Search in Google Scholar

2. Oslen T. Sources od error in intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18: 125-129.10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80917-0Search in Google Scholar

3. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, Rainer G, Vass C, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):524-534.10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00113-5Search in Google Scholar

4. Fontes BM, Castro E. Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial lenth with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2011; 74: 166-170.10.1590/S0004-27492011000300004Search in Google Scholar

5. Haigis W. Matrix-optical representation of currently used intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 229-234.10.3928/1081597X-20090201-09Search in Google Scholar

6. Oslen T. Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32; 419-424.10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.139Search in Google Scholar

7. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(5):472-85. 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.xSearch in Google Scholar

8. Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):85-88.10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01500-6Search in Google Scholar

9. Rose LT, Moshegov Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and Applanation A-Scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31(2):121-124.10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00617.xSearch in Google Scholar

10. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(2):125-129.10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80917-0Search in Google Scholar

11. Hollady JT, Prager TC et al. Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculation. Arch Ophtalmol 1986; 104: 539-541.10.1001/archopht.1986.01050160095020Search in Google Scholar

12. Oslen T. Theoretical approach to intraocular lens calculation using Gaussian optics. I Cataract Refract Surg 1987; 13: 141-145.10.1016/S0886-3350(87)80128-1Search in Google Scholar

13. Findle O. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16(1):61-61.10.1097/00055735-200502000-00011Search in Google Scholar

14. Sahin A, Hamrah P. Clinically relevant biometry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23: 47-53. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd63eSearch in Google Scholar

15. Mylonas G, Sacu S, Buehl W, Ritter M, Georgopoulos M, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Performance of three biometry devices in patients with different grades of age-related cataract. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: e237-e241.10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02042.xSearch in Google Scholar

16. M S Rajan, I Keilhorn, J A Bell. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculatios. Eye 2002; 16: 552-556.10.1038/sj.eye.6700157Search in Google Scholar

17. Shammas HJ. A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1984;10(4):444-447.10.1016/S0146-2776(84)80044-0Search in Google Scholar

18. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(12):1961-1968.10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7Search in Google Scholar

19. Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL Master. A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2001; 281: 61-5.Search in Google Scholar

20. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, Heinzl H, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(6):861-867.10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00699-4Search in Google Scholar

21. Bhatt AB, Schefler AC, Feuer WJ, Yoo SH, Murray TG. Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(7):929-33.10.1001/archopht.126.7.92918625938Search in Google Scholar

22. Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, et al. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2): 230-4. 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01274-3Search in Google Scholar

23. Beatriz Machado Fontes, , Bruno Machado FonteI, Elaine Castro. Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial length with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. vol.74 no.3 São Paulo May/June 2011.10.1590/S0004-27492011000300004Search in Google Scholar

24. Cech R, Utikal T, Juhaszova J. Comparison of optical and ultrasound biometry and assessment of using both methods in practice. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2014 Feb; 70(1): 3-9.Search in Google Scholar

25. Goyal R, North RV, Morgan JE. Comparison of laser interferometry and ultrasound A-scan in the measurement of axial length. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81: 331-335. 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00092.xSearch in Google Scholar

26. Yang Q, Chen B, Peng, Li Z, Huang Y. Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasoumd biometry in high myopic patients with cataract. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2014 Jan; 50(1): 32-6.Search in Google Scholar

27. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989; 15: 425-428. 10.1016/S0886-3350(89)80062-8Search in Google Scholar

28. Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 700-712.10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0Search in Google Scholar

29. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988; 14: 17-24. 10.1016/S0886-3350(88)80059-2Search in Google Scholar

30. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16: 333-340. 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80705-5Search in Google Scholar

31. Haigis W. Matrix-optical representation of currently used intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 229-234.10.3928/1081597X-20090201-0919241775Search in Google Scholar

32. Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 63-71. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.03221183100Search in Google Scholar