[1. R Sheard. Optimising biometry for best outcomes in cataract surgery. Eye 2014; 28(2): 118-125.10.1038/eye.2013.248]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Oslen T. Sources od error in intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992; 18: 125-129.10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80917-0]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Drexler W, Findl O, Menapace R, Rainer G, Vass C, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Partial coherence interferometry: a novel approach to biometry in cataract surgery. Am J Ophthalmol. 1998;126(4):524-534.10.1016/S0002-9394(98)00113-5]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Fontes BM, Castro E. Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial lenth with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry. Arq Bras Oftalmol 2011; 74: 166-170.10.1590/S0004-27492011000300004]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Haigis W. Matrix-optical representation of currently used intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 229-234.10.3928/1081597X-20090201-09]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Oslen T. Prediction of the effective postoperative (intraocular lens) anterior chamber depth. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006; 32; 419-424.10.1016/j.jcrs.2005.12.139]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Olsen T. Calculation of intraocular lens power: a review. Acta Ophthalmol Scand. 2007; 85(5):472-85. 10.1111/j.1755-3768.2007.00879.x]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Nemeth J, Fekete O, Pesztenlehrer N. Optical and ultrasound measurement of axial length and anterior chamber depth for intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003;29(1):85-88.10.1016/S0886-3350(02)01500-6]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Rose LT, Moshegov Comparison of the Zeiss IOLMaster and Applanation A-Scan ultrasound: biometry for intraocular lens calculation. Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2003;31(2):121-124.10.1046/j.1442-9071.2003.00617.x]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg. 1992;18(2):125-129.10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80917-0]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Hollady JT, Prager TC et al. Improving the predictability of intraocular lens power calculation. Arch Ophtalmol 1986; 104: 539-541.10.1001/archopht.1986.01050160095020]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Oslen T. Theoretical approach to intraocular lens calculation using Gaussian optics. I Cataract Refract Surg 1987; 13: 141-145.10.1016/S0886-3350(87)80128-1]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Findle O. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation. Curr Opin Ophthalmol. 2005;16(1):61-61.10.1097/00055735-200502000-00011]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Sahin A, Hamrah P. Clinically relevant biometry. Curr Opin Ophthalmol 2012; 23: 47-53. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834cd63e]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Mylonas G, Sacu S, Buehl W, Ritter M, Georgopoulos M, Schmidt-Erfurth U. Performance of three biometry devices in patients with different grades of age-related cataract. Acta Ophthalmol 2011; 89: e237-e241.10.1111/j.1755-3768.2010.02042.x]Search in Google Scholar
[16. M S Rajan, I Keilhorn, J A Bell. Partial coherence laser interferometry vs conventional ultrasound biometry in intraocular lens power calculatios. Eye 2002; 16: 552-556.10.1038/sj.eye.6700157]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Shammas HJ. A comparison of immersion and contact techniques for axial length measurement. J Am Intraocul Implant Soc. 1984;10(4):444-447.10.1016/S0146-2776(84)80044-0]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Vogel A, Dick HB, Krummenauer F. Reproducibility of optical biometry using partial coherence interferometry: intraobserver and interobserver reliability. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(12):1961-1968.10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01214-7]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Verhulst E, Vrijghem JC. Accuracy of intraocular lens power calculations using the Zeiss IOL Master. A prospective study. Bull Soc Belge Ophtalmol 2001; 281: 61-5.]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Findl O, Drexler W, Menapace R, Heinzl H, Hitzenberger CK, Fercher AF. Improved prediction of intraocular lens power using partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2001;27(6):861-867.10.1016/S0886-3350(00)00699-4]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Bhatt AB, Schefler AC, Feuer WJ, Yoo SH, Murray TG. Comparison of predictions made by the intraocular lens master and ultrasound biometry. Arch Ophthalmol. 2008;126(7):929-33.10.1001/archopht.126.7.92918625938]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Kiss B, Findl O, Menapace R, Wirtitsch M, Petternel V, Drexler W, et al. Refractive outcome of cataract surgery using partial coherence interferometry and ultrasound biometry: clinical feasibility study of a commercial prototype II. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2002;28(2): 230-4. 10.1016/S0886-3350(01)01274-3]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Beatriz Machado Fontes, , Bruno Machado FonteI, Elaine Castro. Intraocular lens power calculation by measuring axial length with partial optical coherence and ultrasonic biometry. Arq. Bras. Oftalmol. vol.74 no.3 São Paulo May/June 2011.10.1590/S0004-27492011000300004]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Cech R, Utikal T, Juhaszova J. Comparison of optical and ultrasound biometry and assessment of using both methods in practice. Cesk Slov Oftalmol 2014 Feb; 70(1): 3-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Goyal R, North RV, Morgan JE. Comparison of laser interferometry and ultrasound A-scan in the measurement of axial length. Acta Ophthalmol Scand 2003; 81: 331-335. 10.1034/j.1600-0420.2003.00092.x]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Yang Q, Chen B, Peng, Li Z, Huang Y. Accuracy of immersion B-scan ultrasoumd biometry in high myopic patients with cataract. Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi 2014 Jan; 50(1): 32-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Schelenz J, Kammann J. Comparison of contact and immersion techniques for axial length measurement and implant power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1989; 15: 425-428. 10.1016/S0886-3350(89)80062-8]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Hoffer KJ. The Hoffer Q formula: a comparison of theoretic and regression formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 1993; 19: 700-712.10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80338-0]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Holladay JT, Prager TC, Chandler TY, Musgrove KH, Lewis JW, Ruiz RS. A three-part system for refining intraocular lens power calculations. J Cataract Refract Surg 1988; 14: 17-24. 10.1016/S0886-3350(88)80059-2]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Retzlaff JA, Sanders DR, Kraff MC. Development of the SRK/T intraocular lens implant power calculation formula. J Cataract Refract Surg 1990; 16: 333-340. 10.1016/S0886-3350(13)80705-5]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Haigis W. Matrix-optical representation of currently used intraocular lens power formulas. J Refract Surg 2009; 25: 229-234.10.3928/1081597X-20090201-0919241775]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Aristodemou P, Knox Cartwright NE, Sparrow JM, Johnston RL. Formula choice: Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, or SRK/T and refractive outcomes in 8108 eyes after cataract surgery with biometry by partial coherence interferometry. J Cataract Refract Surg 2011; 37: 63-71. 10.1016/j.jcrs.2010.07.03221183100]Search in Google Scholar