Quality test entrance examination for full-time second-level in Midwifery faculty – 5-year retrospective analysis

1. Drennan J. Professional and academic destination of masters in nursing graduates: a national survey. Nurse. Educ. Today. 2008; 28(6): 751-9.Search in Google Scholar

2. Raines CF, Taglaireni ME. Career pathways in nursing: Entry points and academic progression. Online. J. Issues. Nurs. 2008; 13(3): 3.Search in Google Scholar

3. Kostrzanowska Z, Zarzycka D. Struktura i zasoby pielęgniarstwa europejskiego. [w:] Wrońska I, Krajewska-Kułak E, red. Wybrane zagadnienia z pielęgniarstwa europejskiego. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Czelej; 2007, s. 27-47.Search in Google Scholar

4. Muecke L. Pre- and post-admission criteria as predictors of academic success in an associate degree nursing program. Ames: Iowa State University; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

5. Kuncel NR, Hezlett SA, Ones DS. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychol. Bull. 2001; 127(1): 162-81.Search in Google Scholar

6. Panczyk M, Zarzeka A, Belowska J, et al. Risk of attrition from Bachelor’s degree of Nursing programme – predictive evaluation. Piel. XXI. 2015; 51(2): 66-72.Search in Google Scholar

7. Uchwała nr 13/2008 z dnia 25 lutego 2008 roku w sprawie uchwalenia zasad i trybu postępowania rekrutacyjnego na pierwszy rok studiów na rok akademicki 2009/2010 w Akademii Medycznej w Warszawie.Search in Google Scholar

8. Niemierko B. Pomiar wyników kształcenia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne; 1999.Search in Google Scholar

9. Jankowski K, Zajenkowski M. Metody szacowania rzetelności pomiaru testem. [w:] Fronczyk K, red. Psychometria - podstawowe zagadnienia. Warszawa: Vizja Press & IT; 2009, s. 84-110.Search in Google Scholar

10. Rhodes ML, Bullough B, Fulton J. The Graduate Record Examination as an admission requirement for the graduate nursing program. J. Prof. Nurs. 1994; 10(5): 289-96.Search in Google Scholar

11. Auerhahn C. Predictors of success in master’s level nurse practitioner programs. New York: Columbia University; 1996.Search in Google Scholar

12. Newton SE, Moore G. Undergraduate grade point average and graduate record examination scores: the experience of one graduate nursing program. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2007; 28(6): 327-31.Search in Google Scholar

13. Katz JR, Chow C, Motzer SA, Woods SL. The graduate record examination: help or hindrance in nursing graduate school admissions? J. Prof. Nurs. 2009; 25(6): 369-72.Search in Google Scholar

14. Megginson L. Exploration of nursing doctoral admissions and performance outcomes. J. Nurs. Educ. 2011; 50(9): 502-12.10.3928/01484834-20110517-0421598860Search in Google Scholar

15. Panczyk M, Rebandel H, Belowska J, et al. Entrance exam for candidates for master’s nursing studies – a 5-year retrospective analysis. Prob. Piel. 2015; 23(3): in press.Search in Google Scholar

16. Panczyk M, Gotlib J. Analiza dyskryminacyjna kryteriów rekrutacyjnych na studia II stopnia na kierunku Pielęgniarstwo na Warszawskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym. Prob. Piel. 2015; 23(1): 51-6.Search in Google Scholar

17. Panczyk M, Ścieglińska B, Woynarowska-Sołdan M, Gotlib J. MSc Nursing Entrance Exams - admission to full-time and part-time programmes at medical university. Prob. Piel. 2015; 22(4): 477-4483.Search in Google Scholar

18. Fleiss JL. Reliability of Measurement. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.10.1002/9781118032923Search in Google Scholar

19. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J. Pers. Assess. 2003; 80(1): 99-103.10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_1812584072Search in Google Scholar

20. Guilford JP. Psychometric methods. 2^nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1954.Search in Google Scholar

21. Tarrant M, Ware J. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments. Med. Educ. 2008; 42(2): 198-206.Search in Google Scholar

22. Harasym PH, Leong EJ, Violato C, et al. Cuing effect of „all of the above” on the reliability and validity of multiple-choice test items. Eval. Health. Prof. 1998; 21(1): 120-33.Search in Google Scholar

23. Boland RJ, Lester NA, Williams E. Writing Multiple-Choice Questions. Academic Psychiatry. 2010; 34(4): 310-6.10.1176/appi.ap.34.4.31020576995Search in Google Scholar

24. Downing SM. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Adv. Health. Sci. Educ. Theory. Pract. 2005; 10(2): 133-43.10.1007/s10459-004-4019-516078098Search in Google Scholar

25. Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 9 maja 2012 r. w sprawie standardów kształcenia dla kierunków studiów: lekarskiego, lekarsko-dentystycznego, farmacji, pielęgniarstwa i położnictwa (Dz.U. 2012 nr 0 poz. 631).Search in Google Scholar