[1. Drennan J. Professional and academic destination of masters in nursing graduates: a national survey. Nurse. Educ. Today. 2008; 28(6): 751-9.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Raines CF, Taglaireni ME. Career pathways in nursing: Entry points and academic progression. Online. J. Issues. Nurs. 2008; 13(3): 3.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Kostrzanowska Z, Zarzycka D. Struktura i zasoby pielęgniarstwa europejskiego. [w:] Wrońska I, Krajewska-Kułak E, red. Wybrane zagadnienia z pielęgniarstwa europejskiego. Lublin: Wydawnictwo Czelej; 2007, s. 27-47.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Muecke L. Pre- and post-admission criteria as predictors of academic success in an associate degree nursing program. Ames: Iowa State University; 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Kuncel NR, Hezlett SA, Ones DS. A comprehensive meta-analysis of the predictive validity of the graduate record examinations: implications for graduate student selection and performance. Psychol. Bull. 2001; 127(1): 162-81.]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Panczyk M, Zarzeka A, Belowska J, et al. Risk of attrition from Bachelor’s degree of Nursing programme – predictive evaluation. Piel. XXI. 2015; 51(2): 66-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Uchwała nr 13/2008 z dnia 25 lutego 2008 roku w sprawie uchwalenia zasad i trybu postępowania rekrutacyjnego na pierwszy rok studiów na rok akademicki 2009/2010 w Akademii Medycznej w Warszawie.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Niemierko B. Pomiar wyników kształcenia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Szkolne i Pedagogiczne; 1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Jankowski K, Zajenkowski M. Metody szacowania rzetelności pomiaru testem. [w:] Fronczyk K, red. Psychometria - podstawowe zagadnienia. Warszawa: Vizja Press & IT; 2009, s. 84-110.]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Rhodes ML, Bullough B, Fulton J. The Graduate Record Examination as an admission requirement for the graduate nursing program. J. Prof. Nurs. 1994; 10(5): 289-96.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Auerhahn C. Predictors of success in master’s level nurse practitioner programs. New York: Columbia University; 1996.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Newton SE, Moore G. Undergraduate grade point average and graduate record examination scores: the experience of one graduate nursing program. Nurs. Educ. Perspect. 2007; 28(6): 327-31.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Katz JR, Chow C, Motzer SA, Woods SL. The graduate record examination: help or hindrance in nursing graduate school admissions? J. Prof. Nurs. 2009; 25(6): 369-72.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Megginson L. Exploration of nursing doctoral admissions and performance outcomes. J. Nurs. Educ. 2011; 50(9): 502-12.10.3928/01484834-20110517-0421598860]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Panczyk M, Rebandel H, Belowska J, et al. Entrance exam for candidates for master’s nursing studies – a 5-year retrospective analysis. Prob. Piel. 2015; 23(3): in press.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Panczyk M, Gotlib J. Analiza dyskryminacyjna kryteriów rekrutacyjnych na studia II stopnia na kierunku Pielęgniarstwo na Warszawskim Uniwersytecie Medycznym. Prob. Piel. 2015; 23(1): 51-6.]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Panczyk M, Ścieglińska B, Woynarowska-Sołdan M, Gotlib J. MSc Nursing Entrance Exams - admission to full-time and part-time programmes at medical university. Prob. Piel. 2015; 22(4): 477-4483.]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Fleiss JL. Reliability of Measurement. The Design and Analysis of Clinical Experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1999.10.1002/9781118032923]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Streiner DL. Starting at the beginning: an introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J. Pers. Assess. 2003; 80(1): 99-103.10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_1812584072]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Guilford JP. Psychometric methods. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1954.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Tarrant M, Ware J. Impact of item-writing flaws in multiple-choice questions on student achievement in high-stakes nursing assessments. Med. Educ. 2008; 42(2): 198-206.]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Harasym PH, Leong EJ, Violato C, et al. Cuing effect of „all of the above” on the reliability and validity of multiple-choice test items. Eval. Health. Prof. 1998; 21(1): 120-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Boland RJ, Lester NA, Williams E. Writing Multiple-Choice Questions. Academic Psychiatry. 2010; 34(4): 310-6.10.1176/appi.ap.34.4.31020576995]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Downing SM. The effects of violating standard item writing principles on tests and students: the consequences of using flawed test items on achievement examinations in medical education. Adv. Health. Sci. Educ. Theory. Pract. 2005; 10(2): 133-43.10.1007/s10459-004-4019-516078098]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Rozporządzenie Ministra Nauki i Szkolnictwa Wyższego z dnia 9 maja 2012 r. w sprawie standardów kształcenia dla kierunków studiów: lekarskiego, lekarsko-dentystycznego, farmacji, pielęgniarstwa i położnictwa (Dz.U. 2012 nr 0 poz. 631).]Search in Google Scholar