[Ackerman, P., Beier, M., & Boyle, M. (2005). Working memory and intelligence: The same or different constructs? Psychological Bulletin, 131(1), 30-60.10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.30]Search in Google Scholar
[Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park: Sage.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alloway, T. P. (2009). Cognitive training: Improvements in academic attainments. Professional Association for Teachers of Students with Specific Learning Difficulties, 22, 57-61.]Search in Google Scholar
[Alloway, T. P. (2010). Working memory and executive function profiles of students with borderline intellectual functioning. Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 54(5), 448-456.10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01281.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Alloway, T. P., & Alloway, R. G. (2010). Investigating the predictive roles of working memory and IQ in academic attainment. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 106(1), 20-29.10.1016/j.jecp.2009.11.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Anderson, V., Jacobs, R., & Anderson, P. J. (Eds.). (2008). Executive functions and the frontal lobes: A lifespan perspective. NY: Psychology Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Baddeley, A. D. (2000). The episodic buffer: A new component of working memory? Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 417-423.10.1016/S1364-6613(00)01538-2]Search in Google Scholar
[Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 8, pp. 47-89). New York: Academic Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Banich, M. T., Milham, M. P., Atchley, R., Cohen, N. J., Webb, A., & Wszalek, T. (2000). fMRI studies of Stroop tasks reveal unique roles of anterior and posterior brain systems in attentional selection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(6), 988-1000.10.1162/08989290051137521]Search in Google Scholar
[Blair, C. (2006). How similar are fluid cognition and general intelligence? A developmental neuroscience perspective on fluid cognition as an aspect of human cognitive ability. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 29(2), 109-160.10.1017/S0140525X06009034]Search in Google Scholar
[Brydges, C. R., Reid, C. L., Fox, A. M., & Anderson, M. (2012). A unitary executive function predicts intelligence in children. Intelligence, 40, 458-469.10.1016/j.intell.2012.05.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Budoff, M. (1987). The validity of learning potential assessment. In: C. S. Lidz (Ed.), Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential (pp. 53-81). New York, NY: Guilford Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Carlson, J. S., & Wiedl, K. H. (1979). Toward a differential testing approach: Testing- -the-limits employing the Raven matrices. Intelligence, 3(4), 323-344.10.1016/0160-2896(79)90002-3]Search in Google Scholar
[Carter, C. S., Mintun, M., Cohen, J. D. (1995). Interference and facilitation effects during selective attention: An (H2O)-O-15 PET study of Stroop task performance. Neuroimage, 2(4), 264-272.10.1006/nimg.1995.1034]Search in Google Scholar
[Cattell, R. B. (1971). Abilities: Their structure, growth, and action. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.]Search in Google Scholar
[Chuderski, A. (2014). Which working memory components predict fluid intelligence. Psychology, 5(5), 328-339.10.4236/psych.2014.55043]Search in Google Scholar
[Chuderski, A., Taraday, M., Nęcka, E., & Smoleń, T. (2012). Storage capacity explains fluid intelligence while executive control does not. Intelligence, 40(3), 278-295.10.1016/j.intell.2012.02.010]Search in Google Scholar
[Colom, R., Rebollo, I., Palacios, A., Juan-Espinosa, & M. Kyllonen, P. (2004). Working memory is (almost) perfectly predicted by g. Intelligence, 32(2004), 277-296.]Search in Google Scholar
[Conway, A. R. A., Cowan, N., Bunting, M. F., Therriault, D. J., & Minkoff, S. R. (2002). A latent variable analysis of working memory capacity, short-term memory capacity, processing speed, and general fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 30(2002), 163-183.]Search in Google Scholar
[Delis, D. C., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan executive function system (D-KEFS). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.]Search in Google Scholar
[Džuka, J., & Kovalčíková, I. (2008). Dynamické testovanie latentných učebných schopností [Dynamic testing of latent learning abilities]. Československá Psychologie, 52(4), 366-377.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elliott, J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Resing, W. C. M. (2010). Dynamic assessment: The need for a dynamic approach. In E. Baker, B. McGraw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). Oxford, United Kingdom: Elsevier.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elliot, J. & Lauchlan, F. (1997). Assessing potential: The search for the philosopher’s stone? Educational and Child Psychology, 14(4), 6-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[Engle, R. W., & Kane, M. J. (2004). Executive attention, working memory capacity, and a two-factor theory of cognitive control. In B. Ross (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (pp. 145-199). New York, NJ: Elsevier. ]Search in Google Scholar
[Fabio, R. A. (2005). Dynamic assessment of intelligence is a better reply to adaptive behaviour and cognitive plasticity. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(1), 41-64.10.3200/GENP.132.1.41-66]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrer, E., McArdle, J. J., Shawitz, B. A., Holahan, J. N., Marchione, K., & Shawitz, S. E. (2007). Longitudinal models of developmental dynamics between reading and cognition from childhood to adolescence. Developmental Psychology, 43(6), 1460-1473.10.1037/0012-1649.43.6.1460]Search in Google Scholar
[Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., & Hoffman, M. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The learning potential assessment device (LPAD). Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Feuerstein, R., Rand, Y., Hoffman, M. B., & Miller, R. (1980). Instrumental enrichment: An intervention program for cognitive modifiability. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Fiszdon, J. M., McClough, J. F., Silverstein, S. M., Bell, M. D., Jaramillo, J. R., & Smith, T. E. (2006). Learning potential as a predictor of readiness for psychosocial rehabilitation in schizophrenia. Psychiatry Research, 143(2-3), 159-166.10.1016/j.psychres.2005.09.012]Search in Google Scholar
[Freund, P. A., & Holling, H. (2011). Retest effects in matrix test performance: Differential impact of predictors at different hierarchy levels in an educational setting. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(5), 597-601.10.1016/j.lindif.2011.07.006]Search in Google Scholar
[Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., Defries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172-179.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01681.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Haywood, H. C. (1997). Interactive assessment. In R. Taylor (Ed.), Assessment of persons with mental retardation (pp. 103-129). San Diego: Singular Publishing Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Hornung, C., Brunner, M., Reuter, R. A. P., & Martin, R. (2011). Children’s working memory: Its structure and relationship to fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 39(4), 210-22.10.1016/j.intell.2011.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Hotulainen, R., Thuneberg, H., Hautamäki, J., & Vainikainen, M-P. (2014). Measured attention in prolonged over-learned response tasks and its correlation to high level scientific reasoning and school achievement. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56(3), 237-254.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jeltova, I., Birney, D., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2011). Making instruction and assessment responsive to diverse students’ progress: Group-administered dynamic assessment in teaching mathematics. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44(4), 381-395.10.1177/0022219411407868]Search in Google Scholar
[Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. Westport, CN: Praeger.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kail, R. V. (2007). Longitudinal evidence that increases in processing speed and working memory enhance children’s reasoning. Psychological Science, 18(4), 312-313.10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01895.x]Search in Google Scholar
[Kane, M. J., Hambrick, D. Z., Tuholski, S. W., Wilhelm, O., Payne, T. W., & Engle, R. W. (2004). The generality of working memory capacity: A latent variable approach to verbal and visuo-spatial memory span and reasoning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 189-217.10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.189]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovalčíková, I. (2009). Dynamic testing and assessment of latent learning capacities. Sosyal Bilimler Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1, 47-53.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kovalčíková, I. (Ed.). (2010). Kognitívna stimulácia individuálnych edukačných potrieb žiaka zo sociálne znevýhodňujúceho prostredia [Cognitive stimulation of individual The Relationship Between Fluid Intelligence And Learning Potential: Is There An Interaction... 3 9 educational needs of pupils from socially disadvantaging environments]. Prešov, Slovakia: Vydavateľstvo Prešovskej univerzity.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lee, K., Pe, M. L., Ang, S. Y., & Stankov, L. (2009). Do measures of working memory predict academic proficiency better than measures of intelligence? Psychology Science Quarterly, 51(4), 403-419.]Search in Google Scholar
[Lehto, J. E., Juujärvi, P., Kooistra, L., & Pulkkinen, L. (2003). Dimensions of executive functioning: Evidence from children. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 21(1), 59-80.10.1348/026151003321164627]Search in Google Scholar
[Lidz, C. (2000). The Application of Cognitive Functions Scale. In C. S. Lidz & J. G.]Search in Google Scholar
[Elliott (Eds.), Dynamic Assessment: Prevailing models and applications. Amsterdam: JAI/Elsevier Science.]Search in Google Scholar
[MacDonald, A. W., Cohen, J. D., Stenger, V. A., & Carter, C. S. (2000). Dissociating the role of the dorsolateral prefrontal and anterior cingulate cortex in cognitive control. Science, 288(5472), 1835-1838.]Search in Google Scholar
[Mackey, A. P., Hill, S. S., Stone, S. I., & Bunge, S. A. (2011). Dissociable effects of reasoning and speed training in children. Developmental Science, 14(3), 582-590.10.1111/j.1467-7687.2010.01005.x]Search in Google Scholar
[MacKinnon, D. P. (2008). Introduction to Statistical Mediation Analysis. New York: Erlbaum.]Search in Google Scholar
[McCandliss, B., Beck, I. L., Sandak, R., & Perfetti, C. (2003). Focusing attention on decoding for children with poor reading skills: Design and preliminary tests of the word building intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(1), 75-104.10.1207/S1532799XSSR0701_05]Search in Google Scholar
[Milham, M. P., Erickson, K. I., Banich, M. T., Kramer, A. F., Webb, A., Wszalek, T., & Cohen, N. J. (2002). Attentional control in the aging brain: Insights from an fMRI study of the Stroop task. Brain and Cognition, 49(3), 277-296.10.1006/brcg.2001.1501]Search in Google Scholar
[Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “Frontal Lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49-100.10.1006/cogp.1999.0734]Search in Google Scholar
[Posner, M. I., & Dehaene, S. (1994). Attentional networks. Trends in Neuroscience, 17(2), 75-79.10.1016/0166-2236(94)90078-7]Search in Google Scholar
[Primi, R., Ferrão, M. E., & Almeida, L. S. (2010). Fluid intelligence as a predictor of learning: A longitudinal multilevel approach applied to math. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(5), 446-451.10.1016/j.lindif.2010.05.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Resing, W. C. M. (2013). Dynamic testing and individualized instruction: Helpful in cognitive education? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12(1), 81-95.10.1891/1945-8959.12.1.81]Search in Google Scholar
[Resing, W. C. M., Stevenson, C., & Bosma, T. (2012). Dynamic testing: Measuring inductive reasoning in children with developmental disabilities and mild cognitive impairments. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 11(2), 159-178.10.1891/1945-8959.11.2.159]Search in Google Scholar
[Ropovik, I. (2014). Do executive functions predict the ability to learn problem-solving principles? Intelligence, 44, 64-74.10.1016/j.intell.2014.03.002]Search in Google Scholar
[Schweizer, K. (2010). The relationship of attention and intelligence. In A. Gruszka, G. Matthiews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition: Attention, memory, and executive control (pp. 247-262). New York: Springer.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sergi, M. J., Kern, R. S., Mintz, J., & Green, M. F. (2005). Learning potential and the prediction of work skill acquisition in schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 31(1), 67-72.10.1093/schbul/sbi007]Search in Google Scholar
[Spearman, C. (1904). “General Intelligence,” objectively determined and measured.10.2307/1412107]Search in Google Scholar
[Stanovich, K. E., Cunningham, A. E., & Freeman, D. (1984). Intelligence, cognitive skills and early reading progress. Reading Research Quarterly, 14, 278-303.10.2307/747822]Search in Google Scholar
[Stauffer, J. M., Ree, M. J., & Caretta, T. R. (1996). Cognitive-components tests are not much more than g: An extension of Kyllonen’s analysis. Journal of General Psychology, 123, 193-205.10.1080/00221309.1996.9921272]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., Birney, D. P., Fredine, N., Jarvin, L., & Jeltova, I. (2007). Dynamic instruction for and assessment of developing expertise in four ethnic groups. In E. J. Gubbins (Ed.), Research Monograph of the National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented. University of Connecticut. Stevenson C. E. (2012). Puzzling with potential. Dynamic testing of analogical reasoning in children (Doctoral dissertation, Leiden University). Amsterdam, the Netherlands: Ipskamp Drukkerij.]Search in Google Scholar
[Stevenson, C. E., Hickendorff, M., Resing, W. C. M., Heiser, W., & de Boeck, P. (2013). Explanatory item response modeling of children’s change on a dynamic test of analogical reasoning. Intelligence, 41(3), 157-168.10.1016/j.intell.2013.01.003]Search in Google Scholar
[Swanson, H. L. & Howard, C. B. (2005). Children with reading disabilities: Does dynamic assessment help in the classification? Learning Disability Quarterly, 28(1), 17-34.10.2307/4126971]Search in Google Scholar
[Swanson, H. L., & Lussier, C. M. (2001). A selective synthesis of the experimental literature on dynamic assessment. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 321-363.10.3102/00346543071002321]Search in Google Scholar
[Taub, G., Floyd, R. G., Keith, T. Z., & McGrew, K. S. (2008). Effects of general and broad cognitive abilities on mathematics. School Psychology Quarterly, 23(2), 187-198.10.1037/1045-3830.23.2.187]Search in Google Scholar
[Taylor, T. R. (1992). Beyond competence: Measuring potential in a cross-cultural situation fairly. Potential in psychometrics. In Congress on psychometrics for psychologists. Megawatt Park, Sandton: Eskom and the Society of Industrial Psychology of South Africa.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tillman, C. M., Nyberg, L., & Bohlin, G. (2008). Working memory components and intelligence in children. Intelligence, 36(5), 394-402.10.1016/j.intell.2007.10.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Tzuriel, D. (2000). Dynamic assessment of young children: Educational and intervention perspectives. Educational Psychology Review, 12(4), 385-435.10.1023/A:1009032414088]Search in Google Scholar
[Unsworth, N., & Engle, R. W. (2007). The nature of individual differences in working memory capacity: Active maintenance in primary memory and controlled search from secondary memory. Psychological Review, 114(1), 104-132.10.1037/0033-295X.114.1.104]Search in Google Scholar
[Unsworth, N., & Spillers, G. J. (2010). Working memory capacity: Attention, memory, or both? A direct test of the Dual-Component Model. Journal of Memory and Language, 62, 392-406.10.1016/j.jml.2010.02.001]Search in Google Scholar
[Vygotsky, L. S. (1962). Thought and language. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.10.1037/11193-000]Search in Google Scholar
[West, R., Alain, C. (2000). Effects of task context and fluctuations of attention on neural activity supporting performance of the Stroop task. Brain Research, 873(1), 102-111.10.1016/S0006-8993(00)02530-0]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiebe, S. A., Sheffield, T., Nelson, J. M., Clark, C. A., Chevalier, N., & Espy, K. A. (2011). The structure of executive function in 3-year-olds. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 108(3), 436-452.10.1016/j.jecp.2010.08.008]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiedl, K. H. (1999). Cognitive modifiability as a measure of readiness for rehabilitation. Psychiatric Services, 50(11), 1411-1413.10.1176/ps.50.11.1411]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiedl, K. H. (2003). Dynamic testing: A comprehensive model and current fields of application. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 3(2), 93-119. journalofpedagogy1/201510.1891/194589503787383055]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiedl, K. H., Schottke, H. H., & Calero-Garcia, D. (2001). Dynamic assessment of cognitive rehabilitation potential in schizophrenic persons and in elderly persons with and without dementia. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 17(2), 112-117.10.1027//1015-5759.17.2.112]Search in Google Scholar
[Wiedl, K. H., & Wienobst, J. (1999). Interindividual differences in cognitive remediation research with schizophrenic patients: Indicators of rehabilitation potential? International Journal of Rehabilitation Research, 22(1), 55-59.10.1097/00004356-199903000-00007]Search in Google Scholar