The E-Patient

1. NUA. How many online? [Internet]; [cited 2018 Mar 08]. Available from: http://www.nua.ie/surveys/howmanyonline/.Search in Google Scholar

2. Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin.2003;53(6):356– 71.10.3322/canjclin.53.6.35615224975Search in Google Scholar

3. Are online doctors the best medicine? [Internet]. New York: USA Today. c2010. [cited 2018 Mar 08]. New York Office; [about 4 screens]. Available from: https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/yourlife/health/healthcare/doctorsnurses/2010-11-19-1Ateledoc19_ST_N.htmSearch in Google Scholar

4. van Woerkum CM. The Internet and primary care physicians: coping with different expectations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77 (4 Suppl):1016S-1018S.10.1093/ajcn/77.4.1016S12663310Search in Google Scholar

5. Meyers AD. eMedicine Otolaryngology: an online textbook for ENT specialists. Ear Nose Throat J. 2000;79(4):268-71.10.1177/014556130007900411Search in Google Scholar

6. Hallam K. Physicians caught in the Web. Thanks to Internet, doc disciplinary data now just a mouse click away. Mod Healthc. 2000;30(37):30-2.Search in Google Scholar

7. Giveon S, Yaphe J, Hekselman I, Mahamid S, Hermoni D. The e-patient: a survey of Israeli primary care physicians’ responses to patients’ use of online information during the consultation. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11(9):537-41.Search in Google Scholar

8. Ferguson T, Dreiss M, Fox S, Frydman G, Graedon J, Graedon T, et al. e-Patients: How they can help us help health care. San Francisco; 2007.Search in Google Scholar

9. Masters, K. Opening the non-open access medical journals: Internet-based sharing of journal articles on a medical web site. Int J Med Inform. 2008;5(1):[about 6.]. Available from: http://ispub.com/IJMI/5/1/697110.5580/f69Search in Google Scholar

10. Masters, K. Articles shared on a medical web site – an international survey of non-open access journal editors. Int J Med Inform. 2010;5(2):[ about 6 p]. Available from: https://print.ispub.com/api/0/ispub-article/13669.10.5580/2993Search in Google Scholar

11. Marshall WW, Haley RW. Use of a secure Internet Web site for collaborative medical research. JAMA. 2000;284(14):1843-9.10.1001/jama.284.14.184311025839Search in Google Scholar

12. Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 2003;289(18):2400-6.10.1001/jama.289.18.240012746364Search in Google Scholar

13. Fox S. The Online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington: The Pew Internet and American Life Project;.2000.Search in Google Scholar

14. Pereira JL, Koski S, Hanson J, Bruera ED, Mackey JR. Internet usage among women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2000;1(2):148-53.10.3816/CBC.2000.n.01311899653Search in Google Scholar

15. Norum J. Evaluation of Norwegian cancer hospitals Web sites and explorative survey among cancer patients on their use of the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(4):e30.10.2196/jmir.3.4.e30176191611772545Search in Google Scholar

16. Norum J, Grev A, Moen MA, Balteskard L, Holthe K. Information and communication technology in oncology. Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and suggestions. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11(5):286-93.10.1007/s00520-002-0437-112690539Search in Google Scholar

17. Mills ME, Davidson R. Cancer patients’ sources of information: use and quality issues. Psychooncology. 2002;11(5):371-8.10.1002/pon.584Search in Google Scholar

18. Oncologists disagree on impact of patient Internet use. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(3):135-7.10.3322/canjclin.53.3.135Search in Google Scholar

19. Helft PR, Hlubocky F, Daugherty CK. American oncologists’ views of Internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(5):942-7.10.1200/JCO.2003.08.007Search in Google Scholar

20. Irving L, Klegar-Levy K, McConnaughey J, Everette DW, Reynolds T, Lader W. Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. A report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America. Washington: National Telecommunications and Information Administration;1999.Search in Google Scholar

21. Brodie M, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Rosenbaum MD. Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19(6):255-65.10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.255Search in Google Scholar

22. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, Hampshire M, Godwein J, Whittington R. A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(4):1201-5.10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00407-3Search in Google Scholar

23. Smith RP, Devine P, Jones H, DeNittis, A., Whittington, R. Metz, JM. Internet use by patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Urology. 2003;62(2):273-7.10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00251-6Search in Google Scholar

24. Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3):e15.10.2196/jmir.5.3.e15155057014517106Search in Google Scholar

25. Peterson MW, Fretz PC. Patient use of the Internet for information in a lung cancer clinic. Chest. 2003;123(2):452-7.10.1378/chest.123.2.45212576365Search in Google Scholar

26. Diefenbach MA, Dorsey J, Uzzo RG, Hanks GE, Greenberg RE, Horwitz E, et al al. Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol. 2002;20(1):55-62.10.1053/suro.2002.3039911828358Search in Google Scholar

27. Raupach JC, Hiller JE. Information and support for women following the primary treatment of breast cancer. Health Expect. 2002;5(4):289-301.10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00191.x514273412460218Search in Google Scholar

28. Yakren S, Shi W, Thaler H, Agre P, Bach PB, Schrag D, et al. Use of the Internet and other information resources among adult cancer patients and their companions. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;20:398a.Search in Google Scholar

29. Vordermark D, Kölbl O, Flentje M. The Internet as a source of medical information. Investigation in a mixed cohort of radiotherapy patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2000;176(11):532-5.10.1007/PL00002322Search in Google Scholar

30. Fleisher J. Relationships among Internet health information use, patient behavior and self-efficacy in newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute’s Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service. Proc AMIA Annual Symp.2002:260-4.Search in Google Scholar

31. Rheingold H. The virtual community. London: Addison-Wesley;1993.Search in Google Scholar

32. Wellman B. An electronic group is virtually a social network. Kiesler S, editor. Cultures of the Internet. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997.Search in Google Scholar

33. Chen X, Siu LL. Impact of the media and the Internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. J Clin Oncol. 200;19(23):4291-7.10.1200/JCO.2001.19.23.429111731511Search in Google Scholar

34. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, Catania J, Lee K, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: National U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3):e17.10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17155056414517108Search in Google Scholar

35. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287(20):2691-2700.10.1001/jama.287.20.269112020305Search in Google Scholar

36. Lawrence S, Giles CL. Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature. 1999;400(6740):107-9.10.1038/2198710428673Search in Google Scholar

37. Podichetty VK, Booher J, Whitfield M, Biscup RS. Assessment of Internet use and effects among healthcare professionals: a cross sectional survey. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(966):274-9.10.1136/pgmj.2005.040675257963416597816Search in Google Scholar

38. Ferguson T. E-Patient Scholars Working Group. 2007. E-patients: how they can help us heal healthcare. Patient advocacy for health care quality. Strategies for achieving patient-centered care. Canada: Jones and Bartley;2008, p. 93-121.Search in Google Scholar

39. Masters K, Ng‘ambi D, Todd G. “I found it on the Internet”: preparing for the e-patient in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2010;10(2):169-79.Search in Google Scholar

40. Fraval A, Chong YM, Holcdorf D, Plunkett V, Tran P. Internet use by orthopaedic outpatients – current trends and practices. Australas Med J. 2012;5(12):633-8.10.4066/AMJ.2012.1530356159123382767Search in Google Scholar

41. Colineau N, Paris C. Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients. New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 2010;16(1-2):141– 60.10.1080/13614568.2010.496131Search in Google Scholar

42. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online. Washington: Pew Research Center; 2013.Search in Google Scholar

43. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients‘ use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):180-5.10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x149502111929503Search in Google Scholar

44. Fox S. E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. October 8;2007;Washington: Pew Research Center;2007.Search in Google Scholar

45. Hay MC, Cadigan RJ, Khanna D, Strathmann C, Lieber E, Altman R, et al. Prepared patients: Internet information seeking by new rheumatology patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(4):575-82.10.1002/art.2353318383399Search in Google Scholar

46. Klinar I, Balazin A, Baršić B, Tiljak H. Identification of general characteristics, motivation, and satisfaction of internet-based medical consultation service users in Croatia. Croat Med J. 2011;52(4):557-65.10.3325/cmj.2011.52.557316070721853551Search in Google Scholar

47. Harper L, Brock SM. The eventuality of the e-patient. Med Teach. 2016;38(6):635.10.3109/0142159X.2016.117078827093368Search in Google Scholar

48. Masters K. Preparing medical students for the e-patient. Med Teach. 2017;39(7):681-5.10.1080/0142159X.2017.132414228532256Search in Google Scholar

49. Bovi AM. 2003. Ethical guidelines for use of electronic mail between patients and physicians. Am J Bioeth..2003;3(3):W-IF2.10.1162/15265160332287477114735881Search in Google Scholar

50. Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, Black EW, Boyer J, Coutts J, et all. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954-7.10.1007/s11606-008-0538-8251793618612723Search in Google Scholar

51. Jain SH. Practicing medicine in the age of Facebook. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):649-51.10.1056/NEJMp090127719675328Search in Google Scholar

52. Garner J, O’Sullivan H. Facebook and the professional behaviors of undergraduate medical students. Clin Teach. 2010;7(2):112-5.10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00356.x21134159Search in Google Scholar

53. Gray K, Annabell L, Kennedy G. Medical students’ use of Facebook to support learning: insights from four case studies. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):971-6.10.3109/0142159X.2010.49782621090950Search in Google Scholar

54. Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1168-74.10.1007/s11606-011-1761-2318128821706268Search in Google Scholar

55. Televox. Technology beyond the exam room: How digital media is helping doctors deliver the highest level of care [Internet]. 2012: [cited 2018 Mar 08]; [about 31 p.]. Available from: https://www.televox.com/downloads/technologySearch in Google Scholar

56. Shachak A, Jadad A. Electronic health records in the age of social networks and global telecommunications. JAMA. 2010;303(5):452-3.10.1001/jama.2010.6320124543Search in Google Scholar

57. Dalal AK, Schnipper J, Massaro A, Hanna J, Mlaver E, McNally K, et al. A web-based and mobile patient-centered “microblog” messaging platform to improve care team communication in acute care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(e1):e178-e184.10.1093/jamia/ocw110765193027539201Search in Google Scholar

58. Masters K. The e-patient and medical students. Med Teach. 2016;38(3):314-6.10.3109/0142159X.2015.111289626618371Search in Google Scholar

59. Eysenbach G, Kummervold PE. “Is cybermedicine killing you?” – the story of a Cochrane disaster. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(2):e21; doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e21.10.2196/jmir.7.2.e21155064915998612Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

60. Marshall LA, Williams D. Health information: does quality count for the consumer?: How consumers evaluate the quality of health information materials across a variety of media. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2006;38(3):141-56.10.1177/0961000606066575Search in Google Scholar

61. Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris P, Fishwick L. Changes in online health usage over the last 5 years. Proceeding. of the Conference of human factors in computing systems; 2002 Apr 22-27; Montreal, Canada. 2006. p. 1331-6.10.1145/1125451.1125698Search in Google Scholar

62. Ritterband LM, Andersson G, Christensen HM, Carlbring P, Cuijpers P. Directions for the International society for research on Internet interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e23.10.2196/jmir.8.3.e23201883417032639Search in Google Scholar

63. Anderson C. The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more. 1^st ed. New York: Hyperion; 2008.Search in Google Scholar

64. Potts HWW. Is e-health progressing faster than e-health researchers? J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e24. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.3.e24.10.2196/jmir.8.3.e24201883517032640Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

65. Huang E, Wang J, Liu T. Interactive e-health tools for patients on Chinese hospitals’ websites. Int J Healthc Manag. 2014;7(2):75-83.10.1179/2047971914Y.0000000069Search in Google Scholar

66. Hoque MR, Bao Y, Sorwar G. Investigating factors influencing the adoption of e-Health in developing countries: a patient’s perspective. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017;42(1):1-17.10.3109/17538157.2015.107554126865037Search in Google Scholar

67. Jeong da E, Kim KO, Jang BI, Kim EY, Jung JT, Jeon SW, et al. The clinical usefulness of a web-based messaging system between patients with Crohn disease and their physicians. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(26):e4028.10.1097/MD.0000000000004028493794027368026Search in Google Scholar