[1. NUA. How many online? [Internet]; [cited 2018 Mar 08]. Available from: http://www.nua.ie/surveys/howmanyonline/.]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Eysenbach G. The impact of the Internet on cancer outcomes. CA Cancer J Clin.2003;53(6):356– 71.10.3322/canjclin.53.6.35615224975]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Are online doctors the best medicine? [Internet]. New York: USA Today. c2010. [cited 2018 Mar 08]. New York Office; [about 4 screens]. Available from: https://usatoday30.usatoday.com/yourlife/health/healthcare/doctorsnurses/2010-11-19-1Ateledoc19_ST_N.htm]Search in Google Scholar
[4. van Woerkum CM. The Internet and primary care physicians: coping with different expectations. Am. J. Clin. Nutr. 77 (4 Suppl):1016S-1018S.10.1093/ajcn/77.4.1016S12663310]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Meyers AD. eMedicine Otolaryngology: an online textbook for ENT specialists. Ear Nose Throat J. 2000;79(4):268-71.10.1177/014556130007900411]Search in Google Scholar
[6. Hallam K. Physicians caught in the Web. Thanks to Internet, doc disciplinary data now just a mouse click away. Mod Healthc. 2000;30(37):30-2.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Giveon S, Yaphe J, Hekselman I, Mahamid S, Hermoni D. The e-patient: a survey of Israeli primary care physicians’ responses to patients’ use of online information during the consultation. Isr Med Assoc J. 2009;11(9):537-41.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Ferguson T, Dreiss M, Fox S, Frydman G, Graedon J, Graedon T, et al. e-Patients: How they can help us help health care. San Francisco; 2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Masters, K. Opening the non-open access medical journals: Internet-based sharing of journal articles on a medical web site. Int J Med Inform. 2008;5(1):[about 6.]. Available from: http://ispub.com/IJMI/5/1/697110.5580/f69]Search in Google Scholar
[10. Masters, K. Articles shared on a medical web site – an international survey of non-open access journal editors. Int J Med Inform. 2010;5(2):[ about 6 p]. Available from: https://print.ispub.com/api/0/ispub-article/13669.10.5580/2993]Search in Google Scholar
[11. Marshall WW, Haley RW. Use of a secure Internet Web site for collaborative medical research. JAMA. 2000;284(14):1843-9.10.1001/jama.284.14.184311025839]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Baker L, Wagner TH, Singer S, Bundorf MK. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. JAMA 2003;289(18):2400-6.10.1001/jama.289.18.240012746364]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Fox S. The Online health care revolution: how the Web helps Americans take better care of themselves. Washington: The Pew Internet and American Life Project;.2000.]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Pereira JL, Koski S, Hanson J, Bruera ED, Mackey JR. Internet usage among women with breast cancer: an exploratory study. Clin Breast Cancer. 2000;1(2):148-53.10.3816/CBC.2000.n.01311899653]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Norum J. Evaluation of Norwegian cancer hospitals Web sites and explorative survey among cancer patients on their use of the Internet. J Med Internet Res. 2001;3(4):e30.10.2196/jmir.3.4.e30176191611772545]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Norum J, Grev A, Moen MA, Balteskard L, Holthe K. Information and communication technology in oncology. Patients’ and relatives’ experiences and suggestions. Support Care Cancer. 2003;11(5):286-93.10.1007/s00520-002-0437-112690539]Search in Google Scholar
[17. Mills ME, Davidson R. Cancer patients’ sources of information: use and quality issues. Psychooncology. 2002;11(5):371-8.10.1002/pon.584]Search in Google Scholar
[18. Oncologists disagree on impact of patient Internet use. CA Cancer J Clin. 2003;53(3):135-7.10.3322/canjclin.53.3.135]Search in Google Scholar
[19. Helft PR, Hlubocky F, Daugherty CK. American oncologists’ views of Internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(5):942-7.10.1200/JCO.2003.08.007]Search in Google Scholar
[20. Irving L, Klegar-Levy K, McConnaughey J, Everette DW, Reynolds T, Lader W. Falling through the net: Defining the digital divide. A report on the telecommunications and information technology gap in America. Washington: National Telecommunications and Information Administration;1999.]Search in Google Scholar
[21. Brodie M, Flournoy RE, Altman DE, Blendon RJ, Benson JM, Rosenbaum MD. Health information, the Internet, and the digital divide. Health Aff (Millwood) 2000;19(6):255-65.10.1377/hlthaff.19.6.255]Search in Google Scholar
[22. Metz JM, Devine P, DeNittis A, Hampshire M, Godwein J, Whittington R. A multi-institutional study of Internet utilization by radiation oncology patients. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2003;56(4):1201-5.10.1016/S0360-3016(03)00407-3]Search in Google Scholar
[23. Smith RP, Devine P, Jones H, DeNittis, A., Whittington, R. Metz, JM. Internet use by patients with prostate cancer undergoing radiotherapy. Urology. 2003;62(2):273-7.10.1016/S0090-4295(03)00251-6]Search in Google Scholar
[24. Satterlund MJ, McCaul KD, Sandgren AK. Information gathering over time by breast cancer patients. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3):e15.10.2196/jmir.5.3.e15155057014517106]Search in Google Scholar
[25. Peterson MW, Fretz PC. Patient use of the Internet for information in a lung cancer clinic. Chest. 2003;123(2):452-7.10.1378/chest.123.2.45212576365]Search in Google Scholar
[26. Diefenbach MA, Dorsey J, Uzzo RG, Hanks GE, Greenberg RE, Horwitz E, et al al. Decision-making strategies for patients with localized prostate cancer. Semin Urol Oncol. 2002;20(1):55-62.10.1053/suro.2002.3039911828358]Search in Google Scholar
[27. Raupach JC, Hiller JE. Information and support for women following the primary treatment of breast cancer. Health Expect. 2002;5(4):289-301.10.1046/j.1369-6513.2002.00191.x514273412460218]Search in Google Scholar
[28. Yakren S, Shi W, Thaler H, Agre P, Bach PB, Schrag D, et al. Use of the Internet and other information resources among adult cancer patients and their companions. Proc Am Soc Clin Oncol. 2001;20:398a.]Search in Google Scholar
[29. Vordermark D, Kölbl O, Flentje M. The Internet as a source of medical information. Investigation in a mixed cohort of radiotherapy patients. Strahlenther Onkol 2000;176(11):532-5.10.1007/PL00002322]Search in Google Scholar
[30. Fleisher J. Relationships among Internet health information use, patient behavior and self-efficacy in newly diagnosed cancer patients who contact the National Cancer Institute’s Atlantic Region Cancer Information Service. Proc AMIA Annual Symp.2002:260-4.]Search in Google Scholar
[31. Rheingold H. The virtual community. London: Addison-Wesley;1993.]Search in Google Scholar
[32. Wellman B. An electronic group is virtually a social network. Kiesler S, editor. Cultures of the Internet. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1997.]Search in Google Scholar
[33. Chen X, Siu LL. Impact of the media and the Internet on oncology: survey of cancer patients and oncologists in Canada. J Clin Oncol. 200;19(23):4291-7.10.1200/JCO.2001.19.23.429111731511]Search in Google Scholar
[34. Murray E, Lo B, Pollack L, Donelan K, Catania J, Lee K, et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on health care and the physician-patient relationship: National U.S. survey among 1.050 U.S. physicians. J Med Internet Res 2003;5(3):e17.10.2196/jmir.5.3.e17155056414517108]Search in Google Scholar
[35. Eysenbach G, Powell J, Kuss O, Sa ER. Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web: a systematic review. JAMA 2002;287(20):2691-2700.10.1001/jama.287.20.269112020305]Search in Google Scholar
[36. Lawrence S, Giles CL. Accessibility of information on the Web. Nature. 1999;400(6740):107-9.10.1038/2198710428673]Search in Google Scholar
[37. Podichetty VK, Booher J, Whitfield M, Biscup RS. Assessment of Internet use and effects among healthcare professionals: a cross sectional survey. Postgrad Med J. 2006;82(966):274-9.10.1136/pgmj.2005.040675257963416597816]Search in Google Scholar
[38. Ferguson T. E-Patient Scholars Working Group. 2007. E-patients: how they can help us heal healthcare. Patient advocacy for health care quality. Strategies for achieving patient-centered care. Canada: Jones and Bartley;2008, p. 93-121.]Search in Google Scholar
[39. Masters K, Ng‘ambi D, Todd G. “I found it on the Internet”: preparing for the e-patient in Oman. Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2010;10(2):169-79.]Search in Google Scholar
[40. Fraval A, Chong YM, Holcdorf D, Plunkett V, Tran P. Internet use by orthopaedic outpatients – current trends and practices. Australas Med J. 2012;5(12):633-8.10.4066/AMJ.2012.1530356159123382767]Search in Google Scholar
[41. Colineau N, Paris C. Talking about your health to strangers: understanding the use of online social networks by patients. New review of hypermedia and multimedia. 2010;16(1-2):141– 60.10.1080/13614568.2010.496131]Search in Google Scholar
[42. Fox S, Duggan M. Health online. Washington: Pew Research Center; 2013.]Search in Google Scholar
[43. Diaz JA, Griffith RA, Ng JJ, Reinert SE, Friedmann PD, Moulton AW. Patients‘ use of the Internet for medical information. J Gen Intern Med. 2002;17(3):180-5.10.1046/j.1525-1497.2002.10603.x149502111929503]Search in Google Scholar
[44. Fox S. E-patients with a disability or chronic disease. October 8;2007;Washington: Pew Research Center;2007.]Search in Google Scholar
[45. Hay MC, Cadigan RJ, Khanna D, Strathmann C, Lieber E, Altman R, et al. Prepared patients: Internet information seeking by new rheumatology patients. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59(4):575-82.10.1002/art.2353318383399]Search in Google Scholar
[46. Klinar I, Balazin A, Baršić B, Tiljak H. Identification of general characteristics, motivation, and satisfaction of internet-based medical consultation service users in Croatia. Croat Med J. 2011;52(4):557-65.10.3325/cmj.2011.52.557316070721853551]Search in Google Scholar
[47. Harper L, Brock SM. The eventuality of the e-patient. Med Teach. 2016;38(6):635.10.3109/0142159X.2016.117078827093368]Search in Google Scholar
[48. Masters K. Preparing medical students for the e-patient. Med Teach. 2017;39(7):681-5.10.1080/0142159X.2017.132414228532256]Search in Google Scholar
[49. Bovi AM. 2003. Ethical guidelines for use of electronic mail between patients and physicians. Am J Bioeth..2003;3(3):W-IF2.10.1162/15265160332287477114735881]Search in Google Scholar
[50. Thompson LA, Dawson K, Ferdig R, Black EW, Boyer J, Coutts J, et all. The intersection of online social networking with medical professionalism. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23(7):954-7.10.1007/s11606-008-0538-8251793618612723]Search in Google Scholar
[51. Jain SH. Practicing medicine in the age of Facebook. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(7):649-51.10.1056/NEJMp090127719675328]Search in Google Scholar
[52. Garner J, O’Sullivan H. Facebook and the professional behaviors of undergraduate medical students. Clin Teach. 2010;7(2):112-5.10.1111/j.1743-498X.2010.00356.x21134159]Search in Google Scholar
[53. Gray K, Annabell L, Kennedy G. Medical students’ use of Facebook to support learning: insights from four case studies. Med Teach. 2010;32(12):971-6.10.3109/0142159X.2010.49782621090950]Search in Google Scholar
[54. Bosslet GT, Torke AM, Hickman SE, Terry CL, Helft PR. The patient-doctor relationship and online social networks: results of a national survey. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26(10):1168-74.10.1007/s11606-011-1761-2318128821706268]Search in Google Scholar
[55. Televox. Technology beyond the exam room: How digital media is helping doctors deliver the highest level of care [Internet]. 2012: [cited 2018 Mar 08]; [about 31 p.]. Available from: https://www.televox.com/downloads/technology]Search in Google Scholar
[56. Shachak A, Jadad A. Electronic health records in the age of social networks and global telecommunications. JAMA. 2010;303(5):452-3.10.1001/jama.2010.6320124543]Search in Google Scholar
[57. Dalal AK, Schnipper J, Massaro A, Hanna J, Mlaver E, McNally K, et al. A web-based and mobile patient-centered “microblog” messaging platform to improve care team communication in acute care. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2017;24(e1):e178-e184.10.1093/jamia/ocw110765193027539201]Search in Google Scholar
[58. Masters K. The e-patient and medical students. Med Teach. 2016;38(3):314-6.10.3109/0142159X.2015.111289626618371]Search in Google Scholar
[59. Eysenbach G, Kummervold PE. “Is cybermedicine killing you?” – the story of a Cochrane disaster. J Med Internet Res. 2005;7(2):e21; doi: 10.2196/jmir.7.2.e21.10.2196/jmir.7.2.e21155064915998612]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[60. Marshall LA, Williams D. Health information: does quality count for the consumer?: How consumers evaluate the quality of health information materials across a variety of media. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science. 2006;38(3):141-56.10.1177/0961000606066575]Search in Google Scholar
[61. Sillence E, Briggs P, Harris P, Fishwick L. Changes in online health usage over the last 5 years. Proceeding. of the Conference of human factors in computing systems; 2002 Apr 22-27; Montreal, Canada. 2006. p. 1331-6.10.1145/1125451.1125698]Search in Google Scholar
[62. Ritterband LM, Andersson G, Christensen HM, Carlbring P, Cuijpers P. Directions for the International society for research on Internet interventions. J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e23.10.2196/jmir.8.3.e23201883417032639]Search in Google Scholar
[63. Anderson C. The long tail: why the future of business is selling less of more. 1st ed. New York: Hyperion; 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[64. Potts HWW. Is e-health progressing faster than e-health researchers? J Med Internet Res. 2006;8(3):e24. doi:10.2196/jmir.8.3.e24.10.2196/jmir.8.3.e24201883517032640]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[65. Huang E, Wang J, Liu T. Interactive e-health tools for patients on Chinese hospitals’ websites. Int J Healthc Manag. 2014;7(2):75-83.10.1179/2047971914Y.0000000069]Search in Google Scholar
[66. Hoque MR, Bao Y, Sorwar G. Investigating factors influencing the adoption of e-Health in developing countries: a patient’s perspective. Inform Health Soc Care. 2017;42(1):1-17.10.3109/17538157.2015.107554126865037]Search in Google Scholar
[67. Jeong da E, Kim KO, Jang BI, Kim EY, Jung JT, Jeon SW, et al. The clinical usefulness of a web-based messaging system between patients with Crohn disease and their physicians. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016; 95(26):e4028.10.1097/MD.0000000000004028493794027368026]Search in Google Scholar