Judicial Activism Contributing to the Understanding of Social State Principle(S) – Constitutional Court of Slovenia at the Crossroads

Benvenisti, E. (1999). Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 31, 843-854.Search in Google Scholar

Bustamante, T. and De Godoi Bustamante E. (2011). Constitutional Courts as “Negative Legislators”: The Brazilian Case. In Ed. Brewer-Carias, A. Constitutional Courts as Negative Legislators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Duguit, L. (1919). Law in a modern state. Reprint Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 2008.Search in Google Scholar

Ferrari, G. F. (2008). Introduction to Italian Public Law. Giuffr`e Editore.Search in Google Scholar

Heinig, H. M. (2008). Der Sozialstaat im Dienst der Freiheit: zur Formel vom “sozialen” Staat in Art. 20. Abs. 1 GG. Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

Huber, E. R. (2006). Verfassungsgeschichte 2nd edition (1957-1991). Dreier H. (ed.). Grundgesetz Kommentar, 2. Auflage, Band II. Mohr Siebeck.Search in Google Scholar

Jambrek, P. (1992). Ustavna demokracija. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije.Search in Google Scholar

Kantorowicz, J. (2014). Judges as Fiscal Activists: Can Constitutional Review Shape Public Finance? DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 5(2), 79-104.10.2478/danb-2014-0005Search in Google Scholar

Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar

Kingreen, T. (2003). Das Sozialstaatsprinzip im europäischen Verfassungsverbund. Jus Publicum.Search in Google Scholar

Kmiec, K. D. (2004). The Origin and Current Meanings of “JudicialActivism”. California Law Review, Inc. 1441-1478.10.2307/3481421Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, L. D. (2000). Putting the Politics Back into the Political Safeguards of Federalism. 100 Columbia Law Review, 215-294.10.2307/1123559Search in Google Scholar

Kramer, L. D. (2001). The Supreme Court 2000 Term Foreword: We the Court. Harvard Law review, 115, 4-169.10.2307/1342592Search in Google Scholar

Lawson, G. (1994). The Constitutional Case Against Precedent. Harvard Journal of Law& Public Policy, 17(1), 23-33.Search in Google Scholar

Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston. Beacon Press.Search in Google Scholar

Posner, R. A. (1983). The Meaning of Judicial Self-Restraint. Indiana Law Journal, 59(1), 1-25.Search in Google Scholar

Remington, G. (2002). The Sting of Originalism: Defending Legislating from the Bench, Justice and Law. Scalet S. P. (ed.). Birmingham, New York: Global Academic Publishing.Search in Google Scholar

Testen, F. (2002). Interpretative judgement. In Šturm, L. (ed.). Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije. Ljubljana: FPDEŠ.Search in Google Scholar

Tiedmann, P. (2003). Nacelo socialne države v nemški ustavi: Navodilo sodstvu ali le argumentativni okras? Družboslovne razprave, XIX(42), 95-107.Search in Google Scholar

Tushnet, M. (2000). Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400822973Search in Google Scholar

Tümay, M. (2008). The »Margin of Appreciation Doctrine« Developed by the case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Ankara Law Review, 5(2), 201-234.10.1501/Lawrev_0000000056Search in Google Scholar

Tyler, A. L. (2006). Is Suspension a Political Question. Stanford Law Review, 59(2), 333-413.Search in Google Scholar