[Benvenisti, E. (1999). Margin of Appreciation, Consensus, and Universal Standards. New York University Journal of International Law and Politics, 31, 843-854.]Search in Google Scholar
[Bustamante, T. and De Godoi Bustamante E. (2011). Constitutional Courts as “Negative Legislators”: The Brazilian Case. In Ed. Brewer-Carias, A. Constitutional Courts as Negative Legislators. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Duguit, L. (1919). Law in a modern state. Reprint Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 2008.]Search in Google Scholar
[Ferrari, G. F. (2008). Introduction to Italian Public Law. Giuffr`e Editore.]Search in Google Scholar
[Heinig, H. M. (2008). Der Sozialstaat im Dienst der Freiheit: zur Formel vom “sozialen” Staat in Art. 20. Abs. 1 GG. Mohr Siebeck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Huber, E. R. (2006). Verfassungsgeschichte 2nd edition (1957-1991). Dreier H. (ed.). Grundgesetz Kommentar, 2. Auflage, Band II. Mohr Siebeck.]Search in Google Scholar
[Jambrek, P. (1992). Ustavna demokracija. Ljubljana: Državna založba Slovenije.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kantorowicz, J. (2014). Judges as Fiscal Activists: Can Constitutional Review Shape Public Finance? DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 5(2), 79-104.10.2478/danb-2014-0005]Search in Google Scholar
[Kelsen, H. (1945). General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kingreen, T. (2003). Das Sozialstaatsprinzip im europäischen Verfassungsverbund. Jus Publicum.]Search in Google Scholar
[Kmiec, K. D. (2004). The Origin and Current Meanings of “JudicialActivism”. California Law Review, Inc. 1441-1478.10.2307/3481421]Search in Google Scholar
[Kramer, L. D. (2000). Putting the Politics Back into the Political Safeguards of Federalism. 100 Columbia Law Review, 215-294.10.2307/1123559]Search in Google Scholar
[Kramer, L. D. (2001). The Supreme Court 2000 Term Foreword: We the Court. Harvard Law review, 115, 4-169.10.2307/1342592]Search in Google Scholar
[Lawson, G. (1994). The Constitutional Case Against Precedent. Harvard Journal of Law& Public Policy, 17(1), 23-33.]Search in Google Scholar
[Polanyi, K. (1944). The Great Transformation: The Political and Economic Origins of Our Time. Boston. Beacon Press.]Search in Google Scholar
[Posner, R. A. (1983). The Meaning of Judicial Self-Restraint. Indiana Law Journal, 59(1), 1-25.]Search in Google Scholar
[Remington, G. (2002). The Sting of Originalism: Defending Legislating from the Bench, Justice and Law. Scalet S. P. (ed.). Birmingham, New York: Global Academic Publishing.]Search in Google Scholar
[Testen, F. (2002). Interpretative judgement. In Šturm, L. (ed.). Komentar Ustave Republike Slovenije. Ljubljana: FPDEŠ.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tiedmann, P. (2003). Nacelo socialne države v nemški ustavi: Navodilo sodstvu ali le argumentativni okras? Družboslovne razprave, XIX(42), 95-107.]Search in Google Scholar
[Tushnet, M. (2000). Taking the Constitution Away from the Courts. Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400822973]Search in Google Scholar
[Tümay, M. (2008). The »Margin of Appreciation Doctrine« Developed by the case Law of the European Court of Human Rights. Ankara Law Review, 5(2), 201-234.10.1501/Lawrev_0000000056]Search in Google Scholar
[Tyler, A. L. (2006). Is Suspension a Political Question. Stanford Law Review, 59(2), 333-413.]Search in Google Scholar