[[1] Kolomuç A, Tekin S. Chemistry teachers’misconceptions concerning concept of chemical reaction rate. Eurasian J Phys Chem Educ. 2011;3(2):84-101. http://www.ijpce.org/Issue-2-2011,2968.]Search in Google Scholar
[[2] Cakmakci G. J Chem Educ. 2010;87(4):449-455. DOI: 10.1021/ed8001336.10.1021/ed8001336]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[3] Bektaşli B, Cakmakci G. Consistency of students’ ideas about the concept of rate across different contexts. Educ Sci. 2011;36(162):273-287. http://egitimvebilim.ted.org.tr/index.php/EB/article/viewFile/1034/327.]Search in Google Scholar
[[4] Yalçinkaya E, Taştan-Kirik Ö, Boz Y, Yildiran D. Res Sci Technol Educ. 2012;30(2):151-172. DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2012.698605.10.1080/02635143.2012.698605]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[5] Taştan Kirik Ö, Boz Y. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2012;13:221-236. DOI: 10.1039/C1RP90072B.10.1039/C1RP90072]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[6] Cakmakci G, Leach J, Donnelly J. Int J Sci Educ. 2006;28(15):1795-1815. DOI: 10.1080/09500690600823490.10.1080/09500690600823490]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[7] Yan YK, Subramaniam R. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2016;17:1114-1126. DOI: 10.1039/C6RP00168H.10.1039/C6RP00168]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[8] Çakmakçi G. A cross-sectional study of the understanding of chemical kinetics among Turkish secondary and undergraduate students. [PhD Thesis]. Leeds: The University of Leeds; 2005. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/160748590.pdf.]Search in Google Scholar
[[9] Suwandy FI, Irhasyuarna Y. J Res Meth Educ. 2017;7(1):54-61. DOI: 10.9790/7388-070104546110.9790/7388-0701045461]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[10] Chairam S, Klahan N, Coll, R. Eurasia J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2015;11(5):937-956. DOI: 10.12973/eurasia.2015.1365a.10.12973/eurasia.2015.1365a]Search in Google Scholar
[[11] Garnett PJ, Garnett PJ, Hackling MW. Stud Sci Educ. 1995;25(1):69-95. DOI: 10.1080/03057269508560050.10.1080/03057269508560050]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[12] Justi RS, Raus RM. Quimica Nova na Escola. 1997;5:23-26. http://qnesc.sbq.org.br/online/qnesc05/.]Search in Google Scholar
[[13] Sözbilir M, Pınarbaşı T, Canpolat N. Eurasia J Math Sci Tech Ed. 2010;6(2):111-120. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12973/ejmste/75232.10.12973/ejmste/75232]Search in Google Scholar
[[14] Turányi T, Tóth Z. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2013;14:105-116. DOI: 10.1039/C2RP20015E.10.1039/C2RP20015]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[15] Milenković DD, Hrin, TN, Segedinac MD, Horvat S. J Subject Did. 2017;1(1);3-12. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.55468.10.5281/zenodo.55468]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[16] Johnstone AH. Chem Educ Res Pract. 2001;1(1):9-15. DOI: 10.1039/A9RP90001B.10.1039/A9RP90001]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[[17] Sirhan G. Learning difficulties in chemistry: An overview. J Turk Sci Educ. 2007;4(2):2-20. https://dspace.alquds.edu/bitstream/handle/20.500.12213/742/RES_52_JOURNAL_paper_1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.]Search in Google Scholar
[[18] Prokša M, Michalisková R. Mastering the concept of chemical reactions rate after the bachelor degree preparation of future teachers at the Faculty of Natural Sciences of Comenius University in Bratislava. In: Nodzyńska M, Kopek-Putała W, editors. Teaching of Science Subjects in Higher & Highest Education. Kraków: Pedagogical University of Cracow; 2016. ISBN: 9788080829933.]Search in Google Scholar
[[19] Prokša M, Michalisková R. Žiacke chápania konceptu rýchlosť chemickej reakcie (The pupils’understanding of the concept of Chemical Reaction Rate). In: Held Ľ, editor. Východiská prípravy prírodovedného kurikula pre základnú školu 2020 (The Basics for the Preparation of Natural Sciences Curriculum for Elementary School 2020). Trnava: Trnavská Univerzita v Trnave; 2016. ISBN: 9788380840386.]Search in Google Scholar