Attitudes among chemistry teachers towards increasing personal competencies in applying ICT

[1] Cox MJ. 2 Motivating Pupils through the Use of ICT. In: Leask M, Pachler N. editors. Learning to Teach using ICT in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience. Abingdon: Routledge; 2002. ISBN: 978-0-415-51652-5.Search in Google Scholar

[2] Hennessy S. Graphing investigations using portable (palmtop) technology. J Comput Assist Learn. 2000;16(3):243-258. DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00136.x.10.1046/j.1365-2729.2000.00136.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[3] JeetKaur R, Sharma S. Managing students’ attitude towards science through computer assisted instruction. Int Index Refer Res J. 2013;4(40):79-81.Search in Google Scholar

[4] Owusu KA, Monney KA, Appiah, JY, Wilmot EM. Effects of computer-assisted instruction on performance of senior high school biology students in Ghana. Comput Educat. 2010;55(2):904-910. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.001.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.04.001Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[5] Passey D, Rogers C, Machell J, McHugh G, Allaway D. The motivational effect of ICT on pupils. Lancaster: Department of Educational Research. Lancaster University; 2004. http://portaldoprofessor.mec.gov.br/storage/materiais/0000012854.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[6] Pernaa J, Aksela M. Chemistry teachers' and students' perceptions of practical work through different ICT learning environments. Problems of Education in the 21st Century. 2009;16:80-88. http://www.scientiasocialis.lt/pec/files/pdf/vol16/80-88.Pernaa_Vol.16.pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[7] Rau P-LP, Gao Q, Wu L-M. Using mobile communication technology in high school education: Motivation, pressure, and learning performance. Comput Educat. 2008;50(1):1-22. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.008.10.1016/j.compedu.2006.03.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[8] Basturk R. The effectiveness of computer-assisted instruction in teaching introductory statistics. J Educat Technol Soc. 2005;8(2):170-178. http://www.ifets.info/journals/8_2/16.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[9] Çepni S, Taş E, Köse S. The effects of computer-assisted material on student’ cognitive levels, misconceptions and attitudes towards science. Comput Educat. 2006;46(2):192-205. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.008.10.1016/j.compedu.2004.07.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[10] Cheng Y-H, Cheng J-T, Chen D-J. The effect of multimedia computer assisted instruction and learning style on learning achievement. WSEAS Transactions Informat Sci Applicat. 2012;9(1):24-35. https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/fb21/da5db19d486967751f620a8c04069b63c156.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[11] Cox MJ, Preston C, Cox C. What factors support or prevent teachers from using ICT in the primary classroom. Paper presented at the British Educational Research Association Annual Conference. University of Sussex at Brighton. September 2-5 1999. https://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/ Retrieved documents/00001304.htm.Search in Google Scholar

[12] Higgins S, Xiao Z, Katsipataki M. The impact of digital technology on learning: A summary for the education endowment foundation. Durham, UK: Education Endowment Foundation and Durham University; 2012. https://educationendowmentfoundation.org.uk/public/files/Publications/The_Impact_of_Digital_Technologies_on_Learning_(2012).pdfSearch in Google Scholar

[13] Keengwe J, Onchwari G, Wachira P. The use of computer tools to support meaningful learning. Associat Advancem Comput In Educat J. 2008;16(1):77-92. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.597.7776&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[14] Liao YKC. Effects of hypermedia on students’ achievement: a meta-analysis. J Educat Multimed Hypermed. 1999;8(3):255-277. http://c3l.uni-ldenburg.de/cde/media/readings/liao.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[15] Sun K, Lin Y, Yu CH. A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Comput Educat. 2008;50(4):1411-1422. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.003.10.1016/j.compedu.2007.01.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[16] Williamson VM, Abraham MR. The effects of computer animation on the particulate mental models of college Chemistry students. J Res Sci Teach. 1995;32(5):521-534. DOI: 10.1002/tea.3660320508.10.1002/tea.3660320508Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[17] Jimoyiannis A. Designing and implementing an integrated technological pedagogical science knowledge framework for science teachers professional development. Comput Educat. 2010;55(3):1259-1269. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.05.022Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[18] Polly D, Mims C, Shepherd CE, Inan F. Evidence of impact: Transforming teacher education with preparing tomorrow's teachers to teach with technology (PT3) grants. Teaching Teacher Educat. 2010;26(4):863-870. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.024.10.1016/j.tate.2009.10.024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[19] Blonder R, Jonatan M, Bar-Dov Z, Benny N, Rap S, Sakhnini S. Can you tube it? Providing chemistry teachers with technological tools and enhancing their self-efficacy beliefs. Chem Educat Res Practic. 2013;14(3):269-285. DOI: 10.1039/C3RP00001J.10.1039/C3RP00001JOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[20] Mishra P, Koehler MJ. Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record. 2006;108(6):1017-1054. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[21] So H, Kim B. Learning about problem based learning: Student teachers integrating technology, pedagogy and content knowledge. Austral J Educat Technol. 2009;25(1):101-116. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.1183.10.14742/ajet.1183Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[22] Doering A, Hughes J, Huffman D. Preservice teachers: Are we thinking with technology? J Res Technol Educat. 2003;35(3):342-361. DOI: 10.1080/15391523.2003.10782390.10.1080/15391523.2003.10782390Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[23] Brand GA. What research says: Training teachers for using technology. J Staff Develop. 1997;19(1);1-9. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.460.2632&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[24] Lee D. Factors influencing the success of computer skills learning among in-service teachers. British J Educat Technol. 1997;28(2):139-141. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8535.00018.10.1111/1467-8535.00018Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[25] Pina A, Harris B. Increasing teachers’ confidence in using computers for education. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Arizona Educational Research Organisation (Tucson, AZ, November 1993). https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED365648.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[26] Koehler MJ, Mishra P. What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J Educat Comput Res. 2005;32(2):131-152. DOI: 10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV.10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYVOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[27] Preston C, Cox M, Cox K. Teachers as innovators: an evaluation of the motivation of teachers to use Information and Communications Technology. South Croydon: MirandaNet; 2000. ISBN 1-871-984-09-2.Search in Google Scholar

[28] Veen W. The role of beliefs in the use of information technology: implications for teacher education, or teaching the right thing at the right time. J Inform Technol Teach Educat. 1993;2(2):139-153. DOI: 10.1080/0962029930020203.10.1080/0962029930020203Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[29] Celik V, Yesilyurt E. Attitudes to technology, perceived computer self-efficacy and computer anxiety as predictors of computer supported education. Comput Educat. 2013;60(1):148-158. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.06.008Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[30] Van Acker F, van Buuren H, Kreijns K, Vermeulen M. Why teachers use digital learning materials: The role of self-efficacy, subjective norm and attitude. Educat Informat Technol. 2013;18(3):495-514. DOI: 10.1007/s10639-011-9181-9.10.1007/s10639-011-9181-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[31] Sang G, Valcke M, van Braak J, Tondeur J. Student teachers’ thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Comput Educat. 2010;54(1):103-112. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010.10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[32] Ross JA, Hogaboam-Gray A, Hannay L. Predictors of teachers' confidence in their ability to implement computer-based instruction. J Educat Comput Res. 1999;21(1):75-97. DOI: 10.2190/CGXF-YYJE-47KQ-MFA1.10.2190/CGXF-YYJE-47KQ-MFA1Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[33] Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Yahya K. Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Comput Educat. 2007;49(3):740-762. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012.10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[34] Niess ML. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teaching Teacher Educat. 2005;21(5):509-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006.10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[35] Albion P. Self-Efficacy Beliefs as an Indicator of Teachers' Preparedness for Teaching with Technology. In: 10th Int Conf Soc Information Technol Teacher Educat (SITE 1999), 1602-1608. Associat Advancement Computing Educat (AACE). https://eprints.usq.edu.au/6973/1/Albion_SITE_1999_AV.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[36] Koehler MJ, Mishra P. What is technological pedagogical content nowledge? Contemp Issues Technol Teacher Educat. 2009;9(1):60-70. http://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/general/what-is-technological-pedagogicalcontent-knowledge.Search in Google Scholar

[37] Shulman LS. Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educat Res. 1986;15(2):4-14. http://www.fisica.uniud.it/URDF/masterDidSciUD/materiali/pdf/Shulman_1986.pdf.10.3102/0013189X015002004Search in Google Scholar

[38] Voogt J, Fisser P, Pareja Roblin N, Tondeur J, van Braak J. Technological pedagogical content knowledge - a review of the literature. J Comput Assist Learn. 2012;29(2):109-121. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.xOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[39] Ay Y, Karadağ, E, Acat MB. The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge - practical (TPACKPractical) model: Examination of its validity in the Turkish culture via structural equation modeling. Comput Educat. 2015;88:97-108. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[40] Hammond TC, Manfra MM. Giving, prompting, making: aligning technology and pedagogy within TPACK for social studies instruction. Contemp Issues Technol Teacher Educat. 2009;9(2):160-185. http://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-2-09/social-studies/giving-prompting-making-aligning-technology-and-pedagogy-within-tpack-for-social-studies-instruction.Search in Google Scholar

[41] Koh JHL, Chai ChS. Teacher clusters and their perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) development through ICT lesson design. Comput Educat. 2014;70:222-232. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017.10.1016/j.compedu.2013.08.017Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[42] Koehler MJ, Mishra P. Introducing TPCK. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. 2008;3-29. ISBN: 978-0805863550.Search in Google Scholar

[43] McCrory R. Science, Technology, and Teaching: The Topic-specific Challenges of TPCK in Science. In AACTE Committee on Innovation and Technology, editor. Handbook of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPCK) for Educators. New York: Routledge; 2008. ISBN 978-1317639763.Search in Google Scholar

[44] Niess ML. Preparing teachers to teach science and mathematics with technology: Developing a technology pedagogical content knowledge. Teach Teacher Educat. 2005;21(5):509-523. DOI: 10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006.10.1016/j.tate.2005.03.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[45] Jen TH, Yeh YF, Hsu YS, Wu HK, Chen KM. Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Comput Educat. 2016;95:45-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[46] Oster-Levinz A, Klieger A. Online tasks as a tool to promote teachers’ expertise within the Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK). Procedia-Social Behavioral Sci. 2010;2(2):354-358. DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.024.10.1016/j.sbspro.2010.03.024Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[47] Chai CS, Koh JHL, Tsai CC. A Review of Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge. Educat Technol Soci. 2013;16(2):31-51. http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.299.6205&rep=rep1&type=pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[48] Jen TH, Yeh YF, Hsu YS, Wu HK, Chen KM. Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Comput Educat. 2016;95:45-62. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[49] Yeh Y, Hsu Y, Wu H, Hwang F, Lin T. Developing and validating technological pedagogical content knowledge-practical (TPACK-practical) through the Delphi survey technique. British J Educat Technol. 2013;45(4):707-722. DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12078.10.1111/bjet.12078Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[50] Angeli Ch, Valanides N. Epistemological and methodological issues for the conceptualization, development, and assessment of ICT-TPCK: Advances in technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK). Comput Educat. 2009;51:154-168. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006.10.1016/j.compedu.2008.07.006Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[51] Lee M-H, Tsai Ch-Ch. Exploring teachers’ perceived self efficacy and technological pedagogical content knowledge with respect to educational use of the World Wide Web. Instruction Sci. 2010;38(1):1-21. DOI: 10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4.10.1007/s11251-008-9075-4Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[52] Yurdakul IK, Odabasi HF, Kilicer K, Coklar AN, Birinci G, Kurt AA. The development, validity and reliability of TPACK-deep: A technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Comput Educat. 2012;58(3):964-977. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012.10.1016/j.compedu.2011.10.012Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[53] Jang SJ, Chen KC. From PCK to TPACK: Developing a transformative model for pre-service science teachers. J Sci Educat Technol. 2010;19(6):553-564. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-010-9222-y.10.1007/s10956-010-9222-yOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[54] Koehler MJ, Mishra P, Kereluik K, Shin TS, Graham CR. The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. In: Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology. New York: Springer; 2014. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9.10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[55] Jimoyiannis A. Developing a technological pedagogical content knowledge framework for science education: Implications of a teacher trainers’ preparation program. Proc Informing Sci IT Educat Conf (InSITE). 2010;567-607. http://proceedings.informingscience.org/InSITE2010/InSITE10p597-607Jimoyiannis867.pdf.10.28945/1277Search in Google Scholar

[56] Engida T. ICT-enhanced Teacher Development Model. Addis Ababa: UNESCO-IICBA. 2011;29. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Temechegn_Engida/publication/275245938_ICT-enhanced_Teacher_Development_Model/links/553610410cf20ea35f10fa9b/ICT-enhanced-Teacher-Development-Model.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[57] Engida T. Chemistry teacher professional development using the technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) framework. Afr J Chem Educat. 2014;4(3):2-21. ISSN 2227-5835. https://www.ajol.info/index.php/ajce/article/view/104084/94193.Search in Google Scholar

[58] Guzey SS, Roehrig GH. Teaching science with technology: Case studies of science teachers’ development of technology, pedagogy, and content knowledge. Contemp Issues Technol Teaching Educat. 2009;9(1):25-45. http://www.citejournal.org/volume-9/issue-1-09/science/teaching-science-with-technology-case-studies-of-science-teachersdevelopment-of-technology-pedagogy-and-content-knowledge.Search in Google Scholar

[59] Jang SJ, Tsai MF. Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese elementary mathematics and science teachers with respect to use of interactive whiteboards. Comput Educat. 2012;59(2):327-338. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003.10.1016/j.compedu.2012.02.003Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[60] Jang SJ, Tsai MF. Exploring the TPACK of Taiwanese secondary school science teachers using a new contextualized TPACK model. Australasian J Educat Technol. 2013;29(4):566-580. DOI: 10.14742/ajet.282.10.14742/ajet.282Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[61] Lin TC, Tsai CC, Chai CS, Lee MH. Identifying science teachers’ perceptions of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). J Sci Educat Technol. 2013;22(3):325-336. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6.10.1007/s10956-012-9396-6Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[62] Bell L, Juersivich N, Hammond TC, Bell RL. The TPACK of Dynamic Representations. Educational Technology, Teacher Knowledge, and Classroom Impact: A Research Handbook on Frameworks and Approaches. 2012;103-135. DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4502-8.ch067.10.4018/978-1-4666-4502-8.ch067Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[63] Hechter R, Phyfe L. Using online videos in the science methods classroom as context for developing preservice teachers’ awareness of the TPACK components. Proc Soc Informat Technol Teacher Educat Inter Conf. 2010;3841-3848. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/33979/.Search in Google Scholar

[64] Jang SJ. Integrating the interactive whiteboard and peer coaching to develop the TPACK of secondary science teachers. Comput Educat. 2010;55(4):1744-1751. DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.020.10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.020Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[65] Khan S. New pedagogies on teaching science with computer simulations. J Sci Educat Technol. 2011;20(3):215-232. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-010-9247-2.10.1007/s10956-010-9247-2Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[66] Maeng JL, Mulvey BK, Smetana LK, Bell RL. Preservice teachers’ TPACK: Using technology to support inquiry instruction. J Sci Educat Technol. 2013;22(6):838-857. DOI: 10.1007/s10956-013-9434-z.10.1007/s10956-013-9434-zOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[67] Smetana LK, Bell RL. Computer simulations to support science instruction and learning: A critical review of the literature. Int J Sci Educat. 2012;34(9):1337-1370. DOI: 10.1080/09500693.2011.605182.10.1080/09500693.2011.605182Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[68] Karolčík Š, Čipková E. Digital technologies in the education process from the Slovak teachers’ perspective. Int Multidiscipl Sci Conf Social Sci Arts. SGEM Conf Psychol Psychiatry, Sociol Healthcare, Educat. Albena, Bulgaria: 2014;681-692.10.5593/sgemsocial2014/B11/S3.088Search in Google Scholar

[69] EUR-Lex - 32006H0962 - EN - EUR-Lex. Recommendation of the European parliament and of the council of 18 December 2006on key competences for lifelong learning (2006/962/EC). http://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reco/2006/962/oj.Search in Google Scholar

[70] ISTE Standards Teachers. International Society for Technology in Education. 2008. http://www.iste.org/docs/pdfs/20-14_ISTE_Standards-T_PDF.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[71] Aksela M, Lundell J. Computer-based molecular modelling: Finnish school teachers’ experiences and views. Chem Educat Res Pract. 2008;9(4,):301-308. DOI: 10.1039/B818464J.10.1039/B818464JOpen DOISearch in Google Scholar

[72] Chiu MH, Wu HK. The roles of multimedia in the teaching and learning of the triplet relationship in Chemistry. Multiple Representat Chem Educat. 2009;251-283. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_12.10.1007/978-1-4020-8872-8_12Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[73] Gabel D. Improving teaching and learning through Chemistry education research: A look to the future. J Chem Educat. 1999;76(4):548-554. DOI: 10.1021/ed076p548.10.1021/ed076p548Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[74] Leask M, Pachler N. editors. Learning to Teach using ICT in the Secondary School: A Companion to School Experience. 3rd Edition. Routledge. 2014;262. ISBN 978-0-415-51652-5.Search in Google Scholar

[75] Osborne J, Dillon J. Good Practice In Science Teaching: What Research Has To Say. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Education; 2010; 352. ISBN 978-0-33-523858-3. https://channayousif.files.wordpress.com/2011/06/good-practice-in-science-teaching-what-research-has-to-say.pdf.Search in Google Scholar

[76] Webb M. Impact of IT on science education. In: International Handbook of Information Technology in Primary and Secondary Education. New York: Springer; 2008;133-148. DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9.10.1007/978-0-387-73315-9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[77] ACD/ChemSketch for Academic and Personal Use: ACD/Labs.com. http://www.acdlabs.com/resources/freeware/chemsketch/.Search in Google Scholar

[78] Naučteviac.sk - Vzdelávací portal pre moderných učiteľov. http://www.naucteviac.sk/.Search in Google Scholar

[79] Young Digital Planet. http://www.ydp.eu/.Search in Google Scholar

[80] Karolčík Š, Čipková E, Kinchin I. Teacher attitudes to professional development of proficiency in the classroom application of digital technologies. Int Educat Stud. 2016;9(4):9-19. DOI: 10.5539/ies.v9n4p9.10.5539/ies.v9n4p9Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

[81] Tschannen-Moran M, Woolfolk-Hoy A, Hoy WK. Teacher efficacy: its meaning and measure. Rev Educat Res. 1998;68(2):202-248. DOI: 10.3102/00346543068002202.10.3102/00346543068002202Open DOISearch in Google Scholar