Altruistic Surrogacy – Ethical Issues and Demographic Differences in Public Opinion

1. Agacinski S. Maternité pour autrui. Liberation 26 juin 2008 (France).Search in Google Scholar

2. Bruce-Hickman K., Kirkland L. and T. Ba – Obeid. The attitudes and knowledge of medical students towards surrogacy, J. of Obst.& Gyn., 2009; 29(3): 229-232.Search in Google Scholar

3. Brunet I., Mc Candless J., C. Marzo C., et al. Comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in the EU member states. PE 474.403. European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium./2013/ available in (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/juri/studiesdownload.html?language.Search in Google Scholar

4. Chliaoutakis JE. A relationship between traditionally motivated patterns and gamete donation and surrogacy in urbain areas of Greece, Human Reprod, 2002; 17(8): 2187-2191.Search in Google Scholar

5. Constantinidis D. and Cook R. Australian perspectives on surrogacy: the ifluence of cognition, psychological and demographic charasteristics, Hum. Reprod, 2012;.27(4): 1080-1087.10.1093/humrep/der47022294557Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

6. Ciccarelli J. C., & Beckman L. J. Navigating Rough Waters: An Overview of Psychological aspects of Surrogacy, Journal of Social Issues 2005; 61(1): 21-43.Search in Google Scholar

7. Doctissimo 2011 available in http://bebe.doctissimo.fr/blog/12711-Grande-enquete-de-Doctissimo-sur-la-bio-ethique.html.Search in Google Scholar

8. Frydman R. Contre la grossesse pour autrui, Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2010; 38: 224-225.Search in Google Scholar

9. Golombok S., Murray C., Jadva V., et al. Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3, Human Reproduction, 2006; 21(7): 1918-1924.10.1093/humrep/del03916517564Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

10. Heikkilä K., E. Länsimies, M. Hippeläinen, S. Heinonen. Assessment of attitudes towards assisted reproduction: a survey among medical students and parous women, Gynecol Endocrinol 2006; 22(11): 613-619.Search in Google Scholar

11. IPSOS, 2009 – 60% des Français favorables à l‘autorisation des mères porteuses, Publié le 28/01/2009 available in http://www.ipsos.fr/recherche/?general-search=meres+porteuses%2C+sondage%2C+2009.Search in Google Scholar

12. Mathieu B., La Bioethique, Éditions Dalloz, 2009, Paris, pp.67-117.Search in Google Scholar

13. Minai, J., Suzuki, K., Takeda, Y., et al. There are gender differences in attitudes towards surrogacy when information on this technique is provided. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007; 132: 193-199.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.01617046144Search in Google Scholar

14. Shakour M., Salehi K., Kohan S., Shakour A. Investigating students attitudes and knowledge about surrogacy treatment, Iranien Journal of Obst and Gyn., 2012; 15(17): 8-16.Search in Google Scholar

15. Sharma BR. Forensic considerations of surrogacy – an overview, Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 2006; 13: 80-85.Search in Google Scholar

16. Pennings G. Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion J Med Ethics 2002;28:337-341 doi:10.1136/jme.28.6.337.10.1136/jme.28.6.337175709512468650Open DOISearch in Google Scholar

17. Tieu MM. Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers, J Med. Ethics, 2009; 35: 171-175.10.1136/jme.2008.02467919251968Open DOISearch in Google Scholar