[1. Agacinski S. Maternité pour autrui. Liberation 26 juin 2008 (France).]Search in Google Scholar
[2. Bruce-Hickman K., Kirkland L. and T. Ba – Obeid. The attitudes and knowledge of medical students towards surrogacy, J. of Obst.& Gyn., 2009; 29(3): 229-232.]Search in Google Scholar
[3. Brunet I., Mc Candless J., C. Marzo C., et al. Comparative study on the regime of surrogacy in the EU member states. PE 474.403. European Parliament, Brussels, Belgium./2013/ available in (http://www.europarl.europa.eu/committees/en/juri/studiesdownload.html?language.]Search in Google Scholar
[4. Chliaoutakis JE. A relationship between traditionally motivated patterns and gamete donation and surrogacy in urbain areas of Greece, Human Reprod, 2002; 17(8): 2187-2191.]Search in Google Scholar
[5. Constantinidis D. and Cook R. Australian perspectives on surrogacy: the ifluence of cognition, psychological and demographic charasteristics, Hum. Reprod, 2012;.27(4): 1080-1087.10.1093/humrep/der47022294557]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[6. Ciccarelli J. C., & Beckman L. J. Navigating Rough Waters: An Overview of Psychological aspects of Surrogacy, Journal of Social Issues 2005; 61(1): 21-43.]Search in Google Scholar
[7. Doctissimo 2011 available in http://bebe.doctissimo.fr/blog/12711-Grande-enquete-de-Doctissimo-sur-la-bio-ethique.html.]Search in Google Scholar
[8. Frydman R. Contre la grossesse pour autrui, Gynécologie Obstétrique & Fertilité, 2010; 38: 224-225.]Search in Google Scholar
[9. Golombok S., Murray C., Jadva V., et al. Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3, Human Reproduction, 2006; 21(7): 1918-1924.10.1093/humrep/del03916517564]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[10. Heikkilä K., E. Länsimies, M. Hippeläinen, S. Heinonen. Assessment of attitudes towards assisted reproduction: a survey among medical students and parous women, Gynecol Endocrinol 2006; 22(11): 613-619.]Search in Google Scholar
[11. IPSOS, 2009 – 60% des Français favorables à l‘autorisation des mères porteuses, Publié le 28/01/2009 available in http://www.ipsos.fr/recherche/?general-search=meres+porteuses%2C+sondage%2C+2009.]Search in Google Scholar
[12. Mathieu B., La Bioethique, Éditions Dalloz, 2009, Paris, pp.67-117.]Search in Google Scholar
[13. Minai, J., Suzuki, K., Takeda, Y., et al. There are gender differences in attitudes towards surrogacy when information on this technique is provided. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2007; 132: 193-199.10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.08.01617046144]Search in Google Scholar
[14. Shakour M., Salehi K., Kohan S., Shakour A. Investigating students attitudes and knowledge about surrogacy treatment, Iranien Journal of Obst and Gyn., 2012; 15(17): 8-16.]Search in Google Scholar
[15. Sharma BR. Forensic considerations of surrogacy – an overview, Journal of Clinical Forensic Medicine, 2006; 13: 80-85.]Search in Google Scholar
[16. Pennings G. Reproductive tourism as moral pluralism in motion J Med Ethics 2002;28:337-341 doi:10.1136/jme.28.6.337.10.1136/jme.28.6.337175709512468650]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar
[17. Tieu MM. Altruistic surrogacy: the necessary objectification of surrogate mothers, J Med. Ethics, 2009; 35: 171-175.10.1136/jme.2008.02467919251968]Open DOISearch in Google Scholar