Rivista e Edizione

Volume 33 (2022): Edizione 1 (September 2022)

Volume 32 (2021): Edizione 1 (December 2021)

Volume 31 (2021): Edizione 1 (October 2021)

Volume 30 (2020): Edizione 1 (December 2020)

Volume 29 (2019): Edizione 1 (December 2019)

Volume 28 (2018): Edizione 1 (October 2018)

Volume 27 (2018): Edizione 1 (April 2018)

Volume 26 (2017): Edizione 1 (October 2017)

Volume 25 (2012): Edizione 1 (October 2012)

Volume 24 (2012): Edizione 1 (April 2012)

Volume 22-23 (2011): Edizione 1 (October 2011)

Volume 20-21 (2010): Edizione 1 (October 2010)

Volume 18-19 (2009): Edizione 1 (October 2009)

Volume 16-17 (2008): Edizione 1 (October 2008)

Volume 15 (2008): Edizione 1 (April 2008)

Volume 14 (2007): Edizione 1 (April 2007)

Volume 13 (2007): Edizione 1 (October 2007)

Volume 12 (2006): Edizione 1 (October 2006)

Volume 11 (2006): Edizione 1 (April 2006)

Volume 10 (2005): Edizione 1 (October 2005)

Volume 9 (2004): Edizione 1 (October 2004)

Volume 8 (2004): Edizione 1 (April 2004)

Volume 7 (2003): Edizione 1 (October 2003)

Volume 5-6 (2003): Edizione 1 (April 2003)

Volume 4 (2002): Edizione 1 (October 2002)

Volume 3 (2001): Edizione 1 (October 2001)

Volume 2 (2001): Edizione 1 (April 2001)

Volume 1 (2000): Edizione 1 (October 2000)

Dettagli della rivista
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2183-0142
Pubblicato per la prima volta
20 Dec 2020
Periodo di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Cerca

Volume 4 (2002): Edizione 1 (October 2002)

Dettagli della rivista
Formato
Rivista
eISSN
2183-0142
Pubblicato per la prima volta
20 Dec 2020
Periodo di pubblicazione
2 volte all'anno
Lingue
Inglese

Cerca

11 Articoli
Accesso libero

“O esforço do homem para se pensar”. Foucault, Leitor Das Investigações Lógicas.

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 9 - 19

Astratto

Accesso libero

O Soi sartriano - ou da infelicidade da consciência

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 21 - 36

Astratto

Accesso libero

Fenomenologia e compromisso. O debate entre Merleau-Ponty e Sartre

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 37 - 50

Astratto

Abstract

This essay is an attempt to read Merleau-Ponty’s ln Praise of Philosophy as a text in which the French phenomenologist breaks with Sartre and at the same time states his view on philosophical engagement and the relation between philosophy and politics. By reading this Lecture as a reply to Sartre I shall argue that there is a connection between this text and the lively debate that in the fifties opposed the two French philosophers on the place of philosophy in the Lebenswelt. In the letters exchanged at the time, first edited by François Ewald and published in 1994, one can find evidence for understanding their different views.

In the Lecture Merleau-Ponty never mentions either Sartre’s name or his philosophy. However, I shall argue that some of Merleau-Ponty’s most important theses are directed against Sartre, namely, when the former claims that there is an opposition between the philosopher and the man of action (or the professional politician).

In part one I shall analyse Sartre’s letter to Merleau-Ponty claiming that the Lecture is a self-justification of sorts and accusing him of practising the phenomenological ɛπoχη. This accusation by Sartre is evidence of a clear difference between the sartrean concept of “existential engagement” and Merleau--Ponty’s own concept of the refusal of choice.

In part two, I shall try to show that ln Praise of Philosophy belongs to Merleau-Ponty’ s inquiries in phenomenology and this fact must be taken into account. The analysis of Merleau-Ponty’ s letter to Sartre explaining the Lecture clearly shows the relation between the concept of good ambiguity and the concept of engagement. At this point it becomes quite obvious that the dispute between the two philosophers is not over the meaning of engagement but indeed about the meaning of phenomenology and phenomenological ɛπoχη. I shall argue that Merleau-Ponty’s ambiguity is mainly a kind of the husserlean ɛπoχη. I shall also claim that one finds a clear echo of Husserl’ s Vienna Lecture in Merleau-Ponty’ s ln Praise of Philosophy.

Finally, I shall show that both lectures are replies to unmentioned philosophers, in which both refuse to identify philosophy with political engagement or national engagement. For them, the task of philosophy is truth as engagement with humanity.

Accesso libero

A Fenomenologia Científica de Bachelard

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 51 - 90

Astratto

Abstract

The scientific phenornenology of Bachelard is constituted as an original reflection about the production of the scientific work, in their subjective (the scientist’s Psychology/Psychoanalysis) and objective (the phenomenon while measure) slopes. Inspired for a softer or a soft-headed phenomenology, the French author wanted to reformulate. some concepts and manners of seeing of the German classic phenomenology. Critical of the husserlian phenomenology of the concept of Meinung, Bachelard enrolled his epistemological labor inside of the history of the applied phenomenology to the sciences.

In spite. of, he defends the lost «husserlian purity», independently of the denial of the idealism of the absolute conscience. The main theory is the one of the “Applied Rationalism” to the science and the consequent passing of thc psychologism but, and at the same time, of the mathesis universalis. The “discursive idealism of Bachelard didn’t ignore the specific disparity of the several scientific practices, on the contrary, he examined them the light of what called «phenomenontechnique».

Accesso libero

A consciência histórico-efeitual de H.-G. Gadamer

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 91 - 110

Astratto

Accesso libero

À procura de um narrador. Ricoeur e a identidade narrativa

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 111 - 122

Astratto

Accesso libero

Nota Prévia

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 125 - 126

Astratto

Accesso libero

O Subjectivismo da Fenomenologia Husserliana e a Exigência de Uma Fenomenologia Assubjectiva

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 127 - 148

Astratto

Accesso libero

O Subjectivismo da Fenomenologia Husserliana e a Possibilidade de Uma Fenomenologia “Assubjectiva”

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 149 - 165

Astratto

Accesso libero

Book Review: Nuno Nabais, 1997. Metafísica do Trágico. Lisboa: Relógio d’ Água Editores.

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 169 - 176

Astratto

Accesso libero

Book Review: Don Ihde, Experimental Phenomenology. An introduction, Paragon Books, The Putnam Publishing Group, USA, Second Impression, 1979, 155 pp., 20x13 cm, (aproxi.) 12 USD.

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 177 - 196

Astratto

11 Articoli
Accesso libero

“O esforço do homem para se pensar”. Foucault, Leitor Das Investigações Lógicas.

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 9 - 19

Astratto

Accesso libero

O Soi sartriano - ou da infelicidade da consciência

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 21 - 36

Astratto

Accesso libero

Fenomenologia e compromisso. O debate entre Merleau-Ponty e Sartre

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 37 - 50

Astratto

Abstract

This essay is an attempt to read Merleau-Ponty’s ln Praise of Philosophy as a text in which the French phenomenologist breaks with Sartre and at the same time states his view on philosophical engagement and the relation between philosophy and politics. By reading this Lecture as a reply to Sartre I shall argue that there is a connection between this text and the lively debate that in the fifties opposed the two French philosophers on the place of philosophy in the Lebenswelt. In the letters exchanged at the time, first edited by François Ewald and published in 1994, one can find evidence for understanding their different views.

In the Lecture Merleau-Ponty never mentions either Sartre’s name or his philosophy. However, I shall argue that some of Merleau-Ponty’s most important theses are directed against Sartre, namely, when the former claims that there is an opposition between the philosopher and the man of action (or the professional politician).

In part one I shall analyse Sartre’s letter to Merleau-Ponty claiming that the Lecture is a self-justification of sorts and accusing him of practising the phenomenological ɛπoχη. This accusation by Sartre is evidence of a clear difference between the sartrean concept of “existential engagement” and Merleau--Ponty’s own concept of the refusal of choice.

In part two, I shall try to show that ln Praise of Philosophy belongs to Merleau-Ponty’ s inquiries in phenomenology and this fact must be taken into account. The analysis of Merleau-Ponty’ s letter to Sartre explaining the Lecture clearly shows the relation between the concept of good ambiguity and the concept of engagement. At this point it becomes quite obvious that the dispute between the two philosophers is not over the meaning of engagement but indeed about the meaning of phenomenology and phenomenological ɛπoχη. I shall argue that Merleau-Ponty’s ambiguity is mainly a kind of the husserlean ɛπoχη. I shall also claim that one finds a clear echo of Husserl’ s Vienna Lecture in Merleau-Ponty’ s ln Praise of Philosophy.

Finally, I shall show that both lectures are replies to unmentioned philosophers, in which both refuse to identify philosophy with political engagement or national engagement. For them, the task of philosophy is truth as engagement with humanity.

Accesso libero

A Fenomenologia Científica de Bachelard

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 51 - 90

Astratto

Abstract

The scientific phenornenology of Bachelard is constituted as an original reflection about the production of the scientific work, in their subjective (the scientist’s Psychology/Psychoanalysis) and objective (the phenomenon while measure) slopes. Inspired for a softer or a soft-headed phenomenology, the French author wanted to reformulate. some concepts and manners of seeing of the German classic phenomenology. Critical of the husserlian phenomenology of the concept of Meinung, Bachelard enrolled his epistemological labor inside of the history of the applied phenomenology to the sciences.

In spite. of, he defends the lost «husserlian purity», independently of the denial of the idealism of the absolute conscience. The main theory is the one of the “Applied Rationalism” to the science and the consequent passing of thc psychologism but, and at the same time, of the mathesis universalis. The “discursive idealism of Bachelard didn’t ignore the specific disparity of the several scientific practices, on the contrary, he examined them the light of what called «phenomenontechnique».

Accesso libero

A consciência histórico-efeitual de H.-G. Gadamer

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 91 - 110

Astratto

Accesso libero

À procura de um narrador. Ricoeur e a identidade narrativa

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 111 - 122

Astratto

Accesso libero

Nota Prévia

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 125 - 126

Astratto

Accesso libero

O Subjectivismo da Fenomenologia Husserliana e a Exigência de Uma Fenomenologia Assubjectiva

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 127 - 148

Astratto

Accesso libero

O Subjectivismo da Fenomenologia Husserliana e a Possibilidade de Uma Fenomenologia “Assubjectiva”

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 149 - 165

Astratto

Accesso libero

Book Review: Nuno Nabais, 1997. Metafísica do Trágico. Lisboa: Relógio d’ Água Editores.

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 169 - 176

Astratto

Accesso libero

Book Review: Don Ihde, Experimental Phenomenology. An introduction, Paragon Books, The Putnam Publishing Group, USA, Second Impression, 1979, 155 pp., 20x13 cm, (aproxi.) 12 USD.

Pubblicato online: 07 Dec 2021
Pagine: 177 - 196

Astratto

Pianifica la tua conferenza remota con Sciendo