[
Agudo-Peregrina, Á. F., Iglesias-Pradas, S., Conde-González, M. Á., & Hernández-García, Á. (2014). Can we predict success from log data in VLEs? Classification of interactions for learning analytics and their relationship with performance in VLE-supported F2F and online learning. Computers in human behavior, 31, 542-550.10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.031
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Amale, G. (2021). L’impact d’une grille d’évaluation critériée et élaborée sur l’amélioration des compétences rédactionnelles en FLE au supérieur: Cas des étudiants de 1 ère année du département de français-Université Batna2-The impact of a Criteria-Based and Elaborated Evaluation Grid. Revue des Sciences Humaines, 21(02), 1168-1183.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Arnold, K. E., & Pistilli, M. D. (2012). Course signals at Purdue: Using learning analytics to increase student success. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 267-270).10.1145/2330601.2330666
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bernard, R. M., Abrami, P. C., Borokhovski, E., Wade, C. A., Tamim, R. M., Surkes, M. A., & Bethel, E. C. (2009). A meta-analysis of three types of interaction treatments in distance education. Review of Educational research, 79(3), 1243-1289.10.3102/0034654309333844
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Berthier, J. L., Borst, G., & Guilleray, F. (2021). Les neurosciences cognitives dans la classe: Guide pour expérimenter et adapter ses pratiques pédagogiques. ESF sciences humaines.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bjork, R. A., Dunlosky, J., & Kornell, N. (2013). Self-regulated learning: Beliefs, techniques, and illusions. Annual review of psychology, 64, 417-444.10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143823
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Blikstein, P. (2011). ‘Using learning analytics to assess students’ behavior in open-ended programming tasks’, paper Presented at the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (LAK11), Banff, Canada (27th February – 1st March).10.1145/2090116.2090132
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brookhart, S. M. (2013). How to create and use rubrics for formative assessment and grading. Ascd.10.4135/9781452218649.n15
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Brown, P. C., Roediger, H. L., & McDaniel, M. A. (2016). Mets-toi ça dans la tête!: les stratégies d’apprentissage à la lumière des sciences cognitives (p. 1). Éditions Markus Haller.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bulletin officiel n°31 (2020). Relatif aux programmes d’enseignement : cycle des apprentissages fondamentaux (cycle 2), cycle de consolidation (cycle 3) et cycle des approfondissements (cycle 4) : modification. Arrêté du 17-7-2020 et J.O. du 28-7-2020. 30 July 2020, NOR : MENE2018714A (France).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Bybee, R. W. (2013). The case for STEM education: Challenges and opportunities. NSTA press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Conde, M. Á., Rodríguez-Sedano, F. J., Fernández-Llamas, C., Gonçalves, J., Lima, J., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2021). Fostering STEAM through challenge-based learning, robotics, and physical devices: A systematic mapping literature review. Computer Applications in Engineering Education, 29(1), 46-65.10.1002/cae.22354
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W., & Clark, V. L. P. (2017). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Sage publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into practice, 39(3), 124-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_210.1207/s15430421tip3903_2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2016). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches. Sage publications.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.10.1007/BF02310555
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dawson, S., Joksimovic, S., Poquet, O., & Siemens, G. (2019). Increasing the impact of learning analytics. In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Learning Analytics & Knowledge (pp. 446-455).10.1145/3303772.3303784
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Décret n° 2015-372 (2015). Relatif au socle commun de connaissances, de compétences et de culture. 31 Mars 2015, NOR: MENE1506516D (France).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. O. (2005). The systematic design of instruction.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Dunn, O. J. (1964) Multiple Comparisons Using Rank Sums, Technometrics, 6:3, 241-252, DOI: 10.1080/00401706.1964.1049018110.1080/00401706.1964.10490181
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferguson, R. (2012). Learning analytics: drivers, developments, and challenges. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning, 4(5-6), 304-317.10.1504/IJTEL.2012.051816
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ferguson, R., Brasher, A., Clow, D., Cooper, A., Hillaire, G., Mittelmeier, J., Rienties, B., Ullmann, T. and Vuorikari, R. 2016. Research Evidence on the Use of Learning Analytics: Implications for Education Policy. (2016).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gagné, M. (2003). The role of autonomy support and autonomy orientation in prosocial behavior engagement. Motivation and emotion, 27(3), 199-223.10.1023/A:1025007614869
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gibbons, A. S., & Rogers, P. C. (2009). The architecture of instructional theory. Instructional-design theories and models, 3, 305-326.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gilovich, T. (2008). How we know what isn’t so. Simon and Schuster.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Goff, W., & Veresov, N. (2015). Examining teacher-researcher collaboration through the cultural interface. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 10(3), 621-627. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11422-015-9665-910.1007/s11422-015-9665-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Gupta, A., & Pathania, P. (2021). To study the impact of Google Classroom as a platform of learning and collaboration at the teacher education level. Education and Information Technologies, 26(1), 843-857.10.1007/s10639-020-10294-1
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Guskey, T. R., & Bailey, J. M. (2010). Developing standards-based report cards. Corwin Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Harris, A., & de Bruin, L. R. (2018). Compulsory secondary school creativity, teacher practice and STEM education: An international study. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 153-179.10.1007/s10833-017-9311-2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Inspection Pédagogique Régionale. (2017). Guide Pratique de l’Evaluation (pp. http://www1.ac–poitiers.fr/medias/fichier/guide–pratique–evaluation–15–02–2017_1487230308978.pdf). Poitiers: Académie de Poitiers.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Johnson, L., Smith, R., Willis, H., Levine, A. and Haywood, K. (2011) The Horizon Report: 2011 Edition, The New Media Consortium, Austin, Texas.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Joksimović, S., Gašević, D., Loughin, T. M., Kovanović, V., & Hatala, M. (2015). Learning at distance: Effects of interaction traces on academic achievement. Computers & Education, 87, 204-217.10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.002
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kopeyev, Z., Mubarakov, A., Kultan, J., Aimicheva, G. & Tuyakov, Y. (2020). Using a Personalized Learning Style and Google Classroom Technology to Bridge the Knowledge Gap on Computer Science. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (iJET), 15(2), 218-229. Kassel, Germany: International Journal of Emerging Technology in Learning. Retrieved 18th March 2021 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/217171/.10.3991/ijet.v15i02.11602
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Kruskal, W. H., & Wallis, W. A. (1952). Use of ranks in one-criterion variance analysis. Journal of the American statistical Association, 47(260), 583-621.10.1080/01621459.1952.10483441
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Levene, H. (1960). Contributions to probability and statistics. Essays in honor of Harold Hotelling, 278-292.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Lilliefors, H. W. (1967). On the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for normality with mean and variance unknown. Journal of the American statistical Association, 62(318), 399-402.10.1080/01621459.1967.10482916
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loi n° 2005-102 (2005). Pour l’égalité des droits et des chances, la participation et la citoyenneté des personnes handicapées. 11 Février 2005, NOR: SANX0300217L (France).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Loi n° 2019-791 (2019). Pour une école de la confiance. 26 Juillet 2019, NOR: MENX1828765L (France).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Martínez-Monés, A., Reffay, C., Torío, J. H., & Cristóbal, J. A. M. (2017, October). Learning Analytics with Google Classroom: Exploring the possibilities. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 1-6).10.1145/3144826.3145397
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Marzano, R. J., & Heflebower, T. (2011). Teaching & assessing 21st century skills. Solution Tree Press.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Mazzola, L. and Mazza, R. (2011). ‘Visualizing learner models through data aggregation: a testcase’, paper presented at The Red-Conference, Rethinking Education in the Knowledge Society.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ministère de l’Éducation nationale, de la Jeunesse et des Sports - Direction générale de l’enseignement scolaire. (2016). Évaluer la maîtrise du socle commun aux cycles 2, 3 et 4. Retrieved March 18, 2021 from https://eduscol.education.fr/141/modalites–d–evaluation–des–acquis–scolaires–des–eleves.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Moss, C. M., & Brookhart, S. M. (2012). Learning targets: Helping students aim for understanding in today’s lesson. ASCD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Muñoz, M. A., & Guskey, T. R. (2015). Standards-based grading and reporting will improve education. Phi Delta Kappan, 96(7), 64-68.10.1177/0031721715579043
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Nemoto, T., & Beglar, D. (2014). Likert-scale questionnaires. In JALT 2013 conference proceedings (pp. 1-8).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Ochoa, X., Suthers, D., Verbert, K., & Duval, E. (2014). Analysis and reflections on the third Learning Analytics and Knowledge Conference (LAK 2013). Journal of Learning Analytics, 1(2), 5-22.10.18608/jla.2014.12.2
]Search in Google Scholar
[
O’Connor, K. (2009). Reforming grading practices in secondary schools. Principal’s Research Review, 4(1), 1-7.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Oviedo, H. C., & Arias, A. C. (2005). Aproximación al uso del coeficiente alfa de Cronbach. Revista colombiana de psiquiatría, 34(4), 572-580.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Proulx, C., Spencer-May, K., & Westerberg, T. (2012). Moving to Standards-Based Grading: Lessons from Omaha. Principal Leadership, 13(4), 30-34.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Real Decreto 102/2010 (2010). Por el que se regula la ordenación de las enseñanzas acogidas al acuerdo entre el Gobierno de España y el Gobierno de Francia relativo a la doble titulación de Bachiller y de Baccalauréat en centros docentes españoles BOE-A-2010-4130 (Spain).
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Monés, A., Asensio-Pérez, J. I., & Dimitriadis, Y. (2015). Scripting and monitoring meet each other: Aligning learning analytics and learning design to support teachers in orchestrating CSCL situations. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(2), 330-343.10.1111/bjet.12198
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Schellings G, Van Hout-Wolters B (2011). Measuring strategy use with self-report instruments: theoretical and empirical considerations. Metacogn Learn 6, 83–90.10.1007/s11409-011-9081-9
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Scriffiny, P. L. (2008). Standards-based grading. Educational Leadership.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Sebesta, A. J., & Bray Speth, E. (2017). How should I study for the exam? Self-regulated learning strategies and achievement in introductory biology. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 16(2), ar30.10.1187/cbe.16-09-0269
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Slade, S., & Prinsloo, P. (2014). Student perspectives on the use of their data: Between intrusion, surveillance, and care. In Challenges for Research into Open & Distance Learning: Doing Things Better – Doing Better Things (pp. 291—300). Oxford, UK: European Distance and E-Learning Network
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Soriano Rodríguez, A. M. (2015). Diseño y validación de instrumentos de medición.10.5377/dialogos.v0i14.2202
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stanton JD, Neider XN, Gallegos IJ, Clark NC (2015). Differences in metacognitive regulation in introductory biology students: when prompts are not enough. CBE Life Sci Educ 14, ar15.10.1187/cbe.14-08-0135
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Stiggins, R., & Chappuis, J. (2008). Enhancing student learning. District Administration, 44(1), 42-44.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tanner KD (2012). Promoting student metacognition. CBE Life Sci Educ 11, 113–120. Dinsmore DL, Alexander PA,10.1187/cbe.12-03-0033
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tinto, V. (2005). College student retention: Formula for student success. Greenwood Publishing Group.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Tomlinson, C. A., & McTighe, J. (2006). Integrating differentiated instruction & understanding by design: Connecting content and kids. ASCD.
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vallance, M., & Towndrow, P. A. (2016). Pedagogic transformation, student-directed design, and computational thinking. Pedagogies: an international journal, 11(3), 218-234.10.1080/1554480X.2016.1182437
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Veenman MVJ (2011). Alternative assessment of strategy use with self-report instruments: a discussion. Metacogn Learn 6, 205–211.10.1007/s11409-011-9080-x
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Vescio, V., Ross, D., & Adams, A. (2008). A review of research on the impact of professional learning communities on teaching practice and student learning. Teaching and teacher education, 24(1), 80-91.10.1016/j.tate.2007.01.004
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wang, M. T., Ye, F., & Degol, J. L. (2017). Who chooses STEM careers? Using a relative cognitive strength and interest model to predict careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Journal of youth and adolescence, 46(8), 1805-1820.10.1007/s10964-016-0618-8
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Wise, A. F., Zhao, Y., & Hausknecht, S. N. (2013). Learning analytics for online discussions: a pedagogical model for intervention with embedded and extracted analytics. In Proceedings of the third international conference on learning analytics and knowledge (pp. 48-56).10.1145/2460296.2460308
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zimmerman BJ, Martinez-Pons M (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. Am Educ Res J 23, 614–628.10.3102/00028312023004614
]Search in Google Scholar
[
Zimmerman, B. J. (2008). Investigating self-regulation and motivation: Historical background, methodological developments, and prospects. American Educational Research Journal, 45(1), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831207312909.10.3102/0002831207312909
]Search in Google Scholar
, 